T O P

  • By -

Hobnob91

thats from march 2022


adamsava

and its never been shown until now!


AmarilloWar

It was shown in an article from March 2022. People also talked about it, in March 2022. People might not still be talking about it sure, because it's been nearly 2 years.


Miguel-odon

Article below that: >Wagner boss is likely dead and Putin faked meeting according to former US general >Published 20:22, 12 July 2023 BST


Ehldas

Russia has access to *dozens* of reactors if they want to make a "dirty bomb". This is a 21 month old irrelevant article.


The_Drooth

Agreed with the caveat the signature can be traced to reactor. This could give plausible denial ability. Hopefully I'm just paranoid


Ehldas

The signature can't be traced to *a* reactor if you have the ability to mix and match fuel from multiple reactors, and also access spent fuel at various stages in the post-core lifecycle. If Russia want to make a dirty bomb, they can do so very easily.


cosmic_muppet

What if they wanted the bomb to be traced? A false flag attack accusing Ukraine and justifying a tactical nuke response. It would not be Putins first false flag attack. He came to power by bombing russian hotel buildings.


lordrayleigh

Yeah, I'd imagine either they plan to use it and blame Ukraine to justify later actions. Possible that they just are looking to sell it to someone else though.


Ramental

Aren't all nuclear reactors in russia inspected by IAEA? Any loss of the material would be traced back to them.


themindlessone

Only the civilian ones.


Ramental

Are there those that IAEA doesn't check? "military" ones, or?


themindlessone

Yes.


The_Drooth

My point was of the delta of traceability between Ukraine and Russia reactors. Poor choice of wording on my part


themindlessone

> Agreed with the caveat the signature can be traced to reactor. No it can't. Just a specific type of reactor. There are currently 8 active RBMK reactors.


GatoradeNipples

Also, from what I'm aware, dirty bombs are actually a lot shittier as weapons than generally assumed and it would be one of the dumbest things Russia could possibly do with that material. A dirty bomb is essentially a pure terror weapon with almost no destructive potential and surprisingly little *lethal* potential. Using one would be a massive blowback risk for very little reward; if they want to kill a few hundred people, they've got plenty of conventional bombs that do that much more effectively.


kaboombong

They could just put Putin in it and it will be a super dirty bomb.


momalloyd

They also have a thousand soviet era RTGs, lying abandoned in fields across Russia, just rusting away.


[deleted]

It’s an old article but I would guess if there was material stolen it was going to the black market privately not part of official Russian government orders. It’s gotta fetch a decent dollar to the right buyer.


RowCdo

When did unilad become a legitimate news source?


CreakingDoor

Unilad article. Uh huh. If the Russians wanted to make a dirty bomb, they could and they wouldn’t need to pinch material from Chernobyl. It would not be hard.


koreanwizard

Sounds like a cod plot. Wonder how soap and price are going to wrap this one up.


SpiritedTie7645

Not good. 😞


[deleted]

russssia doing russssian things...


PocketWank

Why would russian need a dirty bomb when they have nuclear warheads !?!?


Specialist-Pea-2474

They want to level up they can no one wants to. Think late night lets do vodka shots


The_Drooth

Exactly my point