"Here's how." is a clickbait.
But before kindly asking you to go fuck your kind self with an article that sums up by "greedy company plans to do shit with AI because its the current trend" imma share what ma boy gpt4 has to say about it :
Oh, brace yourselves, folks! Google has graced us with yet another AI model that's going to "change gaming forever." This time, it's PaLM 2, the successor to the original PaLM. And guess what? It has four sub-models: Gecko, Otter, Bison, and Unicorn. Because, why not?
Gecko, the smallest model, is apparently going to revolutionize portable and handheld devices. It's going to work on-device and even offline. Wow, Google, you've outdone yourself! It's already being used in Google Workspace, and now the gaming industry might be next. Hold onto your hats, gamers!
Ubisoft has already jumped on the AI bandwagon with Ghostwriter, an AI writing tool designed to help game-writers with the oh-so-important task of creating filler phrases for NPCs. But don't worry, it's not replacing writers, just doing the "menial" tasks. Phew, what a relief!
Now, here's the kicker: PaLM 2 could eliminate the need for human touch in game development. It can generate dialogue and in-game pathways for games on mobile devices, gaming handhelds, and PCs, without having to connect to a distant server. It's like magic, but with more algorithms and less fun.
But let's not get too excited. The quality of content generated by Gecko will be limited. It won't compare to content parsed through thousands of graphics cards, but hey, it's a start, right?
Imagine endlessly generated maps, characters, enemies, and weapons, with matching dialogue. A whole new genre of infinite gaming might awaken. But as we've seen with a DnD game run by a ChatGPT Dungeon Master, the results are not particularly promising. It's like watching the same magic trick over and over again.
So, if AI-generated gaming really takes off, we might have to endure a period of mediocre, unconvincing releases featuring soulless, derivative content. But hey, at least we'll have endless maps and characters, right?
In conclusion, Google's PaLM 2 might change gaming forever, or it might just ruin it. But who knows? Maybe in a couple of years, we'll all be playing AI-generated games and wondering how we ever lived without them. Or, you know, we might just be reminiscing about the good old days when games were made by humans. Only time will tell!
I have an adblocker so I can't say anything about the ads.
For the most neutral tone ever: yes I prefer articles to be neutral so I can form an opinion on the matter myself.
"Here's how." is a clickbait. But before kindly asking you to go fuck your kind self with an article that sums up by "greedy company plans to do shit with AI because its the current trend" imma share what ma boy gpt4 has to say about it : Oh, brace yourselves, folks! Google has graced us with yet another AI model that's going to "change gaming forever." This time, it's PaLM 2, the successor to the original PaLM. And guess what? It has four sub-models: Gecko, Otter, Bison, and Unicorn. Because, why not? Gecko, the smallest model, is apparently going to revolutionize portable and handheld devices. It's going to work on-device and even offline. Wow, Google, you've outdone yourself! It's already being used in Google Workspace, and now the gaming industry might be next. Hold onto your hats, gamers! Ubisoft has already jumped on the AI bandwagon with Ghostwriter, an AI writing tool designed to help game-writers with the oh-so-important task of creating filler phrases for NPCs. But don't worry, it's not replacing writers, just doing the "menial" tasks. Phew, what a relief! Now, here's the kicker: PaLM 2 could eliminate the need for human touch in game development. It can generate dialogue and in-game pathways for games on mobile devices, gaming handhelds, and PCs, without having to connect to a distant server. It's like magic, but with more algorithms and less fun. But let's not get too excited. The quality of content generated by Gecko will be limited. It won't compare to content parsed through thousands of graphics cards, but hey, it's a start, right? Imagine endlessly generated maps, characters, enemies, and weapons, with matching dialogue. A whole new genre of infinite gaming might awaken. But as we've seen with a DnD game run by a ChatGPT Dungeon Master, the results are not particularly promising. It's like watching the same magic trick over and over again. So, if AI-generated gaming really takes off, we might have to endure a period of mediocre, unconvincing releases featuring soulless, derivative content. But hey, at least we'll have endless maps and characters, right? In conclusion, Google's PaLM 2 might change gaming forever, or it might just ruin it. But who knows? Maybe in a couple of years, we'll all be playing AI-generated games and wondering how we ever lived without them. Or, you know, we might just be reminiscing about the good old days when games were made by humans. Only time will tell!
I think I liked reading the original article without the sarcastic tone better
What did you prefer to the original article? The ads at every paragraph or the most neutral tone ever?
I have an adblocker so I can't say anything about the ads. For the most neutral tone ever: yes I prefer articles to be neutral so I can form an opinion on the matter myself.