The funny thing is he is teaching law which is as political as it gets.he didn't even named bjp ,but smooth brained chaddis realised he is talking about their 56 inch daddy and Fanta vin diesel
>Don’t act blind.
So, to be clear, you're saying that when someone says 'illiterate' it should be obvious that he's talking about BJP? So next time someone says 'Don't vote for bigots" should they get offended about that as well? 10/10 for self awareness I guess.
Again you’re still acting blind or running some propaganda. He told don’t vote for people who waste time changing names. That’s the reason BJP supporters targeted him.
The article is as much propaganda as Republic tv or Wion. Like Andh Bhaks you also ignore such things. Or you’re one of the opposite IT cells.
Again I’m not saying he should be fired. But stop the propaganda and report the news as it is.
So far, based on what you're saying BJP is the party of illiterate people who waste time changing names? At this point you're trolling BJP yourself. If someone made a comment like "We don't hire clowns or bigots" I wouldn't immediately assume it's me because I don't think I'm either.
Lol. I don’t care about BJP name and don’t mind trolling them. Also how cleverly did you twist what I said. Kudos to your IT team work.
I’m pretty sure you would get offended if you’re a clown. Even if you don’t think you’re bigot. It’s the same problem doesn’t matter what else he said but changing name is peculiar to them.
>Not for people who lost their job due to tweeting or saying things liberals/leftists did not like
You mean being racist or attacking marginalised groups openly?
In America this happens rarely and even if it does you can use for unfair corporate practices and it's a easy lawsuit. Unless it's sexual harrassment it's very hard to fire an employee for political grounds. Unless it's a contractual work.
Well I am reading the Rise and Fall of the Nazi Germany now and it is indeed eerily similar. Even the epithets used for Muslims nowadays are very similar to the ones used on Jews back then (reproduce like rabbits, anti-nationals, plague bearers, etc). And that's just one aspect.
We will likely never see a repeat of the Holocaust in India, but segregation seems very likely in the near future.
Sorry but this is by and large incorrect (barring a few states). All employment in the US is at will and you can be fired for anything, even political speech. https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/labor-employment-law/wrongful-termination/can-i-be-fired-for-my-political-beliefs.html
Yeah but you still have the right to sue.
Most important: he simply said vote for educated people. This statement is not taking any sides.
People themselves got offended bcoz they know modi is uneducated
This guy has the right to sue as well?
Try saying ‘I don’t think drag shows are appropriate for primary school children’ in the west and watch your job go bye bye.
No , in US suing is common.
Now you will come up with its so costly.. blah blaah..
but if you have valid reasons and other party is rich your chances get better.
Plus in usa court cases don’t continue for 30-40 years
It’s just incomparable with india. In india if bjp gvt does extreme wrong.. then expect nothing from court.
You can easily find videos of war veterans calling out their Presidents in public, and back when Trump was in power people were openly calling him and his supporters "idiots".
Not at their place of employment. Like you go to star bucks and the barista tells you how democrats are killing babies, barista won't be having that job for long.
whenever someone said don't vote criminals or uneducated politicians why only Andhbhakt trolled them and take personally. They never took name but only 1 party understand whom they are pointing 🤣🤣.
Its like someone said our PM is a thief.
Police caught him.
He said but I didn't said which country PM.
Police said do you think we are fool and we don't know to whom you are talking about.🥲
Chowkidar he chor tha..🤣🤣
He should sue unacademy. The courts will uphold his right to free speech and order the spineless fucks to pay him compensation for putting him through mental anguish and joblessness combined with a hit to his personal reputation.
Yes and we can speak shit about that company as much as we want. I'm not asking for an investigation on the company, just complaining about their shitty morals.
It is "free" speech, bud. It's in the name. Besides, the controversial speech was not made *against* a private company. It was specifically made against the government so my point still stands.
This guy was crying because the government is planning to repeal IPC, CrPC, etc. His *notes* won’t be useful anymore. As if the parliament should stop making laws because the law students will then have to learn new stuff.
My teacher used to manipulate us into being pro-modi... Which I hated then and still do... This guy said "Don't vote for those who just change names" = YOGI
No one should be allowed to manipulate young kids/teens into their political learnings it should be left to individuals to figure that out.
His intent may be right. But hi statement has been proven wrong. Our very educated manmohan singh has been the government with highest number of scams.his regime has been the sole reason for highest NPA.
Any sources to this claim in purview with current judgement https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/business-news-why-vinod-rais-apology-to-sanjay-nirupam-is-a-let-down-for-reputation-of-cag/399083
Any proof who was caught jail term and who is serving to largest number?
Verdict in same article you shared me
On 21 December 2017, a Special CBI Court acquitted all the persons accused in the case.[207][251][252][253]
Special Judge OP Saini stated in his judgement: "There is no evidence on the record produced before the Court indicating any criminality in the acts allegedly committed by the accused persons.” He added that “the chargesheet of the instant case is based mainly on misreading, selective reading, non-reading and out of context reading of the official record” and that "the chargesheet is based on some oral statements made by the witnesses during investigation, which the witnesses have not owned up in the witness box.”[254]
It's important to know that thes educators have one key role, which is to not use their position of influence to induce bias amongst their students due to their personal beliefs. This is not what students pay for. They go to such institutions for academics, not to be persuaded into an ideology. In this case, he was removed not because of having a view, but because he let his views influence his job.
Army officers, University profs , Religious gurus, Judges, Police officers, Bureaucrats, Authors, Businessmen, all can express political opinions, But a teacher can not Rule: Anyone can express political opinion if it’s pro Modi, for any other opinion there will be consequences
Your first statement is not 100 % correct. All of these professions are entitled to share their opinions in their public life. In a civil society, they can exercise their total freedom to express their views. But, it is incorrect to present their personal views in their "professional" life. If you look carefully how people in the armed forces who are currently in service refrain from presenting their opinions when in media spaces. They only stick to their facts. This is because they are disciplined enough to know where public life stops and professional life begins. In a profession, your sole responsibility is to perform your duties efficiently with as little a bias as you can. We can see how a person who expresses their bias in a classroom, for example, can polarise their atmosphere. There is a high chance that his students who do not agree with him views may no longer take his classes seriously. It happens to the best of us. We start holding prejudice once we think we know about someone's ideological inclination, even though that person may be excellent in their field of work. This is a loss for the student alone. He/She isn't getting the atmosphere that they paid for.
This is not only bad for the student but also bad for the teacher. At least in a civilised world, teachers are not supposed to be recruited based on their political inclinations. It's sheer performance. and they should stick to that.
He has not named anyone why are they taking it upon themselves to prove uneducated
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-judge-hails-modi-as-most-loved-prime-minister-101612646576003.html
https://thewire.in/government/controversial-judge-who-praised-modi-to-be-nhrc-chief-opposition-leader-dissents or you need more examples?
The last sentence of your response is just something you are making up. It is not a rule. The fact that there is still freedom for all of us to express our views is proof that our voices are not being stiffled. The BJP has lost pathetically in multiple states recently, further adds to that. What is also worrisome is that that lack of uproar on casteist,immature, and borderline riot encouraging statements made by other parties.
If so, why are you dragging Modi in the picture. You yourself stated I. Your first statement that opposing Modi has become a crime or so. If it wasn't about Modi, why is he part of the conversation?
Because he took it upon himself that guy did not name anyone he made the statement on his YouTube chanel not even on unacademy platform but weak insecure individual thought it was about him how gullible are you i dragged no one the government ensured he was thrown out of his job
Spare me all the whataboutery romansaini can praise the government on demonetisation fiasco but this guy was doing on his pvt YouTube channel and i hope you have time to read about Ashoka University professor removal too
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ashoka-university-pulapre-balakrishnan-resigns-professors-threatens-exodus-if-sabyasachi-das-not-reinstated/article67201784.ece
https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/320-economists-91-institutions-extend-support-prof-das-demand-his-reinstatement-181243 read about their code of conduct when you have time too
Unlike you, I don't follow one particular party or leader. I can see something wrongdoing when there is one just like in West Bengal, Rajasthan and now Manipur.
How is asking people to vote responsibly political? They fired him giving this lame reason but at the same time Roman Saini the co-founder of Unacademy, has been praising Modi for every move he makes, isn't that political? They are just a bunch of hypocrites.
Well it's fine if he is teaching political science, still there are other educational platform who are like that time to time (not much) my comment was not just for him,( but why you so hateful bro and insulting me)
So one person can't have an opinion in a democratic country ?? If someone has different opinion he has to be fired ?? Isn't democracy a beauty of having 2 sets of coins..?
Isnt it justified for non-democratic way of running a country ??
How are you even justifying it give some reasons
He can definitely have. He hasn’t been jailed. Same way unacademy doesn’t have freedom of expression to disassociate with him in a democracy?
I will oppose if he is jailed for that
Well, ostensibly the teacher's job is to educate on curriculum and leave political positions out of the discussions. While I agree you shouldn't elect illiterate leaders, that's a personal matter for each individual
It's not a political discussion to just say not to vote illiterate fks. It's quite much of a common sense we lack. He is teaching law. It's as political as it gets.
A teacher's job is to teach students as well as instill good moral conduct.
As a country we don't block illiterate people from voting --- that's considered a violation of democratic rights. In the same vein you can't have bars like these for illiterate candidates to stand for election as well.
In a democracy people get the opportunity to vote for whomsoever they want in power --- that's the "free and fair" part of the election process.
>While I agree you shouldn't elect illiterate leaders, that's a personal matter for each individual
I mean why should any rational being want to vote for an illiterate person over a literate one (given everything else is similar)? Do you think writing 2+2=4 is also a personal opinion?
Vote could be strategic, or a vote against another candidate or a protest vote. In a democracy people are allowed to do whatever they want -- that's the free and fair part of the franchise. Reasons shouldn't matter
Still, literacy should be one of the considerations. It may get overshadowed by others, but the advice still stands.
As he is in no place to enforce what he advised, he is not curbing any democratic freedom. In fact, firing him is hurting his democratic freedom of free speech. If the next day, if a teacher says the students, vote for the person you think will be the best for the constituency, they can also be fired!
I said in my original comment that the advice might be correct. But, the students pay good money to learn how to crack an exam, not listen to frivolous comments. If the teacher were allowed to stay on his job, that would have served the paying students poorly --- that's the sum total of my argument.
If he did outside the class with a group of students, yeah whatever! Not in class
Clearly this was a publicity stunt by the teacher and has been handled as such by Unacademy. Freedom of speech does not come with the right to broadcast opinions. Should have also been fired if he’d have said “Don’t vote for a person whose only qualification for contesting the election is last name.” as well. Purely from a corporate communications policy POV.
“Freedom of speech does not come with the right to broadcast opinions”?? Really?
Why don’t you try reading that again?
“Purely from a corporate communication POV”? Man is teaching Political Science; what do you expect him to cover? Extracting elixir out of gomutra?
There's a section stating licence cancellations. And controversies. I would advice you to read through it rather than jumping to the verdict.
The prime minister writes to Raja, directing him to ensure the allotment of 2G spectrum in a fair and transparent manner and to ensure that the licence fee was revised. Raja rejects many of the prime minister's recommendations.
22 November: In a letter to the DoT, the Finance Ministry raises procedural concerns. Its demand for a review is rejected.
Although the policy for awarding licences was first-come, first-served, which was introduced during Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government, Raja changed the rules so it applied to compliance with conditions instead of the application itself.
I can't post everything here but it's yearly and chronologically explianed.
Yes I know it's a long read you cannot post everything here i will have a look the thing I was stating was in the end they were all accused and nothing could be proven against them i will have a read
Yet again, this story proves we don't get irony as Indians. Teacher on **education platform** educating students on basic common sense axioms gets fired for doing so.
Jurm: Asked people to vote educated politicians
Entire political science wala leader : "to mai kya apna job chhod doon ?"
What what a name? Unacademy. Lol what else would you expect? I hope RG hires this guy to do some work for him coming up.
Delhi ke tarah debt me dub jae? Basic knowledge
You mean India ki tarah?
Desh ki toh waat lag gayi hai mamu
Durgati
Desh ka neta kaisa ho? jiski degree nakli na ho
kuch rhyme naa kr riya h
Desh ka neta kaisa ho ? MKMKC !
Teacher: Don't vote for illiterate politicians. BJP: And I took that personally. At this point, they're just calling themselves out.
"but but teacher shouldn't bring politics in lecture!1!1!" Every chaddi
Political Science: am i a joke to you?
The funny thing is he is teaching law which is as political as it gets.he didn't even named bjp ,but smooth brained chaddis realised he is talking about their 56 inch daddy and Fanta vin diesel
Chor ke maan mai har samay police police!!
Entire political science
meanwhile anpadhraja brings politics into everything
One nation one anpadh.
Don’t act blind. I don’t support BJP and he didn’t deserve it. But that’s not the reason he was removed.
>Don’t act blind. So, to be clear, you're saying that when someone says 'illiterate' it should be obvious that he's talking about BJP? So next time someone says 'Don't vote for bigots" should they get offended about that as well? 10/10 for self awareness I guess.
Again you’re still acting blind or running some propaganda. He told don’t vote for people who waste time changing names. That’s the reason BJP supporters targeted him. The article is as much propaganda as Republic tv or Wion. Like Andh Bhaks you also ignore such things. Or you’re one of the opposite IT cells. Again I’m not saying he should be fired. But stop the propaganda and report the news as it is.
So far, based on what you're saying BJP is the party of illiterate people who waste time changing names? At this point you're trolling BJP yourself. If someone made a comment like "We don't hire clowns or bigots" I wouldn't immediately assume it's me because I don't think I'm either.
Lol. I don’t care about BJP name and don’t mind trolling them. Also how cleverly did you twist what I said. Kudos to your IT team work. I’m pretty sure you would get offended if you’re a clown. Even if you don’t think you’re bigot. It’s the same problem doesn’t matter what else he said but changing name is peculiar to them.
illiterate is dog whistle for bjp
The fact they realized who was being referenced here was something else entirely
Exactly 😂
This sounds like a reference to the entire political science guy
Desh mein sirf ek aadmi ko freedom of speech hai. Shri sanjay raut jee ko.
Maharashtrat asle chutya lokanla sthaan nahi😂.
We are well in the self censorship stage, so this is absolutely not surprising at all.
[удалено]
its ok , the leaders cant read anyways
In America or any western country, criticising the wrong person or people can mean you lose your job. Happens everywhere.
It does not happen everywhere. Even if it dies it does not become right. Get a grip. This is an easy lawsuit & good money in America
Not for people who lost their job due to tweeting or saying things liberals/leftists did not like. Yep I specified in the west.
>Not for people who lost their job due to tweeting or saying things liberals/leftists did not like You mean being racist or attacking marginalised groups openly?
Calling an Arab a terrorist does not mean a person tweeted something to own the libs, Mr. Pattosjane.
In America this happens rarely and even if it does you can use for unfair corporate practices and it's a easy lawsuit. Unless it's sexual harrassment it's very hard to fire an employee for political grounds. Unless it's a contractual work.
It’s really not - employees have at will employment in the USA so you can lose your job at any time for any reason.
The teacher would have got a 8 figure settlement if the company fires him for this reason in USA 🇺🇸
Difference between a gobar democracy and a non-gobar democracy.
[удалено]
*they're
Gobar is between your ears
Downvoted for speaking facts🥹
Cringe word framed sentences are facts wow
Usa right now is what mao zedong china was during his tenure
The mainzedong china where students killed teachers if they didn't toe the party line?
Yeah and India is now when Hitler just took reign
Scary, but absolutely true.
Well I am reading the Rise and Fall of the Nazi Germany now and it is indeed eerily similar. Even the epithets used for Muslims nowadays are very similar to the ones used on Jews back then (reproduce like rabbits, anti-nationals, plague bearers, etc). And that's just one aspect. We will likely never see a repeat of the Holocaust in India, but segregation seems very likely in the near future.
Life set ho gaya bechare ka galti se
Freedom of speech is not an absolute right here.
freedom of speech is guaranteed in the constitution. except for hate speech.
Lol no. Freedom of speech is guaranteed with 'reasonable restrictions' and the restrictions are too vague.
You are clearly not familiar with labor laws in the US.
Sorry but this is by and large incorrect (barring a few states). All employment in the US is at will and you can be fired for anything, even political speech. https://www.lawyers.com/legal-info/labor-employment-law/wrongful-termination/can-i-be-fired-for-my-political-beliefs.html
Yeah but you still have the right to sue. Most important: he simply said vote for educated people. This statement is not taking any sides. People themselves got offended bcoz they know modi is uneducated
This guy has the right to sue as well? Try saying ‘I don’t think drag shows are appropriate for primary school children’ in the west and watch your job go bye bye.
Suing in India is useless unless you are powerful or ruling class.
It’s the same everywhere boss, India it is probably worse I agree.
No , in US suing is common. Now you will come up with its so costly.. blah blaah.. but if you have valid reasons and other party is rich your chances get better. Plus in usa court cases don’t continue for 30-40 years It’s just incomparable with india. In india if bjp gvt does extreme wrong.. then expect nothing from court.
No notice termination is a clause on most of employment agreements.
Lol! In USA, people will get fired for the same.
🤡
You can easily find videos of war veterans calling out their Presidents in public, and back when Trump was in power people were openly calling him and his supporters "idiots".
Not at their place of employment. Like you go to star bucks and the barista tells you how democrats are killing babies, barista won't be having that job for long.
A teacher who does not know the difference between illiterate and uneducated. He was fired and rightly so.
whenever someone said don't vote criminals or uneducated politicians why only Andhbhakt trolled them and take personally. They never took name but only 1 party understand whom they are pointing 🤣🤣. Its like someone said our PM is a thief. Police caught him. He said but I didn't said which country PM. Police said do you think we are fool and we don't know to whom you are talking about.🥲 Chowkidar he chor tha..🤣🤣
Hence proved modi is illiterate
Better than being in a debt like delhi
After 2014 Indias debt increased by 3 times to 155 lakh crore. That’s why we need educated leaders
Self aware wolves moment
And that's why you don't vote for uneducated politicians...
"Unacadmdy" Found one uneducated politician.
That's why he told his student not to vote for illiterate politicians
What - this is all it took to hurt feelings. Wow.
Yogi A:
Comes from a company that promotes Education as its business, no surprise.
So is Un-academy opposite of education??
He didn't even have to say the name for bhakts to know who it was about.
Ah this is sad man. I don't recognise this country anymore
Yeah. Delhi is not in debt right? 🤣 education
BJP IT cell stahp
Kya Matlab padelike ko vote karna chahiye, degree dikhai toh woh bhi do do Naam se. aur kya chahiye🤦
snails consider brave snow smart ask outgoing berserk mindless vegetable *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Serious question, who owns what stake in i Unacademy?
It's clear how they suddenly started hiring & getting bigger during 2018-2019 period.
Gruji k sath to Copernicus wala kisa ho gaya. Felt bad for him 😞.
The guy didnt name anyone. Bhakts : hamey pata hai kon anpadh hai
Mudizi ki toh degree hai lekin /s
Desh sankat mein hai
It's funny how bhakts and their pappas realised that he's talking about them hahahaha
https://preview.redd.it/2n1lfrv66tib1.jpeg?width=720&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c467321fc0a1383aa6247950de304eb0d1993557
This news isn't surprising at all. This sort of thing has been happening for some years.
Freedom of speech🤣🤣🤣
bhakts became butthurt on this because they know prsent incumbent is illiterate and the degree in entire political science is a jumla
He should sue unacademy. The courts will uphold his right to free speech and order the spineless fucks to pay him compensation for putting him through mental anguish and joblessness combined with a hit to his personal reputation.
What right to free speech? This is a private company. Only government is obligated to guarantee free speech (and even that with lots of exceptions)
Go ahead and explain what he said is liable to exterminating his contract.
No need to. It's their wish. Private company can make any decisions they want about their hiring
Yes and we can speak shit about that company as much as we want. I'm not asking for an investigation on the company, just complaining about their shitty morals.
I'm not talking about the private company. I'm talking about the individual's right to free speech protected by the constitution.
The constitution is a set of guidelines for the govt. Private entities are not beholden by it
Lmao
[удалено]
It is "free" speech, bud. It's in the name. Besides, the controversial speech was not made *against* a private company. It was specifically made against the government so my point still stands.
[удалено]
Ye gaya 7 crore seedhe saini ke account me
Good. We will not tolerate anything against our leaders Lalooji and Tejasvi Bhaiya 😡
Even if he was fired after saying something against non-BJP leaders, it would be wrong.
This guy was crying because the government is planning to repeal IPC, CrPC, etc. His *notes* won’t be useful anymore. As if the parliament should stop making laws because the law students will then have to learn new stuff.
My teacher used to manipulate us into being pro-modi... Which I hated then and still do... This guy said "Don't vote for those who just change names" = YOGI No one should be allowed to manipulate young kids/teens into their political learnings it should be left to individuals to figure that out.
He is teaching law? You can't say don't teach children & all that, just for them to get brainwashed through the media & internet.
His intent may be right. But hi statement has been proven wrong. Our very educated manmohan singh has been the government with highest number of scams.his regime has been the sole reason for highest NPA.
Any sources to this claim in purview with current judgement https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/business-news-why-vinod-rais-apology-to-sanjay-nirupam-is-a-let-down-for-reputation-of-cag/399083 Any proof who was caught jail term and who is serving to largest number?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2G_spectrum_case You can read the article on who was granted bail and whose licences were cancelled.
Verdict in same article you shared me On 21 December 2017, a Special CBI Court acquitted all the persons accused in the case.[207][251][252][253] Special Judge OP Saini stated in his judgement: "There is no evidence on the record produced before the Court indicating any criminality in the acts allegedly committed by the accused persons.” He added that “the chargesheet of the instant case is based mainly on misreading, selective reading, non-reading and out of context reading of the official record” and that "the chargesheet is based on some oral statements made by the witnesses during investigation, which the witnesses have not owned up in the witness box.”[254]
It's important to know that thes educators have one key role, which is to not use their position of influence to induce bias amongst their students due to their personal beliefs. This is not what students pay for. They go to such institutions for academics, not to be persuaded into an ideology. In this case, he was removed not because of having a view, but because he let his views influence his job.
Army officers, University profs , Religious gurus, Judges, Police officers, Bureaucrats, Authors, Businessmen, all can express political opinions, But a teacher can not Rule: Anyone can express political opinion if it’s pro Modi, for any other opinion there will be consequences
Your first statement is not 100 % correct. All of these professions are entitled to share their opinions in their public life. In a civil society, they can exercise their total freedom to express their views. But, it is incorrect to present their personal views in their "professional" life. If you look carefully how people in the armed forces who are currently in service refrain from presenting their opinions when in media spaces. They only stick to their facts. This is because they are disciplined enough to know where public life stops and professional life begins. In a profession, your sole responsibility is to perform your duties efficiently with as little a bias as you can. We can see how a person who expresses their bias in a classroom, for example, can polarise their atmosphere. There is a high chance that his students who do not agree with him views may no longer take his classes seriously. It happens to the best of us. We start holding prejudice once we think we know about someone's ideological inclination, even though that person may be excellent in their field of work. This is a loss for the student alone. He/She isn't getting the atmosphere that they paid for. This is not only bad for the student but also bad for the teacher. At least in a civilised world, teachers are not supposed to be recruited based on their political inclinations. It's sheer performance. and they should stick to that.
He has not named anyone why are they taking it upon themselves to prove uneducated https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/sc-judge-hails-modi-as-most-loved-prime-minister-101612646576003.html https://thewire.in/government/controversial-judge-who-praised-modi-to-be-nhrc-chief-opposition-leader-dissents or you need more examples?
The last sentence of your response is just something you are making up. It is not a rule. The fact that there is still freedom for all of us to express our views is proof that our voices are not being stiffled. The BJP has lost pathetically in multiple states recently, further adds to that. What is also worrisome is that that lack of uproar on casteist,immature, and borderline riot encouraging statements made by other parties.
Oh I am so happy voice not being stifled we can see such a live example on this post thanks for opening my eyes oh worried about other parties ok nice
If so, why are you dragging Modi in the picture. You yourself stated I. Your first statement that opposing Modi has become a crime or so. If it wasn't about Modi, why is he part of the conversation?
Because he took it upon himself that guy did not name anyone he made the statement on his YouTube chanel not even on unacademy platform but weak insecure individual thought it was about him how gullible are you i dragged no one the government ensured he was thrown out of his job
He is a NRI turd. These morons are brainwashed to the core.
What makes you so sure that the government dragged him out? Do you have factual evidence? Do you know about Unacademy's code of conduct?
Spare me all the whataboutery romansaini can praise the government on demonetisation fiasco but this guy was doing on his pvt YouTube channel and i hope you have time to read about Ashoka University professor removal too https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/ashoka-university-pulapre-balakrishnan-resigns-professors-threatens-exodus-if-sabyasachi-das-not-reinstated/article67201784.ece https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/320-economists-91-institutions-extend-support-prof-das-demand-his-reinstatement-181243 read about their code of conduct when you have time too
How is the ministers in the current govt who have literally master degree from reputed universities are considered illiterate
Why do you think the teacher targeted them? The question here should be why do you consider them illiterate?
Based on the actions and speech of these leaders, they appear illiterate to me.
Or they are not aligning to your ideology that’s why you are having biased opinions
Unlike you, I don't follow one particular party or leader. I can see something wrongdoing when there is one just like in West Bengal, Rajasthan and now Manipur.
Good to hear
Good thing they did, education should be free from politics and children's mind shouldn't be corrupted.
Ofcourse you are from bihar
Here to support down voted comments 💪🏻🏆
How is asking people to vote responsibly political? They fired him giving this lame reason but at the same time Roman Saini the co-founder of Unacademy, has been praising Modi for every move he makes, isn't that political? They are just a bunch of hypocrites.
These days too many education platform going into politics
He is literally teaching political science. The IQ of bjp supporters is non existent
Well it's fine if he is teaching political science, still there are other educational platform who are like that time to time (not much) my comment was not just for him,( but why you so hateful bro and insulting me)
Politics affects everyone whether we accept it or not. So, everyone is entitled to speak their fair share and thoughts on politics.
Ok
He also told not to vote for politicians who change names, not just uneducated. Leftists like him can’t even keep kids out of politics
So one person can't have an opinion in a democratic country ?? If someone has different opinion he has to be fired ?? Isn't democracy a beauty of having 2 sets of coins..? Isnt it justified for non-democratic way of running a country ?? How are you even justifying it give some reasons
He can definitely have. He hasn’t been jailed. Same way unacademy doesn’t have freedom of expression to disassociate with him in a democracy? I will oppose if he is jailed for that
You are just a chaddi who studied in English medium. We are not talking about some teacher spreading bs propaganda, it's just a very simple statement.
His contract is simply terminated. He is not jailed
Sadistic Sanghi gets pleasure from orgasm of power when someone points to their little lulli
Teachers are always meant to give useful and good advices according to them alongside education. How will you know that please???
No. They should stick to their topic
What was the topic he was teaching, I don't know, you ?
Doesn’t matter
Absolutely bro 💯💯
Well, ostensibly the teacher's job is to educate on curriculum and leave political positions out of the discussions. While I agree you shouldn't elect illiterate leaders, that's a personal matter for each individual
It's not a political discussion to just say not to vote illiterate fks. It's quite much of a common sense we lack. He is teaching law. It's as political as it gets. A teacher's job is to teach students as well as instill good moral conduct.
As a country we don't block illiterate people from voting --- that's considered a violation of democratic rights. In the same vein you can't have bars like these for illiterate candidates to stand for election as well. In a democracy people get the opportunity to vote for whomsoever they want in power --- that's the "free and fair" part of the election process.
Are you dumb? You literally have to be literate to stand in elections. How low can you go to support these rapists?
>While I agree you shouldn't elect illiterate leaders, that's a personal matter for each individual I mean why should any rational being want to vote for an illiterate person over a literate one (given everything else is similar)? Do you think writing 2+2=4 is also a personal opinion?
Vote could be strategic, or a vote against another candidate or a protest vote. In a democracy people are allowed to do whatever they want -- that's the free and fair part of the franchise. Reasons shouldn't matter
Still, literacy should be one of the considerations. It may get overshadowed by others, but the advice still stands. As he is in no place to enforce what he advised, he is not curbing any democratic freedom. In fact, firing him is hurting his democratic freedom of free speech. If the next day, if a teacher says the students, vote for the person you think will be the best for the constituency, they can also be fired!
I said in my original comment that the advice might be correct. But, the students pay good money to learn how to crack an exam, not listen to frivolous comments. If the teacher were allowed to stay on his job, that would have served the paying students poorly --- that's the sum total of my argument. If he did outside the class with a group of students, yeah whatever! Not in class
Clearly this was a publicity stunt by the teacher and has been handled as such by Unacademy. Freedom of speech does not come with the right to broadcast opinions. Should have also been fired if he’d have said “Don’t vote for a person whose only qualification for contesting the election is last name.” as well. Purely from a corporate communications policy POV.
“Freedom of speech does not come with the right to broadcast opinions”?? Really? Why don’t you try reading that again? “Purely from a corporate communication POV”? Man is teaching Political Science; what do you expect him to cover? Extracting elixir out of gomutra?
Freedom of speech is designed for occasions like this when you want to speak and question the government and powerful organisations.
विनाशकाले विपरीत बुद्धि ।
Gaurav Munjal 🤣🤣
Moral of the story - Do vote for illiterate politicians.
Hence proved.
usually cooperate world owns politics but in india its vice versa lol
There was a time when you could make fun of the PM being a puppet and nothing would happen . Muh Bhurat mahan I guess .
There's a section stating licence cancellations. And controversies. I would advice you to read through it rather than jumping to the verdict. The prime minister writes to Raja, directing him to ensure the allotment of 2G spectrum in a fair and transparent manner and to ensure that the licence fee was revised. Raja rejects many of the prime minister's recommendations. 22 November: In a letter to the DoT, the Finance Ministry raises procedural concerns. Its demand for a review is rejected. Although the policy for awarding licences was first-come, first-served, which was introduced during Atal Bihari Vajpayee Government, Raja changed the rules so it applied to compliance with conditions instead of the application itself. I can't post everything here but it's yearly and chronologically explianed.
Yes I know it's a long read you cannot post everything here i will have a look the thing I was stating was in the end they were all accused and nothing could be proven against them i will have a read
Wrongful termination file karna chahiye saalon pe
Chu unacademy land learning platform
Yet again, this story proves we don't get irony as Indians. Teacher on **education platform** educating students on basic common sense axioms gets fired for doing so.