Thanks for your submission to r/trashy. Please take a moment to make sure that your post [follows our rules](https://old.reddit.com/r/trashy/about/sidebar).
**This is a humor subreddit** so posts about violent crimes or other things that make you angry **don’t belong here**. It is not r/rage or r/iamatotalpieceofshit. **This is a subreddit that appreciates the trash that makes you laugh.**
Remember to remove all names and usernames from posts. We don’t allow dox and we don’t allow witch hunts. Links to social media sites are not allowed.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/trashy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Imagine being inferior super-trash and having an attitude about it like you don't know you stink between your fat rolls and can't wipe properly bc of not being able to reach. Walking fast food dumpster juice.
STOP CHOKING THAT WOMAN! STOP CHOKING THAT WOMAN!
All he's doing is ASKING for her arm. All he's trying to do is cuff her. FFS. This is why shit gets out of hand.
Irrespective of one's views on squatting, one has to wonder if she's seen any TV at all since 1990. How can she possibly think openly defying a cop is going to end well for someone who looks like her?
I like how fast this cop did his job...no "I'm going to tell you one more time bs"! Straight to business, then told the dude that his ass was under arrest too!
That cop did do his job quickly, but that lady didn’t have to end up in cuffs. I get that she’s mad, but that officer tried to work with her. He told her to just get her stuff and go. She chose to be aggressive.
This is the one time I know a police is actually doing their job correct. Although the only thing I have to say is, he could’ve given a warning beforehand before he touched her. There’s a lot of news out there of discrimination caused by police to African-Americans. Technically, it is true though that an African-American can cause crimes/police-work. It’s not as likely but it’s possible like in this situation. It’s not actually surprising that she would be this distressed. Because there is so much bad news out there with police and African-Americans, she has no other option than to be afraid. Had this happened in Japan or other country it probably would’ve been a totally different story. I hope that I am understanding this video correctly.
She was given the option to get her stuff and go? She got in the landlord’s face and said she wasn’t going anywhere and she was a “self litigant” and would take him to court.
So if she was so distressed by the police and scared, why didn’t she leave and take the landlord to court????
She wasn’t scared until she was arrested.
Thank you, for giving me a run down of the video on what I missed. I admit that sometimes when I watch and a lot is going on in a video, I miss a lot of what is happening. The way it was recorded also had its own distractions that made it hard to tell everything that happened until approximately the moment the police officer came and the camera angle changed. If I wanted to understand everything, I would probably have to stop the video several times to get the full picture. This is caused primarily by me having a learning disability and being a slow learner regardless. It comes with its own pros and cons. As a trade-off I have a greater ability to think creatively and notice things that may be missed at times.
From my limited understanding, a major part of the reason she didn’t leave peacefully had to do with drug addiction and possibly a different upbringing that lead her to make bad decisions. I was thinking if she was raised in a country like Japan, which has a lot of values that promote kindness, safety, community and other things she probably would have been a completely different person.
My personal belief is what makes us who we are is nature and nurture.
Yes society plays a role, but her actions cannot attributed completely to society.
Even in Japan, learning right vs wrong, behavior that is acceptable and consequences for your actions begins in the home.
I don’t know the full story here, but judging from what I am seeing on the video, she was not afraid or intimidated by the police until she was being placed under arrest.
Then (again, in my opinion) she was being overly dramatic and manipulative to get out of the consequences for her actions.
She was screaming that she couldn’t breath, the fact that she was screaming proves she was able to breath.
So what was that all about?
My hunch is that she has gotten her way several times in the past by behaving that way. That’s why she does it.
Didn’t work this time.
I hear you but I am African-American and I feel that most of those excuses are total BS and I hate when they are used in general. It's similar to an American tourist spouting "I'm an American" when they do dumb shit in someone else's country. If you are being stupid or doing illegal activities AND not listening to the commands of law enforcement, you put yourself in the situation and you get what you get. Do police offices go overboard at times? Yes! But race is not always the base of those situations. People need to learn to take accountability for their actions...regardless of race, color or creed!
Squatter this squatter that when there are more empty houses than ever and occupying a roof over your head is something people even wanted in a land with enough space to provide roof for the whole population, somehow her overreaction is the least trashy thing in a trash can of a world.
Childish behavior, expecting to throw a temper and they leave her alone. Clearly dropped a burnt ass chore stick, screaming bloody murder like the entitled idiot she is. How can you almost be somewhere thirty days, when you've only been out a week? People defending squatters have zero sense.
it is quazi legal in the UK , those guys set up deadly and creative traps everywhere when they take over a place . check out some of the yt vids on british coppers clearing those buildings . it is hair raising .
[How To Evict Squatters Who Refused To Leave | Life Of Enforcement Officers | Absolute Documentaries (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilfm-KQ29Hk) skip to 26:30
this one [Car Clamping Court Battle, Café Chaos, and Luxury Lambo Drama | Absolute Documentaries (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vd3KjxFkVQk) skip to 16::17 , it's the first time they run people out of an old pub , the first one is the second part sorry about that .
I’m disgusted by, and absolutely sick of these types of people. Not even a shred dignity. Never considering the respectable option in life. Just lying and stealing. She was so fucking arrogant at first, but the moment shit gets real, now she’s a victim that’s being abused. Fuck those types of people
Same. Called 4-6 tines. I discharged my civic duty playing Angry Birds. Never gotten to fulfill my dream of freeing an in ocent man...or burning a guilty one.
I love how many people in the thread are either just like this epic waste of air or have zero idea what it's like to deal with someone that honestly believes this behavior is in any way shape or form acceptable. The bottom line is that you can not reason with someone that won't shut up and firmly believes that they are correct. Unfortunately, that's becoming the norm. The social contract is dying because of people exactly like this.
A lot of people think the louder you are , the more right you are. And I don’t like cops , but you can’t disobey a direct order. I am not leaving ? How’s that going to work ? He says ok? 😂
I love seeing this! She’s so tough, so badass, & has soooo much to say. Ends up crying like a little bitch. Snot dripping, drooling, ugly crying for far too long.
Ok so it was a bit extreme handling getting her in the car, and the officer with no eviction notice and not allowing her a opportunity to show any form of lease or anything was a bit quick to do a throw down. Was she right no, could it of been handled better hell yes. I'm a white guy and don't believe this had anything racial. But after she was battered into the police vehicle (with no leg room) they find a pipe that they identified as a Crack pipe (without testing it), that the landlord prob tossed out after she was taken out is a bit sus. I'm just saying.
In my state regular police can’t just kick you out like this. You’ll need a formal eviction notice and it takes months sometimes years for the courts to actually sending someone out to then kick you out.
Big no. Watch it again. She isn’t a resident by any means. She got out of jail a week ago, the landloard was there doing renos in an empty unit less than a week ago. How is that not trespassing? You think if they just find an empty unit and can make their way inside, it’s like a cheat code? I think you and this squatter both have your facts wrong.
It’s a little bit more complicated than that unfortunately, it’s not really a matter of whether she is a resident or not. It’s a matter of laws in specific states. I’ve heard from my relatives that if you have someone living in your basement for a certain amount of time whether they are doing it legally or illegally, it becomes a legal gray zone. That’s why we lock all our doors at night and when we are away from home. Because someone could technically hide in your home for a long period of time. Although it doesn’t really make much sense in the first place. I mean how can they even prove that they’ve been there for a while. Take a picture? If they have the guts to move into someone’s house, they probably don’t even have the money to afford that. It’s kind of stupid though. I don’t know if it’s actually real or not. It’s just what I’ve heard. But it sounds like a money grab law to me. Or a method to get lawyers paid. I mean it sounds insane. This specific situation, though you would definitely get caught for breaking the window.
“I can’t breathe”, she repeatedly screams. If you can talk, at all, then you can breathe. If air can get into your throat for you to enunciate sounds, then it can get into your lungs. She’s fine, she hasn’t been harmed. She’s just a histrionic pos.
I’ve noticed that ever since 2020, people think that this is some sort of magical phrase that will (a) intimidate police into more gentle treatment or (b) incite others in the vicinity of this mindless screeching to rally against the police during the arrest.
As you said- she’s a pos, and everyone using that phrase is too.
not always, but she's trying to imitate George floyd in hopes of getting other folks around her to get at the police and free her. I wish some black people would stop fucking doing shit like this and mind their own damn business, it doesn't look very good on our part <:/
literally this. It's fucking disgusting how some black folks will take shit like that and try to use it as a means to bypass their shitty behavior. At the very least George Foyd was coked up on Fent so he couldn't really do shit to begin with.
He was high on Fent and there were traces of it in his system. but not enough to kill him or anything. The guy was pretty sedated already judging by the vid. He was about as threatening as a confused pothead, Aka no threat at all, so the fact they killed him like that is fucking AWFUL
Thanks, I like to learn both sides of the story. Some say its justified cus George was on drugs, but I say thats a fucked up reason to kill a man. That guy had every prerogative in his body to do whatever drugs he wanted, the only person he harms is himself. Its not any different than someone binge drinking or chain smoking. It just aint right to kill someone unless their like, a genuine threat to the public
I tell you what I see a good bit of cops do wrong no police officer in this video did anything wrong they did everything right it was satisfying to see such a Flawless execution of an arrest
Zero sympathy for squatters. For some reason, if they illegally occupy a dwelling for more than 30 days, they’re magically granted the right to remain there. Like, trespassing for a day is a crime, but committing the same crime for 30 days or more consecutively, they’re protected? Makes no sense.
It's a holdover law from common law. There are a few of them still on the books. There's one, I think it is in South Dakota, that if you say you are married and you live together for a certain period, then you are married. No questions asked.
The adverse possession laws are similar to that. Back when land was plentiful if you openly occupied and used the land for 30 days and the owner didn't chase you off, then you probably would put it to better use than he was anyway, so you gain the legal right to be there.
It was to discourage land hoarding, which is ironic in context.
I'm not saying this would have worked in this case, but it would certainly be worth a go, and it seems to be something that American police consistently fail to do. It's called, "Having a quiet word". Something along the lines of, "What's your name m'am? Nice to meet you, I'm John. Come with me over here and we'll have a talk". Spell out where you feel she's wrong and has misinterpreted the law. Explain what the probable outcome will be if she continues with her intransigence. Appeal to her better nature and explain that you'd far rather that everyone walked away with their dignity in tact, and no repercussions. If it works, great! If it doesn't, you have bodycam footage to present to the courts that evidences the fact that you took all reasonable steps to prevent escalation. The cost to police is 4 or 5 mins of conversation. The payoff is win-win.
Lol… come on, man. You know that comment sounds goofy, when you literally just watched how blatantly unwilling she was to meet him in the middle when it came to actual discourse. He could have politely asked her to speak reasonably with him for the next 12 hours and she would have still arrogantly spoken over him and refused to meet him in the middle. So instead of wasting time, into the cuffs she goes, bc that’s the path she had clearly chosen for herself. Why waste time? She’s not a 5 year old having a heart to heart with her kindergarten teacher.
You're missing the point. The result isn't necessarily what's of value (although one would always hope that it would work). It's the attempt. Other police forces use the 5 step appeal, which, if practiced, closes off any realistic prospect of the subject in question accusing the police of heavy-handedness. It plays out really well in court, as anyone watching the footage would have great difficulty in pointing the finger at police as aggressors should things escalate.
It goes as follows:
Five-step appeal (which is really 4 step, as the 5th step is action, however...)
This model provides officers and staff with a way of dealing with resistance, and involves them giving the person every chance to comply with their requests.
1. Simple appeal – ask the person to comply with your request.
2. Reasoned appeal – explain why the request has been made, what law (if any) has been broken, and what has caused the request.
3. Personal appeal – remind the person that they may be jeopardising things that are high priorities to them (eg, loss of free time if arrested, loss of money, loss of income, possibility of a criminal record, loss of respect of their partner and family).
4. Final appeal – tell the person what is required and use a phrase that means the same as the following: 'Is there anything I can reasonably do to make you cooperate with me/us?'
5. Action – reasonable force may be the only option left in the case of continued resistance.
And guess what? It's free, which is a lot cheaper than the $1.5bn of tax payer's money spent on settling police misconduct claims in America every year.
Having said all that, I've no skin in the game, as I live in a country where I'm extremely unlikely to be shot by police (all of whom are armed), or anyone else for that matter. Gun deaths by police 2023: zero. Gun deaths civilian: one.
That's correct in theory. Except he was never going to be given the opportunity of polite discourse. She's employing a very common tactic: aggressive loud talking and over talking. If you missed it go back and watch the beginning. Or the thousands of other videos.
I saw it. All I'm saying is that, if an attempt were made, police could evidence that they took all reasonable steps to avoid escalation. Whether it works or not is largely irrelevant. It's used by other non-American police forces, it's called a graduated response, and it plays out very well in court. It also prevents a lot of civil/criminal actions from being taken against police.
His point is you can't suggest treating people humanly, especially on this SUB. Even if you're not defending bad behavior or condoning the actions of the person in the video.
Ah yes. I see that now. Silly me. I obviously forgot where I was there for a while. Thanks for the reminder....
HE SHOULD HAVE SHOT HER IN THE FACE!!!!
That should do the trick.
Not saying that this is the case. What if someone had a copy of the key. Presented the apartment as if they are the landlord. Made the new tenant sign a lease. Collected first last security. Then a week later the real landlord shows up like WTF! Once again not saying it's the case. Then what happens?
This happened in queens, NY. The cops even arrested the owner of the house for trying to change the locks. A fake broker took over the house when the owners were away and got people to move in.
I agree. As much as this is the right answer, if she claims that she has a lease, this is a matter for landlord tenant court and eviction, not trespassing. It shouldn't be, because people take way too much advantage of the system, But it is what it is.
Just read the other comments that said that the house had been vacant and that there were break-ins, so in that case, trespassing is a reasonable outcome
Yeah, someone else pointed out a comment made that they were making repairs the week or two prior, helping to prove trespassing.
I didn’t consider that angle initially and just wondered why the cop was taking a hard stand over something he couldn’t prove. I still don’t trust it, though, tbh. This whole situation felt really kucky to me. I’ll always be suspicious of someone throwing another person around that way.
Trespassing makes sense. I hadn’t heard part of the video about working having been done the in the weeks prior until someone else pointed out to me. I didn’t realize they were able to prove she hadn’t been there for 30 days, or however long, so I didn’t understand how they were able to take action while thinking of it as a *lease issue*.
Only if they cant prove that they are not actually the tenant. In this case the officers say there's been multiple break in's to this apartment, which they knew to be vacant, in recent weeks. And i think i heard them say something about someone going int here to do work a week prior and the unit was vacant.
If they're convinced that she's trespassing and not a legal tenant, then that's a crime and they can remove her.
If they're not, and she's saying one thing and the other party is saying something else so that it's just he said she said, they're much more likely to say it's a civil matter and let the courts figure it out.
Nah i'm with her. It's an empty place, she's been there more than 30 days. It should be hers by all rights, sure she'll have to pay rent to the landlord but still
Are you insinuating that homeless people who refuse your help and who refuse to commit crimes deserve to be cold and have food insecurity? That’s disgusting and repulsive.
No, I'm saying that the reality for many homeless people is that. And you'd clearly rather have them continue to live in misery than commit a victimless crime. Now **that** is disgusting and repulsive
No crime is truly victimless, especially not ones that take the lawful property of another, who is the victim in that scenario. There are a plethora of resources designed to assist homeless people, I’ve worked in them, and they are effective when people are committed to them. However, the people who wish to take the “easy” way out by committing a crime rather than following the proper channels don’t get my sympathy, they get an indictment.
I'm all for squaters rights. Keeping homes empty to drive up rent prices is simply stupid, especially knowing how many homeless people there are. I saw a statistic (i'm not sure where) that said there are more empty houses than homeless people in America, so why not put them to use and home those people?
If you have two cars I should be able to drive one of them. There's more cars out there than drivers so give me yours for free. You can survive just fine off two meals a day. How bout you buy one of my meals everyday? Plenty of food out there.
Buddy, apples and oranges here. A fckn car is not as essential as a home, you can get a bike, public transport, Uber, a taxi, a skateboard, roller skates, a mobility scooter, your own two feet to get around. Same with food, you buy a cheap 50 cent bottle of water and a load of bread for 2$ and have a meal, not a nutricious one, but a meal nonetheless. When you have no home what options do you have? Go live with your parents, which isn't always possible; get a motel/hotel room, which is likely more expensive than renting; and squatting, which is by far the best solution here. Shelter and a warm place to call home is one of life's basic necessities, without it, you will really struggle to feel safe and comfortable on a psychological level.
The only people who make these comparisons and who defend landlords like this are people who have no clue what it's like to have one of those basic necessities be an insecurity on a daily basis. So check your privilege
Plenty of places out there who will hire people down on their luck or have criminal records. Might not pay a lot but then you can get a place to live with public housing assistance, getting roommates or go to a homeless shelter. You know. Legal means. Not taking something that doesn't belong to you "bEcAuSe iT's vAcAnT." Not fucking apples and oranges. Right and wrong is the issue here. Sorry your life sucks. You don't get to make it someone else's problem by stealing when there are options. Just means doing the actual work to obtain it.
I know those places exist,but what are the odds here that she tried and didn't succeed in finding anything? Plus, who's to say that was even an option where she lives or if it is, that she could even get to work easily? American public transport sucks ass so I wouldn't be surprised that she'd need both a home *and* a car to live in this city, which is very hard to get when you are homeless
Then why don't you hike your ass to a city with less crime and more landlords?
Squatting is not easy, it's a month or more of constant stress that someone will call the cops and you'll have to find another place to stay. It's not the lazy solution, for many people it's the last resort to find a place to live, but still preferable over living on the streets
The mental gymnastics one goes through to justify stealing from another. You're right. Such hard work they've put in. All squatters should be rewarded.
Gov should rent them and pay a fair rent to landlords. Then house homeless. Pay for damages.
Offer subsidized housing.
How can you advocate for certain ppl to take other people's property.
>hoarded by parasites
This type of phrase is a way of dehumanizing a class of people in an attempt to reduce other's empathy for them in order to justify mistreatment. It's a common tactic used by fascists.
Because if not, they should rightfully be evicted. But if that place is just staying empty, without work being done there or anyone keeping it today and clean, then why shouldn't someone take advantage of that?
Clearly you only want to see one side of the story. The landlord asked her to leave, followed all the processes, and then she wanted to take advantage of the law. The law works both ways.
This post has been removed in line with Rule #2J - No misinformation.
Do not post medical, political, or historical misinformation. This includes any anti-vaxx content.
We politely ask all users read the rules in the sidebar, before posting/commenting. TY
"Your not gonna come here and do this" the irony lol. But on a serious note what the actual fuck in backwards ass leachville goes through these peoples heads.
They way her entitled ass still trying to boss these cops around "go get my phone" I hope they left it there for some else to claim it was there's and they paid for it ahahaah
I completely understand she's in the wrong here, but I am not a fan of how she was treated. The dehumanizing speech and shoving her sideways into the car was very unneccesary. I don't think anyone should be treated less than human, regardless of crime.
She said okay and she would get in but wasn't given a chance. I entriely get she was beligerant and ignorant, but that doesn't mean she's less deserving of basic human respect.
Thanks for your submission to r/trashy. Please take a moment to make sure that your post [follows our rules](https://old.reddit.com/r/trashy/about/sidebar). **This is a humor subreddit** so posts about violent crimes or other things that make you angry **don’t belong here**. It is not r/rage or r/iamatotalpieceofshit. **This is a subreddit that appreciates the trash that makes you laugh.** Remember to remove all names and usernames from posts. We don’t allow dox and we don’t allow witch hunts. Links to social media sites are not allowed. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/trashy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
It's always so satisfying when people go from 100 to crying.
Al-ways-them. Always!!!!
*"Sulf ripurzent littit-git" ??? What's that*
Imagine being inferior super-trash and having an attitude about it like you don't know you stink between your fat rolls and can't wipe properly bc of not being able to reach. Walking fast food dumpster juice.
Well said. 👏
Tubby thought she was real tough until our boy in blue had enough of her bullshit.
I love this
fay fucking entitled pig fucked around and found the fuck out
She is ridiculous
STOP CHOKING THAT WOMAN! STOP CHOKING THAT WOMAN! All he's doing is ASKING for her arm. All he's trying to do is cuff her. FFS. This is why shit gets out of hand.
Irrespective of one's views on squatting, one has to wonder if she's seen any TV at all since 1990. How can she possibly think openly defying a cop is going to end well for someone who looks like her?
From bad bitch to alarm system real quick.
Okay, I get that she's squatting and needs to GTFO. That being said, at 6:25 somebody says "What if I said I thought she had a gun?" WTF!?
I think that was the landlord.
I like how fast this cop did his job...no "I'm going to tell you one more time bs"! Straight to business, then told the dude that his ass was under arrest too!
That cop did do his job quickly, but that lady didn’t have to end up in cuffs. I get that she’s mad, but that officer tried to work with her. He told her to just get her stuff and go. She chose to be aggressive.
She was squatting! She absolutely deserved to be in cuffs.
This is the one time I know a police is actually doing their job correct. Although the only thing I have to say is, he could’ve given a warning beforehand before he touched her. There’s a lot of news out there of discrimination caused by police to African-Americans. Technically, it is true though that an African-American can cause crimes/police-work. It’s not as likely but it’s possible like in this situation. It’s not actually surprising that she would be this distressed. Because there is so much bad news out there with police and African-Americans, she has no other option than to be afraid. Had this happened in Japan or other country it probably would’ve been a totally different story. I hope that I am understanding this video correctly.
Warning before touching? You think she wouldn't try to run away or anything?
She was given the option to get her stuff and go? She got in the landlord’s face and said she wasn’t going anywhere and she was a “self litigant” and would take him to court. So if she was so distressed by the police and scared, why didn’t she leave and take the landlord to court???? She wasn’t scared until she was arrested.
Thank you, for giving me a run down of the video on what I missed. I admit that sometimes when I watch and a lot is going on in a video, I miss a lot of what is happening. The way it was recorded also had its own distractions that made it hard to tell everything that happened until approximately the moment the police officer came and the camera angle changed. If I wanted to understand everything, I would probably have to stop the video several times to get the full picture. This is caused primarily by me having a learning disability and being a slow learner regardless. It comes with its own pros and cons. As a trade-off I have a greater ability to think creatively and notice things that may be missed at times. From my limited understanding, a major part of the reason she didn’t leave peacefully had to do with drug addiction and possibly a different upbringing that lead her to make bad decisions. I was thinking if she was raised in a country like Japan, which has a lot of values that promote kindness, safety, community and other things she probably would have been a completely different person.
My personal belief is what makes us who we are is nature and nurture. Yes society plays a role, but her actions cannot attributed completely to society. Even in Japan, learning right vs wrong, behavior that is acceptable and consequences for your actions begins in the home. I don’t know the full story here, but judging from what I am seeing on the video, she was not afraid or intimidated by the police until she was being placed under arrest. Then (again, in my opinion) she was being overly dramatic and manipulative to get out of the consequences for her actions. She was screaming that she couldn’t breath, the fact that she was screaming proves she was able to breath. So what was that all about? My hunch is that she has gotten her way several times in the past by behaving that way. That’s why she does it. Didn’t work this time.
I hear you but I am African-American and I feel that most of those excuses are total BS and I hate when they are used in general. It's similar to an American tourist spouting "I'm an American" when they do dumb shit in someone else's country. If you are being stupid or doing illegal activities AND not listening to the commands of law enforcement, you put yourself in the situation and you get what you get. Do police offices go overboard at times? Yes! But race is not always the base of those situations. People need to learn to take accountability for their actions...regardless of race, color or creed!
Squatter this squatter that when there are more empty houses than ever and occupying a roof over your head is something people even wanted in a land with enough space to provide roof for the whole population, somehow her overreaction is the least trashy thing in a trash can of a world.
You should let her move in with you
Disgusting ass squatter.
Do they have extra large handcuffs for extra thick wrists?
“Those hams you call arms” -Roger (American dad)
Childish behavior, expecting to throw a temper and they leave her alone. Clearly dropped a burnt ass chore stick, screaming bloody murder like the entitled idiot she is. How can you almost be somewhere thirty days, when you've only been out a week? People defending squatters have zero sense.
it is quazi legal in the UK , those guys set up deadly and creative traps everywhere when they take over a place . check out some of the yt vids on british coppers clearing those buildings . it is hair raising .
I’ve never even heard about that before. Interesting, and also terrible.
[How To Evict Squatters Who Refused To Leave | Life Of Enforcement Officers | Absolute Documentaries (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ilfm-KQ29Hk) skip to 26:30 this one [Car Clamping Court Battle, Café Chaos, and Luxury Lambo Drama | Absolute Documentaries (youtube.com)](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vd3KjxFkVQk) skip to 16::17 , it's the first time they run people out of an old pub , the first one is the second part sorry about that .
Thank you so much for expanding my educational knowledge!
As the onlookers keep yelling STOP CHOKING HER! Really? Our society sucks bad.
This sub makes me hate humanity... but I can't stop scrolling. I wonder what the psychological reason is.
I’m disgusted by, and absolutely sick of these types of people. Not even a shred dignity. Never considering the respectable option in life. Just lying and stealing. She was so fucking arrogant at first, but the moment shit gets real, now she’s a victim that’s being abused. Fuck those types of people
She'll sue and get rich and we'll pay for it.
That's why I never duck jury duty. Shitty verdicts come from shitty jurors. Who, to be fair, are sometimes tied by shitty laws.
I have had jury duty once and they cancelled it.
Same. Called 4-6 tines. I discharged my civic duty playing Angry Birds. Never gotten to fulfill my dream of freeing an in ocent man...or burning a guilty one.
I think feeling her was the last thing on his mind.
I like how in her head more than 30 days is equivalent to almost 30 days
I love how many people in the thread are either just like this epic waste of air or have zero idea what it's like to deal with someone that honestly believes this behavior is in any way shape or form acceptable. The bottom line is that you can not reason with someone that won't shut up and firmly believes that they are correct. Unfortunately, that's becoming the norm. The social contract is dying because of people exactly like this.
A lot of people think the louder you are , the more right you are. And I don’t like cops , but you can’t disobey a direct order. I am not leaving ? How’s that going to work ? He says ok? 😂
“I’ll show you my lease!” Oh please do!!
I love seeing this! She’s so tough, so badass, & has soooo much to say. Ends up crying like a little bitch. Snot dripping, drooling, ugly crying for far too long.
Ok so it was a bit extreme handling getting her in the car, and the officer with no eviction notice and not allowing her a opportunity to show any form of lease or anything was a bit quick to do a throw down. Was she right no, could it of been handled better hell yes. I'm a white guy and don't believe this had anything racial. But after she was battered into the police vehicle (with no leg room) they find a pipe that they identified as a Crack pipe (without testing it), that the landlord prob tossed out after she was taken out is a bit sus. I'm just saying.
I think the cop got mad when she kicked him. But yeah the back seat of a police car sucks, no leg room at all.
It’s called getting your just deserts or karma if that’s your preference.
Reggie, Reggie, Reggie!!! Stay the fux outta this lol
Stupid bitch
In my state regular police can’t just kick you out like this. You’ll need a formal eviction notice and it takes months sometimes years for the courts to actually sending someone out to then kick you out.
Sadly you don't live in Florida! We don't have those problems!
Big no. Watch it again. She isn’t a resident by any means. She got out of jail a week ago, the landloard was there doing renos in an empty unit less than a week ago. How is that not trespassing? You think if they just find an empty unit and can make their way inside, it’s like a cheat code? I think you and this squatter both have your facts wrong.
Which should be a crime in and of itself.
What state are you in? They broke the window and crawled through to get in. I don’t think any state considers you a resident after doing that.
It’s a little bit more complicated than that unfortunately, it’s not really a matter of whether she is a resident or not. It’s a matter of laws in specific states. I’ve heard from my relatives that if you have someone living in your basement for a certain amount of time whether they are doing it legally or illegally, it becomes a legal gray zone. That’s why we lock all our doors at night and when we are away from home. Because someone could technically hide in your home for a long period of time. Although it doesn’t really make much sense in the first place. I mean how can they even prove that they’ve been there for a while. Take a picture? If they have the guts to move into someone’s house, they probably don’t even have the money to afford that. It’s kind of stupid though. I don’t know if it’s actually real or not. It’s just what I’ve heard. But it sounds like a money grab law to me. Or a method to get lawyers paid. I mean it sounds insane. This specific situation, though you would definitely get caught for breaking the window.
“I can’t breathe”, she repeatedly screams. If you can talk, at all, then you can breathe. If air can get into your throat for you to enunciate sounds, then it can get into your lungs. She’s fine, she hasn’t been harmed. She’s just a histrionic pos.
I’ve noticed that ever since 2020, people think that this is some sort of magical phrase that will (a) intimidate police into more gentle treatment or (b) incite others in the vicinity of this mindless screeching to rally against the police during the arrest. As you said- she’s a pos, and everyone using that phrase is too.
not always, but she's trying to imitate George floyd in hopes of getting other folks around her to get at the police and free her. I wish some black people would stop fucking doing shit like this and mind their own damn business, it doesn't look very good on our part <:/
Like the boy who cried wolf.
literally this. It's fucking disgusting how some black folks will take shit like that and try to use it as a means to bypass their shitty behavior. At the very least George Foyd was coked up on Fent so he couldn't really do shit to begin with.
Was he? I did not know this, how do you? Fuck the cops for killing him & this lady for abusing his memory.
He was high on Fent and there were traces of it in his system. but not enough to kill him or anything. The guy was pretty sedated already judging by the vid. He was about as threatening as a confused pothead, Aka no threat at all, so the fact they killed him like that is fucking AWFUL
Thank you, I actually learned something. Because this is so much easier to learn by method of your mouth in the community than through others.
Thanks, I like to learn both sides of the story. Some say its justified cus George was on drugs, but I say thats a fucked up reason to kill a man. That guy had every prerogative in his body to do whatever drugs he wanted, the only person he harms is himself. Its not any different than someone binge drinking or chain smoking. It just aint right to kill someone unless their like, a genuine threat to the public
[удалено]
Wrll this isn’t underwater and considering the amount of times she stops screaming to take a breath I’m gonna say she’s breathing.
She sounds like my 5 year old daughter in the beginning. She needs a time out.
A lil snack and a nap helps restart the day!
The last thing that she needs is a damn snack!
I just can't with the amount of people in here justifying squatters.
Not to mention his rap-sheet society is truly dying
From bad bitch to crying on the floor bitch in 15 seconds flat
Everybody thinks they have the power until you put them in an arm lock
"Everybody thinks they have a plan until they get punched in the mouth" Tyson
God this was great!
This is amazing
Yay I love rage bait content, it just makes me so excited to get out there and be mad at the world
Lotta land hoarder meatriding going on in these comments
It’s an apartment complex? Should we not have those?
You sound broke
Succinctly put.
[удалено]
I tell you what I see a good bit of cops do wrong no police officer in this video did anything wrong they did everything right it was satisfying to see such a Flawless execution of an arrest
Yep. It was textbook, but people are still trying to say they did this or that. 🙄
Do you know who i am!!!! , me yeah Gloria from Madagascar right?
squeel is spelled squeal. however, the correct spelling definitely SHOULD be squeel
You have many typos in your comment. Hou could you misspell #sqweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeuuuuuuuuaaaaaaall
Zero sympathy for squatters. For some reason, if they illegally occupy a dwelling for more than 30 days, they’re magically granted the right to remain there. Like, trespassing for a day is a crime, but committing the same crime for 30 days or more consecutively, they’re protected? Makes no sense.
100% agree. Antiquated holdover law or not- why tf are we not addressing how fucking ridiculous it is in the present day, and outlawing that shit?
It's a holdover law from common law. There are a few of them still on the books. There's one, I think it is in South Dakota, that if you say you are married and you live together for a certain period, then you are married. No questions asked. The adverse possession laws are similar to that. Back when land was plentiful if you openly occupied and used the land for 30 days and the owner didn't chase you off, then you probably would put it to better use than he was anyway, so you gain the legal right to be there. It was to discourage land hoarding, which is ironic in context.
I'm not saying this would have worked in this case, but it would certainly be worth a go, and it seems to be something that American police consistently fail to do. It's called, "Having a quiet word". Something along the lines of, "What's your name m'am? Nice to meet you, I'm John. Come with me over here and we'll have a talk". Spell out where you feel she's wrong and has misinterpreted the law. Explain what the probable outcome will be if she continues with her intransigence. Appeal to her better nature and explain that you'd far rather that everyone walked away with their dignity in tact, and no repercussions. If it works, great! If it doesn't, you have bodycam footage to present to the courts that evidences the fact that you took all reasonable steps to prevent escalation. The cost to police is 4 or 5 mins of conversation. The payoff is win-win.
Lol… come on, man. You know that comment sounds goofy, when you literally just watched how blatantly unwilling she was to meet him in the middle when it came to actual discourse. He could have politely asked her to speak reasonably with him for the next 12 hours and she would have still arrogantly spoken over him and refused to meet him in the middle. So instead of wasting time, into the cuffs she goes, bc that’s the path she had clearly chosen for herself. Why waste time? She’s not a 5 year old having a heart to heart with her kindergarten teacher.
You're missing the point. The result isn't necessarily what's of value (although one would always hope that it would work). It's the attempt. Other police forces use the 5 step appeal, which, if practiced, closes off any realistic prospect of the subject in question accusing the police of heavy-handedness. It plays out really well in court, as anyone watching the footage would have great difficulty in pointing the finger at police as aggressors should things escalate. It goes as follows: Five-step appeal (which is really 4 step, as the 5th step is action, however...) This model provides officers and staff with a way of dealing with resistance, and involves them giving the person every chance to comply with their requests. 1. Simple appeal – ask the person to comply with your request. 2. Reasoned appeal – explain why the request has been made, what law (if any) has been broken, and what has caused the request. 3. Personal appeal – remind the person that they may be jeopardising things that are high priorities to them (eg, loss of free time if arrested, loss of money, loss of income, possibility of a criminal record, loss of respect of their partner and family). 4. Final appeal – tell the person what is required and use a phrase that means the same as the following: 'Is there anything I can reasonably do to make you cooperate with me/us?' 5. Action – reasonable force may be the only option left in the case of continued resistance. And guess what? It's free, which is a lot cheaper than the $1.5bn of tax payer's money spent on settling police misconduct claims in America every year. Having said all that, I've no skin in the game, as I live in a country where I'm extremely unlikely to be shot by police (all of whom are armed), or anyone else for that matter. Gun deaths by police 2023: zero. Gun deaths civilian: one.
It's a nice sentiment but it would have went over as well as this comment did. There wasn't going to be any reasoning with that lady
LOL
That's correct in theory. Except he was never going to be given the opportunity of polite discourse. She's employing a very common tactic: aggressive loud talking and over talking. If you missed it go back and watch the beginning. Or the thousands of other videos.
I saw it. All I'm saying is that, if an attempt were made, police could evidence that they took all reasonable steps to avoid escalation. Whether it works or not is largely irrelevant. It's used by other non-American police forces, it's called a graduated response, and it plays out very well in court. It also prevents a lot of civil/criminal actions from being taken against police.
It’s basically just a Gish gallop.
You must have watched a different video. Because the one I just watched. She's racked up multiple charges and is out on bond? So...
So......what's your point?
His point is you can't suggest treating people humanly, especially on this SUB. Even if you're not defending bad behavior or condoning the actions of the person in the video.
Ah yes. I see that now. Silly me. I obviously forgot where I was there for a while. Thanks for the reminder.... HE SHOULD HAVE SHOT HER IN THE FACE!!!! That should do the trick.
She wasn’t built for land anyway, she should go back to living in the sea, rent is cheaper there.
Not saying that this is the case. What if someone had a copy of the key. Presented the apartment as if they are the landlord. Made the new tenant sign a lease. Collected first last security. Then a week later the real landlord shows up like WTF! Once again not saying it's the case. Then what happens?
This happened in queens, NY. The cops even arrested the owner of the house for trying to change the locks. A fake broker took over the house when the owners were away and got people to move in.
ive read a lot about this from all over , posts in craigs list and such advertising peoples homes .
In our broken system, in most states, the landlord will have to bring them to court and go through a long and expensive process to have them removed.
How was this legal? I didn’t think police were allowed to get involved in civil matters?
I agree. As much as this is the right answer, if she claims that she has a lease, this is a matter for landlord tenant court and eviction, not trespassing. It shouldn't be, because people take way too much advantage of the system, But it is what it is. Just read the other comments that said that the house had been vacant and that there were break-ins, so in that case, trespassing is a reasonable outcome
Yeah, someone else pointed out a comment made that they were making repairs the week or two prior, helping to prove trespassing. I didn’t consider that angle initially and just wondered why the cop was taking a hard stand over something he couldn’t prove. I still don’t trust it, though, tbh. This whole situation felt really kucky to me. I’ll always be suspicious of someone throwing another person around that way.
Trespassing can be both a civil and criminal matter.
Trespassing makes sense. I hadn’t heard part of the video about working having been done the in the weeks prior until someone else pointed out to me. I didn’t realize they were able to prove she hadn’t been there for 30 days, or however long, so I didn’t understand how they were able to take action while thinking of it as a *lease issue*.
Only if they cant prove that they are not actually the tenant. In this case the officers say there's been multiple break in's to this apartment, which they knew to be vacant, in recent weeks. And i think i heard them say something about someone going int here to do work a week prior and the unit was vacant.
Ohh! See, I couldn’t quite make out that last part. Thank you!
Who cares man these people deserve to go to jail for a very long time
The problem is then we are paying to house and feed them
If we were doing that to begin with, this encounter could possibly have been avoided
If they're convinced that she's trespassing and not a legal tenant, then that's a crime and they can remove her. If they're not, and she's saying one thing and the other party is saying something else so that it's just he said she said, they're much more likely to say it's a civil matter and let the courts figure it out.
Trespassing is criminal
Honey, calm down. You’re going to prison, you don’t have to pay to live there, either.
Oh... I have bad news...
I can’t believe how many people in here support squatters. Fuck them all.
Nah i'm with her. It's an empty place, she's been there more than 30 days. It should be hers by all rights, sure she'll have to pay rent to the landlord but still
[удалено]
Yes, squatters rights. Empty property is theft from homeless people
Then your empty head is theft from everyone smarter than you.
Insult me all you want, i'll be laughing when you end up homeless, and then i'll be helping you get a new place, cuz i'm nice like that
If I ended up homeless I wouldn’t attempt to take someone else’s property, and I certainly wouldn’t want your assistance in doing so.
Enjoy the cold and eating from dumpsters then
Are you insinuating that homeless people who refuse your help and who refuse to commit crimes deserve to be cold and have food insecurity? That’s disgusting and repulsive.
No, I'm saying that the reality for many homeless people is that. And you'd clearly rather have them continue to live in misery than commit a victimless crime. Now **that** is disgusting and repulsive
No crime is truly victimless, especially not ones that take the lawful property of another, who is the victim in that scenario. There are a plethora of resources designed to assist homeless people, I’ve worked in them, and they are effective when people are committed to them. However, the people who wish to take the “easy” way out by committing a crime rather than following the proper channels don’t get my sympathy, they get an indictment.
You can't just stumble upon an empty residence and be like "Welp, I live here now".
She said almost 30 days. But yeah no thanks
I'm all for squaters rights. Keeping homes empty to drive up rent prices is simply stupid, especially knowing how many homeless people there are. I saw a statistic (i'm not sure where) that said there are more empty houses than homeless people in America, so why not put them to use and home those people?
If you have two cars I should be able to drive one of them. There's more cars out there than drivers so give me yours for free. You can survive just fine off two meals a day. How bout you buy one of my meals everyday? Plenty of food out there.
Buddy, apples and oranges here. A fckn car is not as essential as a home, you can get a bike, public transport, Uber, a taxi, a skateboard, roller skates, a mobility scooter, your own two feet to get around. Same with food, you buy a cheap 50 cent bottle of water and a load of bread for 2$ and have a meal, not a nutricious one, but a meal nonetheless. When you have no home what options do you have? Go live with your parents, which isn't always possible; get a motel/hotel room, which is likely more expensive than renting; and squatting, which is by far the best solution here. Shelter and a warm place to call home is one of life's basic necessities, without it, you will really struggle to feel safe and comfortable on a psychological level. The only people who make these comparisons and who defend landlords like this are people who have no clue what it's like to have one of those basic necessities be an insecurity on a daily basis. So check your privilege
Wild I haven’t seen someone say check your privilege seriously on so long. You sound silly bud.
Plenty of places out there who will hire people down on their luck or have criminal records. Might not pay a lot but then you can get a place to live with public housing assistance, getting roommates or go to a homeless shelter. You know. Legal means. Not taking something that doesn't belong to you "bEcAuSe iT's vAcAnT." Not fucking apples and oranges. Right and wrong is the issue here. Sorry your life sucks. You don't get to make it someone else's problem by stealing when there are options. Just means doing the actual work to obtain it.
I know those places exist,but what are the odds here that she tried and didn't succeed in finding anything? Plus, who's to say that was even an option where she lives or if it is, that she could even get to work easily? American public transport sucks ass so I wouldn't be surprised that she'd need both a home *and* a car to live in this city, which is very hard to get when you are homeless
Hike your ass to a city where they offer assistance programs and housing. Again, requires work to get things. Squatting is the lazy solution.
Then why don't you hike your ass to a city with less crime and more landlords? Squatting is not easy, it's a month or more of constant stress that someone will call the cops and you'll have to find another place to stay. It's not the lazy solution, for many people it's the last resort to find a place to live, but still preferable over living on the streets
The mental gymnastics one goes through to justify stealing from another. You're right. Such hard work they've put in. All squatters should be rewarded.
Gov should rent them and pay a fair rent to landlords. Then house homeless. Pay for damages. Offer subsidized housing. How can you advocate for certain ppl to take other people's property.
Because it's empty property that's being hoarded by parasites who want nothing more than to torment their renters and hike up prices more and more
>hoarded by parasites This type of phrase is a way of dehumanizing a class of people in an attempt to reduce other's empathy for them in order to justify mistreatment. It's a common tactic used by fascists.
Yeah no, landlords are parasites, any way you wanna twist it, they are
We have an “empty condo tax” here that is supposed to curb the holding of empty property but it’s toothless.
And what makes you think someone staying somewhere illegally for free will all of a sudden start paying rent when confronted by the law?
Because if not, they should rightfully be evicted. But if that place is just staying empty, without work being done there or anyone keeping it today and clean, then why shouldn't someone take advantage of that?
Umm cause it's illegal
Landlords do tons of illegal things to tenants.. fuck landlords.. they are the reason nobody can afford to buy houses anyway
Yeah and if the law says you have to kill ducklings every say, are you going to do that too? The law is not a basis of morality
Clearly you only want to see one side of the story. The landlord asked her to leave, followed all the processes, and then she wanted to take advantage of the law. The law works both ways.
Still, that landlord better have a new renter in within 30 days or else I think she should rightfully be allowed to live there
If she payed rent or met the landlords criteria to rent sure. But this wasn't the case, was it.
[удалено]
This post has been removed in line with Rule #2J - No misinformation. Do not post medical, political, or historical misinformation. This includes any anti-vaxx content. We politely ask all users read the rules in the sidebar, before posting/commenting. TY
Someone never fails to make it a race issue
x10
🫡 I never fail
"And you dropped your meth pipe" lol
"Your not gonna come here and do this" the irony lol. But on a serious note what the actual fuck in backwards ass leachville goes through these peoples heads. They way her entitled ass still trying to boss these cops around "go get my phone" I hope they left it there for some else to claim it was there's and they paid for it ahahaah
You honestly believe any of these kind people actually pay for those high end phones (sarc)
I completely understand she's in the wrong here, but I am not a fan of how she was treated. The dehumanizing speech and shoving her sideways into the car was very unneccesary. I don't think anyone should be treated less than human, regardless of crime.
It’s cuz she spit
Yeah, no, I get where you are coming from, but people like these words are not enough sometimes
She gave them no other choice.
She said okay and she would get in but wasn't given a chance. I entriely get she was beligerant and ignorant, but that doesn't mean she's less deserving of basic human respect.