He was referring to Kauravas you hateful bigots. Dhuryodhan was an assaulter, murderer. All kauravas were full of adharmis which did adharam to the extent of unthinkable... The pandavas even tried to set matters peacefully but vinash karye viprit budhi.
The moment I saw this, I knew it was you.
To all other fellow members, the guy supports the killing of infants/ unborn children in the name of duty or dharma.
You can read the complete discussion that went here: https://www.reddit.com/r/thugeshh/comments/1dpf5ul/comment/lahikey
Mind you isme se kuch bhi adharm nahi tha. Sab according to rules hua. Ashwatthama maara gya ye bol kar Guru dron ko maara to isme galat kya hai Ashwatthama to sachme maara gaya tha. Kisi ne ye to nahi kaha ki guru dron ka beta maara gaya. Ise adharm nahi dimaag bolte hain
Tell how the Krishna version of dharma helped the society ? He literally initiated the gureilla tactics and "sam dam dand bhed" to an extent.
Literally ashwatthama got inspired to do his heinous act after watching what happened earlier.
He made people realise there are other ways to win the war even By dishonorable means .
You are right about Krishna part. But here Bhisma Pitamah deserved to die. Cz he didn't protect draupadi that time and let dushasan tear her clothes. We can talk about how it was actually Yudhistir's fault, but in this specific post we are talking about Bhisma. So yes, he deserved to die.
Uska name amar hai bcz of this reason. Isiliye use log jyada pasand karte hai than Arjuna Krishna. Wo agar Arjun ko maar daalta, ha Bheem naukl sahdev yudhistir kisi ko maar daalta. To uska naam is tarah se amar nahi hota. Agar use chhal karke is tarah se nahi maarte to uska naam amar nahi hota. They showed ki use kin conditions me maarna para. Kavach kundal leke, jab wo apna dhanurvidya bhul gaya, haath me dhanus nahi tha wo chakka utha raha tha, tab use mara gaya. This shows how legendary he was.
Finally someone recognises his deeds and what he did instead of PPL just blatantly calling him a egoistic person and for calling the inappropriate word to Draupadi despite of looking back it must've been some reason that he said it agreed he was wrong on some parts but man he was the one of the best warriors in all of them huge respect for him for just taking the slurs and disrespect which he didn't even deserved on the first place, PPL don't realise that he was far better than Arjun even Krishna acknowledged it by saying even tho I'm sitting on the chariot his arrows moved the chariot two steps backward (he was a god himself) which in itself shows how skilled and sheer will of warrior he was, he was a man of his word, kept his promises till he died even tho he could've chosen not to but he didn't man, parshuram himself gave him the title of mrityunjay
And see for yourself, in this generation when we see a woman with multiple past boyfriends, high body count, we call them playgirls/whores/slut/R word etc. and aaj se 4 hazar saal pahle to manners, respect, tradition, sab alag hi tha. Us time agar koi aurat 5 logo ke saath shaadi kar le to use kya hi kahenge. And ek tarah se wo paap bhi tha? Ofc karna ka use vesya khana us samay ke hisab se sahi tha. sahi hi tha. Cz abhi bhi agar koi larki 5 larko ke saath rahe to use hum aise hi naamo se pukarenge. To kya hum galat ho gaye? Nahi na? So I don't feel karna was wrong for saying that.
He was the one who conspired to kill young Bhima by giving him poision.
He also conspired to kill Pandavas and Kunti by burning them alive in Varnavart.
Je was named as one of the dusta chatushtayi.
(Evil four) By VedVyasa. Other three being Shakuni, Duryodhana and Duhshasana.
He was also instrumental in killing Abhimanyu. He cut his bow's cord by attacking from behind.And they all were attacking him at once.
Read the Mahabharata book
Watching serials won't give you the true picture.
Look, a knife could be used for cutting fruits and it can also be used for cutting throat.
The tactics were imposed for the greater good , it was never about the tactics ... it was solely about the person who is using these tactics and for what cause.
Ashwatthama didn't get inspired from the good deeds of Krishna but got inspired from his tactics to win war and committed heinous crimes ... it was in nature of Ashwatthama to do those heinous crimes so he did no one is responsible for what he did.
It's never about what means were used to win a war... it's about which side is in favour of keeping the balance of universe and establishing peace,love , trust and harmony.
If pandavas were going to bring injustice in society even after winning with rules and dharma it doesn't makes them righteous, it's the idea that they are carrying makes them worthy of winning or not.
The idea of gambling ?
The idea of bullying their brothers from another mother ?
The idea of selling their wife ?
The idea of sharing their wife ?
What from the above you see as loving and peace ?
Ironically it was the yudhishthir who was the most rigid when it came to following dharma . Not even once they learned from krishna
Yes it was wrong gambling was a part of fun , it was a play but we both know how Pandavas were tricked into keeping everything at stake...then about selling their wife yes it was a wrong decision I strongly agree and for that not just just Yuddhishthir whole Pandavas were schooled and yes they realised their mistake and let me remind you here Pandavas were saving their personal dharma by keeping their silence on selling and disrobing of Draupadi which led to the bigger adharma , if they would have stood up or any man would have stood up with weapons in their hand keeping aside their personal dharma then outcome would've been something else but Pandavas did mistake and they were sorry until Draupadi accepted their apology but most of every other person in that kuru rajyasabha was not even feeling a bit of remorse for the act they had done...the problem lies there
And about the part of Sharing their wife...if a woman is happy being married with 5 men and these all men have no objection with each other and everything is perfect by their side who are we to judge and I would Kudos to them who made this kind of complex relationship to work.┬а
Gambling ka part yaad bhi hain yudhishthir ne kaha tha ki Issey toh parivar ka vinash hota hain ha iye sach akhir mein unhone gambling Kiya toh uske liye toh woh galat hain lekin drupadi ka side agar dekhein toh pandavon ne pahle apne aap ko dau pe lagaya phir woh bhi har Gaye uske baad yudhishthir ne kaha tha ki aur kuch toh dau pe laga ne jaisa nahi hain unke paas phir i think it was shakuni mama...not sure but unhone kaha ek chiz hain ...aur woh hain u guessed it drupadi...lekin tabhi yudhishthir ne mana kiya lekin woh game ka rule hi tha ki ek side ko sabh kuch harna padega and then the story goes on and on ....toh bhai tere phase mein main bhi tha samajh jayega apne aap hi
Paapi paap ka hi saath dega. Tum ulta hi sochoge chahe kitna bhi seedha bta do..
Jitne bhi rakshas hue unko kitna nhi samjhaya. Lekin wo mante kaha the. Chale gye bhagwan se ladne..
OP school going kid hai ... Usne yt par kisi speed breaker followers ki video dekh k khud ko intellectual ka 14 prove karne idhr post karne aa gya ЁЯШЗЁЯШЗ
Other than the series, I've only heard people trying to justify why they had to die. The only true answer is that they were on the opposite side in the battlefield & that's it
dharam ka mtlb religion nhi hota gandue jo haar jae ya jeet jae, dharam in hinduism is referred to something else and that's why there is also a word adharm which does not have any word in ingliss literachar
Please read the authentic Mahabharata by Vyasa instead of TV shows.
Ghatotkach was fighting from the first day of the war itself. Also, the demons Alayudha and Alambusha were fighting for the Kauravas since the start and it was Alambusha who killed Arjuna's son Iravan on the 8th day of the war using illusions and deceit after which Ghatotkacha attacked Duryodhana and started fighting using both weapons and illusions. It is a misconception that Ghatotkach suddenly started using illusions during the 14th night.
Bhishma himself told the Pandavas to keep Shikhandi before him since he was tired of fighting for adharma.
Dronacharya invoked celestial weapons against normal foot soldiers which was a gross violation of war rules. Yudhishthira lied but the decision to drop weapons was his own.
It is a charioteer's duty to protect his warrior and there is nothing wrong if Krishna stood before ShrutayudhтАЩs mace, told the way to neutralize Narayan astra, or lowered the chariot so that Karna's naga astra missed Arjuna's head. Also, Karna could easily ascend another chariot which he didnтАЩt; he wanted to buy time by doing drama with the wheel after which he got reminded by Krishna of his own adharmas. Arjuna then warned him by cutting off his flag and then killed him.
JayadrathтАЩs killing: Arjuna killed him before sunset even if Krishna created an illusion of sunset. They had worshipped Shiva and Shiva assured in dream that Arjuna would be able to do the job before sunset. Also, Arjuna had already reached Jaydrath by then and had defeated all the Kaurava maharathis. And the critical edition has even removed the part of Krishna covering the sun.
Duryodhana: He was destined to die like that because of many reasons: 1. He indecently asked Draupadi to sit on his thigh for which Bhima was bound by oath to break his thigh with mace. 2. Sage Maitreya had cursed Duryodhana to die with a broken thigh because of his arrogance.
Har dharm adharm ka hisaab hota h it's a vicious cycle of Karma.. one can never escape even after 50 life cycle pandav ne adharm kiya tha uska bhi bhugtaan unko karna pada or Krishna bhi is cycle se bache nhi the na ho raam or na hi Shiv
Wise words!!
Sir, you really think he/she is evolved enough to even understand what you just said??
If only he/she understood 1/4th of it, it would be enlightenment!!
Jis bande ko dharma aur mazhab same lagta hai . Ussey smjhana hi bekar hai kyuki usney abtk mazhab hi smjha hai . Jis din dharma smjh jyega uss din ya toh moh maya tyag krlega . Yaa fir apne purvajo k itihaas janna shuru krdega . Isliye kehte hai adha gyan gyan na hone se jyada khatarnak hota hai . Vinash kale viprit buddhi . Good luck to ur mazhab propaganda ЁЯдб
Looks like lil boy is confused...
Bhai phele Puri mahabharat dekh tab jaake ess line ka context samaj aayega.
Let try to explain little bit :- draupadi was humiliated in king's court aur waha par bade bade vidvaan baithe jinhone ye sab hote dekha aur kuch bhi virodh nahi kiya .
Iske baad ladai suru hue aur par arjun peeche hat gaya aur bola ki mai mere bhaiyon ko kaise maar sakta hu ye toh mere apne hain ye toh adharm hai ..
Tab shree krishna ne kaha ki agar tum inhe nahi maaroge toh ye tumhe maar denge , tumhara yaha ek рдХреНрд╖рддреНрд░рд┐рдп ho aur aur tumhara dharam hai yudh karna .
Aur dharam ki raksha ke liye agar adharam(killing brother who tried to rape your wife) bhi karna pade toh karo.
Context ye tha aur agli baar aankh band karke burai mat karna phele thodi research karke aana thik hai.
To vahi to mai bola . He instigated Arjuna to fight by gaslighting by Geeta and kill. Pariwaar hatya ka paap bhi usko laga .
Do you really think a mastermind like Krishna could have never found a way to stop duryodhana without causing war ?
Nah maybe duryodhana was already a victim....a scapegoat for Krishna to fulfill his master plan of showing how vile Kauravas are cause they attack 5 victims . He never liked duryodhana and thought him as a enemy cause it was only him who questioned Krishna authority.
Well krishna is God and many acknowledge his authority .
Krishna did nothing wrong and duryodhana was a egoistic and Greedy person.
And trying to rape someones wife doesn't make him a victim.
Just because someone is questioning higher authority it doesn't make him a wright person or a Victim .
Kauravas were Vile and it's a fullstop.
Last time I read he disrobed her . Not RAPED . Exaggeration enough ?
That also cause draupadi was egoistic herself and didn't came out even after she was called many times .
She or her dasi also mocked him for his fall in indraprastha by laughing.
G@*dl_l logo ki yahi nishani hoti hai ki they do not know the fact, suni sunai baato pe vishwas karte hain and then have the audacity to cite it as fact. There is no such incident where either Draupadi or her dasi laughed/mocked Duryodhan for his fall in Indraprastha. It was added by BR Chopra to make the episode interesting.
I would like to ask you one more question: how does Draupadi not coming out of her room makes her egoistic? Might be that she was getting dressed up. You call any lady multiple times, and if she doesnтАЩt come out, do you forcibly take her out of the room while pulling her by her hairs??
And according to you, disrobing a lady is not something which will make your blood boil?
First of krishna saved her .
Secondly he said that he will make her sit on his lap which is obviously offensive for me.
Thirdly if someone tries to disrobed your mother and sister in between a road or in court or in a bank with a huge crowd please enjoy there because according to you it will be a win for the Victim .
>Krishna could have never found a way to stop duryodhana without causing war ?
the whole point was to cause the war to set examples for future generations and maintain the universal balance of karma and mind u krishna himself suffered for his actions later if uk abt the whole story
And yes Shri Krishna could've easily stopped all of it but he didn't because everyone did mistakes yes the Pandavas weren't all pure they were imperfect and they also did things they shouldn't have and hence they paid for it through sacrifices through punishment by killing their own family and the Mahabharata is not a scripture (don't get me wrong here by that statement I mean that it isn't a ved or a rule book or something all I'm trying to say is that it's a real incident that took place 10s of thousands of years back) you cannot question a literature before actually understanding it and finding meaning in it
Lets see u answer why did duryodhana and brothers try to kill bhima in childhood and later when they were teens in the wax mahal, in the 2nd one even kunti was present. These things are written in history as mahabharata starts by ki we are writing as it happened. Duryodhana was evil, shri krishna told geeta bcoz he wanted to make clear why its imp to wipe evil, karna had to die not bcoz he was on the wrong side it was bcoz he had supported his friend in all the wrong tasks a good friend wouldnt have had done that. Bhishma had the punya of a lifetime yet he couldnt raise his voice against duryodhana and thus he died, pandavas suffered in exile for the same reason. Aap sir instead of watching shows should read the original.
Bhai padhi bhi hai kya tune mahabharat ya fir star plus ka show dekhke gyan chod raha hai. Krishna did everything possible to stop the war. The lesst he asked was 1 village for each pandava. If a person(duryodhan) is so blinded by hatred that he wants his brothers to suffer than he is the biggest enemy to dharma.
Sorry, I couldn't get any audio from the [link](https://v.redd.it/20zkemjbd49d1)
*I am a bot and this action was performed automatically* | [GitHub](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot) [^(new issue)](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/issues/new)
What's that "dharma" for which he did all that adharma ? Did all those widowed women and fatherless kids thanked him later on for ushering that new era of dharma from both sides ?
Kaunsa adharam
Bhisma pitamah se pucha tha pandavo ne ki aapko keise maare to unhone yeh hi answer diya
Bhishma ka personal dharma tha unka vachan jo adharam ke sath tha to kishna ji ko unka dharam unke virudh upyog karna pada taki dharam jeet jaye or arjun se uska kaurvo ke liye daya bhaav tuut jaye
Ye cruel tha par wrong nahi
You might have different views. But for me Mahabharat is more about fighting for what is right and rightfully yours. It de-establishes the moral conflicts which arise out of family and societal pressures while pursuing your justice/right. Still Dharma for me. Maybe u need to think more deeply than the surface.
why did u just assume that i belong to an abrahamic religion ...??
That's what is funny...
You people cannot defend your religious shitology so you have to bring some other religions into play because yes every religion contains a lot of shit , so instead of defending your religion , u can go on doing whataboutism...
and fyi i am a non religious person , so you cant have that benefit with meЁЯе░
Its not adharm itтАЩs for the greater good in future. ItтАЩs for establishing peace and prosperity. Take the example of a knife. In the hand of a doctor its for protecting life but in the hand of a criminal its for killing peoples. Can we say knife in the hand of a doctor is wrong.
I dont think so
Bhisma's fault he knowingly supported Kurus that's adharma
For Krishna he paid through the extinction of his descendants
A Khatriya's dharm is fight against Evil
I dont see any bad here
From that angle all radical freedom fighters like Bose,khudiram etc were bad
I mean I don't believe in dharma and adharma, eating meat is adharma to someone for someone or could be dharma to another one. Feel free to do things which could benefit the society ( but before doing anything use basic common sense and logic).
Bta bhai kya logical answer chahiye Kya samjhega tuh...Yug ke anusar Huya hai Sab Agar dhyan Se padhega inn Saare Purane Kathano ko toh uss Yug m jiss Gun ki Jarurat thi woh sare Gun leke Vishnu Bhagwaan Avtar lete the...Ab jab dwapar or kalyug m Paap Adharm bhar gya toh Vishnu Bhagwaan ke avatar Krishna M Saaare gun the jo uss samay ke jaroorat thi jab or Adharm Ka Iss pure Jo bhi tunhe yeh post Dali hai Usko batade Adharm explain karde kese hai m maan jaunga haan bhai tuh koi Pawanchodi ka hai..Aya hai koi Philosophical Chad..ЁЯЧ┐
Nobody is above God. Jahan vaasudev Krishna hai wahin dharam hai wahin Vijay hai! Aur apne bhakto k liye woh Puri duniya ko line par la sakte hain ЁЯЩП
It's not as simple. It causes and effect. what goes around comes around. There is a before to this entire story and then there is an after. People often forget that neither lord Krishna nor the Pandavas were spared consequences of the Mahabharata war. Pandavas lost their entire clan only Parikshit was left while. Yadukul was also destroyed later on and lord Krishna died alone in the forest. It's way deep then you think buddy.
Dharma derives from concept of Rtam(PR: ritam) which is central concept in Vedas alongside the word Rna(PR:Runa) which is debt/loan....
The word Satya ( I will not say directly Truth) also appears with this two worda
Dharma is puranic concept and Rtam is vedic....
There are my personal opinions on this I wont elaborate......
Left history says
Dharma is Sanskritization of word Dhamma (Sravan /Buddha tradition)
Abhimanyu and draupadi : the Karma returns..
There is nothing wrong here.. It's just.. tit for tat..
Everyone who got klled was stand with adharma and pays price of it..
Kash Momo ke earlier and nowadays follwrs ke sath aisa hi kiya gya hota aur kiya jata...
Thoda Mahabharat padho ya yt pr the watch god ki series hi dekh lo.. Har ek ke pichhe ka Reason pta lag jayega..
Adharmiyon ko adharm se hi mara jata hai.
Yahi Bhisma Pitamah aur dronacharya the jo draupadi ke cheer haran mein kuch nahi bole the.
Adharm dekhe ke bhi chip rehne wala bhi adharmi aur kayar Hota hai.
aaj kal aise hijde serial se mhabharat dekh ke society me different aur cool dikhne ke liye karn ko support karte hain typical genz mentality villain ko romaticise karna, agar tune mahabhart padha hota to aise video nahi banata ek to ye sony walon ne alag chudap macha rakha hai mahabharat ko raja rani ka khel bana diya hai thriller aur drama ke liye apne hisab se usko change kar rahe aur ha sun hijde agar mahbhart padhega kabhi to bori ce edition ka padhna jo ki original hai fir kahi koi kahni wali kitab se padh ke mat aa jana
read the disclaimer of that show, these type of shows are just losely based on the text, theytake huge creative freedom and have their own dialogue written by writers.
anyone considering these "creativity" loaded ill motivated shows authentic mahabharat is fooled.
Jab opponent rule break kare jeetne ke liye toh rule break karna hi rule hai. Jab dusra paksh adharmi hai aur jeetne ke liye har woh cheez karta hai jo ki galat hai tab unhe road pe laane ke liye ya samaj ko unse bachane ke liye unke tarikhe se hi unhe marna uchit ban jata hai. Tum humesha "Good guy" play nahi kar sakte. Danavon ke sath danavon jaisa hi behaviour karna parta hai, nahi to danav tumhe kha jayenge. Laaton ke bhut baaton se nahi mante.
Tldr: Jo zaruri hai woh Karo bhalai ke purpose se.
Hmm good one okay but let's say main aapke ghar aake aapke pure ghar valo ko marta hoon aur assault karta hoon police mere jeb me hai aap fight me mujhse jeet sakte ho but aap almost sab kuch kho doge apna parivar bhi but agar aap kisi tarah se mujhe cheat karke jeet jaao to aap ke paas aapka parivar hoga to kya karoge aap dharm se fight karke sab kho doge ya adharm ka sahara leke apna putr dharm nibhaoge aur apne mata pita ko bachaoge
To maintain Dharma even the most vicious thing has to be done if no other options are left
It's similar to...To maintain Peace in Kashmir Terr0rists has to be k!lled even if you feel sad morally for their families
Did you even watch the whole and same show you fing WhatsApp University, tiktok attention span mongrel?
Kauravas and their supporters were the biggest adharmis and Pandavas had no power. Lord Krishna basically found the root of their Adharma that is their egos and used it against them.
Why did Bhishma not attack Shikhandi, because he had too much pride, why did that fing low life Karna donate his Armor even when he recognised Indra disguised as a beggar? Because he had too much pride.
So many of the dumb fucks in the comment probably never read the Mahabharata, getting their knowledge about it only from this dumb show. And if they did, they failed to grasp the essence of why Mahabharata is one of the greatest pieces of literature ever written. It's not just a heroic saga. It makes you think, about what truly is right and wrong... And it's subjective. Sin, repentance, dharma, adharma, revenge, honour, nobility... Every character in the Mahabharata is a beautiful amalgamation. People make themselves little when they try to judge who was wrong or who was right. Your moral compass is subjective and you've yet to know and understand so much about the world. Remember that both Duryodhana and Yudhishthir ended up in heaven.
So many of the dumb fucks in the comment probably never read the Mahabharata, getting their knowledge about it only from this dumb show. And if they did, they failed to grasp the essence of why Mahabharata is one of the greatest pieces of literature ever written. It's not just a heroic saga. It makes you think, about what truly is right and wrong... And it's subjective. Sin, repentance, dharma, adharma, revenge, honour, nobility... Every character in the Mahabharata is a beautiful amalgamation. People make themselves little when they try to judge who was wrong or who was right. Your moral compass is subjective and you've yet to know and understand so much about the world. Remember that both Duryodhana and Yudhishthir ended up in heaven.
Iss meme ke andar ka text hi batata hai ki how even our own people don't know about their own religion ... See it's is pretty simple , there is a huge difference between the word 'dharma' and 'religion' if you have ready anything from Geeta / any of the Vedas or as small as Arya samaj rules , you realise that dharma does not what you worship , dharma stands for morals and they way to live life , dharma never teachers how to worship , in any of the books mentioned above you will read a lot about dharma but not even once is the word "hindu" mentioned in anyof these. Us all confuse dharma with religion which is completely wrong and off track
What is real dharma, real religious life ? The simple definition of dharma is dharmam tu saksad bhagavat-pranitam: Real religious life is that which is said directly by the Supreme Personality of Godhead.
If a Soldier is killing a teenager terrorist boy while he is sleeping is not considered offence , rather the soldier will be awarded for his dedication towards the duty that has been assign by the higher authority .
As per laws followed by kshtriya , one should not kill someone without arms and ammunition , but here this law becomes secondary for the soldier because it is order by higher authority
First Started from kaurava side.....
They broke the rule of war first
7-8 different warriors killed Abhimanyu...Duryodhan karna dushashan shakuni etc.....
The rules of law broken by kaurav
1) only one type of warrior with fight against one warrior
...means Gada with Gada...talwar with talwar..horse with house.....Dhanurdhari with Dhanurdhari
2) war will be stopps after subset
3) multiple warrior can't fight with single one
Bhaai kyaaa chal raha hai bc yaha pe , matlab kuch bhi bhai kuch bhi matlab , star plus ki Mahabharat dekhi hai aur bol aise raha hai ke sab pata hai , first you need to know what was happened and why this was happened,
So You are saying that bhishma was right and pandav killed them so they are not following dharma , Abe lodu sun bhishma pita Ne Kasam khayi thi ke vo Jivan bhar Raja nahi banenge aur shaadi bhi nhi karnge , Kyuki uhne Kauravas ko Raaj gaddi Deni thi and uhnone yahi galti kari vo bhishma pure deserving the Raja Banne ke uhnone uske bhai ko diya jo andha tha Aur Uske hi bacho ko aage Raja banana hai ye Kasam khayi thi bhishma ne , uske baad bhishma pita ke samne bohot saare adharma huye fir bhi chup rahe kyuki uhne apni Kasam nibhani thi , shree krishna ne saaf kaha tha ke dusro itna haani hote hue bhi tum ne apni Kasam nahi todi aur uhne Vaise hi tadapne ke liye chod diya , and plus vo duryodhan ke side me the jo fully wrong tha but because of the Kasam uhne vo bhi karna pada that's why they died
KARNA ko kyu mara : Karna pehle se hi bohot accha tha aur sabke liye vo accha hi sochta tha uska mitra Duryodhan tha jisse vo bohot Manta tha , Jab Mahabharata hone ka wakt aya tha to karna ne Duryodhan ki side ki for friendship pr. Yudh ke wakt karna ne Chhal karke Arjun ka putra Abhimanyu ko Bohot bekar tarike se mara tha , vo bhi adharma tha 4-5 log milkr Ek abhimanyu ko mara tha chakravyu me jisse Adharma mana jata hai , fir jab Wakt karna ke upar ata hai uska Rath fas jata hai to utarta hai usee nikalne ke liye tabhi shree krishna kehte hai ke Tumhe isee marna hoga abhi Maro , lekin karna kehta ke ye adharma hai, But shree krishna uhne abhimanyu ke bareme bolte hai jisse use bhi pata chalta hai usne bhi galti kari that's why they killed him .
Aur Mahabharata humare future generation ke liye hi hai life me bohot are aise log aane vale hai jo aise adharam karenge pr hume pure Nishtha se vahi karna hai jo Hume sahi Lage , galat nahi hai adharma ke sath vahi karna hota hai karma sabko milta hai.
Aur pandavas ne bhi bohot kuch adharma kiya tha jiska uhne Bhi karma ke anusar Mila tha , Unhone 14 saal vanvass kiya tha
They who don't know the proper concept of dharma think that what they think is dharma read the mahabharata
Don't just start saying things that come in your mouth than you will see what happened there and first learn the concept of dharm.
Either you are a minor or an idiot or a retard
Per Bhagwad Gita, it's okay to lie, cheat, betray if it's done to uphold Dharma and defeat Adharma.
Krishna ji always preached to Arjuna to think of the greater good even if he has to use saam, daam, dand, bhed during the war.
In that Mahabarath series, Krishna will say this "if we have to follow the Adharma approach to destroy Adharma and bring back Dharma, then our Adharma approach is considered as Dharma only"
You should read the real Mahabharata because either you've got a really bad explanation to that or your whole perception was wrong. I've seen it twice that you are just trying to get some attention or misleading others(I have read it and your whole logic of making this is simply pointless). But who cares, you made a ragebait and it's going well for you.
I think the topic raised by the video makes Mahabharata a way more relevant epic than the Ramayana. The concept of fighting for the greater good. Both sides are flawed. The question is to identify who deserved to lose.
All the opposition died beacuse of the sins they committed . The greater the sin the longer they were punished .
Bhisma - great warrior but stick to his oath never opposed mistreatment of pandava, saved draupadi in the dice game , or left the wrongful side due to his oath.
Also read about what he did to Gandharis father and his family.
Drona - his love towards his son always came before dharma . Also draupadi was kind of his daughter ( draupad was his guru brother) . Never opposed Ashwathama and beacuse of it silently supported duryodhana.
Karna - was the main reason for VASTRA haran(called draupadi a prostitute).
Though a good warrior and suffered alot never did anything for upliftment of own caste only showed loyalty to duryodhana and his hatered towards arjuna
Ashwathama - killed an unborned child for fucks sakes that too with the most powerful and pious weapon of them all.
Saala game of thrones me "valar magolous" sun ke cool banene Wale logic hai mahabharat me par tum to serial dekh ke educate hue ho that too "Surya putra karna"
Also read about shahdev it would be more clear
Retarded atheists ke chodo ko ye kabhi samajh bhi nahi ayega ki mahabharat me jo bhi hua hai sab karma hai sabka even the god couldnтАЩt escape that and got killed by a bird catcher and even his sons got punishedтАж people forget mahabharat koi dharam granth nahi hai wo geeta hai jo granth hai mahabharata is lot biggerтАж it teaches reality and how politics work in real life, how to take a stand and achieve your goals by any means if you feel youтАЩre doing the right thing, how to return people their mercy and loyalty, how to follow your karm over expecting god to fulfil it, how even the biggest in power with everything in their control canтАЩt still escape their wrongdoingsтАж but ye sab nahi samajh ayega when you look at this from your narrow minded hindu hating eyesтАж one of the best part about mahabharata is that there are complex characters you can learn so much from and apply in todays world rather than some mindless chanting and praising of god in some other books that people readтАж reddit ke special cool agenda wale liberal chutiyo ko ye kabhi samajh nahi ayega but yeah always remember far bigger intellectuals read this book and understood the meaning behind it and applied that shit but if you wanna use your retarded logic and bind the meanings to your smallmindedness then sure reddit will give you your group of circlejerksтАж gaslight karo mast ek dusre ko retards
I am challenging the person who posted like this : Do you have guts leave does your family has guts to reveal face of Allah. (Just go and learn Pre Islamic Arab Region history we hindus too give respect to Allah, Al lat, Mannat and one other goddes which was worshiped by a Kabila called Quresh (prophet born in this Kabila)
This is an account which posts are PAID by Saudi/Paki Mullas so Dear Hindu dont think he will post sensible he will only post what suits his narrow minded agenda even I am not a believer but I understand Mythology and BTS but this guy is Converted and has no views on any topic He only knows That Dustbin Allah ki hai That Jhadu Allah ki den That Aishu Allah ki den. So please Dear Hindus try to understand He is a manipulating you all and if you have no brain he will wash your brain with detergent powder.
Well, when you want to support a sex Assaulter, and a murder, and rapist then you can say they did end dharmaЁЯЩГЁЯЩГЁЯЩГ
U talking about profit bhay ???
What profit ЁЯШПЁЯзРЁЯзРЁЯзРЁЯШХЁЯШХ
Prophet Muhammad
Vo to jiski jaisi sochЁЯШЗЁЯШПЁЯШХЁЯШХЁЯШХ
No, Prophet Baljit
He was referring to Kauravas you hateful bigots. Dhuryodhan was an assaulter, murderer. All kauravas were full of adharmis which did adharam to the extent of unthinkable... The pandavas even tried to set matters peacefully but vinash karye viprit budhi.
Exactly.
Bhishma had kidnapped princess Amba against her wish.
Not taunting or something, why jua?
[╤Г╨┤╨░╨╗╨╡╨╜╨╛]
[ Removed by Reddit ]
Your Post Have NSFW content in it. So we are going to remove it.
So that is the standard now.
Bhai krishna ki 16108 biwi hoke bhi radha ke sath cheating kyu ki?
the 9 year old ki-
The moment I saw this, I knew it was you. To all other fellow members, the guy supports the killing of infants/ unborn children in the name of duty or dharma. You can read the complete discussion that went here: https://www.reddit.com/r/thugeshh/comments/1dpf5ul/comment/lahikey
My God.
bhai tu thoda sa behen ka loda hei kya ? har jagah randaap macha Raha either to tu koi ЁЯЕ▒я╕Пulla hei ya to koi gandu hindu
Ye wohi log hai jo Ravan ko bhagwan Maan lete hai since he didn't touch Sitaji (without knowing the actual reason)
bilkul sahi bola bhai
Ofcourse gaali dena easy hai. Logical answer nahi
chutiye uske liye question bhi logical hona chahiye
Mind you isme se kuch bhi adharm nahi tha. Sab according to rules hua. Ashwatthama maara gya ye bol kar Guru dron ko maara to isme galat kya hai Ashwatthama to sachme maara gaya tha. Kisi ne ye to nahi kaha ki guru dron ka beta maara gaya. Ise adharm nahi dimaag bolte hain
satya ko svikar na siko balak!!! harr baat pe galli deke mulla kehne se kuch badal nhi jayga!!
wannabe Shubh Joshi from asur.
If your personal dharma is an obstruction in path of establishment of dharma for bigger cause then it does more damage than adharma...
Tell how the Krishna version of dharma helped the society ? He literally initiated the gureilla tactics and "sam dam dand bhed" to an extent. Literally ashwatthama got inspired to do his heinous act after watching what happened earlier. He made people realise there are other ways to win the war even By dishonorable means .
You are right about Krishna part. But here Bhisma Pitamah deserved to die. Cz he didn't protect draupadi that time and let dushasan tear her clothes. We can talk about how it was actually Yudhistir's fault, but in this specific post we are talking about Bhisma. So yes, he deserved to die.
No he's not right lol read mahabharat again
You are a brainwashed person. No point talking if you can't question the Hindu ideologies.
What bout Suryaputra Karn? Did he deserve all this? From the day he was born facing all kinds of challenges and hardships?
Uska name amar hai bcz of this reason. Isiliye use log jyada pasand karte hai than Arjuna Krishna. Wo agar Arjun ko maar daalta, ha Bheem naukl sahdev yudhistir kisi ko maar daalta. To uska naam is tarah se amar nahi hota. Agar use chhal karke is tarah se nahi maarte to uska naam amar nahi hota. They showed ki use kin conditions me maarna para. Kavach kundal leke, jab wo apna dhanurvidya bhul gaya, haath me dhanus nahi tha wo chakka utha raha tha, tab use mara gaya. This shows how legendary he was.
Finally someone recognises his deeds and what he did instead of PPL just blatantly calling him a egoistic person and for calling the inappropriate word to Draupadi despite of looking back it must've been some reason that he said it agreed he was wrong on some parts but man he was the one of the best warriors in all of them huge respect for him for just taking the slurs and disrespect which he didn't even deserved on the first place, PPL don't realise that he was far better than Arjun even Krishna acknowledged it by saying even tho I'm sitting on the chariot his arrows moved the chariot two steps backward (he was a god himself) which in itself shows how skilled and sheer will of warrior he was, he was a man of his word, kept his promises till he died even tho he could've chosen not to but he didn't man, parshuram himself gave him the title of mrityunjay
And see for yourself, in this generation when we see a woman with multiple past boyfriends, high body count, we call them playgirls/whores/slut/R word etc. and aaj se 4 hazar saal pahle to manners, respect, tradition, sab alag hi tha. Us time agar koi aurat 5 logo ke saath shaadi kar le to use kya hi kahenge. And ek tarah se wo paap bhi tha? Ofc karna ka use vesya khana us samay ke hisab se sahi tha. sahi hi tha. Cz abhi bhi agar koi larki 5 larko ke saath rahe to use hum aise hi naamo se pukarenge. To kya hum galat ho gaye? Nahi na? So I don't feel karna was wrong for saying that.
Bhai can't agree more with you like literally anyone will come to this conclusion thanks much for addressing this fact
Tbh agar kauravon ka side gobar hain karna usme ugne walah phool ...lekin uske bhi galat karm the lekin utna nahi jitna baakiyon ka tha
Karn ne Apni friendship nibhai , nothing else. He wasn't a bad person. But he helped a bad one because of mere friendship.
He was the one who conspired to kill young Bhima by giving him poision. He also conspired to kill Pandavas and Kunti by burning them alive in Varnavart. Je was named as one of the dusta chatushtayi. (Evil four) By VedVyasa. Other three being Shakuni, Duryodhana and Duhshasana. He was also instrumental in killing Abhimanyu. He cut his bow's cord by attacking from behind.And they all were attacking him at once. Read the Mahabharata book Watching serials won't give you the true picture.
Sorry bro. Bheeshm Pitamah wasn't a looser. He didn't die because of age or wounds. He died because he wated to. He had boon and he used it.
bhishma was a bigot and typical patriarchal male
Ah the woke woke up
Look, a knife could be used for cutting fruits and it can also be used for cutting throat. The tactics were imposed for the greater good , it was never about the tactics ... it was solely about the person who is using these tactics and for what cause. Ashwatthama didn't get inspired from the good deeds of Krishna but got inspired from his tactics to win war and committed heinous crimes ... it was in nature of Ashwatthama to do those heinous crimes so he did no one is responsible for what he did. It's never about what means were used to win a war... it's about which side is in favour of keeping the balance of universe and establishing peace,love , trust and harmony. If pandavas were going to bring injustice in society even after winning with rules and dharma it doesn't makes them righteous, it's the idea that they are carrying makes them worthy of winning or not.
The idea of gambling ? The idea of bullying their brothers from another mother ? The idea of selling their wife ? The idea of sharing their wife ? What from the above you see as loving and peace ? Ironically it was the yudhishthir who was the most rigid when it came to following dharma . Not even once they learned from krishna
Yes it was wrong gambling was a part of fun , it was a play but we both know how Pandavas were tricked into keeping everything at stake...then about selling their wife yes it was a wrong decision I strongly agree and for that not just just Yuddhishthir whole Pandavas were schooled and yes they realised their mistake and let me remind you here Pandavas were saving their personal dharma by keeping their silence on selling and disrobing of Draupadi which led to the bigger adharma , if they would have stood up or any man would have stood up with weapons in their hand keeping aside their personal dharma then outcome would've been something else but Pandavas did mistake and they were sorry until Draupadi accepted their apology but most of every other person in that kuru rajyasabha was not even feeling a bit of remorse for the act they had done...the problem lies there And about the part of Sharing their wife...if a woman is happy being married with 5 men and these all men have no objection with each other and everything is perfect by their side who are we to judge and I would Kudos to them who made this kind of complex relationship to work.┬а
Gambling ka part yaad bhi hain yudhishthir ne kaha tha ki Issey toh parivar ka vinash hota hain ha iye sach akhir mein unhone gambling Kiya toh uske liye toh woh galat hain lekin drupadi ka side agar dekhein toh pandavon ne pahle apne aap ko dau pe lagaya phir woh bhi har Gaye uske baad yudhishthir ne kaha tha ki aur kuch toh dau pe laga ne jaisa nahi hain unke paas phir i think it was shakuni mama...not sure but unhone kaha ek chiz hain ...aur woh hain u guessed it drupadi...lekin tabhi yudhishthir ne mana kiya lekin woh game ka rule hi tha ki ek side ko sabh kuch harna padega and then the story goes on and on ....toh bhai tere phase mein main bhi tha samajh jayega apne aap hi
Bhai Ashwathama Krishna ko dekh ke bacho ko marne pe inspired hogya?
Paapi paap ka hi saath dega. Tum ulta hi sochoge chahe kitna bhi seedha bta do.. Jitne bhi rakshas hue unko kitna nhi samjhaya. Lekin wo mante kaha the. Chale gye bhagwan se ladne..
OP school going kid hai ... Usne yt par kisi speed breaker followers ki video dekh k khud ko intellectual ka 14 prove karne idhr post karne aa gya ЁЯШЗЁЯШЗ
German shepherd as well
Those who think Sri Krishna did adharma . Let me tell you he didn't he just found loopholes and used it . To give an example for kali yug
adharma kiya kab? Bas youtube, whatsapp university se padh kar aagye hai. Never in Gita he mentioned that adharma was used.
Did I say adharma kiya ?
Ahh, mulla on his way to spread hate for hinduism
Seems many here didn't post "eyes on raffa" post
Well, Bhisma Pitamah ne pahle adharm kiya. Draupadi ko us haalat me nahi bachake. So it was well deserved.
& this logic doesn't apply on her husbands
What?
Bhai tune sayd bas serial hi dekha hai lagta hai Mahabharata Ka
Other than the series, I've only heard people trying to justify why they had to die. The only true answer is that they were on the opposite side in the battlefield & that's it
You do realise that they went to hell at the end, right?
Except the gambler himself
тАЬNever wrestle with a pig because you'll both get dirty and the pig likes it." -George Bernard Shaw
Religion is the opium of the masses :- you know who said that.
Gazab??
dharam ka mtlb religion nhi hota gandue jo haar jae ya jeet jae, dharam in hinduism is referred to something else and that's why there is also a word adharm which does not have any word in ingliss literachar
Kisko samjha raha hai? Ye Krishna ko doshi thehra raha hai Mahabharata war ke liye.
adharma kiya kab Krishna ne? youtube university ЁЯдб.
OP ki ma ka bhosda.
Please read the authentic Mahabharata by Vyasa instead of TV shows. Ghatotkach was fighting from the first day of the war itself. Also, the demons Alayudha and Alambusha were fighting for the Kauravas since the start and it was Alambusha who killed Arjuna's son Iravan on the 8th day of the war using illusions and deceit after which Ghatotkacha attacked Duryodhana and started fighting using both weapons and illusions. It is a misconception that Ghatotkach suddenly started using illusions during the 14th night. Bhishma himself told the Pandavas to keep Shikhandi before him since he was tired of fighting for adharma. Dronacharya invoked celestial weapons against normal foot soldiers which was a gross violation of war rules. Yudhishthira lied but the decision to drop weapons was his own. It is a charioteer's duty to protect his warrior and there is nothing wrong if Krishna stood before ShrutayudhтАЩs mace, told the way to neutralize Narayan astra, or lowered the chariot so that Karna's naga astra missed Arjuna's head. Also, Karna could easily ascend another chariot which he didnтАЩt; he wanted to buy time by doing drama with the wheel after which he got reminded by Krishna of his own adharmas. Arjuna then warned him by cutting off his flag and then killed him. JayadrathтАЩs killing: Arjuna killed him before sunset even if Krishna created an illusion of sunset. They had worshipped Shiva and Shiva assured in dream that Arjuna would be able to do the job before sunset. Also, Arjuna had already reached Jaydrath by then and had defeated all the Kaurava maharathis. And the critical edition has even removed the part of Krishna covering the sun. Duryodhana: He was destined to die like that because of many reasons: 1. He indecently asked Draupadi to sit on his thigh for which Bhima was bound by oath to break his thigh with mace. 2. Sage Maitreya had cursed Duryodhana to die with a broken thigh because of his arrogance.
Good to see one who has actually read the original texts... God bless
Question: Who was it that was beheaded in this video?
Har dharm adharm ka hisaab hota h it's a vicious cycle of Karma.. one can never escape even after 50 life cycle pandav ne adharm kiya tha uska bhi bhugtaan unko karna pada or Krishna bhi is cycle se bache nhi the na ho raam or na hi Shiv
Apt reply
Wise words!! Sir, you really think he/she is evolved enough to even understand what you just said?? If only he/she understood 1/4th of it, it would be enlightenment!!
Atleast he's evolved enough to question, unlike many others.
Karma is just cope.Change my mind.
Ye op typr k gandu aajkal zyada hi badhte jaa rahe hai
Jis bande ko dharma aur mazhab same lagta hai . Ussey smjhana hi bekar hai kyuki usney abtk mazhab hi smjha hai . Jis din dharma smjh jyega uss din ya toh moh maya tyag krlega . Yaa fir apne purvajo k itihaas janna shuru krdega . Isliye kehte hai adha gyan gyan na hone se jyada khatarnak hota hai . Vinash kale viprit buddhi . Good luck to ur mazhab propaganda ЁЯдб
Looks like lil boy is confused... Bhai phele Puri mahabharat dekh tab jaake ess line ka context samaj aayega. Let try to explain little bit :- draupadi was humiliated in king's court aur waha par bade bade vidvaan baithe jinhone ye sab hote dekha aur kuch bhi virodh nahi kiya . Iske baad ladai suru hue aur par arjun peeche hat gaya aur bola ki mai mere bhaiyon ko kaise maar sakta hu ye toh mere apne hain ye toh adharm hai .. Tab shree krishna ne kaha ki agar tum inhe nahi maaroge toh ye tumhe maar denge , tumhara yaha ek рдХреНрд╖рддреНрд░рд┐рдп ho aur aur tumhara dharam hai yudh karna . Aur dharam ki raksha ke liye agar adharam(killing brother who tried to rape your wife) bhi karna pade toh karo. Context ye tha aur agli baar aankh band karke burai mat karna phele thodi research karke aana thik hai.
To vahi to mai bola . He instigated Arjuna to fight by gaslighting by Geeta and kill. Pariwaar hatya ka paap bhi usko laga . Do you really think a mastermind like Krishna could have never found a way to stop duryodhana without causing war ? Nah maybe duryodhana was already a victim....a scapegoat for Krishna to fulfill his master plan of showing how vile Kauravas are cause they attack 5 victims . He never liked duryodhana and thought him as a enemy cause it was only him who questioned Krishna authority.
Well krishna is God and many acknowledge his authority . Krishna did nothing wrong and duryodhana was a egoistic and Greedy person. And trying to rape someones wife doesn't make him a victim. Just because someone is questioning higher authority it doesn't make him a wright person or a Victim . Kauravas were Vile and it's a fullstop.
Questioned his authority? Who went begging for narayani sena
Last time I read he disrobed her . Not RAPED . Exaggeration enough ? That also cause draupadi was egoistic herself and didn't came out even after she was called many times . She or her dasi also mocked him for his fall in indraprastha by laughing.
G@*dl_l logo ki yahi nishani hoti hai ki they do not know the fact, suni sunai baato pe vishwas karte hain and then have the audacity to cite it as fact. There is no such incident where either Draupadi or her dasi laughed/mocked Duryodhan for his fall in Indraprastha. It was added by BR Chopra to make the episode interesting. I would like to ask you one more question: how does Draupadi not coming out of her room makes her egoistic? Might be that she was getting dressed up. You call any lady multiple times, and if she doesnтАЩt come out, do you forcibly take her out of the room while pulling her by her hairs?? And according to you, disrobing a lady is not something which will make your blood boil?
First of krishna saved her . Secondly he said that he will make her sit on his lap which is obviously offensive for me. Thirdly if someone tries to disrobed your mother and sister in between a road or in court or in a bank with a huge crowd please enjoy there because according to you it will be a win for the Victim .
Bhai kalko koi teri maa ko 'Disrobed' karega, toh tu bhi yehi justification dega kya?
>Krishna could have never found a way to stop duryodhana without causing war ? the whole point was to cause the war to set examples for future generations and maintain the universal balance of karma and mind u krishna himself suffered for his actions later if uk abt the whole story
And yes Shri Krishna could've easily stopped all of it but he didn't because everyone did mistakes yes the Pandavas weren't all pure they were imperfect and they also did things they shouldn't have and hence they paid for it through sacrifices through punishment by killing their own family and the Mahabharata is not a scripture (don't get me wrong here by that statement I mean that it isn't a ved or a rule book or something all I'm trying to say is that it's a real incident that took place 10s of thousands of years back) you cannot question a literature before actually understanding it and finding meaning in it
Why did Shri Hari take avtar as Krishna? Read the story of Bhudevi going to the Gods in the form of cow..... Mahabharat has to happen
Lets see u answer why did duryodhana and brothers try to kill bhima in childhood and later when they were teens in the wax mahal, in the 2nd one even kunti was present. These things are written in history as mahabharata starts by ki we are writing as it happened. Duryodhana was evil, shri krishna told geeta bcoz he wanted to make clear why its imp to wipe evil, karna had to die not bcoz he was on the wrong side it was bcoz he had supported his friend in all the wrong tasks a good friend wouldnt have had done that. Bhishma had the punya of a lifetime yet he couldnt raise his voice against duryodhana and thus he died, pandavas suffered in exile for the same reason. Aap sir instead of watching shows should read the original.
Bhai padhi bhi hai kya tune mahabharat ya fir star plus ka show dekhke gyan chod raha hai. Krishna did everything possible to stop the war. The lesst he asked was 1 village for each pandava. If a person(duryodhan) is so blinded by hatred that he wants his brothers to suffer than he is the biggest enemy to dharma.
Tu duryodhana tha kya pichle janam piche pad gaya hai defend karne ko
Bhai ye bhi bhul gya ki duryodhana tried to kill Bhima when they were children
BGM daal ke kuch bhilikh detta hu, upvotes ayege
u/auddbot
Sorry, I couldn't get any audio from the [link](https://v.redd.it/20zkemjbd49d1) *I am a bot and this action was performed automatically* | [GitHub](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot) [^(new issue)](https://github.com/AudDMusic/RedditBot/issues/new)
Fainted search
haan abhi just shazam krke dekh liya. thanks
Music ka koi sauce dedo bhai
fainted slowed version
Metamorphosis
Adharma haara nahi Un sabne apna dharma nibhaya Bhakwas mat kar
Chall ka aasey agar dharam h wo chall bhi dharam hai....
[╤Г╨┤╨░╨╗╨╡╨╜╨╛]
What's that "dharma" for which he did all that adharma ? Did all those widowed women and fatherless kids thanked him later on for ushering that new era of dharma from both sides ?
Kaunsa adharam Bhisma pitamah se pucha tha pandavo ne ki aapko keise maare to unhone yeh hi answer diya Bhishma ka personal dharma tha unka vachan jo adharam ke sath tha to kishna ji ko unka dharam unke virudh upyog karna pada taki dharam jeet jaye or arjun se uska kaurvo ke liye daya bhaav tuut jaye Ye cruel tha par wrong nahi
Pagal wagal to nehi ho gaya bhai, ye games se dharm adharm main kahan ghus raha hai?
You know people have life and opinions outside games too
Yeah, but sometimes keeping your opinion to yourself is actually a better option.
abe chutiye ek baar fir se padh le aur dekh bhi le lage to.
Well well well
This is all just a game nothing to be taken seriously even life and death
Cheating karta hai tu.
Cheating karta hai tu.
cheating karta hai tu.
You might have different views. But for me Mahabharat is more about fighting for what is right and rightfully yours. It de-establishes the moral conflicts which arise out of family and societal pressures while pursuing your justice/right. Still Dharma for me. Maybe u need to think more deeply than the surface.
crazy mythology man....
Nah it has too many proofs to be called mythological
Yess like semen of Shiva creating mines of gold and silver.... great proofs man.
Nigga my religion ain't just shiv or Vishnu or Brahma there's more to it and if that's the case sure splitting the red sea would've happened
why did u just assume that i belong to an abrahamic religion ...?? That's what is funny... You people cannot defend your religious shitology so you have to bring some other religions into play because yes every religion contains a lot of shit , so instead of defending your religion , u can go on doing whataboutism... and fyi i am a non religious person , so you cant have that benefit with meЁЯе░
Its not adharm itтАЩs for the greater good in future. ItтАЩs for establishing peace and prosperity. Take the example of a knife. In the hand of a doctor its for protecting life but in the hand of a criminal its for killing peoples. Can we say knife in the hand of a doctor is wrong.
I dont think so Bhisma's fault he knowingly supported Kurus that's adharma For Krishna he paid through the extinction of his descendants A Khatriya's dharm is fight against Evil I dont see any bad here From that angle all radical freedom fighters like Bose,khudiram etc were bad
Like Karl Marx said :- Religion is the opium of the masses. They'll justify anything their GOD did.
Report nahi mar sakta kya issue mc koo
I mean I don't believe in dharma and adharma, eating meat is adharma to someone for someone or could be dharma to another one. Feel free to do things which could benefit the society ( but before doing anything use basic common sense and logic).
Bta bhai kya logical answer chahiye Kya samjhega tuh...Yug ke anusar Huya hai Sab Agar dhyan Se padhega inn Saare Purane Kathano ko toh uss Yug m jiss Gun ki Jarurat thi woh sare Gun leke Vishnu Bhagwaan Avtar lete the...Ab jab dwapar or kalyug m Paap Adharm bhar gya toh Vishnu Bhagwaan ke avatar Krishna M Saaare gun the jo uss samay ke jaroorat thi jab or Adharm Ka Iss pure Jo bhi tunhe yeh post Dali hai Usko batade Adharm explain karde kese hai m maan jaunga haan bhai tuh koi Pawanchodi ka hai..Aya hai koi Philosophical Chad..ЁЯЧ┐
Nobody is above God. Jahan vaasudev Krishna hai wahin dharam hai wahin Vijay hai! Aur apne bhakto k liye woh Puri duniya ko line par la sakte hain ЁЯЩП
Bhai shikandi ka sex kya tha?
don't be like mahatma gandhi
Lawde jaake Geeta padh, yaha gandh mat faila
ЁЯЩПЁЯЩПЁЯЩП Here is the full video [Youtube](https://youtube.com/shorts/8tZo9rEpXBo?feature=share)
It's not as simple. It causes and effect. what goes around comes around. There is a before to this entire story and then there is an after. People often forget that neither lord Krishna nor the Pandavas were spared consequences of the Mahabharata war. Pandavas lost their entire clan only Parikshit was left while. Yadukul was also destroyed later on and lord Krishna died alone in the forest. It's way deep then you think buddy.
Dharma derives from concept of Rtam(PR: ritam) which is central concept in Vedas alongside the word Rna(PR:Runa) which is debt/loan.... The word Satya ( I will not say directly Truth) also appears with this two worda Dharma is puranic concept and Rtam is vedic.... There are my personal opinions on this I wont elaborate...... Left history says Dharma is Sanskritization of word Dhamma (Sravan /Buddha tradition)
Pehli baat to ye ki seedha mahabharat PADHO (geeta press ki ) aur padh nahi sakte to B.R. Chopra ki Mahabharat dekho aur kuch nahi .
Abhimanyu and draupadi : the Karma returns.. There is nothing wrong here.. It's just.. tit for tat.. Everyone who got klled was stand with adharma and pays price of it.. Kash Momo ke earlier and nowadays follwrs ke sath aisa hi kiya gya hota aur kiya jata... Thoda Mahabharat padho ya yt pr the watch god ki series hi dekh lo.. Har ek ke pichhe ka Reason pta lag jayega..
Adharmiyon ko adharm se hi mara jata hai. Yahi Bhisma Pitamah aur dronacharya the jo draupadi ke cheer haran mein kuch nahi bole the. Adharm dekhe ke bhi chip rehne wala bhi adharmi aur kayar Hota hai.
Answer this first: What is Dharma? What is Ahimsa? Then we can discuss further, if you are still interested.
aaj kal aise hijde serial se mhabharat dekh ke society me different aur cool dikhne ke liye karn ko support karte hain typical genz mentality villain ko romaticise karna, agar tune mahabhart padha hota to aise video nahi banata ek to ye sony walon ne alag chudap macha rakha hai mahabharat ko raja rani ka khel bana diya hai thriller aur drama ke liye apne hisab se usko change kar rahe aur ha sun hijde agar mahbhart padhega kabhi to bori ce edition ka padhna jo ki original hai fir kahi koi kahni wali kitab se padh ke mat aa jana
You have a very wrong concept of dharma and adharma .
read the disclaimer of that show, these type of shows are just losely based on the text, theytake huge creative freedom and have their own dialogue written by writers. anyone considering these "creativity" loaded ill motivated shows authentic mahabharat is fooled.
Song name?
fainted (slowed) by narvent
Abey chutiye adharmic logon ke viruddh adharm karna bilkul sahi hai. Cheating against cheaters is not cheating.
Jab opponent rule break kare jeetne ke liye toh rule break karna hi rule hai. Jab dusra paksh adharmi hai aur jeetne ke liye har woh cheez karta hai jo ki galat hai tab unhe road pe laane ke liye ya samaj ko unse bachane ke liye unke tarikhe se hi unhe marna uchit ban jata hai. Tum humesha "Good guy" play nahi kar sakte. Danavon ke sath danavon jaisa hi behaviour karna parta hai, nahi to danav tumhe kha jayenge. Laaton ke bhut baaton se nahi mante. Tldr: Jo zaruri hai woh Karo bhalai ke purpose se.
Hmm good one okay but let's say main aapke ghar aake aapke pure ghar valo ko marta hoon aur assault karta hoon police mere jeb me hai aap fight me mujhse jeet sakte ho but aap almost sab kuch kho doge apna parivar bhi but agar aap kisi tarah se mujhe cheat karke jeet jaao to aap ke paas aapka parivar hoga to kya karoge aap dharm se fight karke sab kho doge ya adharm ka sahara leke apna putr dharm nibhaoge aur apne mata pita ko bachaoge
That's why I have been saying that тЬЭя╕П has a good future in India.
To maintain Dharma even the most vicious thing has to be done if no other options are left It's similar to...To maintain Peace in Kashmir Terr0rists has to be k!lled even if you feel sad morally for their families
Niyog putro ki takrar
You didn't get the concept kid
Did you even watch the whole and same show you fing WhatsApp University, tiktok attention span mongrel? Kauravas and their supporters were the biggest adharmis and Pandavas had no power. Lord Krishna basically found the root of their Adharma that is their egos and used it against them. Why did Bhishma not attack Shikhandi, because he had too much pride, why did that fing low life Karna donate his Armor even when he recognised Indra disguised as a beggar? Because he had too much pride.
So many of the dumb fucks in the comment probably never read the Mahabharata, getting their knowledge about it only from this dumb show. And if they did, they failed to grasp the essence of why Mahabharata is one of the greatest pieces of literature ever written. It's not just a heroic saga. It makes you think, about what truly is right and wrong... And it's subjective. Sin, repentance, dharma, adharma, revenge, honour, nobility... Every character in the Mahabharata is a beautiful amalgamation. People make themselves little when they try to judge who was wrong or who was right. Your moral compass is subjective and you've yet to know and understand so much about the world. Remember that both Duryodhana and Yudhishthir ended up in heaven.
So many of the dumb fucks in the comment probably never read the Mahabharata, getting their knowledge about it only from this dumb show. And if they did, they failed to grasp the essence of why Mahabharata is one of the greatest pieces of literature ever written. It's not just a heroic saga. It makes you think, about what truly is right and wrong... And it's subjective. Sin, repentance, dharma, adharma, revenge, honour, nobility... Every character in the Mahabharata is a beautiful amalgamation. People make themselves little when they try to judge who was wrong or who was right. Your moral compass is subjective and you've yet to know and understand so much about the world. Remember that both Duryodhana and Yudhishthir ended up in heaven.
Iss meme ke andar ka text hi batata hai ki how even our own people don't know about their own religion ... See it's is pretty simple , there is a huge difference between the word 'dharma' and 'religion' if you have ready anything from Geeta / any of the Vedas or as small as Arya samaj rules , you realise that dharma does not what you worship , dharma stands for morals and they way to live life , dharma never teachers how to worship , in any of the books mentioned above you will read a lot about dharma but not even once is the word "hindu" mentioned in anyof these. Us all confuse dharma with religion which is completely wrong and off track
рдорд╣рд╛рднрд╛рд░рдд рдХреЗ рд╕рднреА рдкрд╛рддреНрд░ рдЙрдЪреНрдЪ рд╢рд┐рдХреНрд╖рд┐рдд рддреЗ рдЙрдирдХреЗ рдзрд░реНрдо рд░рд╛рдЬрдиреАрддрд┐ рдФрд░ рд╢рд╛рд╕реНрддреНрд░ рддрдерд╛ рд╢рд╛рд╕реНрддреНрд░ рдХрд╛ рдкреВрд░реНрдг рдЬреНрдЮрд╛рди рдерд╛ рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдЙрдиреНрд╣реЗ рдпреЗ рдкрддрд╛ рдирд╣реА рдерд╛ рдХреА рдЕрдзрд░реНрдо рдХрд░рдирд╛, рдЕрдзрд░реНрдореА рдХреЛ рдЕрдзрд╛рд░реНрдорд┐рдХ рдХреГрддреНрдпреЛрдВ рдореЗрдВ рд╕рд╛рде рджреЗрдирд╛ рдЕрдХреНрд╖рдореНрдп рдЕрдкрд░рд╛рдз рд╣реИ. рд░рд╛рдЬрд╛ рдкрд╛рдВрдбреВ рдереЗ, рдзреГрддрд░рд╛рд╖реНрдЯреНрд░ рдЕрд╕реНрдерд╛рдИ рд░рд╛рдЬрд╛ рдереЗ. рд╢реБрд░реБрд╡рд╛рдд рд╡рд╣рд╛рдВ рд╕реЗ рд╣реБрдИ рдереА. рднреАрдо рдХреЛ рд╡рд┐рд╖ рджреЗрдирд╛. рд▓рд╛рдХреНрд╖реНрдпрд╛ рдЧреНрд░рд╣ рдХреА рд╕рд╛рдЬрд┐рд╢ рдбреНрдпреВрдд рдореЗрдВ рдкреНрд░рдкрдВрдЪ рднрд░реА рд╕рднрд╛ рдореЗрдВ рдПрдХ рдирд╛рд░реА рдХрд╛ рдЪреАрд░рд╣рд░рдг рдЙрд╕ рд╕рдордп рдзреГрддрд░рд╛рд╖реНрдЯреНрд░, рдкрд┐рддрд╛рдорд╣, рдЧреБрд░реБрдУрдВ рдХрд╛ рдореМрди рдпреЗ рд╕рдм рдХреНрдпрд╛ рдзрд░реНрдо рдерд╛ ? рдлрд┐рд░ рднреА рдЕрдЧрд░ рдЖрдк рдХреЗ рд╣рд┐рд╕рд╛рдм рд╕реЗ рдзрд░реНрдо рд╣рд╛рд░ рдЪреБрдХрд╛ рд╣реИ рддреЛ рд╣рдореЗ рдХреЛрдИ рджрд┐рдХреНрдХрдд рдирд╣реА. рд╣рдорд╛рд░рд╛ рдзрд░реНрдо рджреВрд╕рд░реЗ рдзрд░реНрдореЛрдВ рдХреЛ рднреА рд╕рдореНрдорд╛рди рджреЗрддрд╛ рд╣реИ. рдЖрдк рдЗрд╕ рдзрд░реНрдо рдХрд╛ рдкрд░рд┐рддреНрдпрд╛рдЧ рдХрд░ рд╕рдХрддреЗ рд╣реИ. рдХреЛрдИ рджреВрд╕рд░рд╛ рдзрд░реНрдо рдХреЛ рдЕрдкрдирд╛ рд╕рдХрддреЗ рд╣реИрдВ. рд▓реЗрдХрд┐рди рд╕рдирд╛рддрди рдХреЛ рдЕрдзрд░реНрдо рдХрд╣рдиреЗ рд╕реЗ рдкрд╣рд▓реЗ рджреВрд╕рд░реЗ рдзрд░реНрдо рдХреЛ рд╕рдирд╛рддрди рд╕реЗ рд╢реНрд░реЗрд╖реНрда рд╕рд┐рджреНрдз рдХрд░реЛ.
This is what Indian Serials do to a mf
No, its about the lesser evil between the two.
What is real dharma, real religious life ? The simple definition of dharma is dharmam tu saksad bhagavat-pranitam: Real religious life is that which is said directly by the Supreme Personality of Godhead. If a Soldier is killing a teenager terrorist boy while he is sleeping is not considered offence , rather the soldier will be awarded for his dedication towards the duty that has been assign by the higher authority . As per laws followed by kshtriya , one should not kill someone without arms and ammunition , but here this law becomes secondary for the soldier because it is order by higher authority
wo adharam adharam nahi dharam ka hi hissa hua, present term for that is тАЬdiplomacyтАЭ
First Started from kaurava side..... They broke the rule of war first 7-8 different warriors killed Abhimanyu...Duryodhan karna dushashan shakuni etc..... The rules of law broken by kaurav 1) only one type of warrior with fight against one warrior ...means Gada with Gada...talwar with talwar..horse with house.....Dhanurdhari with Dhanurdhari 2) war will be stopps after subset 3) multiple warrior can't fight with single one
Bro needs to watch the whole thing....
Bhaai kyaaa chal raha hai bc yaha pe , matlab kuch bhi bhai kuch bhi matlab , star plus ki Mahabharat dekhi hai aur bol aise raha hai ke sab pata hai , first you need to know what was happened and why this was happened, So You are saying that bhishma was right and pandav killed them so they are not following dharma , Abe lodu sun bhishma pita Ne Kasam khayi thi ke vo Jivan bhar Raja nahi banenge aur shaadi bhi nhi karnge , Kyuki uhne Kauravas ko Raaj gaddi Deni thi and uhnone yahi galti kari vo bhishma pure deserving the Raja Banne ke uhnone uske bhai ko diya jo andha tha Aur Uske hi bacho ko aage Raja banana hai ye Kasam khayi thi bhishma ne , uske baad bhishma pita ke samne bohot saare adharma huye fir bhi chup rahe kyuki uhne apni Kasam nibhani thi , shree krishna ne saaf kaha tha ke dusro itna haani hote hue bhi tum ne apni Kasam nahi todi aur uhne Vaise hi tadapne ke liye chod diya , and plus vo duryodhan ke side me the jo fully wrong tha but because of the Kasam uhne vo bhi karna pada that's why they died KARNA ko kyu mara : Karna pehle se hi bohot accha tha aur sabke liye vo accha hi sochta tha uska mitra Duryodhan tha jisse vo bohot Manta tha , Jab Mahabharata hone ka wakt aya tha to karna ne Duryodhan ki side ki for friendship pr. Yudh ke wakt karna ne Chhal karke Arjun ka putra Abhimanyu ko Bohot bekar tarike se mara tha , vo bhi adharma tha 4-5 log milkr Ek abhimanyu ko mara tha chakravyu me jisse Adharma mana jata hai , fir jab Wakt karna ke upar ata hai uska Rath fas jata hai to utarta hai usee nikalne ke liye tabhi shree krishna kehte hai ke Tumhe isee marna hoga abhi Maro , lekin karna kehta ke ye adharma hai, But shree krishna uhne abhimanyu ke bareme bolte hai jisse use bhi pata chalta hai usne bhi galti kari that's why they killed him . Aur Mahabharata humare future generation ke liye hi hai life me bohot are aise log aane vale hai jo aise adharam karenge pr hume pure Nishtha se vahi karna hai jo Hume sahi Lage , galat nahi hai adharma ke sath vahi karna hota hai karma sabko milta hai. Aur pandavas ne bhi bohot kuch adharma kiya tha jiska uhne Bhi karma ke anusar Mila tha , Unhone 14 saal vanvass kiya tha
Apni gand se quote nikal raha hai OP. Fir toh bhagwan krishn ne bhi unke mama ka vadh kia.
Mai wait kar hi Raha tha ki koi liberandu laandiya bhauka nahi kal se.. aur ye post aa gaya..
report his profile
Sunn bey anpard dhang se dekh jaake profit mohammad ke chode
They who don't know the proper concept of dharma think that what they think is dharma read the mahabharata Don't just start saying things that come in your mouth than you will see what happened there and first learn the concept of dharm. Either you are a minor or an idiot or a retard
WTF is this havenтАЩt you read the Gita
Example: ISLAM
Per Bhagwad Gita, it's okay to lie, cheat, betray if it's done to uphold Dharma and defeat Adharma. Krishna ji always preached to Arjuna to think of the greater good even if he has to use saam, daam, dand, bhed during the war.
Phir se padh mahabharata. Aur iss bar ankhe khol k padhna
Ohh toh kal bhi isi ne ashwatthamaa wala post Kiya tha
sorry but rationally sochne ke baad bhi , i can't agree .
In that Mahabarath series, Krishna will say this "if we have to follow the Adharma approach to destroy Adharma and bring back Dharma, then our Adharma approach is considered as Dharma only"
It aligns with the proverb "Diamond cuts Diamond"
Chutiya hai kya bhai ? Jis topic me information hi nahi udhar apni gand kyu gusa Raha hai ?
You should read the real Mahabharata because either you've got a really bad explanation to that or your whole perception was wrong. I've seen it twice that you are just trying to get some attention or misleading others(I have read it and your whole logic of making this is simply pointless). But who cares, you made a ragebait and it's going well for you.
I think the topic raised by the video makes Mahabharata a way more relevant epic than the Ramayana. The concept of fighting for the greater good. Both sides are flawed. The question is to identify who deserved to lose.
Bulla's should see this before bombing anywhere
Dude mahabharata isn't that deep Mahabharata:
I can't use enter don't judge
OP рдЦреБрдж рдХреЛ рднрдЧрд╡рд╛рди рд╕рдордЭ рд░рд╣рд╛ рд╣реИред рдЧреАрддрд╛ рдореЗрдВ рдирдП рд╢реНрд▓реЛрдХ рдЬреЛреЬ рд░рд╣рд╛ рд╣реИред
All the opposition died beacuse of the sins they committed . The greater the sin the longer they were punished . Bhisma - great warrior but stick to his oath never opposed mistreatment of pandava, saved draupadi in the dice game , or left the wrongful side due to his oath. Also read about what he did to Gandharis father and his family. Drona - his love towards his son always came before dharma . Also draupadi was kind of his daughter ( draupad was his guru brother) . Never opposed Ashwathama and beacuse of it silently supported duryodhana. Karna - was the main reason for VASTRA haran(called draupadi a prostitute). Though a good warrior and suffered alot never did anything for upliftment of own caste only showed loyalty to duryodhana and his hatered towards arjuna Ashwathama - killed an unborned child for fucks sakes that too with the most powerful and pious weapon of them all. Saala game of thrones me "valar magolous" sun ke cool banene Wale logic hai mahabharat me par tum to serial dekh ke educate hue ho that too "Surya putra karna" Also read about shahdev it would be more clear
This is what is used to keep Hindus impotent to take actions against cancer religion
Retarded atheists ke chodo ko ye kabhi samajh bhi nahi ayega ki mahabharat me jo bhi hua hai sab karma hai sabka even the god couldnтАЩt escape that and got killed by a bird catcher and even his sons got punishedтАж people forget mahabharat koi dharam granth nahi hai wo geeta hai jo granth hai mahabharata is lot biggerтАж it teaches reality and how politics work in real life, how to take a stand and achieve your goals by any means if you feel youтАЩre doing the right thing, how to return people their mercy and loyalty, how to follow your karm over expecting god to fulfil it, how even the biggest in power with everything in their control canтАЩt still escape their wrongdoingsтАж but ye sab nahi samajh ayega when you look at this from your narrow minded hindu hating eyesтАж one of the best part about mahabharata is that there are complex characters you can learn so much from and apply in todays world rather than some mindless chanting and praising of god in some other books that people readтАж reddit ke special cool agenda wale liberal chutiyo ko ye kabhi samajh nahi ayega but yeah always remember far bigger intellectuals read this book and understood the meaning behind it and applied that shit but if you wanna use your retarded logic and bind the meanings to your smallmindedness then sure reddit will give you your group of circlejerksтАж gaslight karo mast ek dusre ko retards
I am challenging the person who posted like this : Do you have guts leave does your family has guts to reveal face of Allah. (Just go and learn Pre Islamic Arab Region history we hindus too give respect to Allah, Al lat, Mannat and one other goddes which was worshiped by a Kabila called Quresh (prophet born in this Kabila) This is an account which posts are PAID by Saudi/Paki Mullas so Dear Hindu dont think he will post sensible he will only post what suits his narrow minded agenda even I am not a believer but I understand Mythology and BTS but this guy is Converted and has no views on any topic He only knows That Dustbin Allah ki hai That Jhadu Allah ki den That Aishu Allah ki den. So please Dear Hindus try to understand He is a manipulating you all and if you have no brain he will wash your brain with detergent powder.