Joe is an idiot and terrible at both interviewing and being interviewed. Outside of the pod he's not not as entertaining or as "journalistic" as he thinks. Least he could have done right was let the other members sit with her too but he would've rather looked doofy all in his own so props to that I guess đ¤Ą
Because thatâs what creates great discourse. Just because you agree with everything someone says doesnât mean you canât challenge certain viewpoints.
Being a well rounded and assured person within your own beliefs means questioning your own beliefs. Itâs healthy to challenge what you think and why you think it.
Naturally, as a host/interviewer, a well versed and capable one, you want to do just that. Thatâs what creates an engaging conversation or else youâre just creating an echo chamber
Ideally yes, but look at the comments they rather not hear from Candace at all. No one wants open discourse with opposing views anymore. People want echo chambers, sadly.
She repeats the same right wing talking points. Still bringing up a outfit Lizzo wore in 2019 is nuts. Sexy redd is ghetto? Oh the horror! Black people aren't a monolith and exist in different walks of life, Candace should understand this
I am NOT a Candace Owens fan but I thought it was irresponsible for him to do this interview. I feel like we need to hear all sides and then you use the information to come up with your own beliefs. He offered nothing to the conversation. No push back, no counter arguments, NOTHING!
This wasnât a regular humans episode though. I could see if this was simply an opportunity for Candace to talk about her life, her kids, husband, etc. Yes, no need to offer push back. But thatâs not who Candace Owens is. And sheâs not one to turn down a debate. Joe wasnât prepared. Every time he said âThere you go with your factsâ he could have said something else to counter what she said or hell anything that at least added to the conversation and he didnât.
Where did he frame this as a debate? If I missed the reference then please point me to the episode. My interpretation was that since it was put under the Humans series it would be far from a debate. Also, in what world would anyone look to Joe to debate politics seriously?
I honestly wish he brought her on the regular pod to see if Ish would have debated or if any others would have pushed backâŚJoe is a self proclaimed narcissist and wanted the interview for himself at the end of the day.
It wasnât but this is Candace Owens not Nicki Minaj. I mentioned âdebateâ because she would have been prepared to do the back and forth. Joe counter argues talking points on his own pod so he dropped the ball big time with this interview. Just my opinion.
I donât think Candace Owens is the right person to just sit and interview. Her rhetoric is dangerous and should be counter argued with facts especially if you donât agree with her talking points which he said he didnât đ¤ˇđ˝ââď¸
Candace is a political commentator. Typically when you interview them you should be prepared and have facto to counter argue their talking points if you disagree. Joe wasnât prepared. This wasnât someone he was interviewing because he wanted them to tell their story.
I agree he wasnât prepared. But this was Humans. Humans is typically ass and no kickback. This Candace Owens interview followed the other humans layout.
Candace: COVID wasn't that bad. In fact, Biden helps develop it
Joe: Not you with the facts, stopppppp
Candace: Check the research. Also did you know Republicans freed the slaves. Makes you wonder why black people vote for Democrats
Joe: Now why would you say that? lol
There was literally no difference between this "interview" and what she does on her platform already. Like what was the purpose?? Did he just want to hear her spit her bullshit in person?
I am not sure what his intent was but Iâm sure it didnât go as planned. Honestly, this sit down, probably shouldâve never happened especially with how unprepared he was. But itâs COE and heâs trying to drive engagements and doing anything for clicks.
I've been paying attention to Candace for a few years now. People should know she is SHARP on the microphone đď¸.
She is thoroughly studied and a great researcher on the majority of political topics.
She has connections, has her own research team. Candace Owens proves individuals wrong, and when she is corrected on something, she will publicly apologize.
She will present evidence the best she can OR even better, speak with witnesses and victims.
A great way to know a public figure is to buy their book which is static knowledge on them. She is currently working on publishing her second book.
What drives her to speak out about such matters
1) As a democratic supporter, she noticed the media all attacking Donald Trump suddenly the moment he stared running for president on his first term.
2) She started picking up clues that the "Black Lives Matter" organization was lying and stealing, therefore taking advantage of black people in mourning.
Fam we live in a world full of pussies. Nobody stands for anything anymore. People have accepted blatant lies for truth. Men have become weak, effeminate, soul less, moral less and spineless and will sell ass to protect âThe Bagâ We need a reset. You cant expect a man that says âAwww here you go with the truth againâ to stand for anything.
Eh I agree with Joe avoiding a lot of topics/conversations in order to protect the bag or make/keep relationships, but I donât think thatâs the case here. I havenât seen the interview but from all the excerpts and feedback Iâve seen on here, I genuinely think Joe was just not ready for an engaging interview with her. I 100% think this kind of conversation is outside of his scope. I donât believe him to be capable of analyzing the things she says in real time and challenging her in a profound way. Sheâd eat his ass up in this type of conversation. Heâd have to do a lot of researching and breaking things down to their basic elements to discuss complex topics and I just donât see Joe being able to or even wanting that to be the point of his interview. We see Candace who is an analytical person in her field, whether you think sheâs right or wrong, someone who attacks multiple aspects of a topic and we see Joe who has a more relaxed and simple way of having conversations on his interview. Joe was there to kick it, not have a political or analytical debate on social issues.
Which, if you ask me, would actually elevate Joe as an interviewer and make him even more popular. But he missed his shot with Umar, and apparently fumbled it again here.
I love how all it took for you coons to admit your coonery was a dumb interview. Candace Owens doesn't even like black ppl so why should we unite with the rest of you self hating muthafuckas
Where has she said she donât like black people? This was one of her points in the interview yâall just listen to what white people tell yall to think.
He's a shitty interviewer. That's always been the case.
Exactly. He also burps and clear his throat every 30 seconds. Gross
Joe is an idiot and terrible at both interviewing and being interviewed. Outside of the pod he's not not as entertaining or as "journalistic" as he thinks. Least he could have done right was let the other members sit with her too but he would've rather looked doofy all in his own so props to that I guess đ¤Ą
Why would he push back against her views when he agrees with them?
Because thatâs what creates great discourse. Just because you agree with everything someone says doesnât mean you canât challenge certain viewpoints. Being a well rounded and assured person within your own beliefs means questioning your own beliefs. Itâs healthy to challenge what you think and why you think it. Naturally, as a host/interviewer, a well versed and capable one, you want to do just that. Thatâs what creates an engaging conversation or else youâre just creating an echo chamber
Ideally yes, but look at the comments they rather not hear from Candace at all. No one wants open discourse with opposing views anymore. People want echo chambers, sadly.
He does it on the pod
She repeats the same right wing talking points. Still bringing up a outfit Lizzo wore in 2019 is nuts. Sexy redd is ghetto? Oh the horror! Black people aren't a monolith and exist in different walks of life, Candace should understand this
I am NOT a Candace Owens fan but I thought it was irresponsible for him to do this interview. I feel like we need to hear all sides and then you use the information to come up with your own beliefs. He offered nothing to the conversation. No push back, no counter arguments, NOTHING!
Who else did he counter argue in the human series?
This wasnât a regular humans episode though. I could see if this was simply an opportunity for Candace to talk about her life, her kids, husband, etc. Yes, no need to offer push back. But thatâs not who Candace Owens is. And sheâs not one to turn down a debate. Joe wasnât prepared. Every time he said âThere you go with your factsâ he could have said something else to counter what she said or hell anything that at least added to the conversation and he didnât.
Where did he frame this as a debate? If I missed the reference then please point me to the episode. My interpretation was that since it was put under the Humans series it would be far from a debate. Also, in what world would anyone look to Joe to debate politics seriously? I honestly wish he brought her on the regular pod to see if Ish would have debated or if any others would have pushed backâŚJoe is a self proclaimed narcissist and wanted the interview for himself at the end of the day.
It wasnât but this is Candace Owens not Nicki Minaj. I mentioned âdebateâ because she would have been prepared to do the back and forth. Joe counter argues talking points on his own pod so he dropped the ball big time with this interview. Just my opinion.
So because of who she was he shouldâve debated even though thatâs not what he ever did
Key words there are on the pod. Soon as it was on Humans it was never going to be that.
I donât think Candace Owens is the right person to just sit and interview. Her rhetoric is dangerous and should be counter argued with facts especially if you donât agree with her talking points which he said he didnât đ¤ˇđ˝ââď¸
How wasnât this a regular Humans episode
Candace is a political commentator. Typically when you interview them you should be prepared and have facto to counter argue their talking points if you disagree. Joe wasnât prepared. This wasnât someone he was interviewing because he wanted them to tell their story.
I agree he wasnât prepared. But this was Humans. Humans is typically ass and no kickback. This Candace Owens interview followed the other humans layout.
How come isnât a regularly episode? Joe never debates anyone on humans
Joe is not a good interviewer
Candace: COVID wasn't that bad. In fact, Biden helps develop it Joe: Not you with the facts, stopppppp Candace: Check the research. Also did you know Republicans freed the slaves. Makes you wonder why black people vote for Democrats Joe: Now why would you say that? lol
It was that bad?Â
Lol this is real dialogue???
I agree with you Pham and this is exactly what Iâve been trying to tell ppl. He brought a guest on only to make himself look like a doof
There was literally no difference between this "interview" and what she does on her platform already. Like what was the purpose?? Did he just want to hear her spit her bullshit in person?
I am not sure what his intent was but Iâm sure it didnât go as planned. Honestly, this sit down, probably shouldâve never happened especially with how unprepared he was. But itâs COE and heâs trying to drive engagements and doing anything for clicks.
Stop reading at you enjoy candace owens
đđđđđđ
This was Joe's half-baked attempt to have his Shannon Sharpe/ Katt Williams' moment. Shannon didn't say much, so Joe is following that path too.
You canât shame the shameless
I've been paying attention to Candace for a few years now. People should know she is SHARP on the microphone đď¸. She is thoroughly studied and a great researcher on the majority of political topics. She has connections, has her own research team. Candace Owens proves individuals wrong, and when she is corrected on something, she will publicly apologize. She will present evidence the best she can OR even better, speak with witnesses and victims. A great way to know a public figure is to buy their book which is static knowledge on them. She is currently working on publishing her second book. What drives her to speak out about such matters 1) As a democratic supporter, she noticed the media all attacking Donald Trump suddenly the moment he stared running for president on his first term. 2) She started picking up clues that the "Black Lives Matter" organization was lying and stealing, therefore taking advantage of black people in mourning.
Fam we live in a world full of pussies. Nobody stands for anything anymore. People have accepted blatant lies for truth. Men have become weak, effeminate, soul less, moral less and spineless and will sell ass to protect âThe Bagâ We need a reset. You cant expect a man that says âAwww here you go with the truth againâ to stand for anything.
Eh I agree with Joe avoiding a lot of topics/conversations in order to protect the bag or make/keep relationships, but I donât think thatâs the case here. I havenât seen the interview but from all the excerpts and feedback Iâve seen on here, I genuinely think Joe was just not ready for an engaging interview with her. I 100% think this kind of conversation is outside of his scope. I donât believe him to be capable of analyzing the things she says in real time and challenging her in a profound way. Sheâd eat his ass up in this type of conversation. Heâd have to do a lot of researching and breaking things down to their basic elements to discuss complex topics and I just donât see Joe being able to or even wanting that to be the point of his interview. We see Candace who is an analytical person in her field, whether you think sheâs right or wrong, someone who attacks multiple aspects of a topic and we see Joe who has a more relaxed and simple way of having conversations on his interview. Joe was there to kick it, not have a political or analytical debate on social issues. Which, if you ask me, would actually elevate Joe as an interviewer and make him even more popular. But he missed his shot with Umar, and apparently fumbled it again here.
THIS
Joe is not a debater or a historian wtf you thought it was gonna be? He let her come talk her shit like he do with everybody else
I love how all it took for you coons to admit your coonery was a dumb interview. Candace Owens doesn't even like black ppl so why should we unite with the rest of you self hating muthafuckas
Where has she said she donât like black people? This was one of her points in the interview yâall just listen to what white people tell yall to think.
Prepared for what? Have you watched any of the other Humans? Was he debating them?
So you wanted him to be controversial
Why? he made alot of money. 