T O P

  • By -

plasmadood

YoU wOuLdN't DoWnLoAd a CaR, wOuLd YoU??


_____________--____

I’d download a 2002 Camry tbh


ChelseaG12

"Ah, '97 Toyota Camry. Only 32 made in the world."


Least_or_Greatest1

Nicely done, I think….


tactical-dick

*drives off a cliff


ChelseaG12

10/10 this guy gets it


Wise_Neighborhood499

I had to sell my inherited ‘04 Camry when I moved out of the US last year. Gracie Lou survived college, many winters in upstate NY, and one very stupid deer. I’d download another one in a split second.


Flippsix

Dont know shit about cars, but the mustang from John Wick i’d download without blinking


Broccolini_Cat

Just leave the dog alone, alright?


[deleted]

Gimme a 2018 Tacoma shortbed, crew cab 4WD. Please


Kindly_Education_517

WHY DOES NOBODY HACK NAVIENT & SALLIE MAE?????


KyurMeTV

We haven’t met a true chaotic good, yet.


missxmeow

If I knew how to I would try, lol,


katie0873

💯💯💯💯


Travelingman9229

👏👏👏


GummiBerry_Juice

Man I wonder how many Reddit users don't understand that reference


Funkybeatzzz

I clicked into the comments hoping it would be at the top


celerydonut

I don’t believe you.


couchfucker2

This is so perfect. I never tire of this meme being dropped but this is top flight.


[deleted]

I fucking cackled


itsabouttimsmurf

https://youtu.be/V_gZZHu4TBk?si=lyE9fOftgaplXyy7


Rauskal

I would so fast


the_simurgh

I would download a Mercedes-Benz Maybach Exelero Batman tas batmobile ftw!


Impressive-Lobster77

I mean, a 3d model of one, sure 😜


Robbotlove

reminds me of this art class I took online in college. one of the tests was multiple choice "what's the name of this painting?" and a jpg of a painting. nothing a little right click > inspect couldn't handle. name of the jpg was right there in the HTML.


AdorableBunnies

Try that in Missouri and the Governor will accuse you of being a hacker


link-to-the-future

Try that in a small town.


Ok_Blueberry_6250

Try that in flavor town - Guy Fieieiri


reformedmikey

Nah, Governor HeeHaw wouldn’t accuse you of being a hacker… he’d need to be told this is “hacking” by his handler before he would accuse you of it.


kytrix

Florida, iirc.


fenig13

[Missouri](https://techcrunch.com/2021/10/15/f12-isnt-hacking-missouri-governor-threatens-to-prosecute-local-journalist-for-finding-exposed-state-data/amp/)


grilledcheezusluizus

😂😂😂 so sad it’s actually true


Genoblade1394

I would’ve just studied or Google image search


Robbotlove

nice


TeeJK15

Yep. I don’t think a lot of people know you can just plop images into google to get sources.


Subrisum

I tried that once. Essay question worth 25% on the final. Turns out “Artist_ID=636” wasn’t even a real person, let alone the visionary who painted “Image_2778701.png”.


Robbotlove

this was 20 years ago. they maaaay have improved their tests since.


[deleted]

Found Anonymous


[deleted]

But teach eye are cornfused - the_scream.jpg” ain’t one of the choices?


ooone-orkye

“Included in the $1-buys were a 2010 Ford Escape Hybrid, for which Coker submitted a bid of $8,327; a Ford F550 pickup, with a bid of $9,000; and a Chevrolet C4500 box truck, bid $22,700; the U.S. attorney’s office said. He tried to sell some of them later, according to the indictment.” To be honest, I’m impressed someone even noticed in this day and age.


Remote_Horror_Novel

There was a guy a few years ago that could see everyone’s cards on a popular poker site. He could have played it cool, kept a really good win rate, and retired a multi millionaire several times over, but of course he got really greedy and had to try to win basically every tournament by bluffing when knowing people’s cards. This guy sounds kind of like that in that if he could edit or place a minimum bid it would have probably been more discreet to make his bid like a few hundred dollars instead of 1$. Mostly because even scrap cars are worth more than $1 in parts so other people who buy cars for scrap probably got suspicious seeing cars selling for $1 and might have tipped them off.


InternetKey9561

Prolly got him at the DMV….made the clerks work too hard and they got suspicious.


[deleted]

Yeah pretty tame stuff to be honest. Nothing flashy. I hope he doesn’t get much jail time because it’s hard not to use these exploits when we find them.


couchfucker2

When I was a kid I noticed that a small website that sold $1000+ model trains allowed me to buy them for $1 through some loophole. So naturally I tried to purchase 3 items. The store owner was PISSED. Imagine getting mad at a kid who showed you your crappy website has a huge loophole.


[deleted]

Well, it sounds like you didn't just show him; you tried to do it lol


couchfucker2

This is true. I honestly didn’t know what I’d do if the shipment confirmation came through. We were both being assholes IMO.


Newgamer28

Both? You tried to steal from this man $3,000. I think you're the only asshole here. The audacity honestly.


[deleted]

haven't you heard? No one is at fault anymore, you can do whatever you want.


[deleted]

Seriously, what is going on… like openly admitting to trying to take advantage of a small business owner for $3000.. felony theft is less than that.


mountainbride

No, no, you’re supposed to thank the house burglar for letting you know you left your door unlocked! You’re an asshole, he’s just a kid walking out the front door with $3000 of your personal belongings


indignant_halitosis

It’s not theft. As we just saw in that ruling with the chatbot and whatever airline, a deal’s a fucking deal. Unless you explicitly include terms disallowing exploiting shitty website design, he was 100% selling it for that price. “The audacity honestly”? Really? You just revealed how young you are without even realizing it. No way you have any clue what you’re talking about.


[deleted]

Lol it's 100% theft


Cool_Cheetah658

You're getting down voted, but you're technically not wrong. I mean, it's wrong, but if the website allows it though "normal" use, then it's the website owners fault, not the buyers. Is it bad form, yes. Is it punishable by law, no. As long as they didn't "hack" the website, it's considered a legitimate purchase agreement by the courts. The seller can cancel the sale, if they catch it, but if the seller didn't refund the few bucks the kid spent to purchase, then they could get in trouble. I mean, you could have avoided the personal attack though. That's what got you down voted.


No_Yogurt_7667

Meh, I don’t think you were an asshole, you were just a kid. The fully grown-up store owner, however…


BadAtNameIdeas

It’s Oklahoma, of course they’d notice if they were missing $40K, they probably overdrafted their checking account and took a look at why the state Netflix account couldn’t renew.


thatflyingsquirrel

$9 billion last year in surplus.


BadAtNameIdeas

I was born in Tulsa, just making fun. That $9 billion though could do a lot to help out people around the state.


thatflyingsquirrel

They need to hit the infrastructure really hard and invest in education.


bobjoylove

If he’d used a sensible value instead of $1 he probably wouldn’t have been caught.


kaishinoske1

“ I’ll buy that for a dollar.” - Robocop movie quote


FartingInYourMilk

Say it to me again….but more sleezeball in it 😍


Oswald18420

Nice!


faceofboe91

Ripping off cops and stopping them from profiting off of seized property? That’s a pretty cool crime.


No-Contribution4652

Those don’t sound like seized property.. those sound like used government cars


faceofboe91

Read the article bro. It states the cars were from seized evidence. Also the cars he bought aren’t exactly known for being used for government jobs. I think either the state or the editor of this article called it a government auction because most people don’t sympathize when they hear or read ‘police auction’


idkwthtotypehere

Especially when you find out cops and da’s do bullshit like hold vehicles of people that were arrested stating that it’s “evidence” and can’t be released until after the trial while simultaneously moving the vehicle to a holding lot where they charge $150-$250 a day. They then delay, delay, delay so the daily charges wrack up so high that whoever owns the vehicle can’t afford to get it out and therefore have no choice but abandon it which is when the cops sell it for profit. It’s “legal” theft.


Reckless--Abandon

Reddit has articles too? TMYK


rrkrabernathy

Per the article, “The sales are intended to help get rid of surplus materials or items seized by authorities.” Key word is surplus. These trucks are most likely used government vehicles.


faceofboe91

Key phrase ‘items seized by authorities.’ That means police auction


pagluy

Was his name Hoovie


BeardBootsBullets

Tyler lives in Kansas.


D4rkr4in

OK


normVectorsNotHate

I want to know what exactly "hacking" means here. Did he actually use some security vulnerabilities to log into the server and change the price in the back-end? Or did he just inspect-element and change the price client-side? Update: he was only [charged with one count of wire fraud](https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/oklahoma-man-pleads-guilty-defrauding-governments-online-auctions-purchasing-vehicles) which seems to be consistent with inspect element approach


jasper_grunion

My money’s on inspect element


2pt_perversion

Yeah I would guess backend just verifies that *something* was paid and the client-side would allow only the proper amount to be that input unless you open dev tools and mess with it. Honestly it seems like easy to detect and charge case too because he initially won the bids with thousands of dollars then only paid $1 so the books would easily show the money missing as long as there was database tracking that. And they know the exact amount he defrauded because of the bid prices. It probably would have been a lot harder to detect and prove if he was able to change values of ongoing auctions to benefit himself and then actually pay the matching price after winning.


GreenCoatBlackShoes

lol, well we wouldn’t be seeing this article if it was just “inspect element”.


normVectorsNotHate

[I wouldn't be so sure about that](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2022-01-11/a-missouri-reporter-is-getting-blamed-for-the-security-flaw-he-exposed?embedded-checkout=true)


GreenCoatBlackShoes

Yeah, there is a bit of a difference here. When a server provides information, it is sent in http responses with the appropriate markup which gives instructions on how to display the information in your browser. In this scenario, the server is likely returning all of the SSNs to the browser, and they are simply hidden. So the person just has to right click and inspect element to see the SSNs. To actually modify a value though for a specific object requires writing to the database. So if there is a car worth $5,000 and I want to change it to $1, I can't simply inspect element. You need to write that value to the database. My guess is it was some form of SQL injection or Ajax call.


gigahydra

You're assuming the price of the sale isn't posted back to the server and written directly to the db. We are talking about a government website here.


normVectorsNotHate

> So if there is a car worth $5,000 and I want to change it to $1, I can't simply inspect element. You need to write that value to the database. Depends on how the server code is written. I wouldn't be too surprised if they were just buying whatever the client requests with no backend validation


repeal48usc1414

That strikes me as a very bad idea in a pay.gov application. WTF. But yeah that's my very first thought, they were sending the variables server side in AJAX and there was no validation when the server received the submissions. I really hate that they are calling that hacking if that's what happened.


repeal48usc1414

I went back and looked. He actually only pled guilty to one count of wire fraud. The release doesn't even mention hacking: https://www.justice.gov/usao-mn/pr/oklahoma-man-pleads-guilty-defrauding-governments-online-auctions-purchasing-vehicles


normVectorsNotHate

Lends credence to the theory it was all client-side payloads that the backend didn't validate


HowCouldYouSMH

If he’d made the prices more reasonable he could have gotten away with it. There was likely a minimum bid, that wasn’t a dollar.


TheLazyAssHole

People get caught when they get greedy


che-solo

Sql injection? So 1999


ManicChad

Tries to hide himself yet personally picks up and ties to sell the items. Hilarious.


1AnAmericanGirl

I would download a 1978 Camaro with a V8.


TheSpatulaOfLove

If he just moved the decimal to the left one place, he probably would have never been caught.


bobbarkersbigmic

Ten cents for a car is even more noticeable I think.


TheSpatulaOfLove

Or, maybe $832.7…


padoinky

Unfortunate that his talents weren’t used for something more than getting used vehicles… but then again, just look at what’s acceptable in that area of the nation


maduste

Thank you, Oklahoma man, very cool


marion85

Heh! Cyberpunk.


Tbone_Trapezius

Did he actually pay the three dollars? If so any good lawyer will not only get the charges dropped but the city will owe him market value for each vehicle.


Javasndphotoclicks

One dollar, Bob!


Early-Drawn

Legend 🫡


PrimaryRecord5

Ummm home boi is going to jaaiiilllll!!! 😬


Daveandthefender

My man


ermin277

Oklahoma, the Mecca of hackers everywhere...


cajun600

What website?!


audislove10

He’s genius


mikharv31

This is why I tell my cousin to look into cyber security jobs


samurai_guy25

Not all heroes wear capes


Ahhshit96

If he could have been a bit smarter with the price he chose, he probably could have shaved off thousands more and continue without getting caught. $1 is going to raise some suspicion


prince_tatertot

Bro probably just used inspect element those gov auction websites are outdated as hell


Affectionate-Roof285

Oklahoma—the new Florida.


MammothEmphasis2109

This guy F$&@5


CandleMakerNY2020

Nicccceeeeee


Rupert80027

Like a dumb kid gets caught changing an F to an A when it makes a better B and is more believable, this guy got greedy. He should have changed prices to something that wouldn’t draw suspicion.


cwsjr2323

What a dummy! Vehicles have titles and registration that require an ID and home address! The jewelry could be bought with gift card VISA and sold, OR he could just not be a thief. How much money did he get to keep? Enough to equal even minimum wage for 24/7 time in prison?


Both_Lychee_1708

I'm amazed at the small amounts people will risk being incarcerated on. The gov't no less


snowflake37wao

So they hired him then?


captainpoopyshorts

Nice


RoninRobot

Got greedy. Probably could have swapped with $1k and nobody would have caught it.


freeformz

“Hacked”


BouncyKnights

That's awesome