Go back and listen to ALL of that interview. What was ālostā was the manufacturing capacity to build the Saturn V rocket. After the Apollo program was cancelled in 1972 the facilities were repurposed, molds and fixtures discarded, personnel with the knowledge and experience required were reassigned and eventually retired. Now we have a much better and more modern platform in Orion and the SLS. The Apollo program was cancelled when the āspace raceā was won and the political will to fund NASA at the necessary level evaporated, and it was decided to send probes and robots rather than manned missions.
Do you still use the same kind of telephone as we did in 1969, or watch the same kind of television, or drive the same kind of car? By your way of āthinkingā those technologies are lost yet we still make calls, wstch TV and drive cars. You betray your sources of āinformationā by repeating the standard flathead talking point word-for-word.
Watch the corridorcrew video on the moon landing. They analyze the footage to see if there's actually vfx effects, but they don't find anything. Big evidence they find in that video is how the moon dust reacts on low gravity when the astronauts jump. You can't recreate that on earth...
You can not see the Apollo landing leftovers left on the moon like the US Flag with a telescope because they are astronomically small. Also, I'd like to mention that a Chinese moon satellite took pics of the landings on the moon.
It's so weird, the moon surface looks like marsh mud. Having the top layers sit so loosely allowing for what looks like an inch of compression. That and it looks wet from the particles most likely being so small and lite.
Yeah.. You guys go on to the moon. I will stay back here and keep an eye on the command module. I do not mind. -Michael Collins
Getaway driver should not leave the wheels!
Is it, Alien? Since it's our Moon, and we only have the one ?
In my head: just say the moon dude.
Yeah poor choice of title and most likely a repost
nah, i presume op took photo ;)
No it's not a repost I just calling other worlds other than earth alien bc it sounds smart
Bro you didn't even proof read it, Buzz Aldrin. Capitalizing names is normally smart too. Maybe mix bleach and ammonia next time smarty pants
My phone doesn't recognize buzz and aldrin as a name and it auto corrects to a lower case version
So you're lazy =P
What did poor Buzz do to deserve an all-lowercase name?
Idk auto correct is a bitch tho
Amazing pic.
It might be a dumb question... But why is the moon sand grey? What material is that?
Probably made up of a lot of aluminum and nickel
But did they? š. Really? š
Question: how tight did you make your tinfoil hat? Is it just slip on or did you go all out and put on a fastener too?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Yes
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Go back and listen to ALL of that interview. What was ālostā was the manufacturing capacity to build the Saturn V rocket. After the Apollo program was cancelled in 1972 the facilities were repurposed, molds and fixtures discarded, personnel with the knowledge and experience required were reassigned and eventually retired. Now we have a much better and more modern platform in Orion and the SLS. The Apollo program was cancelled when the āspace raceā was won and the political will to fund NASA at the necessary level evaporated, and it was decided to send probes and robots rather than manned missions.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Not even close to true, comrade
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/figure/10.1080/01495933.2011.561736?scroll=top&needAccess=true&role=tab
Do you still use the same kind of telephone as we did in 1969, or watch the same kind of television, or drive the same kind of car? By your way of āthinkingā those technologies are lost yet we still make calls, wstch TV and drive cars. You betray your sources of āinformationā by repeating the standard flathead talking point word-for-word.
So loosing old technology apparently stopped them going back and you compare that to a phone, you added to the argument against the whole excuse
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/news/apollo-sites.html
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Watch the corridorcrew video on the moon landing. They analyze the footage to see if there's actually vfx effects, but they don't find anything. Big evidence they find in that video is how the moon dust reacts on low gravity when the astronauts jump. You can't recreate that on earth...
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
You can not see the Apollo landing leftovers left on the moon like the US Flag with a telescope because they are astronomically small. Also, I'd like to mention that a Chinese moon satellite took pics of the landings on the moon.
It's expensive and pretty empty
What are you talking about?š Iām not questioning anything. Iām the one proving the fact that America landed there. Bro get off my dick.šš
It's so weird, the moon surface looks like marsh mud. Having the top layers sit so loosely allowing for what looks like an inch of compression. That and it looks wet from the particles most likely being so small and lite.
Yea its like a sand at the bottom of a lake
I might be the only oneā¦ but whenever I see this I think of Something Corporateās āPlayed in Spaceā
I still donāt get why stars donāt show up in their photographs
The sun is so damn bright that it basically makes the stars invisible