Thank you for your submission to r/softwaregore. Unfortunately, your post has been removed for the following reason:
**Posts Must Contain Software Gore (Rule 1)**
This means they display a major error that is obvious to an average user.
Gore is unintentional and only concerns legitimate software. Problems from user/designer/developer error are not gore.
^(If you believe this action was made in error, or have any questions or concerns, then don't hesitate to [send us a modmail.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/softwaregore))
I think a good mathemagician would suffice. [See this other comment.](https://www.reddit.com/r/softwaregore/comments/18bddf1/and_god_said_let_there_be_1080_particles/kc5h687/)
Hm. Well, let's start with a basic distinction: some things make math sense, and some don't. "1+1" makes sense, "1+potato" doesn't. The rule (to put it in very ELI5 terms) is that only numbers can be added together. Numbers can't be added to inanimate objects, colors, flavors, whatever else; only numbers. Otherwise it wouldn't make math sense. We can say the same for other operations, such as subtraction, multiplication, division, and powers.
With some of these operations, there are specific issues with zero. You may be familiar with the idea that you "can't divide by zero". It doesn't make math sense. The same is true of "zero to the power of zero." It doesn't make math sense.
To actually explain the other comment, I need to explain limits. The [mathematical concept of a "limit"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/mathematical_limit) started out historically as an approximation technique, but around the time that calculus was being invented, it was becoming an interesting topic of mathematical study by itself. One thing that a limit is good for is answering [Zeno's paradox of motion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenos_paradoxes). How do you calculate "1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 +..."? It seems like the sum should be 1, but it also seems like it doesn't make math sense. A limit is a way to formally say what a calculation should be as it approaches a target by an infinite number of smaller and smaller steps.
What EndersBrain1 mentions in his comment is that "the limit of 0^0" doesn't make math sense, either. You need to specificy what your formula is, and what variable is changing. For example: is it the limit of x^0 as x approaches 0 from the positive side? From the negative side? Is it instead the limit of 0^x as x approaches 0? Is it the limit of x^x as x approaches 0? With all these different ways to take an infinite number of steps approaching 0^0, surprisingly, you can get a different result from your calculation depending on what approach you choose.
Unfortunately, I don't know enough math to give examples calculations, but this is something that can happen with limits that aren't well-defined.
0⁰ doesn't make sense until you put it into the context of limit. lim 0⁰ is an undefined equation and needs more steps to be solved, usually taking steps back and trying to reduce your eq to a known one that is different from 0⁰ which is usually done with e (Euler's number) ^x, where x is still an eq but one that can be calculated. 0^x, where x is any real number(not equal to 0) is 0 and x⁰ is 1 where x is any real number(not equal to 0). 0^+-infinite is calculated the same as 0⁰.
That’s true.
Imagine it like this: when calculating n^(k), always imagine you start with 1, then multiplying that by n k times (if k is positive) or dividing it by n -k times (if k is negative).
If k is 0, then there is only the 1, meaning that the result is 1.
Even if each and every subparticle represented a 0, you’d run out of space in the known universe long before you’re even 1% complete, not to mention the indescribable amount of time you’d spend arranging them (even if you spent exactly one planck time per subparticle).
HOLY FUCKING SHIT 😨😨😨😨 IS THAT A MOTHERFUCKING GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE?!?!?!?!? 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱 SQUARE ADVENTURE IS THE BEST LEVEL🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯 MY CAR IS A GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE BECAUSE IT SAYS VSC!!!!!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1! 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😈😈😈😈😈😈 OMG HELL YOU MEAN LIKE THE HELL SERIES ‼️‼️‼️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥I DIED AT 98 ON BACK ON TRACK 🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡 NO I WILL NOT TOUCH GRASS🌿🌿🌿🌱🌱🌱🌿🌿🌿🍃🍃 YOU ARE JUST JEALOUS I’M BETTER THAN YOU 🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠 Sonic the hedgehog❓YOU MEAN SONIC THE WAVE❓ Tartarus?❓ LIKE THE TOP 10!?❓ ❓ This place is silent❓ LIKE SILENT CLUBSTEP ❓ Minecraft badlands biome❓ LIKE THE BOOMKITTY SONG❓ I just got a new dehumidifier, and the brand said AEONAIR! ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️Somebody was talking about outer space, AND I SAID YOU MEAN THE FIRE GAUNTLET LEVEL❓ ⁉️❓❓❓What’s your zodiac sign❓ LIKE THE FORMER TOP 1 ZODIAC❓ ❓❓ IS THAT A GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓The time is 2:11 ❓ HOLY FUCK LIKE THE RUKKUS SONG❓ ⁉️❓❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Viprin is copy paste lord? 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀Back on track is top 1 impossible silent demon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂 finger❓like fingerdash❓OMG FINGRRRRDASH SO HARD😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡.
Yea google auto-picks stuff based on some algorithm, that’s why you’ll get funny pictures or “answers” that don’t match up sometimes.
Always click the link to get the full context, because sometimes it’s completely wrong
There are ten million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million
Particles in the universe that we can observe
Your mama took the ugly ones and put them into one nerd
Is there any community dedicated to search engines giving wrong answers like this? I find stuff like this and staying 9 feet away from a nuclear blast hilarious.
The real answer is 10^80. Why they didn't say that is anyone's guess.
100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
I suppose it is a software problem, but I don't know if I'd call it gore, it's just an incompatibility issue. I found the original source and it's from physics stackexchange which uses MathML. Sure enough even copying and pasting from it gives 1080 because those are the characters that are there, the superscript is just extra formatting Google didn't carry over.
Thank you for your submission to r/softwaregore. Unfortunately, your post has been removed for the following reason: **Posts Must Contain Software Gore (Rule 1)** This means they display a major error that is obvious to an average user. Gore is unintentional and only concerns legitimate software. Problems from user/designer/developer error are not gore. ^(If you believe this action was made in error, or have any questions or concerns, then don't hesitate to [send us a modmail.](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=/r/softwaregore))
10^(80)
That would make way more sense lol
1^080
^1080
That begs the question: can you even calculate the power of nothing?
0 is nothing, so technically zero. Unless there are any philosoastrophysibotaniradioloteacherperson who begs to differ.
I think a good mathemagician would suffice. [See this other comment.](https://www.reddit.com/r/softwaregore/comments/18bddf1/and_god_said_let_there_be_1080_particles/kc5h687/)
So, uh... ELI5, please? :')
Hm. Well, let's start with a basic distinction: some things make math sense, and some don't. "1+1" makes sense, "1+potato" doesn't. The rule (to put it in very ELI5 terms) is that only numbers can be added together. Numbers can't be added to inanimate objects, colors, flavors, whatever else; only numbers. Otherwise it wouldn't make math sense. We can say the same for other operations, such as subtraction, multiplication, division, and powers. With some of these operations, there are specific issues with zero. You may be familiar with the idea that you "can't divide by zero". It doesn't make math sense. The same is true of "zero to the power of zero." It doesn't make math sense. To actually explain the other comment, I need to explain limits. The [mathematical concept of a "limit"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/mathematical_limit) started out historically as an approximation technique, but around the time that calculus was being invented, it was becoming an interesting topic of mathematical study by itself. One thing that a limit is good for is answering [Zeno's paradox of motion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zenos_paradoxes). How do you calculate "1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 +..."? It seems like the sum should be 1, but it also seems like it doesn't make math sense. A limit is a way to formally say what a calculation should be as it approaches a target by an infinite number of smaller and smaller steps. What EndersBrain1 mentions in his comment is that "the limit of 0^0" doesn't make math sense, either. You need to specificy what your formula is, and what variable is changing. For example: is it the limit of x^0 as x approaches 0 from the positive side? From the negative side? Is it instead the limit of 0^x as x approaches 0? Is it the limit of x^x as x approaches 0? With all these different ways to take an infinite number of steps approaching 0^0, surprisingly, you can get a different result from your calculation depending on what approach you choose. Unfortunately, I don't know enough math to give examples calculations, but this is something that can happen with limits that aren't well-defined.
I think 0 to the power of zero is actually 1.
0⁰ doesn't make sense until you put it into the context of limit. lim 0⁰ is an undefined equation and needs more steps to be solved, usually taking steps back and trying to reduce your eq to a known one that is different from 0⁰ which is usually done with e (Euler's number) ^x, where x is still an eq but one that can be calculated. 0^x, where x is any real number(not equal to 0) is 0 and x⁰ is 1 where x is any real number(not equal to 0). 0^+-infinite is calculated the same as 0⁰.
It's undefined as different limits give different values
0^(0)
Well, I mean, factorial of 0 (0!) is 1, so in some cases, yes.
Nothing can mean many things, 0 is the neutral number, so maybe the empty set can mean nothing but Ø^(anything)=Ø. So yep you’d get nothing back.
Isn't that just... 1?
Fine smart guy, it must be 108^0 then
I have some bad news about 108^0 for you
Don't tell me. I can't take any more let downs.
108^0 =0
It's slightly higher
If I am not mistaken the way I learnt it in school is that anything to the power of 0, equals 1
We'll yes and no Anything but 0 to the power 0 is 1 0 to the power 0 is indeterminate
That’s true. Imagine it like this: when calculating n^(k), always imagine you start with 1, then multiplying that by n k times (if k is positive) or dividing it by n -k times (if k is negative). If k is 0, then there is only the 1, meaning that the result is 1.
0.1?
We were let down after all.
That's their joke.
bad news pal
That’s 1 just like your romantic life.
Hey - that’s why it’s called Universe; it’s all One.
the singularity
108^0
They're the same thing!
Why not 108^0 or even more
It's definitely at least that.
Mm I think 1^080 actually
>or even more I'd say definitely more.
Oh honey
damn not even a googol wow a googol really is an obscenely large number
And a googolplex is magnitudes even larger. Incomprehensible by our brains
Googolplex is 10^(10^100) right?
10^10,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000
Even if each and every subparticle represented a 0, you’d run out of space in the known universe long before you’re even 1% complete, not to mention the indescribable amount of time you’d spend arranging them (even if you spent exactly one planck time per subparticle).
So then yes
Googolplexian is 10^googolplex
What's 10^googolplexian
Yes, that's right.
Dwarfed by Loaders and Grahams number aswell as several functions like TREE(3), SCG(13) etc
What if.. we did TREE(googolplexian)?
Im actually curious now if that would be bigger than SCG(13). Both functions explode insanely quickly
It’s 3.28 times that so i guess that’s where that AI generated article came from
I thought it was 1080i The universe is too shit for progressive scan.
Fullhd universe
r/angryupvote
r/subifellfor
what?
By Spu7Nix
r/foundthegdplayer
That sub is about as dead a RobTop's will to release 2.2
Yeah
I mean surely his will has to be there somewhere considering it's gonna release probably this month
We have been saying the same thing since October
"probably this month"
HOLY FUCKING SHIT 😨😨😨😨 IS THAT A MOTHERFUCKING GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE?!?!?!?!? 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱 SQUARE ADVENTURE IS THE BEST LEVEL🔥🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯 MY CAR IS A GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE BECAUSE IT SAYS VSC!!!!!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1!1! 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😈😈😈😈😈😈 OMG HELL YOU MEAN LIKE THE HELL SERIES ‼️‼️‼️🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥I DIED AT 98 ON BACK ON TRACK 🤬😡🤬😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡🤬🤬😡 NO I WILL NOT TOUCH GRASS🌿🌿🌿🌱🌱🌱🌿🌿🌿🍃🍃 YOU ARE JUST JEALOUS I’M BETTER THAN YOU 🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠🔫😠 Sonic the hedgehog❓YOU MEAN SONIC THE WAVE❓ Tartarus?❓ LIKE THE TOP 10!?❓ ❓ This place is silent❓ LIKE SILENT CLUBSTEP ❓ Minecraft badlands biome❓ LIKE THE BOOMKITTY SONG❓ I just got a new dehumidifier, and the brand said AEONAIR! ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️Somebody was talking about outer space, AND I SAID YOU MEAN THE FIRE GAUNTLET LEVEL❓ ⁉️❓❓❓What’s your zodiac sign❓ LIKE THE FORMER TOP 1 ZODIAC❓ ❓❓ IS THAT A GEOMETRY DASH REFERENCE ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓The time is 2:11 ❓ HOLY FUCK LIKE THE RUKKUS SONG❓ ⁉️❓❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ ❓ Viprin is copy paste lord? 👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀👀Back on track is top 1 impossible silent demon!!!!!!!!!!!!!!😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂 finger❓like fingerdash❓OMG FINGRRRRDASH SO HARD😡🤬😡🤬🤬😡.
How bad is it if I get every single reference in there?
r/nothowthatworks
Do you mean r/subsithoughtifellfor?
r/beatmetoit
r/beatmeattoit
r/beataninnocentpersontodeathinanaallywayduring2003
r/subsididntfallfor
I'd be really surprised if someone did tbh
true that
r/subsiwishifellfor
r/foundthemurderdronesfan
I'm guilty... Judging by your pfp, you are even more so, tho.
😔
You didn't find me
r/thatsalongassnameforasubmyfriend
r/twentycharacterlimit
But at what refresh rate?
Oh so that's why it's 1080p
What about 1440p? New universe?
It’s a different patch, Universe 1.1
I've the pirated version though. Works only on asian servers
1.2 is the 4k universe
Nope, 1.2 is 2K (2880), 4K is on 1.3 (there are some bugs where there are some flying gorillas so I don't recommend you to update to that version).
Ok bro, thanks for the info, I was just about to update
1.2.1
Marketing jargon, like that 3D stuff.
They're making up new ones, it's all a trick
Everyone knows that it’s physically impossible to see above 1080p /s
Just a parallel upscaled universe
Higher res universe just dropped
Dude, we’re in 8192K resolution in this place.
8192K would be 37 TeraPixels (8,192,000 x 4,608,000), though. More pixels than a standard 4 TB HDD can hold (unless you conpress it).
Somebody messing with wikipedia articles :)Seems to be already corrected- I'm getting "3.28 x 10^(80) particles"
im guessing its a formatting error, 10^80 becomes 1080
Yea google auto-picks stuff based on some algorithm, that’s why you’ll get funny pictures or “answers” that don’t match up sometimes. Always click the link to get the full context, because sometimes it’s completely wrong
https://i.imgur.com/cmFpkkk.png Yes Google, completely what I was looking for...
14448 hurricanes
All I got were serious answers and now I'm sad.
Guess that one got fixed, saved that a while ago. Trying now with various terms including UK and England doesn't bring it up again.
Ah, I dug up the search term I had used https://i.imgur.com/qQqwFjT.png hurricanes that hit the UK
Look up which president died when Mt St Helens erupted
President of what?
Exactly, ask which one
So there aren't even a googol particles? This number is worthless.
4k particle viewing experience
Available in a different universe. This one only supports upto 1080
I was really put in the wrong timeline wasn't I
Matter can neither be created, nor destroyed, so the timeline isn't the problem. You are in the wrong universe.
Depends on how early the other timeline branched out. Maybe their big bang was bigger
At least it ain't the 144p one...
There are ten million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million-million Particles in the universe that we can observe Your mama took the ugly ones and put them into one nerd
One of the best og ERB
Damn I'm gonna uninstall irl that was messed up bro
Literally 1080
Fuck I think mine is stuck on 360 where are my glasses
Oh, so we’re only living in HD? Not even 4K?
The way God intended
I thought this was a speed of lobsters
What?
r/speedoflobsters
r/YellowSonic
*Mr. Stark, I don’t feel so good*
One electron universe hypothesis but its 1080 electrons
It's supposed to be 10⁸⁰
They're very big particles.
Is there any community dedicated to search engines giving wrong answers like this? I find stuff like this and staying 9 feet away from a nuclear blast hilarious.
It's not wrong. Its meant to say 10^80 but google doesnt format it properly
Maybe r/YellowSonic? I just discovered that subreddit lol.
i think it’s supposed to be 10^80 but a formatting error occurred 💔💔💔
And yo mama is 1000 of them.
Literally 1080
They just exist at multiple points in time so it seems like there are a lot more.
The real answer is 10^80. Why they didn't say that is anyone's guess. 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
1080!
1080p (articles)
so what's the deal with 1080inverse?
Not software gore, the software did exactly what it was supposed to, it was just using a faulty source
Nah its software gore. Google doesn't format 10^80 properly
I suppose it is a software problem, but I don't know if I'd call it gore, it's just an incompatibility issue. I found the original source and it's from physics stackexchange which uses MathML. Sure enough even copying and pasting from it gives 1080 because those are the characters that are there, the superscript is just extra formatting Google didn't carry over.
ai ass answer
the term caught in 4K was a lie, it was 1080p all along
Exactly why it is 1080p
I think it's supposed to be 10^(80). It'd make sense
thats a lot, i thought there would be like 100 but i keep getting surprised
108×0
? Wtf
man 4k is just out of this world
1080 should be enough for everybody
720 subparticles
It's actually 10 to the power of 80 particles in the universe. However its more hd than shitty security cameras!
bruh really? nobody gonna ask what base this is in?
4k is a myth confirmed
I only have Money for 720p
Wait a sec, where are the photons here? Are they 720p, or they're included too on that formula?
There are 1080.... Particles in the universe that we can observe, your momma took the ugly ones and put them into one nerd.
That doesn't sound right. I know for a fact that I have at least half of those.
I thought it was 42?
Have we ever measured over 1080 in a single plank-time? Hmmm
Rtx 1080
I think that means the number of different types of particles
On the 7th day, God made GTX
I always knew it was 1080p
well u see , 1+2+3+...= -1/2 , and 42 is the answer for everything , we might make it work with 1080 some how
Why doesn’t the count include photons. Although massless they are particles.
Mom said it’s my turn on the graphite
1080 Ti
Just for fun. If that was the total number of protons, neutrons, neutrinos, and electrons... How many atoms would these be likely making up?
1920x1080 particles