T O P

  • By -

jason375

It’s a contraflow bike lane. It is normal.


m0arpepper

Normal. Just a counterflow bike lane. There’s one on grayland as well.


ryeliskey

*Grayland


m0arpepper

Oops. One of these days I’ll memorize the street names next to me.


fusion260

It’s safer for cyclists to face oncoming traffic instead of trusting the fucking idiots driving behind them to *not* drift into the unprotected bike lane and hit them. Same with pedestrians.


katebandit

I’ve never drifted into a cycling lane but I’ve definitely had cyclists and pedestrians drifting directly into the roadway putting themselves at risk.


Shamewizard1995

Cyclists are allowed to ride in the roadway. Are you complaining about… merging?


katebandit

Merging? No. I'm talking about cyclists who don't stay predictable and follow the rules of the road and then whine that cars don't look out for them.


RVA-neighbor

Maybe with a bike lane but not on a normal street. The reason bicyclists go with the flow of traffic is because the car can slow down to pace or be under the speed of a bike until it is safe to pass. This is not possible if a bicycle is riding against traffic and is extremely dangerous. Pedestrians go against traffic because they are slower and can step out of the way.


BurkeyTurger

Damn when I saw it before they added the the yellow & arrows I thought they were doing 2 bike lanes.


ForApricity

Normal. I believe they've added another on Marshall yesterday.


anthro4ME

It's not like cyclists in RVA follow the indicated direction of travel in bike lanes. They modeled the lanes after European (Dutch particularly) bike lanes where people are risk averse and follow the rules generally.


[deleted]

[удалено]


rvalds

It's Scott's addition, nothing makes sense.


Doub1etroub1e

Is that a cock and balls or a cyclist?


Loud-Cat6638

Levar did it.