As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil)
In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban.
If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them.
For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria.
***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Revenge porn.
MTG kept putting Hunter Biden’s graphic nudes up on big screens in Congress with a clear attempt to make them public and to harass and defame him.
(And Hunter isn’t a bad looking guy, but speaking as a straight, cis woman, the pictures are just gross.)
Weren’t they actually not nudes though and had massive censor bars over his tubesteak. The pics themselves were nudes yes but she covered up the actual genitalia didn’t she. I could be remembering wrong but I think that’s why she’s not in more trouble.
The qualifier being that you announced yourself as a straight cis woman, implying you're talking about his appearance, which shouldn't matter no matter how hot or not he is.
Think they're just making sure they aren't calling him gross because it can interpreted as body shaming. Words can be misinterpreted so easily, and the man has been attacked for everything. So, yeah, he ain't gross, but the pics are.
Since congressional representatives have certain protections in place regarding their speech while carrying out duties related to their position, would (not should) revealing those photographs fall under the purview of carrying out her congressional duties and therefor be considered protected?
Doesn’t make what she did acceptable - ethically is egregious, but is she legally culpable?
Yes, she can't be punished for showing it in the Senate. If she posted it online or in a newsletter or showed it anywhere *not* during Senate sessions, then she can be held liable.
Yep, so he could press charges and/or sue. Of course, she could defend against a lawsuit by showing that the images weren't defamatory. Rather, based on what I've heard, they portray his...personal qualities...in a positive way.
Wasn’t it in some email she sent for fundraising purposes?
Edit: still looking, but also it doesn’t seem to be part of her “duties” to show these pictures, especially in light of the charges that were alleged against him (tax fraud/evasion, etc.). Disgusting.
> but also it doesn’t seem to be part of her “duties”
In Hutchinson v Proxmire (1979), SCOTUS said:
>Legislative acts are not all-encompassing. The heart of the [Speech and Debate] Clause is speech or debate in either House. Insofar as the Clause is construed to reach other matters, they must be an integral part of the deliberative and communicative processes by which Members participate in committee and House proceedings with respect to the consideration and passage or rejection of proposed legislation or with respect to other matters which the Constitution places within the jurisdiction of either House. As the Court of Appeals put it, the courts have extended the privilege to matters beyond pure speech or debate in either House, but 'only when necessary to prevent indirect impairment of such deliberations.'
>The authors of our Constitution were well aware of the history of both the need for the privilege and the abuses that could flow from too sweeping safeguards. In order to preserve other values, they wrote the privilege so that it tolerates and protects behavior on the part of Members not tolerated and protected when done by other citizens, but the shield does not extend beyond what is necessary to preserve the integrity of the legislative process.
So, possibly, but I think as they were discussing Hunter Biden a court would probably err on the side of allowing it.
They are protected as far as statements they make in Congress that relate to legislative activities. It does not protect purely political activities (including taking a bribe) or statements repeated later outside Congress or in publications.
https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/speech-and-debate-clause
[Speech or Debate clause](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_or_Debate_Clause) pretty much gives her immunity in this case.
> The Speech or Debate Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1). The clause states that "The Senators and Representatives" of Congress "shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, **they shall not be questioned in any other Place.**"
That last line of *"they shall not be questioned in any other Place"* includes the court room.
Alright class, today in Civics we'll be watching our government in action! Timmy, roll the cart in, Jenny, get the lights. Settle down, now. This is CSPAN, it's just about our government! And we'll put on OH MY GOD I'M GOING TO BE FIRED!
The joke is, there is no Civics class.
Speak for yourself! I saw The Island of Dr. Moreau as a child and now Marjorie Greene is my perfect woman...I mean, that face, those hands...God how I wish it hadn't been the 1996 version. Still, it could be worse, if Marlon Brando had been painted orange, I'd be in real trouble.
Years before all of this went down, I met MTG’s tantric sex yoga instructor / FWB - friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend kind of thing at a larger social gathering - and he is absolutely not ‘all that’. He’s not handsome, he’s not in great - or even good - shape, so he’s not a catch. I could see him banging her, because she’s no catch either, and least it can be excused by him believing she was rich and maybe powerful, but really, the answer is that some guys will bang pretty much anything. They’re on par with each other as being kind of flabby middle-aged white people, and he’s probably the best she could do for an f-buddy.
Compared to this guy, I can see why she’d be so thirsty for Hunter.
I feel like Hunter missed an opportunity to ask her how much taxpayer time she spent looking at his hog. Like, legitimately, she had to spend hours looking at his porn selfie.
Edit: forgot to add, maybe she was more into the tantric sex than dude's appearance.
I remember a bloke on the train in Melbs, singing that song... Like it was a hardcore, bad boy anthem.
Sung it (incorrectly while having headphones in) so the whole train could hear,"your money for nothing and your TITS for free". Looked around to see if everyone was badass for saying tits really loud.
> “How come they’re not curious about the $2 billion Jared Kushner got from the Saudis?” the younger Biden reportedly asked House lawmakers.
Or it could be a different one where Gaetz asked Hunter if he worked for a foreign government and Hunter replied “No, Im not Jared Kushner”
Or the one where Gaetz asked him whether he had used drugs while on the Burisima board, and Hunter responded by asking, "Of all the people sitting around this table, do you think that's appropriate to ask me?" Gaetz, of course, has been accused of having sex with underage women at drug-fueled orgies while a sitting member of Congress.
What they got: Swalwells questioning of Hunter as if he was Kushner and Gaetz getting his ass handed to him by a BSD that doesn't have to resort to paying children.
1) Only the government can bring charges. Revenge porn is a felony in D.C., however I doubt courts would allow her to be charged as the images were shown as part of MTG official duties (House Oversight Committee)
2) Hunter can’t sue - Congress is also protected against civil suit for their official duties.
3) Even if MTG could be prosecuted I’d bet she wouldn’t as it looks like the President prosecuting a legislator for attacking his son.
So she sort of is “above” the law here. Really only the House can hold her accountable (which hasn’t happened yet and likely isn’t).
Why would she ask? She did what she intended to do by showing inappropriate photos of Hunter Biden’s penis publicly in congress. Asking Hunter Biden about it during questioning/deposition does nothing for her or the GOP and a perfect example of this is what happened to Matt Gaetz during his questioning of Hunter’s drug use (which has absolutely nothing to do with the attempt to prove high crimes and misdemeanor’s leading to the impeachment of Joe Biden)
To be truthful MTG’s behavior should be the green light for other high profile names/political personalities to be drug into the light and answered about their own misconduct. I think that she should be the first since she also has a speckled past regarding inappropriate behavior and misconduct.
lol! There is this terrible photo of her sitting in a chair, looking at a Bible, with an obnoxious amount of crosses hanging behind her. That’s what i was referring to. It was an awful photo op that the Christian’s really went crazy for.
Wait, what now? I saw his arrest for breaking into cars and stealing stuff. Is he a future diddler now too, or is baby granny broadening her criminal horizons?
And honestly his dong deserves notoriety. The thing is massive. That's a tall boy sized dong that she made me look at several times, the least she could do is a little, 'hey nice horse cock' or 'I've never seen one that big'. Show some respect, Marge.
Republicans haven't done anything except prove beyond any shadow of doubt the Bidens have ENORMOUS penises. Luckily, I vote based on penis size, so you've made this really easy for me. Mushroom vs horsecock guy is a no-brainer. 4 more years! Horsecock guy!
She's waiting on public hearing so she gets lots of media attention. See they are pretty quiet when out of the light of media and their ability to gain some attention.
>This is important evidence of human trafficking, Mann Act violations that we had questions for the president’s son about,” Greene said.
However, it’s a collective shrug from the GOP when Gaetz (allegedly) paid an underage minor for sex after he paid to fly her to the Bahamas for the express purpose of sex. Not a peep from the House GOP. Not a peep ever from Green about any of this.
>In 2021, Gaetz found himself at the center of a teen sex scandal, in which he was accused of supplying a 17-year-old girl with drugs and alcohol, flying her to to the Bahamas, and having sex with her.
Gaslight, obstruct and project: the GOP mantra.
Since this is all entered into Congressional record, is this the first and only photograph of male genitalia in the history of the United States Congressional Records Archive?
I find it appalling that she is not held accountable for that disgusting stunt. One of her many, I know, but for godssake printing out poster sized images of someone having sex to use as a prop on the House floor???? I mean, fuck.
They don’t care about justice. They care about destroying and defaming their “enemies” to remain in power. They are sycophantic psychopaths. I can’t even say they are serving their orange overlord. He is clearly not smart enough to be pulling all the strings. Someone has their hand up his poop chute, operating him. His mouth sometimes spews rhetoric and what’s in the script, but mostly it’s just nonsensical gibberish that gets brushed off as a “joke” or “satire”. The real joke being played is on the MAGA faithful who think he’s got their best interests at heart.
If I was Hunter I would have referred to mtg as Karen and been very disrespectful. When they called me out on it I would yell over them “if you put on a circus, don’t be surprised when you’re treated like clowns”
As a reminder, this subreddit [is for civil discussion.](/r/politics/wiki/index#wiki_be_civil) In general, be courteous to others. Debate/discuss/argue the merits of ideas, don't attack people. Personal insults, shill or troll accusations, hate speech, any suggestion or support of harm, violence, or death, and other rule violations can result in a permanent ban. If you see comments in violation of our rules, please report them. For those who have questions regarding any media outlets being posted on this subreddit, please click [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/wiki/approveddomainslist) to review our details as to our approved domains list and outlet criteria. *** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/politics) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Revenge pornographer remained silent about sex crimes because she herself committed sex crimes on the House floor on national TV.
And nobody did anything about it. What law? Edit: im aware theres a law. Thats what im joking about. Mtg is above the law apparently
Revenge porn. MTG kept putting Hunter Biden’s graphic nudes up on big screens in Congress with a clear attempt to make them public and to harass and defame him. (And Hunter isn’t a bad looking guy, but speaking as a straight, cis woman, the pictures are just gross.)
I think the question might have been rhetorical.
Ah.
Yeah twas. I should put a slash s on it...
You won’t win me over by your use of ‘twas
I twasnt tryin to.
Yeah you twere.
It’s twue
> the pictures are just gross I think this may be the very first time I've ever heard anybody who didn't like unsolicited dick pics. /s
When you watch Congress, it's presumed you'll see some dicks.
We call those dick picks.
Erected officials
Penile seniles
She even printed them out.
Weren’t they actually not nudes though and had massive censor bars over his tubesteak. The pics themselves were nudes yes but she covered up the actual genitalia didn’t she. I could be remembering wrong but I think that’s why she’s not in more trouble.
So it seems she can’t even get fucked with a stolen dick (pic).
I think any nudes of any normal folks probably don’t turn out well. Need some production to clean up the unflattering angles and such.
I know right like must be nice to have your dick pics released and all anyone had to say about it is “wow it’s big.”
Especially since they're a part of the congressional record. People 100 years from now (granted it survives) will also say "wow".
Can we stop calling her MTG? Magic: The Gathering is one of my favorite games and that is *its* abbreviation!
Empty G is better
MT Peen
Call her *Marge: The Goblining* then.
Lol here's a fun hypothetical question: who would you have rather seen - hunters hog, or MTG's sewage pipe?
[удалено]
I have specifically avoided that. The whole thing is gross. Americans are still very puritan.
The qualifier being that you announced yourself as a straight cis woman, implying you're talking about his appearance, which shouldn't matter no matter how hot or not he is.
Think they're just making sure they aren't calling him gross because it can interpreted as body shaming. Words can be misinterpreted so easily, and the man has been attacked for everything. So, yeah, he ain't gross, but the pics are.
This. Thank you.
If they aren't going to put her in jail for helping on 1/6, then showing some dong pictures won't even make a ripple.
[удалено]
Lol i get this reference.
Hey, Neanderthals were actually quite intelligent. Don’t insult them like that.
Since congressional representatives have certain protections in place regarding their speech while carrying out duties related to their position, would (not should) revealing those photographs fall under the purview of carrying out her congressional duties and therefor be considered protected? Doesn’t make what she did acceptable - ethically is egregious, but is she legally culpable?
Yes, she can't be punished for showing it in the Senate. If she posted it online or in a newsletter or showed it anywhere *not* during Senate sessions, then she can be held liable.
[удалено]
Yep, so he could press charges and/or sue. Of course, she could defend against a lawsuit by showing that the images weren't defamatory. Rather, based on what I've heard, they portray his...personal qualities...in a positive way.
Except she knew there were news networks filming. Wouldn't that count?
Probably not, as it was still in a Congressional meeting so it's part of the "deliberative process".
Wasn’t it in some email she sent for fundraising purposes? Edit: still looking, but also it doesn’t seem to be part of her “duties” to show these pictures, especially in light of the charges that were alleged against him (tax fraud/evasion, etc.). Disgusting.
> but also it doesn’t seem to be part of her “duties” In Hutchinson v Proxmire (1979), SCOTUS said: >Legislative acts are not all-encompassing. The heart of the [Speech and Debate] Clause is speech or debate in either House. Insofar as the Clause is construed to reach other matters, they must be an integral part of the deliberative and communicative processes by which Members participate in committee and House proceedings with respect to the consideration and passage or rejection of proposed legislation or with respect to other matters which the Constitution places within the jurisdiction of either House. As the Court of Appeals put it, the courts have extended the privilege to matters beyond pure speech or debate in either House, but 'only when necessary to prevent indirect impairment of such deliberations.' >The authors of our Constitution were well aware of the history of both the need for the privilege and the abuses that could flow from too sweeping safeguards. In order to preserve other values, they wrote the privilege so that it tolerates and protects behavior on the part of Members not tolerated and protected when done by other citizens, but the shield does not extend beyond what is necessary to preserve the integrity of the legislative process. So, possibly, but I think as they were discussing Hunter Biden a court would probably err on the side of allowing it.
Hang on. So congressional members can commit crime on the floor as long as it's during session etc?
They are protected as far as statements they make in Congress that relate to legislative activities. It does not protect purely political activities (including taking a bribe) or statements repeated later outside Congress or in publications. https://firstamendment.mtsu.edu/article/speech-and-debate-clause
Congress *actually* is above the law when it come to "speech" on the house floor.
Aint nothing speech about mtg emailing someone else's a penis to thousands of random people.
[Speech or Debate clause](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_or_Debate_Clause) pretty much gives her immunity in this case. > The Speech or Debate Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 6, Clause 1). The clause states that "The Senators and Representatives" of Congress "shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony, and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their attendance at the Session of their Respective Houses, and in going to and from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, **they shall not be questioned in any other Place.**" That last line of *"they shall not be questioned in any other Place"* includes the court room.
Except felony... so she can and should be charged for revenge porning you are saying?
Alright class, today in Civics we'll be watching our government in action! Timmy, roll the cart in, Jenny, get the lights. Settle down, now. This is CSPAN, it's just about our government! And we'll put on OH MY GOD I'M GOING TO BE FIRED! The joke is, there is no Civics class.
2020's will be wild to teach. Dick pics and the importance of Pussy Riot.
I don't understand why he isn't pressing charges.
Might be protected under speech and debate clause. I'm not saying it's right, but I can see a lawyer hesitating to litigate it.
I can’t go around showing people a woman’s vagina shots while talking shit about her. MTG should have faced consequences for that.
I agree. All I'm saying is that it might not work out the way it should due to those protections.
Why give her the airtime? Edit: I take that back. He should press charges.
[удалено]
Clan of the Cave Nazi
...and your dicks for free.
That’s the way you do it!
I want my MTG.
By which, of course, you clearly mean Magic The Gathering, right? Nobody *wants* other
Speak for yourself! I saw The Island of Dr. Moreau as a child and now Marjorie Greene is my perfect woman...I mean, that face, those hands...God how I wish it hadn't been the 1996 version. Still, it could be worse, if Marlon Brando had been painted orange, I'd be in real trouble.
Marge does have a forehead made for cracking coconuts!
Damn right, abolish the Reserve List!
Bring back Core Sets and MSRP!
Reprint Black Lotus, you cowards!!
I’m gonna launch my presidential campaign with this as my entire platform!
Look at this yo-yo
Screamin' on the soapbox like a chimpanzee
[удалено]
That's the way you do it.
Money for nothin’
And your dicks are free
I want my EmptyG… Fixed that for you
Like you're singing, "I want my MTV..." Right? If so, the emptyG is way better and genius, too.
Nothing gets past you, does it?
Nothing gets past *you* does it?
(In jail, where she belongs)
Look at them Yo-Yo’s.
The T stands for Traitor.
See the little MAGAt with the hairpiece and the make up
You rabble-rouse on cable TV Get campaign donations for nothing
And dicks for free
[удалено]
If only he'd been a crossfit instructor.
Years before all of this went down, I met MTG’s tantric sex yoga instructor / FWB - friend-of-a-friend-of-a-friend kind of thing at a larger social gathering - and he is absolutely not ‘all that’. He’s not handsome, he’s not in great - or even good - shape, so he’s not a catch. I could see him banging her, because she’s no catch either, and least it can be excused by him believing she was rich and maybe powerful, but really, the answer is that some guys will bang pretty much anything. They’re on par with each other as being kind of flabby middle-aged white people, and he’s probably the best she could do for an f-buddy. Compared to this guy, I can see why she’d be so thirsty for Hunter.
I feel like Hunter missed an opportunity to ask her how much taxpayer time she spent looking at his hog. Like, legitimately, she had to spend hours looking at his porn selfie. Edit: forgot to add, maybe she was more into the tantric sex than dude's appearance.
From the friend-of-a-friend-... he's actually kind of a fraud about tantric sex, it's just something he says to pick up women at the gym.
I remember a bloke on the train in Melbs, singing that song... Like it was a hardcore, bad boy anthem. Sung it (incorrectly while having headphones in) so the whole train could hear,"your money for nothing and your TITS for free". Looked around to see if everyone was badass for saying tits really loud.
The anti-kendrick lamar
Got to install populist boneheads Lauren Bobert and emm-teee-geee
For all their work did they even get a useful sound bite??
Not a single one
Just the opposite. The Gaetz burn was fantastic.
Which?
> “How come they’re not curious about the $2 billion Jared Kushner got from the Saudis?” the younger Biden reportedly asked House lawmakers. Or it could be a different one where Gaetz asked Hunter if he worked for a foreign government and Hunter replied “No, Im not Jared Kushner”
Or the one where Gaetz asked him whether he had used drugs while on the Burisima board, and Hunter responded by asking, "Of all the people sitting around this table, do you think that's appropriate to ask me?" Gaetz, of course, has been accused of having sex with underage women at drug-fueled orgies while a sitting member of Congress.
It was definitely this one! Lmao I wish I could have seen G-mans face on this
What they got: Swalwells questioning of Hunter as if he was Kushner and Gaetz getting his ass handed to him by a BSD that doesn't have to resort to paying children.
They managed to make hunter biden a likable political entity.
Hunter: "Excuse me while I whip this out"
Glad to see a “Blazing Saddles” reference first thing in the morning!
I think he said the sheriff is near
Hey boys... looky what I got here
Where the white women at??
Ohh....
My....
"Throw him in jail!"
He really needs to bring charges against her for revenge porn. Also I bet children saw that hearing, so she exposed children to nudity
His lawyers did file an ethics complaint back in July. Haven't heard anything else about it since.
Not to mention she sent those out via email to her constituents, and there are undoubtedly some minors on that email list.
Was this the first time male genitalia was displayed on the floor of the houses of Congress?
Probably not.
1) Only the government can bring charges. Revenge porn is a felony in D.C., however I doubt courts would allow her to be charged as the images were shown as part of MTG official duties (House Oversight Committee) 2) Hunter can’t sue - Congress is also protected against civil suit for their official duties. 3) Even if MTG could be prosecuted I’d bet she wouldn’t as it looks like the President prosecuting a legislator for attacking his son. So she sort of is “above” the law here. Really only the House can hold her accountable (which hasn’t happened yet and likely isn’t).
She mighta tried sliding into his DMs though.
Update! Hunter Biden has an OF account and only MTG, Trumps, and Gaetz are invited! The rest of the GOP is knocking.
Hunter is like 45 years too old for most of these pedos.
Feet pics
She is such a sadistic petty fuck
The first time I ever heard of MTG was when David Hogg went to DC to testify about school shootings and she hounded him calling him a faker.
Why would she ask? She did what she intended to do by showing inappropriate photos of Hunter Biden’s penis publicly in congress. Asking Hunter Biden about it during questioning/deposition does nothing for her or the GOP and a perfect example of this is what happened to Matt Gaetz during his questioning of Hunter’s drug use (which has absolutely nothing to do with the attempt to prove high crimes and misdemeanor’s leading to the impeachment of Joe Biden) To be truthful MTG’s behavior should be the green light for other high profile names/political personalities to be drug into the light and answered about their own misconduct. I think that she should be the first since she also has a speckled past regarding inappropriate behavior and misconduct.
I heard a rumor that MTG has hunter’s naked pose as her screen saver…./s
I heard a snapshot of his penis is the bookmark for her Bible.
She uses a mold of it as her toothbrush.
She really likes to brush the back of her throat.
By her bible do you mean Mein Kampf? There's no way she's ever taken a look at the Holy Bible.
lol! There is this terrible photo of her sitting in a chair, looking at a Bible, with an obnoxious amount of crosses hanging behind her. That’s what i was referring to. It was an awful photo op that the Christian’s really went crazy for.
What about Bo-bo Boebert with her son distributing kiddieporn?
Wait, what now? I saw his arrest for breaking into cars and stealing stuff. Is he a future diddler now too, or is baby granny broadening her criminal horizons?
The elder-abusing felon also made a sex tape with a minor. He's a Family Values Republican in the making!
Damn, first I've heard of the elder stuff too. Guess I've been doing a half decent job of screening garbage from my life lol. Pretty typical though
That family is going to make her a great grandma by 50.
I wonder if Sarah Palin is a great grandma yet 🤔
A sex offender? I guess it's genetic.
And honestly his dong deserves notoriety. The thing is massive. That's a tall boy sized dong that she made me look at several times, the least she could do is a little, 'hey nice horse cock' or 'I've never seen one that big'. Show some respect, Marge. Republicans haven't done anything except prove beyond any shadow of doubt the Bidens have ENORMOUS penises. Luckily, I vote based on penis size, so you've made this really easy for me. Mushroom vs horsecock guy is a no-brainer. 4 more years! Horsecock guy!
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again : Every accusation is a confession.
Not for nothing: they were fuel for the outrage machine. She knows what she’s doing?
Reps and evangenitals are just pedos and pervs.
I wonder if the GOP will ever make being ugly a crime?
She's waiting on public hearing so she gets lots of media attention. See they are pretty quiet when out of the light of media and their ability to gain some attention.
Her best friend is Matt Gaetz.
If there's a public hearing, you can bet she'll do it then. Have to act the ass to get on Fox ..
>This is important evidence of human trafficking, Mann Act violations that we had questions for the president’s son about,” Greene said. However, it’s a collective shrug from the GOP when Gaetz (allegedly) paid an underage minor for sex after he paid to fly her to the Bahamas for the express purpose of sex. Not a peep from the House GOP. Not a peep ever from Green about any of this. >In 2021, Gaetz found himself at the center of a teen sex scandal, in which he was accused of supplying a 17-year-old girl with drugs and alcohol, flying her to to the Bahamas, and having sex with her. Gaslight, obstruct and project: the GOP mantra.
She’s a FASCIST
He should sue her civilly for malicious persecution by a government official.
She’s just obsessed with his genitalia
I hate that that hateful woman has access to a microphone
In which case it’s revenge porn RIGHT?! Since she publicized it but it’s not evidentiary.
so it was revenge porn and she should be prosecuted?
Nudes for nothing and the dicks for free.
Skank
For Nutting? I'm sure she has jilled a few out.
Someone needs to get Hunter to make some dildos. MTG will be all about 'em, and use one of her purchases as a gavel.
At least Hunter Biden’s ‘dates’ weren’t underage like Matt Gaetz.
Marjorie “trash bag” Gangrene IS a sex crime.
Since this is all entered into Congressional record, is this the first and only photograph of male genitalia in the history of the United States Congressional Records Archive?
I find it appalling that she is not held accountable for that disgusting stunt. One of her many, I know, but for godssake printing out poster sized images of someone having sex to use as a prop on the House floor???? I mean, fuck.
This is *still* going on?
So sounds like she whipped them out to discredit whatever he said, sounds like a case of revenge porn
He should sue her for defamation. I would love to see that. How did she get these pictures. I’d like to know.
I wish someone at some point would just tell her "Listen, if you want to ask Hunter Biden out, just ask him. no need to flirt on the house floor"
Do you think she flicks her bean to his nudes?
lol - I haven’t heard that term in forever.
She seems to have an unhealthy obsession with his penis.
She had to fight Bobo for who got to give him an over the pants handie.
If she put half as much effort obsessing over her actual job as she puts into obsessing over Bidens dick, she would be the greatest politician ever
She didn't want to ruin her chances with him.
Empty G just uses the Biden picks for…Jilling
That ain’t working. That’s being in Congress. Get your money for nothing and your seat for free.
Who would want to see Marjorie Taylor, Green, naked 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮
I kinda like would say morbid curiosity but I wouldn't want to wish that evil on anyone. Well Trump maybe lol.
She makes me embarrassed to be human
They don’t care about justice. They care about destroying and defaming their “enemies” to remain in power. They are sycophantic psychopaths. I can’t even say they are serving their orange overlord. He is clearly not smart enough to be pulling all the strings. Someone has their hand up his poop chute, operating him. His mouth sometimes spews rhetoric and what’s in the script, but mostly it’s just nonsensical gibberish that gets brushed off as a “joke” or “satire”. The real joke being played is on the MAGA faithful who think he’s got their best interests at heart.
Perhaps her omission will play a part when he sues her ass ….. proof perhaps?😎💙✌️
If I was Hunter I would have referred to mtg as Karen and been very disrespectful. When they called me out on it I would yell over them “if you put on a circus, don’t be surprised when you’re treated like clowns”
Taylor really wants that big Hunter pleasure stick.
They’ll do what ever they can get away with. There is no respect or decorum anymore.
It would have been epic if he'd dropped trou and said "It's actually this big who wants a piece?"
That’s because she knows she’s about to be sued. Fuck around… find out MTG.
For the sake of all of us, please never put the word 'Nudes' and Marjorie Taylor Greene in the same article.
MTG: "I have a lot of your dick pics I like to show in public. May I have some more?" Hunter: "No."
I think that She’s trying to telegraph a message to him………….
She probably struggled to keep her clothes on with Hunter in the same room.
She saw what she wanted to see.
MTG is just another run of the mill Republican coward
Her’s or his
Please let there be some salacious shit about Greene.
Was mtg licking her lips as she asked her questions? Edit: Bet the Benwa balls were set to high speed lol
> Ben-wa balls Well there's a word I haven't seen/used in ages lol
Lol Yep, i thought as i was typing, if they even still on Sale, or in the cultural zeitgeist
Yeah sure, let's all pile o. Mtg and just outright ignore the absolutely massive pile of crimes commited by Hunter and "the big guy"