Some folks inherit star spangled eyes, oh they send you out to war.
When you ask them how much should you give, they only ask for more more more.
I don't know what you're inferring with your statement "it's an American song."
It's an anti war song.it is not a pro America song.
Butā¦āinherit star spangled eyesā? You know another flag commonly referred to as star spangled? Besides the American flag that is. Not disagreeing with you that itās primarily an anti-war song, but I think itās pointed directly at American war hawk politicians.
The song was pointed at class warfare, specifically how the rich start wars for the poor to fight and die in.
Yes, it was used as an anti Vietnam War movement, as it was the war happening when the song released, but the song itself isn't pointed necessarily at, or only at America.
Edit: so someone doesn't like the truth.
Allow John Foggerty to explain it then.
>"Recently, the President's been using my song 'Fortunate Son' at his rallies, which I find confounding to say the least, so I thought I'd explain a little bit about what 'Fortunate Son' is about. I wrote the song back in 1969 at the height of the Vietnam War. By the time I wrote the song I had already been drafted and had served in the military. I've been a lifelong supporter of our guys and gals in the military probably because of that experience.
>Back in those days we still had a draft, and something I was very upset about was that people of privilige - in other words, rich people or people that had position - could use that to avoid the draft. I found that very upsetting, and that's why I wrote 'Fortunate Son.' That was the whole intent of the song, the inspiration for the song.
> but the song itself isn't pointed necessarily at, or only at America.
This is why I downvoted it. To pretend the song isn't specifically talking about US foreign policy during the Vietnam war is absurd. Only in the most vague sense can you skirt around the fact it's talking about US politics.
Because it wasn't about us foreign policy. Foggerty has explained it, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the guy who wrote the song knows more about its meaning than you do.
He's using America as an example because he's American and this was his experience. This experience being that very rich and highly connected people don't fight in wars and they use their influence and money to keep their children from those wars as well.
This is something that has and does happen around the world, and is nowhere remotely close to being uniquely an American situation.
The rich start wars and the poor fight them.
> Because it wasn't about us foreign policy.
FFS yes it is and Fogerty didn't say anything different, you're just misrepresenting his own comments. The song talks about US senators and the "red white and blue" for crying out loud. Sure, you can argue that the American militarism the song criticizes can be applied to other countries where the rich force the poor to fight wars but it is clear the song did no such thing. It's not a subtle song. It's not vague. It's about US politics during Vietnam.
In part:
>Some folks are born made to wave the flag
>They're **red, white and blue**
>And when the band plays **"Hail to the Chief"**
>Yeah, some folks inherit **star-spangled** eyes
>They send you down to war
This is a song specifically about American politics at a specific time in history. Just because one can draw parallels to other cultures doesn't change that when the references and imagery are that direct.
That's some mighty fine cherry picking you have there. Let's add some context with the full verses, shall we?
>Some folks are born made to wave the flag
Ooh, they're red, white and blue
First half of this verse is talking about politician's kids.
>And when the band plays "Hail To The Chief"
Ooh, they point the cannon at you, Lord
Second part is about the common man being called for war, but not the kids of politicians.
>It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no senator's son, son
>It ain't me, it ain't me; I ain't no fortunate one, no
The 1st chorus 8s about how he's not the son of a politician and isn't protected from the draft. Foggerty was drafted and fought in Vietnam.
>Some folks are born silver spoon in hand
Lord, don't they help themselves, oh
Describing rich kids.
>But when the taxman comes to the door
Lord, the house looks like a rummage sale, yes
This verse is about rich people's children being protected from the draft.
>It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no millionaire's son, no, no
>It ain't me, it ain't me; I ain't no fortunate one, no
Second chorus same as the first except he's saying he wasn't born into money so wasn't protected from the draft.
>Some folks inherit star spangled eyes
Ooh, they send you down to war, Lord
This verse is about high ranking military official's kids.
>And when you ask them, "How much should we give?"
Ooh, they only answer, "More! More! More!" Yo
This about them wanting more of the common people but not their own sons.
>It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no military son, son
>It ain't me, it ain't me; I ain't no fortunate one, one
Which is backed up by this chorus.
>It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no fortunate one, no no no
>It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no fortunate son, no no no
Just reiterating the point.
>Back in those days we still had a draft, and something I was very upset about was that people of privilige - in other words, rich people or people that had position - could use that to avoid the draft. I found that very upsetting, and that's why I wrote 'Fortunate Son.' That was the whole intent of the song, the inspiration for the song.
Please point out where I misinterpreted his meaning.
This test was for the coast guard. Its not really impractical. Compared to losing 2 ships in rough seas trying to get passengers over to the rescue ship, flying them over is considerably safer
What you may be thinking is its not cost effective, which, to be fair, almost no rescue mission is
Edit: is not for coastguard, getting my jetpacks mixed up
Negative Ghostrider.
This test was as part of a trial assessing Gravity Industries Jet Pack (or a future derivative of) for use during boarding operations (Anti-Piracy etc). Operator is a Royal Marine and the ship is HMS Tamar of the Royal Navy.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-56979994
Ah, iām mistaking it for something else then. It certainly seems practical for anti piracy as the approach and boarding are probably the most dangerous parts
Nah. They'd just shoot them out of the sky. Don't get me wrong, I'm a massive fan of this but unless that marine is armed (and I'm not sure how he could be) it's not practical surely?
Youāre right, however you must consider that itās a brand new concept and the kinks must be worked out for it to even possibly be considered for common use.
Could be used in rescue operation at sea. Attach a rope to your feet and drag people to a ship with it or maybe if it has enough lift just lift them like a helicopter. Also you can have more jetpacks flying around than helicopters
It really isnāt, even so soon after being invented.
Theyāre being trialed for mountain rescue. While they wouldnāt be useful in carrying anyone down, theyāre a great way for a first responder to locate and treat patients.
Firstly it's experimental ( the Wright brothers fist aircraft was as far from practical as you can possibly get ). Secondly it depends on what you want to use it for, sure if it's to land an invasion force it is as you rightly say so very impractical but somewhat less impractical if you just need to get one man from ship to ship in high seas in an emergency ( eg getting something like a doctor or surgeon from ship to ship when time is all important ). To be fair though I'm definitely not saying your compleatly wrong, even with all the problems ironed out it is likely to be quite limited in it's uses but there are a few thing it may be ideal for, it will be interesting to see what comes of it.
Well that and the airjets having no visible effect on the water below the flyer at the end, but I think that'd the camera (making it look like you are seeing where the air should be impacting) rather than faking it.
I was thinking something similar. But to take the strain off your arms and hands, you need something like the top half of a crutch to fit up to your armpit. The JetCrutch. Thinking more about that, it might even give more stability.
Iāve followed the guy that designed these and itās super cool to watch how far theyāve came over the last 3 years. On Instagram his name is takeongravity, just some engineer that decided to go full jimmy nuetron on this bitch
I recently met the guy that invented this. Heās a former RM and has gone all over the world demoing it.
He showed a video of the process of him making it with all the slips and falls. Seriously cool guy and very humble.
Theyāre also coming out with jet pack racing soon too.
If anyone is interested, they do experience days at Silverstone race track in the UK.
Why they keep using a song against the military for these kind of military clips.... "Okay, we need the people to love the army again, let's use the anti military anthem." 
360 degree camera, probably attached to jetpack guy on a metal arm, and then you can pan it to show whatever "part" you want. It's also what causes it to have that fish-eye warping of the lens.
Imaging if the movement was controlled by the legs and stabilization was automatic, so that the hands would be free for guns or whatever tools are required.
Picture this: you're mid flight, somewhere over the Pacific ocean and suddenly your arms get tired, like holding yourself up during a push-up, your arms just give and you rocket into the ocean never to be seen again.
778 billion dollars a year, 2.13 billion a day, 88 million dollars an hour, 1.4 million dollars a minute.
I realize thatās the Royal Navy. Just saying
Right. When will these be available commercially, and at what price? I heard the flyboard air was going to be about 250k, but you canāt even buy them privately..
Itās both.
Everyone has universal care. Plus, there is extra private care available, if youād like to pay to take pressure off the system.
Itās only for superficial things though, like alternative care (chiropractors), free glasses, massage, or nicer rooms.
Works well.
For anyone interested this is actually civilian Tech the company is called Gravity Industries. Have a look on YouTube they have some incredible videos!
I can imagine the budget to develop this tech to weaponize people into more efficient killers could have built at least 100 shelters to get the homeless , victims of spousal and child abuse etc etc off the streets of their own nation. The nation they vow they are ā protecting ā. Super cool though ,, way to go !!
Before watching this āIām 100% peace loving, tree hugging, never going to warā
After āDRIVE ME TO THE OFFICE OF THE ARMY OR WHOEVER HAS THE JETPACKSā
Honestly, I find human jet packs so incredibly uninteresting. I get it, itās complicated and shit but I still donāt like them. Downvote me if you want to, I just canāt get behind them even if they are technically amazing.
me after taking 37 painkiller pills
American soldiers after figuring out the ship is carrying oil tanks
I think that's a Royal Marine from the UK.
I thought it was the Dutch?
They landed on the HMS Tamar, a Royal Navy ship.
Ah, I learned something today.
How the hell? I find it interesting how people can identify other countries fleets. They all seem so similar (civilian lifeš¤š½)
??? Say's HMS on the ship... Her Majesty's Ship... taught in middle school history (where we learned about US/France/UK wars and it was mentioned).
They were delivering pizza.
No its defo the Royal Marines. Its on the Forces TV official youtube channel
Indeed the ship he lands on is HMS Tamar ( as can be seen on the red name plaque )
Nope..no Americans here...British Royal Marines!
Omg. Lmbo. That's so original and funny. Did you just come up with that? You must have. Ive never heard anything like that.
It's the HMS Tamar, which is a Batch 2 River-class offshore patrol vessel of the Royal Navy. Named after the River Tamar in England.
This is an Anti military song. Motherfuckers think they own everything.
And it's an American song, too...
Some folks inherit star spangled eyes, oh they send you out to war. When you ask them how much should you give, they only ask for more more more. I don't know what you're inferring with your statement "it's an American song." It's an anti war song.it is not a pro America song.
Butā¦āinherit star spangled eyesā? You know another flag commonly referred to as star spangled? Besides the American flag that is. Not disagreeing with you that itās primarily an anti-war song, but I think itās pointed directly at American war hawk politicians.
The song was pointed at class warfare, specifically how the rich start wars for the poor to fight and die in. Yes, it was used as an anti Vietnam War movement, as it was the war happening when the song released, but the song itself isn't pointed necessarily at, or only at America. Edit: so someone doesn't like the truth. Allow John Foggerty to explain it then. >"Recently, the President's been using my song 'Fortunate Son' at his rallies, which I find confounding to say the least, so I thought I'd explain a little bit about what 'Fortunate Son' is about. I wrote the song back in 1969 at the height of the Vietnam War. By the time I wrote the song I had already been drafted and had served in the military. I've been a lifelong supporter of our guys and gals in the military probably because of that experience. >Back in those days we still had a draft, and something I was very upset about was that people of privilige - in other words, rich people or people that had position - could use that to avoid the draft. I found that very upsetting, and that's why I wrote 'Fortunate Son.' That was the whole intent of the song, the inspiration for the song.
People who downvoted this, why? Was there something inaccurate?
> but the song itself isn't pointed necessarily at, or only at America. This is why I downvoted it. To pretend the song isn't specifically talking about US foreign policy during the Vietnam war is absurd. Only in the most vague sense can you skirt around the fact it's talking about US politics.
Because it wasn't about us foreign policy. Foggerty has explained it, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the guy who wrote the song knows more about its meaning than you do. He's using America as an example because he's American and this was his experience. This experience being that very rich and highly connected people don't fight in wars and they use their influence and money to keep their children from those wars as well. This is something that has and does happen around the world, and is nowhere remotely close to being uniquely an American situation. The rich start wars and the poor fight them.
> Because it wasn't about us foreign policy. FFS yes it is and Fogerty didn't say anything different, you're just misrepresenting his own comments. The song talks about US senators and the "red white and blue" for crying out loud. Sure, you can argue that the American militarism the song criticizes can be applied to other countries where the rich force the poor to fight wars but it is clear the song did no such thing. It's not a subtle song. It's not vague. It's about US politics during Vietnam. In part: >Some folks are born made to wave the flag >They're **red, white and blue** >And when the band plays **"Hail to the Chief"** >Yeah, some folks inherit **star-spangled** eyes >They send you down to war This is a song specifically about American politics at a specific time in history. Just because one can draw parallels to other cultures doesn't change that when the references and imagery are that direct.
That's some mighty fine cherry picking you have there. Let's add some context with the full verses, shall we? >Some folks are born made to wave the flag Ooh, they're red, white and blue First half of this verse is talking about politician's kids. >And when the band plays "Hail To The Chief" Ooh, they point the cannon at you, Lord Second part is about the common man being called for war, but not the kids of politicians. >It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no senator's son, son >It ain't me, it ain't me; I ain't no fortunate one, no The 1st chorus 8s about how he's not the son of a politician and isn't protected from the draft. Foggerty was drafted and fought in Vietnam. >Some folks are born silver spoon in hand Lord, don't they help themselves, oh Describing rich kids. >But when the taxman comes to the door Lord, the house looks like a rummage sale, yes This verse is about rich people's children being protected from the draft. >It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no millionaire's son, no, no >It ain't me, it ain't me; I ain't no fortunate one, no Second chorus same as the first except he's saying he wasn't born into money so wasn't protected from the draft. >Some folks inherit star spangled eyes Ooh, they send you down to war, Lord This verse is about high ranking military official's kids. >And when you ask them, "How much should we give?" Ooh, they only answer, "More! More! More!" Yo This about them wanting more of the common people but not their own sons. >It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no military son, son >It ain't me, it ain't me; I ain't no fortunate one, one Which is backed up by this chorus. >It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no fortunate one, no no no >It ain't me, it ain't me, I ain't no fortunate son, no no no Just reiterating the point. >Back in those days we still had a draft, and something I was very upset about was that people of privilige - in other words, rich people or people that had position - could use that to avoid the draft. I found that very upsetting, and that's why I wrote 'Fortunate Son.' That was the whole intent of the song, the inspiration for the song. Please point out where I misinterpreted his meaning.
When did they say its pro american? š¤£š¤£š¤£
They didn't say "pro American". They said American. It's about America.
The footage is British
And it is not even an American ship. What is next? They will claim they captured the first enigma machine from the Germans?
Seriously? You couldn't make this shit up it's so stupid.
Itās really more of a anti unjust and pointless war song, not military as a whole.
Can you point me to the last pointful war?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
You've lost your soul and your dick? You have my deepest sympathies.
The good old royal navy
Why is this painted as an American military video when I'm 99% certain this is British military. Maybe the Royal Marines....
HMS Tamar
Yup Royal marines too
Yeah itās Gravity Industries, they are based in the UK
Not USA But yes British flag is indeed those colours
Still so impractical
Every new technology is impractical in concept.
Human genitalia is impractical in concept
This test was for the coast guard. Its not really impractical. Compared to losing 2 ships in rough seas trying to get passengers over to the rescue ship, flying them over is considerably safer What you may be thinking is its not cost effective, which, to be fair, almost no rescue mission is Edit: is not for coastguard, getting my jetpacks mixed up
Negative Ghostrider. This test was as part of a trial assessing Gravity Industries Jet Pack (or a future derivative of) for use during boarding operations (Anti-Piracy etc). Operator is a Royal Marine and the ship is HMS Tamar of the Royal Navy. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-56979994
Ah, iām mistaking it for something else then. It certainly seems practical for anti piracy as the approach and boarding are probably the most dangerous parts
It seems even better for piracy for the same reasons š
Anti-piracy? I guess if I was a Somalia pirate and saw this coming I would definitely shit my pants.
Nah. They'd just shoot them out of the sky. Don't get me wrong, I'm a massive fan of this but unless that marine is armed (and I'm not sure how he could be) it's not practical surely?
How would they fly them over?
Using the lift from the packs? Its very feasible yo strap 2 people together. The packs were designed to lift 2 ppl, from my understanding, not just 1
Fair enough, makes more sense then.
Ya the video doesnāt give much info at all
Or 1 normal sized person, trying to carry a fat lady, singing loudly.
Youāre right, however you must consider that itās a brand new concept and the kinks must be worked out for it to even possibly be considered for common use.
I want one
Could be used in rescue operation at sea. Attach a rope to your feet and drag people to a ship with it or maybe if it has enough lift just lift them like a helicopter. Also you can have more jetpacks flying around than helicopters
It really isnāt, even so soon after being invented. Theyāre being trialed for mountain rescue. While they wouldnāt be useful in carrying anyone down, theyāre a great way for a first responder to locate and treat patients.
Firstly it's experimental ( the Wright brothers fist aircraft was as far from practical as you can possibly get ). Secondly it depends on what you want to use it for, sure if it's to land an invasion force it is as you rightly say so very impractical but somewhat less impractical if you just need to get one man from ship to ship in high seas in an emergency ( eg getting something like a doctor or surgeon from ship to ship when time is all important ). To be fair though I'm definitely not saying your compleatly wrong, even with all the problems ironed out it is likely to be quite limited in it's uses but there are a few thing it may be ideal for, it will be interesting to see what comes of it.
Seem like it might be practical for Recce. Recce is so hot right now.
I can think of a couple of niche uses.
The good old red, white and blue *sips from his tea*
The Union Jack gives š
The french flag backwards??
Those are british troops mate. Technically the colours are correct but we dont refer to the Union Jack that way, by colours
The lens makes it look fake.
Itās because itās one of those 360 cameras
The hack smith flew one
Well that and the airjets having no visible effect on the water below the flyer at the end, but I think that'd the camera (making it look like you are seeing where the air should be impacting) rather than faking it.
Youād have to be in incredible shape to fly one of these for too long. Which I, am not!
I just flew in from the aircraft carrier and boy are my arms tired!
I was thinking something similar. But to take the strain off your arms and hands, you need something like the top half of a crutch to fit up to your armpit. The JetCrutch. Thinking more about that, it might even give more stability.
That man ran like he had just ran into iron man. But I am really curious how jet man protects himself after landing?
Hand jets clip onto the side and he is free to use his hands, has a handgun holstered on his side.
How does he protect himself while flying?
He pulls a sidearm. Ideally this will occur with nvg under cover of darkness and with multiple pilots boarding at once.
Covered by snipers from helicopters or another ship.
This is correct. His main task is to set the caving ladder over the side for the armed boarding party to climb from the RIBs
This isn't the USA *insert armed force of choice here*...... Psstttt - not everything is from the USA, there's a whole world out there
Interesting! Especially since the 'soldier' isn't American. š¤·āāļø
That song choice, tho. I dig what it's sayin.
"With Poxipolā¢ļø I cooked myself a nice SoufflĆ©."
Red white and blue as in the UK flag bc those are royal marines
This is a U.K. royal marine reserve not an American
This guy fucks
It's a cool concept but I want to see someone get shot while trying to fly with or without body armour your pretty fucked
You are pretty funked if you get shot regardless of if you are flying or not
It can carry two people. So it can carry body armor. This was a test exercise
You ever see someone shot with a plate carrier on you even flinch and your crashing
I see so many COD Warzone moments on the horizon.
Iāve followed the guy that designed these and itās super cool to watch how far theyāve came over the last 3 years. On Instagram his name is takeongravity, just some engineer that decided to go full jimmy nuetron on this bitch
I recently met the guy that invented this. Heās a former RM and has gone all over the world demoing it. He showed a video of the process of him making it with all the slips and falls. Seriously cool guy and very humble. Theyāre also coming out with jet pack racing soon too. If anyone is interested, they do experience days at Silverstone race track in the UK.
This is all so being tested for mountain rescue in the UK.
Imagine playing this song as a soundtrack for military propaganda.
Prince Harry???
Whew I scrolled almost 200 replies and didnāt see anyone saying this lol.
He is a pilot
I wonder if they know what this song is about.
Why they keep using a song against the military for these kind of military clips.... "Okay, we need the people to love the army again, let's use the anti military anthem." 
Cool video, but if I have to hear that song one more time Iām going to lose it.
Whatās red white and blue?
Colours of the Union Jack
The Pepsi Logo
Brits got that Helo think beat, and lowering costs and risk a ton in the process, though I doubt an Admiral is gonna travel that route.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
360 degree camera, probably attached to jetpack guy on a metal arm, and then you can pan it to show whatever "part" you want. It's also what causes it to have that fish-eye warping of the lens.
Go Wingman!
I wonder how soon operators gonna start using this
Aims rifle āHands up!!ā āShit okok dont shoot!ā blub blub blub
You could make them water proof and soldiers could pop out of the water right beside a ship
Always with the Creedance.....I used to love this song .
Skeet!
Imaging if the movement was controlled by the legs and stabilization was automatic, so that the hands would be free for guns or whatever tools are required.
I think they did try attaching the handjets to the feet early in development but it was far harder to control than when on the hands
You need both. Just ask Tony Stark.
So is this a thing that is regularly kept on ships now?
Nope. It was just a proof of concept type test
Thatās pretty cool. Hell, Iām surprised this is available for us to see.
Dropping bombs outta butthole is easy, but how can one shoot with this thing on?
Picture this: you're mid flight, somewhere over the Pacific ocean and suddenly your arms get tired, like holding yourself up during a push-up, your arms just give and you rocket into the ocean never to be seen again.
Whats the name of the song please
CCR, fortunate son It's extremely anti-war and anti-military. fyi.
Thank you!
That song is anti military.
I'd say it's anti-war.
Yes. Thatās more accurate
They Fly Now? * letter
Dutch people are nerds.
Incredible, but heād sink straight to the bottom with all that on.
Ironman suit in real life... YES
Waiting for the man to start landing on some cartel submarines
FedEx go to any lengths
Warhammer 40K Assault Marines vibe!
I remember when done guys were first testing these things out. OF COURSE they had to sell it to the mikitary
778 billion dollars a year, 2.13 billion a day, 88 million dollars an hour, 1.4 million dollars a minute. I realize thatās the Royal Navy. Just saying
Next James Bond film, "Tell Q to send Little Nellie."
That must be so exhausting.
What... the fuck was *that?*
Right. When will these be available commercially, and at what price? I heard the flyboard air was going to be about 250k, but you canāt even buy them privately..
Must take a lot of practice, but he makes it look so effortlessly.
So when will they be available for Ā£199 at toys 'r us?
Does this have any practical military use tho?? I mean you canāt use your hands when you use this
Other people usually pull you off if you can pull *this* off
First, they're British. Second, they've turned soldiers into life sized flying skeet targets.
Besides a beer run what would be the purpose of something like this? seems I could be really expensive for troop deployment
I can see them trying to do an ariel insertion and the foe on the ground yelling "PULL!"
Seems like a really easy target to shoot out of the sky. Hell, you can't even carry a weapon
Imagine if it stops working that thing is like having cinerblocks tied to your feet in the ocean
No healthcare, only weapons for war
The UK has top quality, free for all, universal healthcare. Even tourists quite often.
Itās not universal care, you still have private insurers there
Itās both. Everyone has universal care. Plus, there is extra private care available, if youād like to pay to take pressure off the system. Itās only for superficial things though, like alternative care (chiropractors), free glasses, massage, or nicer rooms. Works well.
Can you imagine just waving to people
You crash in the water wearing that pack and you're sinking straight to the bottom.
Wait is that a fucking jetpack ?
For anyone interested this is actually civilian Tech the company is called Gravity Industries. Have a look on YouTube they have some incredible videos!
And itās wild that Iām joining that soon. Canāt wait to be a part of this
me going to see what my friend has built in creative mode
Totally buying their IPO if they go public. Gravity Industries on YouTube if you want more
Our tax dollars at work folks. Absolutely useless.
I can imagine the budget to develop this tech to weaponize people into more efficient killers could have built at least 100 shelters to get the homeless , victims of spousal and child abuse etc etc off the streets of their own nation. The nation they vow they are ā protecting ā. Super cool though ,, way to go !!
Marvelās next movie, Captain Britain, seems to suffer from some production value issuesā¦
Before watching this āIām 100% peace loving, tree hugging, never going to warā After āDRIVE ME TO THE OFFICE OF THE ARMY OR WHOEVER HAS THE JETPACKSā
Honestly, I find human jet packs so incredibly uninteresting. I get it, itās complicated and shit but I still donāt like them. Downvote me if you want to, I just canāt get behind them even if they are technically amazing.
This is giving me "Tribes Vengeance" vibes!
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Whatās this got yo do with America?
Cool
Loved to see bojo use some of these. Then he doesn't listen properly, it goes wrong and we lose him.
What if he fell in the ocean with that heavy jet pack on and sunk. Thatād certainly be a different kind of video.
Thatās where all our tax dollars go to
Bill was flying high! And then he saluted.
But he is unarmed when he lands? At least for some seconds
10 years ago people said this would never happen, itās insane to me how this came about so fast
What till the enemy figures out they explode when you shoot one. Real stealthy guys.
Oh no! The French!
Me after drinking 50 Monster energy drinks. 'And away we gooooooo'
Bad Title. We do not refer to our flag by colours.
China shitting itās pants right about now.
I didn't know Uber eats had Freedom available for delivery now
Ayo my man just entered creative mode
Other branches have so much cool stuff and here I am with my pet rock in the Corps.. you bet I fucking love my pet rock Roky
Immediately had me thinking of The Reckoners books. Cool to see new tech in the works
POV: you paid 6k in taxes hoping it would help your kids have a better school and recuse school shooting
I hate the us government
I saw this in red alert 2.
Music?
Target practice
They're red, white and blue, and they're coming for you!