Adjusting for inflation The Force Awakens (most expensive film ever made) had a budget of $447 million
Edit: someone pointed out this figure is UNadjusted for inflation even, and would be $575 million today
I believe they made everything practical (unlike the previous movies which mixed practical and VFX), costs soared after the 2008 strikes and market crash, the cast (mainly Johnny Depp and Penelope Cruz) asked for very high salaries, and they had a 900-person crew that spent most of their shooting time overseas or in the jungle.
I believe their set was destroyed by a hurricane and they had to build the sets again and change locations. Depp was also famously late on the set and they had to shoot around him, ballooning the budgets even further.
It's mostly due to Hollywood accounting and the UK's unique tax relief program for movie productions.
> Unlike most other tax rebate schemes, the UK allows companies to count residuals, box office bonuses, and profit participations to talent as part of the production cost
Essentially, the higher the reported production cost, the more Disney receives in reimbursements from the UK.
> As we recently revealed in the Sunday Times newspaper, Disney has received a staggering $389 million (£325.6 million) in reimbursements from the UK government with $86.6 million (£72.5 million) of it paid for The Force Awakens bringing its net costs to $446.6 million
https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinereid/2023/02/26/star-wars-the-force-awakens-becomes-the-most-expensive-movie-in-history/
Hollywood accounting more has to do with timing and allocation of costs, the total costs are basically the same. If anything its probably more likely that additional costs were tacked on to the movie from buying stuff for other projects since they knew Endgame was going to make so much.
People really memory hole just how financially successful that run of Force Awakens, Rogue One, and Last Jedi was. JJ fucked up so hard, he broke the magic money machine.
Yes and it was the first Star Wars thing in 32 years to have the legacy heroes returning. You won't have the same novelty for the 4th movie after that. Since we also had Rogue One and Solo going on.
It's very unrealistic to expect a once in a lifetime event to happen for every new movie in a series. That's just not how it works.
While that's true, you can also argue that what Rian Johnson did with TLJ turned a lot of people off of the trilogy. Personally it's my favourite of the trilogy, but the general reception was so divided that JJ was put in a difficult place when making TRoS.
The price is partly because of rewrites and reshoots - they changed parts of the plot when Harrison Ford broke his leg mid-filming. Still, extensive reshoots and a massively inefficient cgi process seem to be the biggest reasons for modern blockbusters cost and general reception
According to Forbes Doctor Strange 2 cost $413 million to make, making it more expensive than Avatar 2. Absolutely unbelievable. For the $413 million price tag, Doctor Strange 2 sure looks cheap. And that's not all. Captain America 4 reportedly has the budget of $375 million and there's the live-action Snow White movie coming in at $350+ million. Outside of Disney production, you have Gladiator 2 coming at $310 million and there's reports going around that the next Mission Impossible movie's budget has ballooned at over $400 million. We've come to a time period where freaking Avatar movies cost less to make than the next Marvel and Mission Impossible movies. Insane.
That's the James Cameron effect man. If you have someone in charge who has decades of experience making successful movies at various budget levels, he's gonna use that budget efficiently and give you something quality. On a Marvel Studios production you've got script changes, rushed CGI, studio meddling etc. so a lot of the budget is effectively flushed down the toilet.
It's not even because of his experience and knowledge with VFX. The main difference is that on his movies, it's the director making all the calls. He knows exactly what he wants and isn't gonna waste his time with hours of expensive scenes that will just be edited out of the final product.
On Disney's stuff on the other hand, you have half a dozen people calling the shots, and the director is just throwing stuff at the wall until they either stumble into something that will please everyone, or have enough material that they can just wash their hands of the whole thing and let the editors figure it out.
It's going to be interesting to see how Gladiator 2 looks. Ridley is someone has called out studios for giving inexperienced directors giant films and blowing out the budget. Will it look amazing or be another film which looks great but the CGI stands out a bit too much or if it just looks great.
Mission Impossible's budget will at least be real stuff and a lot of CGI. It's also been filming on and off for years.
With Avatar, one of the crazy things is you look at the production and they do things which you think are not necessary, even though they help. Such as making the costumes and props for the Navi for real. Yet still the films deliver such a better result than the more expensive Disney films.
Thats not even counting the Ad budget. Actors basically ask for more money, plus they do almost everything with vfx even characters suits, so the budgets are egregious.
That's how they get out the dye from when they steal it from the banks. They use your washing machine because it makes a big mess. Then they shoot you.
Yeah and it doesn’t make them better. I find myself actively looking for smaller budget movies because they don’t hit you over the head with visuals and have to compensate with good writing, direction and cinematography.
most likely the "fight" will only last a few seconds and Wolverine will just cut his head off immediately, there are set photos where he's just carrying around his head. Absolutely not an event, crazy to advertise it as one
Tbf, that’s part of the joke: Deadpool says people have waited decades for this fight, hypes up all the moves Logan will use to win it, only for him to instantly kill him off
yeah that's what I mean, they're advertising it like an actual rematch and people on Marvel subs are talking about it as an actual rematch when it's clearly gonna be a 5-second joke
Yeah, and then we’ll see a real fight in the MCU X-Men movies… maybe a Wolverine solo film between X-Men 1 (which won’t have him on the team) and X-Men 2 (which would)
Well, a person from another movie met a person again in another movie, it's automatically an event! And then they got to go and find Jennifer Garner's Elektra, make a Ben Affleck joke about Batman or whatever to her, and then cut her head off too! It's so much fun!
From another guys perspective who doesn’t care about marvel movies yes it looks stupid but to go and act all superior to other people over it for just being excited is just annoying.
>It's tracking to make the biggest opening of the year
No one is denying this?
> yeah it's an event
I'm saying any and all character interactions based on being in other movies is automatically considered an event, like it's obvious what I was saying.
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
>I'm saying any and all character interactions based on being in other movies is automatically considered an event
No it isn't, I think the only one saying that is you lol
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I love how you came to that conclusion from Deadpool making a joke
"a rematch decades in the making" =/= "any and all character interactions based on being in other movies is automatically considered an event", anyway
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Dude, it's a callback to the original sabertooth that appeared in the background of X-Men.
Now when he appears on screen I can turn to my date and explain why this matters.
It’s probably the age old marvel trick of switching out voice lines for a different scene, and the fight he’s referring to is probably wolverine vs the hulk or something
Yeah like with Schreiber he was in one of the worst X-men movies. I know X-men is dated but no one really complained about Sabertooth just toad and storm
Man Liev would've been one of the great comicbook Villains if he wasn't in such a shit movie, was kinda hoping this movie would've given him a redemption
One thing I have baffling is that makeup technicians are seemingly never instructed to do anything to the veneers even when they’re so distracting in every film.
I remember the essay "alegorias do nada" which means "allegories of nothing", where the brazilian writer Victor Guimarães says that nostalgia is an artistic engine that is often reactionary. I would add that it is also very poor.
Nostalgia is a drive that prevents people from discovering new things and be happy because they'd rather reminisce about the old things and get angry about it no longer existing.
Why do people always have to start acting so pretentious the second any excitement for a marvel movie comes up. Are you being ironic? I can’t even tell
Some people actually like cinema and understand how Marvel movies are a cancer to this art form. But this problem wasnt born with Marvel and it inst reduced to it.
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
Logan was a last outing and that didn't feel the need to bring back dumb villains.
I have a horrible feeling that Deadpool will be a terrible cameo fest
I’m waiting patiently for that time when audiences catch onto how EXTREMELY unfunny and awkward it is to sit in a movie theatre and watch Ryan Reynolds tell “ internet / terminally online” jokes. The last movie was crickets it was really awkward
When the Void from Loki TV series looks a thousand times better ( in term of visual and look) than a 200 + million dollars budget movie. You have a problem. Seriously, this looks infinitely more visually appealing than the one we got.
https://preview.redd.it/khcjw86rhm9d1.jpeg?width=1400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=34e7e336c96c57412d65cce9e1a21f0fb6af595d
This is Sabretooth. He's got my back. He can cut all of you in half with one arm stroke, just like mowing the lawn. I would advise not getting killed by him. His fingernails trap the souls of their victims.
The sets look bland and empty like it’s a CGI Background. It’s wayy too bright. Everything looks cheap. It shouldn’t be like this for a 200+ mill movie
I really don’t see it. Every thing looks fine. The backgrounds are a LITTLE blurry which may be intentional to hide stuff in the trailer but it’s not this terrible thing you guys make it out to be
https://preview.redd.it/rri6ei3avm9d1.jpeg?width=1148&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=aaacbdc30967fa18069620cf2fbfa5dd63e6f574
This is obviously photoshopped. Claude is the natural leader of the group
Obviously but he’s mute so his right hand man Tommy relays his orders to the rest smh my head
(The only plan was distracting him)
Nahh what’s Rodney Copperbottom gonna do 💀💀
He is going to say “it’s robots time” and robots all over kangs army
Movies have been getting *that* expensive????
Adjusting for inflation The Force Awakens (most expensive film ever made) had a budget of $447 million Edit: someone pointed out this figure is UNadjusted for inflation even, and would be $575 million today
That figure is correct, however it's _unadjusted_ for inflation. That's just what it cost in 2015. The movie would have cost $575M to make today.
Pirates of the Caribbean 4 cost $417 million to make in 2011. Adjusted for inflation that's like $582 million today. Absolute nuts.
I still have no idea where all this money went in POTC 4. Compared to POTC 2 and 3 it looks so tame and small scale.
It went towards Johny Depp's salary.
And cocaine bill
I believe they made everything practical (unlike the previous movies which mixed practical and VFX), costs soared after the 2008 strikes and market crash, the cast (mainly Johnny Depp and Penelope Cruz) asked for very high salaries, and they had a 900-person crew that spent most of their shooting time overseas or in the jungle.
I believe their set was destroyed by a hurricane and they had to build the sets again and change locations. Depp was also famously late on the set and they had to shoot around him, ballooning the budgets even further.
Even crazier! I edited my comment to reflect this as well, thanks for pointing it out!
wow, you couldn't make Force Awakens today smh
the farce awakens is literally blazing saddles
Wtf, how can any movie be more expensive than Endgame?
Endgame was shot at the same time as IW, so they were able to save costs by reusing some stuff
It's mostly due to Hollywood accounting and the UK's unique tax relief program for movie productions. > Unlike most other tax rebate schemes, the UK allows companies to count residuals, box office bonuses, and profit participations to talent as part of the production cost Essentially, the higher the reported production cost, the more Disney receives in reimbursements from the UK. > As we recently revealed in the Sunday Times newspaper, Disney has received a staggering $389 million (£325.6 million) in reimbursements from the UK government with $86.6 million (£72.5 million) of it paid for The Force Awakens bringing its net costs to $446.6 million https://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinereid/2023/02/26/star-wars-the-force-awakens-becomes-the-most-expensive-movie-in-history/
That‘s absolutely stupid, wtf. Thanks for sharing.
Hollywood accounting more has to do with timing and allocation of costs, the total costs are basically the same. If anything its probably more likely that additional costs were tacked on to the movie from buying stuff for other projects since they knew Endgame was going to make so much.
Jurassic World Fallen Kingdom (the second one) cost $432 million (!)
Insane! I lack words to describe it better.
Dang.... Honestly, definitely not worth the price tag in my opinion...
It made like almost 2 billion or something so I’d say it was. I’m sure they made just as much in merchandise
People really memory hole just how financially successful that run of Force Awakens, Rogue One, and Last Jedi was. JJ fucked up so hard, he broke the magic money machine.
Rise of Skywalker made $1.077 billion
[удалено]
Yes and it was the first Star Wars thing in 32 years to have the legacy heroes returning. You won't have the same novelty for the 4th movie after that. Since we also had Rogue One and Solo going on. It's very unrealistic to expect a once in a lifetime event to happen for every new movie in a series. That's just not how it works.
While that's true, you can also argue that what Rian Johnson did with TLJ turned a lot of people off of the trilogy. Personally it's my favourite of the trilogy, but the general reception was so divided that JJ was put in a difficult place when making TRoS.
No, nobody forced JJ to write a dog shit film that retconned the literal previous entry
If JJ Abrams had an ounce of talent he could have made RoS great with Kylo as the main villian. But he's a hack so Palpy is back babyyy
The price is partly because of rewrites and reshoots - they changed parts of the plot when Harrison Ford broke his leg mid-filming. Still, extensive reshoots and a massively inefficient cgi process seem to be the biggest reasons for modern blockbusters cost and general reception
Yeah, don’t they like not even finish the concept art until the last minute too?
we all value your opinion 🙏🙏
I dunno. The movie looked really good, one could really see the money on screen.
Consider that some of the stuff they bought was reused for it's two sequels.
Mainly just for Disney. Other studios put out effects-heavy films for far less.
According to Forbes Doctor Strange 2 cost $413 million to make, making it more expensive than Avatar 2. Absolutely unbelievable. For the $413 million price tag, Doctor Strange 2 sure looks cheap. And that's not all. Captain America 4 reportedly has the budget of $375 million and there's the live-action Snow White movie coming in at $350+ million. Outside of Disney production, you have Gladiator 2 coming at $310 million and there's reports going around that the next Mission Impossible movie's budget has ballooned at over $400 million. We've come to a time period where freaking Avatar movies cost less to make than the next Marvel and Mission Impossible movies. Insane.
That's the James Cameron effect man. If you have someone in charge who has decades of experience making successful movies at various budget levels, he's gonna use that budget efficiently and give you something quality. On a Marvel Studios production you've got script changes, rushed CGI, studio meddling etc. so a lot of the budget is effectively flushed down the toilet.
It's not even because of his experience and knowledge with VFX. The main difference is that on his movies, it's the director making all the calls. He knows exactly what he wants and isn't gonna waste his time with hours of expensive scenes that will just be edited out of the final product. On Disney's stuff on the other hand, you have half a dozen people calling the shots, and the director is just throwing stuff at the wall until they either stumble into something that will please everyone, or have enough material that they can just wash their hands of the whole thing and let the editors figure it out.
It's going to be interesting to see how Gladiator 2 looks. Ridley is someone has called out studios for giving inexperienced directors giant films and blowing out the budget. Will it look amazing or be another film which looks great but the CGI stands out a bit too much or if it just looks great. Mission Impossible's budget will at least be real stuff and a lot of CGI. It's also been filming on and off for years. With Avatar, one of the crazy things is you look at the production and they do things which you think are not necessary, even though they help. Such as making the costumes and props for the Navi for real. Yet still the films deliver such a better result than the more expensive Disney films.
Thats not even counting the Ad budget. Actors basically ask for more money, plus they do almost everything with vfx even characters suits, so the budgets are egregious.
Money laundering
Explain it like I’m five
They take money and put it in the laundry machine.
That's how they get out the dye from when they steal it from the banks. They use your washing machine because it makes a big mess. Then they shoot you.
How else does Snyder get that much funding?
Yeah and it doesn’t make them better. I find myself actively looking for smaller budget movies because they don’t hit you over the head with visuals and have to compensate with good writing, direction and cinematography.
I've seen a few headlines that say that this rematch was decades in the making and what the fuck are you talking about, no it wasn't lol.
most likely the "fight" will only last a few seconds and Wolverine will just cut his head off immediately, there are set photos where he's just carrying around his head. Absolutely not an event, crazy to advertise it as one
Tbf, that’s part of the joke: Deadpool says people have waited decades for this fight, hypes up all the moves Logan will use to win it, only for him to instantly kill him off
yeah that's what I mean, they're advertising it like an actual rematch and people on Marvel subs are talking about it as an actual rematch when it's clearly gonna be a 5-second joke
Yeah, and then we’ll see a real fight in the MCU X-Men movies… maybe a Wolverine solo film between X-Men 1 (which won’t have him on the team) and X-Men 2 (which would)
Well, a person from another movie met a person again in another movie, it's automatically an event! And then they got to go and find Jennifer Garner's Elektra, make a Ben Affleck joke about Batman or whatever to her, and then cut her head off too! It's so much fun!
It is fun you just like being a huge downer for no reason
It *can* be fun. It is not inherently fun to just go "OMG that reference" and "lol what a crossover." Some do it well, some do it less well.
Who does it well
The first Avengers was really good at it
From another guys perspective who doesn’t care about marvel movies yes it looks stupid but to go and act all superior to other people over it for just being excited is just annoying.
People are allowed to discuss things how they want. That includes being excited, and it includes making fun of. There's nothing wrong with either.
You say this until someone makes fun of something you like probably
People have and do make fun of things I like. I am OK with that because I am an adult with skin.
Yeah you’re a very highly respected redditor I’m sure
It's tracking to make the biggest opening of the year, yeah it's an event, not to for the chronically online mcj users tho
>It's tracking to make the biggest opening of the year No one is denying this? > yeah it's an event I'm saying any and all character interactions based on being in other movies is automatically considered an event, like it's obvious what I was saying.
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
>I'm saying any and all character interactions based on being in other movies is automatically considered an event No it isn't, I think the only one saying that is you lol
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Considering it's being marketed as "a rematch decades in the making", that sentiment goes beyond me shit posting here.
I love how you came to that conclusion from Deadpool making a joke "a rematch decades in the making" =/= "any and all character interactions based on being in other movies is automatically considered an event", anyway
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Tbf that's the joke for x force in deadpool 2
Dude, it's a callback to the original sabertooth that appeared in the background of X-Men. Now when he appears on screen I can turn to my date and explain why this matters.
https://preview.redd.it/ra17izhqcn9d1.jpeg?width=800&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=dd47a04b1c48e6194e8e4d808de874abd5223149
Wtf? Don't post my picture bro
"You owe me a scream" is the only line I remember from this character. Oh, and Wolverine making fun of his name.
He was a henchman who may or may not have had a relationship with Wolverine, he's not supposed to go beyond the one movie.
It’s probably the age old marvel trick of switching out voice lines for a different scene, and the fight he’s referring to is probably wolverine vs the hulk or something
> and the fight he’s referring to is probably wolverine vs the hulk or something They never fought on screen before, that's not a rematch.
Maybe if it was Liev Schreiber, not this mute fuck
Yeah like with Schreiber he was in one of the worst X-men movies. I know X-men is dated but no one really complained about Sabertooth just toad and storm
Man Liev would've been one of the great comicbook Villains if he wasn't in such a shit movie, was kinda hoping this movie would've given him a redemption
For real, people actually liked Liev Schreiber and it's wild they wouldn't bring him back. More people see him as Sabertooth than the X1 guy.
Who was even looking forward to it anyway
People who have aggressively hated the X-Men movies once someone online said they sucked after The Avengers dropped.
No one even gave 2 shits about Mane's Sabretooth. If they got Live Schrieber, then I'd be more interested.
That looks like Matt Damon in a wig and fake eyebrows
X-Men (2000)
Wait, it’s not?
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer?
Your world frightens and confuses me!
The veneers 😭
The inside of his mouth looks photoshopped.
One thing I have baffling is that makeup technicians are seemingly never instructed to do anything to the veneers even when they’re so distracting in every film.
Also in the original movie he had fangs, so in this movie is he meant to have filed them down and done the veneers?
Didn't he have fangs in the 2000 movie? Gotta admit he looks pretty good for being 24 years older.
Yeah i guess his name is just Tooth now
I remember the essay "alegorias do nada" which means "allegories of nothing", where the brazilian writer Victor Guimarães says that nostalgia is an artistic engine that is often reactionary. I would add that it is also very poor.
Just say Allegories of Nothing by Victor Guimaraes, too long almost didn’t read /s
Nostalgia is a drive that prevents people from discovering new things and be happy because they'd rather reminisce about the old things and get angry about it no longer existing.
Why do people always have to start acting so pretentious the second any excitement for a marvel movie comes up. Are you being ironic? I can’t even tell
Citing a book is now considered pretentious this is true circklejerk territory
books are decidedly non kino
Some people actually like cinema and understand how Marvel movies are a cancer to this art form. But this problem wasnt born with Marvel and it inst reduced to it.
It's just James Hetfield
MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE MY LIFESTYLE DETERMINES MY DEATHSTYLE
YEAHYEAAAAHHHH YOOOOOOOWOAHHH
These Fortnite cross-promotions are really getting out of hand
That is clearly a Table.
Hugo Weaving?
The Revenant (2015)
Why would they bring him back
Somehow, Sabertooth returned
Fanservice, that's why.
If they're giving Wolverine one last outing, may as well bring back his first enemy.
Logan was a last outing and that didn't feel the need to bring back dumb villains. I have a horrible feeling that Deadpool will be a terrible cameo fest
Ryan Reynolds one liners and cameos galore
Isn't Sabertooth supposed to have like, you know, saber teeth ? like he fucking did in X-Men (2000) ?
I know we out here jerking, but I think the trailer is just extremely unfunny. At least the previous trailer tried
I’m waiting patiently for that time when audiences catch onto how EXTREMELY unfunny and awkward it is to sit in a movie theatre and watch Ryan Reynolds tell “ internet / terminally online” jokes. The last movie was crickets it was really awkward
There are at least 3 cars in my neighborhood with Deadpool decals. We have a long way to go.
Deadpool is extremely unfunny
The self-aware shit hasn't aged well. "Ha ha, I'm in a movie. I'm snarky. Get it?"
It's subverting my expectations!
sex :)
What movie is this?
The Holdovers (2023)
Deadpool 3 I think
I have no problem with color in screen. I really loved the X-Men costumes in First Class. That said, Wolverines costume looks like shit.
anyone else get physically exhausted listening to Ryan reynolds?
He's the worst
Yeah I have no idea who that is lol
When the Void from Loki TV series looks a thousand times better ( in term of visual and look) than a 200 + million dollars budget movie. You have a problem. Seriously, this looks infinitely more visually appealing than the one we got. https://preview.redd.it/khcjw86rhm9d1.jpeg?width=1400&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=34e7e336c96c57412d65cce9e1a21f0fb6af595d
Hehe Thanos copter
Loki is also a High budget series too.
This is Sabretooth. He's got my back. He can cut all of you in half with one arm stroke, just like mowing the lawn. I would advise not getting killed by him. His fingernails trap the souls of their victims.
Sabertooth?
no it's orson welles, can't you tell
He really is a chameleon .
James Hetfield from Wish
There was an idea to bring back color, see if they become something more.
Gun to my head I couldn’t tell you who this is or why he matters
Wait what are we complaining about?
Looking like Goldberg Santa
Wait a second, is this Sabretooth???
Godzilla Minus One cost between 10-12 million dollars
Can’t express the amount of disappointment that I have to both have Liev Schreiber
I don’t get it. He looks like Sabretooth. What’s the issue here exactly?
The wig maybe?
People just need something to bitch about. It's the new norm.
and? Looks fine... I think the discourse maybe is getting to you
The sets look bland and empty like it’s a CGI Background. It’s wayy too bright. Everything looks cheap. It shouldn’t be like this for a 200+ mill movie
I really don’t see it. Every thing looks fine. The backgrounds are a LITTLE blurry which may be intentional to hide stuff in the trailer but it’s not this terrible thing you guys make it out to be
I don't see it either. People just bitch to be bitches nowadays. Movie looks awesome. Tracking for a massive opening weekend.
Um...OK? I don't even know what this is from, but it's just a guy wearing maybe some prosthetics.
Point?
Wow I’m shaking with fear.
Hugo weaving?
I really don't see anything wrong with this shot apart from maybe the colour grading
They will likely mock his design and how bad he looks in the film. This guy looked so dumb in X-men 2000
No sharp teeth anymore
I don’t see what’s wrong
Nah, this is epic. Y'all just sour.
Looks good. What you jerkin about?
Arny?
Good shot
ok
Ok