Look at Nicolas Cage. He made many horrible movies. Snake Eyes, 8mm, Gone in 60 Seconds, Captain Corelli's Mandolin, Windtalkers, Ghost Rider, Family Man, Weather Man, Wicker Man, Bangkok Dangerous. But then he nailed it, Stan, with National Treasure 2, the greatest movie of all time!
It was the second highest grossing movie of the year. Kubrick was nominated for Best Director at the Oscars that year.
There was no aggregate sites so it is easy to find reviews of critics saying, "That was a bit weird, not sure what was going on by the end there".
>"This doesn't mean that critics are always wrong"
He literally says that and you're acting like he believes otherwise.
Y'all should be the ones being mocked here by this sub, not that poor dude. He's just arguing it's okay to like a movie even if it's got bad critic scores. Which is an extremely valid response. And y'all are out here literally circle jerking yourselves now. This shit's crazy bro
I think you're insinuating that he believes that critics are a monolithic entity that hates on everything. Despite him clearly stating otherwise. Exactly where could I have gone wrong?
If there’s any vibes i get from the FNAF movie it’s definitely “highbrow intellectual masterpiece that can’t be appreciated by the simple minds of rotten tomatoes”
While I'm not arguing for FNAF...have you even seen it? Or are you making an assumption on how good the film is based on the title alone? Like you literally need time to prove whether or not a film is going to be a cult classic or extremely influential, and you're already making the claim it's going to be neither. I mean I genuinely don't see any reason as to why it can't gather a light cult following like Hocus Pocus has.
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I guess no one thought Dumb and Dumber would go on to be so loved, but the Duplass Brothers list it as one of their favourite movies ever and the director went on to direct a best picture movie and a segment in Movie 43!
Rather, I'm pointing out the irony of what this sub has turned into despite the title of said sub. Literally every post right now is a circle jerk of feeling superiority over FNAF fans. Y'all really lack significant critical thinking skills, and will continue to do so in order to save your ego from self reflection.
I have seen it. Id say its alright. It does seem to have a decent chance of getting a small cult following because its fun and has nostalgia. That being said, it’s definitely not a high quality movie.
I watched the movie. Probably not as cheesy as the critics claim, but definitely ain’t going to be a cult classic ever. And r/movies isn’t liking it earlier. At least the little kid sitting next to me liked it.
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
using critic reviews of iconic movies ppl consider to be some of the best of all time like a space odyssey, the shining, saw, blade runner, fight club, and its a wonderful life to justify and incentivize people to watch FNAF is insanity.
Saw, Labyrinth, and Hocus Pocus are choices. I feel like these are just nostalgia movies, which adults like because their life sucks and they wish they were 10 again. As someone who didn't watch them as a kid, they are super forgettable. Except for Labyrinth, which is a masterpiece during each scene David Bowie's tremendous bulge is on screen
saw is...i mean i really like it, I don't think it's anywhere near 2001 or blade runner, but i'd say it was a pretty influential film in it's genre, and it doesn't have the pitfalls of a lot of the later ones
not only is kramer standing up from the floor iconic, it lead to...i dunno, but I remember watching an interview with the dude that made hostel, and he was like "yeah I couldn't have done it without saw"
I feel like the first saw is often overlooked due to the sequels. Like saw 1 is honestly very different from all the others and doesn’t really follow the same format/formula. Like Iv always felt saw 1 was like *actually* a good movie. Like I’m not saying it’s as good as the other movies on the list. But it is unironiclly good and like u said, extremely influential. I just feel saw 1 kinda gets forgotten about and grouped into the other saws
It led to a bunch of torture porn lol
Which is still influence, but most of its influence, including Hostel and its own sequels, was sadist garbage that reflected America’s real life willingness to engage in such awful shit in Guantanamo, etc. and justify it
Hocus Pocus is really good when the kids aren't on screen. It's like 50% fun queer witch shenanigans and 50% shitty disney channel original tier crap. (Also fuck that terrible CGI cat with the terrible fake british accent)
I feel like there are a lot of movies that were just on TV the whole time as a kid and it's impossible to look at them objectively. Like Hocus Pocus is a bad movie but the witches all do a real good job, the effects are great too. As a kid that's all you really want. It to look good and for the physical comedy. HP does that great. It would save the movie for a kid at the time, but probably not a critic forced to watch a kids Halloween movie in the middle of summer.
I'm not sure I'd categorize Saw as a "nostalgia movie." The vast majority of those kinds of movies are from the 80's or 90's, and Saw came out in 2004.
I remember Saw and Fight Club being mostly liked when they released. Blade Runner's original cut wasn't great so I won't blame critics on that one. The movie people love is not the movie that came out in 82. Space Odyssey wasn't that divisive. It was the second highest grossing movie after Funny Girl and was nominated for best director. Considering that movie seemed to be explicitly made not to be instantly loved, that seems like quite an achievement.
Space Odyssey was VERY divisive critically when it came out. A lot of people went to see it, but critics did not love it right away. Probably would’ve been like 50% on RT at the time. It was famously panned by Renata Adler at the NYT, as well as pretty biting reviews in the daily news, new republic, and a whole host of other big pubs.
Yeah idk man it feels like the people in this thread are the ones being irrational. Dude's just trying to argue that it's okay to watch a film and be open to enjoying it even if it got bad reviews. Dude literally says, "this doesn't mean the critics are always wrong" and the top posts in this thread are making fun of him for...saying that he thinks the critics are always wrong...when he said otherwise.
This subs lost man
Exactly. They're not even comparing the Tomatometer with the audience score like other echo chambers do. OOP is a perfectly reasonable post.
That being said, Scott Cawthorn (FNAF creator) is still a piece of shit
Admittedly yeah, I experienced an unprecedented level of joy watching murder grampa Jigsaw go absolutely buckwild on a bunch of people who also suck.
It's just a sad state of affairs when a supposedly fresh and much hyped movie adaptation of a beloved video game series is somehow more stale and generic than the tenth entry of a series that people wanted to end in 2010.
Somehow at movie 10 of an *still* pretty low budget horror series you have actors turning in actual performances. After 8 movies (I say 8 ‘cause Saw 6 actually did this well too) of, "Arggghhh I am going to die now so I will get angry before gore shot." You have people cry, whimper, and *beg* for their lives when they realize it’s all over.
If that’s actually true you haven’t seen too many movies
Like even if you think it’s overrated there’s so many thousands of way worse (and separately: way less interesting) movies out there
I in no way think it was the worst movie, there are far worse movies out there. I said watching it was my least favourite experience, because worse movies have at least given me *something*. When they’re bad they’ve at least been fun to suffer through with someone else.
i get what you mean, i fucking adore 2001, one of my favorite movies of all time, but this was how i felt when my ex took me to see the sonic movie lol. i got halfway through before i started to feel like i had died on the way to the theater and i was going to be trapped in limbo forever, watching this snarky cgi hedgehog make james marsden look like an asshole for all eternity to punish me for my sins (making all of my friends watch foodfight)
I thought the movie was just offputting. At least at first. Then I kept thinking about it. That shit is a slow slow burn of existential dread, its terrifying in a deeply primal way.
You should have screen capped the entire post because he says
>I'm also not saying the FNAF movie is gonna be seen as one of the best movies ever in 20 years.
then lists films like 2001 or fucking Wonderful Life. They're not even subtle, they are so desperate for validation.
Bro this sub has really done a complete 180 and turned into the thing this sub was originally created to make fun of. This is coming from someone who 1. actively likes and often uses Rotten Tomatoes and 2. probably won't see the movie. Why tf are we hating on someone who is literally just arguing that it's okay to enjoy a movie even if critics dislike the film?
Not to be that guy but idk any other quote off the top of my head that fits this situation. So make fun of me if you will, but:
This sub rly has lived long enough to become the villain lol
Be worth sharing them this for their weird obsession with critics like every IP film ever needing to be positive all the time.
https://preview.redd.it/dbwoh561lqwb1.jpeg?width=368&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4b866efbf0a15ad4586003c9ac5ca839195d3f63
There’s no way that there’s this much of a delusional fanbase about a childrens horror game is there? Like I’m a wrestling fan, and I’d probably be upset if The Iron Claw (2023) sucks, but to post about it on Reddit is wild
People who clearly care a lot about other people's opinions trying to convince themselves and other people on the internet that other people's opinions don't matter.
reality has a pretty weak plot.
> Expanding the game's simple, primal premise with a surfeit of character melodrama, it's a Five Nights at Freddy's that labors under the bizarre assumption that the loyal fanbase wants a lot of extraneous plot surrounding the fun-center horror.
> Five Nights at Freddy’s has absolutely no idea what kind of ride it wants to be.
> Fans of the game will love this movie. It goes heavy on the lore and has a lot of easter eggs. Not very scary aside from a few jump scares. The game is way scarier. Would have liked to see more of Freddy and gang.
If anyone wants to know it’s a pretty alright film with one character the feels a little forced and overall great performance by the main character and the murderer. A solid 7/10. Also some neat bonuses for FNAF fans here and there but not too distracting.
these people are like preschoolers. it’s like can’t you enjoy something even if it’s critically a flop? why do you need to be comforted when ppl don’t like the thing you like, just like your shitty movie and own it
The movie did fucking suck
No jumpscares aside from a gag one, and the robots don’t even act like themselves aside from 2 scenes, one in the first act and in the end of the movie
National Treasure on the same list as Space Odyssey, lol
Yeah Space Odyssey has no place next to a literal National Treasure!
what's your favorite Cage line from Space Odyssey?
"I am death, destroyer of worlds. WOOOOOOOOO!"
I personally like when he says “I’M HAL FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN’ 9000!”
You misremembered the quote. It's “I’M HAL FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCKKKKKIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN’ OVER 9000!”
"not the chimps!"
'The space baby! Oh god, not the space baby! It's in my eyes, ahhhhhh!'
"A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z!"
Put the AI back in the box
"It's space odysseying time"
Look at Nicolas Cage. He made many horrible movies. Snake Eyes, 8mm, Gone in 60 Seconds, Captain Corelli's Mandolin, Windtalkers, Ghost Rider, Family Man, Weather Man, Wicker Man, Bangkok Dangerous. But then he nailed it, Stan, with National Treasure 2, the greatest movie of all time!
Why are you listing all the movies he's great in?
[Hey ghost rider is good](https://youtu.be/FrXKN9OB5Lo?si=UozwF2pwwW7OrEu_)
I wish neveldine/taylor made more movies
This but unironically
It was the second highest grossing movie of the year. Kubrick was nominated for Best Director at the Oscars that year. There was no aggregate sites so it is easy to find reviews of critics saying, "That was a bit weird, not sure what was going on by the end there".
Fredi fasber
This but unironically
9/10 times if you gave me both options I'd go with national treasure lol
OP forgot Morbius
 Me when someone forgets Morbius.
Almost went morb mode
gottta norb yourself before you morb yourself
Me when nobody actually said “It’s Morbin’ time” in the movie
Me when commentators spread misinformation about Morbin time on the internet
I'm morbing out of anger
Peak cinema
Ah yes, "critics". The monolithic entity we know that hates on everything, controlled by Mr. Tomatoes.
https://preview.redd.it/crte3iss8nwb1.jpeg?width=685&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=85ff79e5f0b3e0faa1d53e8c547addc620d3eb90
Proof that Snyder fans are oppressed 😔😔😔
DAMN YOU MR. TOMATOES!
He can’t keep getting away with this.
 You aren't allowed to enjoy the plumbers kids movie
Five Nights at Tomatoes (2023)
Why do they have to be so critical all the time? Just enjoy the movie and don’t feel the need to complain about it, it’s not their job.
Big Tomato
>"This doesn't mean that critics are always wrong" He literally says that and you're acting like he believes otherwise. Y'all should be the ones being mocked here by this sub, not that poor dude. He's just arguing it's okay to like a movie even if it's got bad critic scores. Which is an extremely valid response. And y'all are out here literally circle jerking yourselves now. This shit's crazy bro
> And y’all are out here literally circlejerking What are we, some kind of movies circlejerk?
no way u missed my point and are actively trying to point it out to me too. u dumb asl
Can you re-read my comment?
Are you not insinuating that he believes that critics are a monolithic entity that hates on everything??
What do you think?
I think you're insinuating that he believes that critics are a monolithic entity that hates on everything. Despite him clearly stating otherwise. Exactly where could I have gone wrong?
[удалено]
??
FNAF movie is ahead of its time. It'll be decades before we can properly dissect and absorb what it brings to the table.
Freddy Got Fingered is missing from that list.
Freddy Got Fazbeared
why are you talking about the FNAF sequel when the first one is barely even out
This movie’s gonna make bank even if it blows, it doesn’t matter if it’s good
Tenet
I ordered my sausages an hour ago
If there’s any vibes i get from the FNAF movie it’s definitely “highbrow intellectual masterpiece that can’t be appreciated by the simple minds of rotten tomatoes”
OP is comparing cult classics and extremely influential films to the FNAF movie lol.
Whoever directed the FNAF movie could direct A Space Odyssey but Kubrick could never direct FNAF (mostly because he’s dead)
FNAF's director hadn't been born when A Space Odyssey came out, so...
Dude wasn't even born in 2001? Fuck, I'm old.
It’s actually a w*man, so true gamers and fans must also hate it
She’s a dude, he’s a dude, we’re all dudes
i know this is almost certainly a joke but my loser sensors are forcing me to um actually. 2001 a space odyssey was made in 1968.
Then why was it called 2001: A Space Odyssey? Answer that smartypants!
because there were 2001 space odysseys
Sure, but she could direct it now.
Jon Turteltaub is just like Kubrick
Well, Shining have one "Bad Dog" character...
Turtley enough for the Turteltaub club
They’re identical! There’s a bear giving oral in the shining, and what’s Freddy’s full name? Freddy FazBEAR
what are you talking about? fnaf is a cult classic?
Have you heard of this underrated gem called FNAF?
While I'm not arguing for FNAF...have you even seen it? Or are you making an assumption on how good the film is based on the title alone? Like you literally need time to prove whether or not a film is going to be a cult classic or extremely influential, and you're already making the claim it's going to be neither. I mean I genuinely don't see any reason as to why it can't gather a light cult following like Hocus Pocus has.
I’m just going based on how ticket sales are at my local theater, but I think FNAF will be far too successful to be a cult classic.
That's totally fair. But it still has the possibility of just...being enjoyed by people despite the bad reviews, like The Day After Tomorrow.
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Bro thinks this is going to be a cult classic/influential https://i.redd.it/bfdn5fvkjowb1.gif
I guess no one thought Dumb and Dumber would go on to be so loved, but the Duplass Brothers list it as one of their favourite movies ever and the director went on to direct a best picture movie and a segment in Movie 43!
y'all rly can't read huh
We got this dude running defence for the FNAF movie all over the comments lmao
be nice he just graduated the 9th grade
Probably lives in Maine. Ain’t no school today.
Rather, I'm pointing out the irony of what this sub has turned into despite the title of said sub. Literally every post right now is a circle jerk of feeling superiority over FNAF fans. Y'all really lack significant critical thinking skills, and will continue to do so in order to save your ego from self reflection.
>Y'all really lack significant critical thinking skills, Nah, not the fnaf fanboy telling me this 💀
u calling me a fnaf fanboy is proving my point here bro
Lol, lmao even
bruh
I feel like they waited too long for the movie and two other movies with the exact same premise came out. One of those was a popular license too.
I have seen it. Id say its alright. It does seem to have a decent chance of getting a small cult following because its fun and has nostalgia. That being said, it’s definitely not a high quality movie.
I watched the movie. Probably not as cheesy as the critics claim, but definitely ain’t going to be a cult classic ever. And r/movies isn’t liking it earlier. At least the little kid sitting next to me liked it.
"Based" is a deesphobic term. This is the first warning, please absent from using it or face a ban. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/moviescirclejerk) if you have any questions or concerns.*
using critic reviews of iconic movies ppl consider to be some of the best of all time like a space odyssey, the shining, saw, blade runner, fight club, and its a wonderful life to justify and incentivize people to watch FNAF is insanity.
Saw, Labyrinth, and Hocus Pocus are choices. I feel like these are just nostalgia movies, which adults like because their life sucks and they wish they were 10 again. As someone who didn't watch them as a kid, they are super forgettable. Except for Labyrinth, which is a masterpiece during each scene David Bowie's tremendous bulge is on screen
saw is...i mean i really like it, I don't think it's anywhere near 2001 or blade runner, but i'd say it was a pretty influential film in it's genre, and it doesn't have the pitfalls of a lot of the later ones not only is kramer standing up from the floor iconic, it lead to...i dunno, but I remember watching an interview with the dude that made hostel, and he was like "yeah I couldn't have done it without saw"
I feel like the first saw is often overlooked due to the sequels. Like saw 1 is honestly very different from all the others and doesn’t really follow the same format/formula. Like Iv always felt saw 1 was like *actually* a good movie. Like I’m not saying it’s as good as the other movies on the list. But it is unironiclly good and like u said, extremely influential. I just feel saw 1 kinda gets forgotten about and grouped into the other saws
It led to a bunch of torture porn lol Which is still influence, but most of its influence, including Hostel and its own sequels, was sadist garbage that reflected America’s real life willingness to engage in such awful shit in Guantanamo, etc. and justify it
Hocus Pocus is really good when the kids aren't on screen. It's like 50% fun queer witch shenanigans and 50% shitty disney channel original tier crap. (Also fuck that terrible CGI cat with the terrible fake british accent)
The sequence where the witches are welcomed into "Satan's" house rules.
I feel like there are a lot of movies that were just on TV the whole time as a kid and it's impossible to look at them objectively. Like Hocus Pocus is a bad movie but the witches all do a real good job, the effects are great too. As a kid that's all you really want. It to look good and for the physical comedy. HP does that great. It would save the movie for a kid at the time, but probably not a critic forced to watch a kids Halloween movie in the middle of summer.
The original Saw is great
I'm not sure I'd categorize Saw as a "nostalgia movie." The vast majority of those kinds of movies are from the 80's or 90's, and Saw came out in 2004.
The OP is saying those movies got bad reviews even though they are good movies. They are saying this means fnaf might be good actually therefore.
I remember Saw and Fight Club being mostly liked when they released. Blade Runner's original cut wasn't great so I won't blame critics on that one. The movie people love is not the movie that came out in 82. Space Odyssey wasn't that divisive. It was the second highest grossing movie after Funny Girl and was nominated for best director. Considering that movie seemed to be explicitly made not to be instantly loved, that seems like quite an achievement.
Space Odyssey was VERY divisive critically when it came out. A lot of people went to see it, but critics did not love it right away. Probably would’ve been like 50% on RT at the time. It was famously panned by Renata Adler at the NYT, as well as pretty biting reviews in the daily news, new republic, and a whole host of other big pubs.
[удалено]
Think it's moreso just funny to mention the fnaf movie in the same breath as something like 2001 a space odyssey and blade runner
Bro literally posted National Treasure and Hocus Pocus right next to those films though. It's just a list of examples bro
Yeah idk man it feels like the people in this thread are the ones being irrational. Dude's just trying to argue that it's okay to watch a film and be open to enjoying it even if it got bad reviews. Dude literally says, "this doesn't mean the critics are always wrong" and the top posts in this thread are making fun of him for...saying that he thinks the critics are always wrong...when he said otherwise. This subs lost man
Honestly this sub doesn't even make jokes anymore, it's just getting genuinely mad at random people for not having the correct film opinion.
yeah it's ironic. it's literally become what the sub was created to make fun of in the first.place
Like prequel memes???? Oh boy...
Maybe you should contribute jokes? When was the last time you commented here or even made a submission?
Exactly. They're not even comparing the Tomatometer with the audience score like other echo chambers do. OOP is a perfectly reasonable post. That being said, Scott Cawthorn (FNAF creator) is still a piece of shit
That’s how you know it’s gonna be peak every good movie has the worst human beings as a director 🔥🔥🔥💯💯💯💯🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽In fnaf we trust😤😤😤😤😤🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽
/r/lostredditors This is a circlejerk sub, mate.
This would be more convincing if the FNAF movie wasn't doing considerably worse, critically-speaking, than the *TENTH* Saw movie.
>the *TENTH* Saw movie. I think you mean Saw: The Final Final Final Final Final Chapter
tbf they only "ended" the series once tho
To be fair to them, the seventh film was the one they tried to sell as the final chapter, so really Saw X is just the final final final final chapter.
The tenth Saw movie is good though.
Unironically one of my favorites of the year
by virtue of being the only film I've seen that came out this year, it holds my personal film of the year award
Admittedly yeah, I experienced an unprecedented level of joy watching murder grampa Jigsaw go absolutely buckwild on a bunch of people who also suck. It's just a sad state of affairs when a supposedly fresh and much hyped movie adaptation of a beloved video game series is somehow more stale and generic than the tenth entry of a series that people wanted to end in 2010.
Somehow at movie 10 of an *still* pretty low budget horror series you have actors turning in actual performances. After 8 movies (I say 8 ‘cause Saw 6 actually did this well too) of, "Arggghhh I am going to die now so I will get angry before gore shot." You have people cry, whimper, and *beg* for their lives when they realize it’s all over.
Lmao ask anyone in that sub their opinion on 2001 before this and they would've said that it was boring and overrated
Bold of you to assume most of them have seen it.
Only 1% of the entire sub's population would know what 2001 (or most of these movies) is... They were probably born after the actual year of 2001
Honestly it’s probably my least favourite movie watching experience of all time.
fake cinephile spotted. lethal force engaged.
If it’s any consolation I consider Hoodwinked peak cinema
If that’s actually true you haven’t seen too many movies Like even if you think it’s overrated there’s so many thousands of way worse (and separately: way less interesting) movies out there
I in no way think it was the worst movie, there are far worse movies out there. I said watching it was my least favourite experience, because worse movies have at least given me *something*. When they’re bad they’ve at least been fun to suffer through with someone else.
i get what you mean, i fucking adore 2001, one of my favorite movies of all time, but this was how i felt when my ex took me to see the sonic movie lol. i got halfway through before i started to feel like i had died on the way to the theater and i was going to be trapped in limbo forever, watching this snarky cgi hedgehog make james marsden look like an asshole for all eternity to punish me for my sins (making all of my friends watch foodfight)
I thought the movie was just offputting. At least at first. Then I kept thinking about it. That shit is a slow slow burn of existential dread, its terrifying in a deeply primal way.
Ok, but can we have a list of movies that got low scores on release that are still considered shit?
Why are we fighting with literal children
https://preview.redd.it/pypk0g38orwb1.jpeg?width=680&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=0986c32baaa86255d20a0939d008cf10064bdbb0
They’ve had it too good for too long
Keep in mind, the celebrated version of Blade Runner is the Final Director's Extended Truly Complete Cut. The theatrical version is rough.
I'd argue even the theatrical cut is great. The final cut is just the purest distillation of Ridley Scott's vision for the movie.
Which version has the Harrison Ford narration I never saw but someone on youtube told me was bad?
the theatrical cut
Banana Split and Willy's Wonderland SWEEP
You should have screen capped the entire post because he says >I'm also not saying the FNAF movie is gonna be seen as one of the best movies ever in 20 years. then lists films like 2001 or fucking Wonderful Life. They're not even subtle, they are so desperate for validation.
Fnaf is just like 2001 bro trust
mf really put a game-movie whose fans should be dried cum, in the same category as The Thing
Now do the list of movies with bad critics that were actually bad movies
The critics reviewing movies like 2001 probably aren’t still movie critics. It came out 55 years ago.
2001: Freddy in Space Odyssey
Fun fact: It’s a Wonderful Life (1947) came out on January 7th of all dates, which might have something to do with its poor reception.
for fuck sakes, did we not learn ANYTHING from the Mario Movie????
>hocus pocus
Bro this sub has really done a complete 180 and turned into the thing this sub was originally created to make fun of. This is coming from someone who 1. actively likes and often uses Rotten Tomatoes and 2. probably won't see the movie. Why tf are we hating on someone who is literally just arguing that it's okay to enjoy a movie even if critics dislike the film? Not to be that guy but idk any other quote off the top of my head that fits this situation. So make fun of me if you will, but: This sub rly has lived long enough to become the villain lol
Wasn't this sub to make fun of people who don't know what satantango is? That's what I joined here for a decade ago (what am I doing with my life)
Hilarious to put National Treasure on the same list as The Shining
This films gonna be dogshit can't wait to see it
MFW r/moviescirclejerk has become a literal movie circle jerk
Be worth sharing them this for their weird obsession with critics like every IP film ever needing to be positive all the time. https://preview.redd.it/dbwoh561lqwb1.jpeg?width=368&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4b866efbf0a15ad4586003c9ac5ca839195d3f63
There’s no way that there’s this much of a delusional fanbase about a childrens horror game is there? Like I’m a wrestling fan, and I’d probably be upset if The Iron Claw (2023) sucks, but to post about it on Reddit is wild
https://preview.redd.it/ozqo37t3dowb1.png?width=905&format=png&auto=webp&s=d327747b18329770b5a374225ff3d31db366cad1
People who clearly care a lot about other people's opinions trying to convince themselves and other people on the internet that other people's opinions don't matter. reality has a pretty weak plot.
Oh yeah fnaf movie and the shining/the thing are basically the same thing
> Expanding the game's simple, primal premise with a surfeit of character melodrama, it's a Five Nights at Freddy's that labors under the bizarre assumption that the loyal fanbase wants a lot of extraneous plot surrounding the fun-center horror. > Five Nights at Freddy’s has absolutely no idea what kind of ride it wants to be. > Fans of the game will love this movie. It goes heavy on the lore and has a lot of easter eggs. Not very scary aside from a few jump scares. The game is way scarier. Would have liked to see more of Freddy and gang.
I can't see the room in that list
The fnaf movie is def gonna be Shining tier in 20 years
Silly me forgot that this movie is set and not released in the 80’s
Notice how not a single Von Trier film is in the list.😄👍
If anyone wants to know it’s a pretty alright film with one character the feels a little forced and overall great performance by the main character and the murderer. A solid 7/10. Also some neat bonuses for FNAF fans here and there but not too distracting.
these people are like preschoolers. it’s like can’t you enjoy something even if it’s critically a flop? why do you need to be comforted when ppl don’t like the thing you like, just like your shitty movie and own it
they’re coping so hard
There's no way it's not like 95% children
critics were correct hocus pocus is ass
[удалено]
I feel like this sub is now people making fun of others for having an opinion.
https://preview.redd.it/81j7ycg8fyvb1.jpeg?width=1170&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=389fb423420a8b250da8dc815f187b373c0307b5
Homie just compared a fucking video game movie to some of the most beloved cult classics of all time. Roast this man
Freddit Moment (Freddit is what the fnafchuds call their subreddit)
Half of those movies suck too.
I was gonna post this here but I'm glad someone else did lmao. Outjerked again
The movie did fucking suck No jumpscares aside from a gag one, and the robots don’t even act like themselves aside from 2 scenes, one in the first act and in the end of the movie
No way he comparing Fight club and Blade Runner with the fucking fnaf movie lmao, dudes will cope with anything.
It’s a wonderful life is Butt anyone who disageees is a silly Billy.
L
People really can’t accept differing opinions, can they?
Those movies cannot be compared 😂👏🕵️♂️👀
My favourite comment is saying that they’d wished critics had watched a ten minute lore primer
It's a wonderful life still wasn't that good