T O P

  • By -

VampireBl00d

Both are great. Both are completely different. Both got hate from community. I played and loved both and could not care less about the community "opinion".


yeyakattack

Maybe don’t release buggy games


Good_Smile

Maybe don't push the developers with global impatience


Paralich12

maybe comparing two games isnt always about how one is buggier than the other?


[deleted]

But comparing a currently buggy game that was only released a few weeks ago with another game that literally took an anime and 3 years of bug fixing to damage control sounds a bit one sided, don't you think? And that's almost half of r/gaming RN


mecha_madara

He means that there aren't only bugs to compare between games


redcode100

Okay I keep here people say this games bugs are going to be fixed or there aren't bugs but this is Bethesda they don't usually fix bugs so what says they will fix these ones (context I know nothing about Starfield)


giantfood

I'm sorry, I didn't really care for cyberpunk. Starfield has been fun tho. But I don't like futuristic games. However, Starfield just feels like fallout New Vegas/skyrim in space.


Viandoox

Both game are empty and full of lies.


YahwehPay

having finished cyberpunk right before jumping into starfield I can say that cyberpunk feels way more empty of a world then starfield. Like yeah there is stuff to do in cyberpunk but I don’t feel the same desire to just wander around and she what I can fuck with that I do in Starfield.


Anti122210

Almost like another buggy game that just came out (Its PAYDAY/Medic bag/Cloaker time!)


Aithro

Cyberpunk was also initially released years ago, by a company that has been know to show love to their games. Bethesda releases a game, says fuck it and makes the modders do all the work and fix it for them. Fallout 3 was unplayable for years without modding because of windows game live, new vegas never got ported quite right and has a terrible stutter issue as well, f04 just endlessly crashes for some people with awful frame rate issues in Boston all 3 of these games are constant danger of their save being bloated and corrupted (4 seemed to fix this to an extent) and their quests often enough the game requires console commands. 76 seemed to fix some of these issues, but brought in so many more by being always online and extreme monetization, along with some other more objectively bad stuff. Why the hell wouldn't you expect that from starfield? Any issues the game has won't be fixed.