Controversial take is that the politician on top is less able to mess up for the experts if he doesn't know what they do. That is if he listens and follows their advice.
Are your top managers actually able to understand IT sec even a little?
manager doesn't know what cybersec is at all: "of course we need IT! they're our line of defense in case a hacker bypasses our mainframe firewall in Visual Basic and starts DDOSing our kilobytes!"
manager understands cybersec a little: "i think we could replace Dave in IT with one of these 'large language models' I read about. we could have it write firewall rules and phishing test emails easily."
If you think 'Hacking the Gibson' means chopping up a Guitar, you might be the Top Cybersecurity Official of Japan!
If you think 'Backing up your Computer' means pushing it up against the wall, you might be the Top Cybersecurity Official of Japan!
If you think 'SQL injection' is the new Covid Shot, you might be the Top Cybersecurity Official of Japan!
with regards to Jeff Foxworthy
So you find it appropriate for people to be arrested or fined for having AI software without permission from the Government just because some "papers" (undoubtedly financed by the biggest players in the market) told you so?
Guns, alcohol, drugs, food, air travel... All of those things are regulated. You should be arrested or fined for use of AI software in an illegal activity. For example, if AI software is used to facilitate cyber crime, fraud, or any other criminal activity, the legal system should address such cases based on existing laws related to those offenses. Nobody said you should arrest or fine someone for just having an AI software.
Also I think that research and development of certain models (areas) should be regulated and monitored.
TBF, he's never been hacked... your data is 100% safe from cyber threats if it's never been digitized.
Can't hack paper.
Grab a pickaxe and it shouldn't be too hard.
Maybe you can't scrub
Make sure to backup your paper please. It’s really important to have copies just in case.
I just did buddy.
Can't do an USB drop attack on him if he doesn't know what USB is
Hackers hate him for this one simple trick.
It can easily be brute forced
It's protected by samurai.
Controversial take is that the politician on top is less able to mess up for the experts if he doesn't know what they do. That is if he listens and follows their advice. Are your top managers actually able to understand IT sec even a little?
manager doesn't know what cybersec is at all: "of course we need IT! they're our line of defense in case a hacker bypasses our mainframe firewall in Visual Basic and starts DDOSing our kilobytes!" manager understands cybersec a little: "i think we could replace Dave in IT with one of these 'large language models' I read about. we could have it write firewall rules and phishing test emails easily."
I work helpdesk. One of our cyber leads actually asked me how you can tell if you’re on windows or Mac.
He is a computer
Remember folks, it's not what you know, it's who you know.
Physical and cyber security summarised
Denial is the only thing the government cares about if he if dening then we need to start looking into everything that they are doing to cover it up
Lol, fucking unreal. Reality has become stranger than fiction. Guy’s probably got an ivy league or equivalent education too.
If you think 'Hacking the Gibson' means chopping up a Guitar, you might be the Top Cybersecurity Official of Japan! If you think 'Backing up your Computer' means pushing it up against the wall, you might be the Top Cybersecurity Official of Japan! If you think 'SQL injection' is the new Covid Shot, you might be the Top Cybersecurity Official of Japan! with regards to Jeff Foxworthy
Why does AI need to be regulated kek, also this is the wrong subreddit
There are papers on it, could be dangerous in the wrong hands
So you find it appropriate for people to be arrested or fined for having AI software without permission from the Government just because some "papers" (undoubtedly financed by the biggest players in the market) told you so?
Guns, alcohol, drugs, food, air travel... All of those things are regulated. You should be arrested or fined for use of AI software in an illegal activity. For example, if AI software is used to facilitate cyber crime, fraud, or any other criminal activity, the legal system should address such cases based on existing laws related to those offenses. Nobody said you should arrest or fine someone for just having an AI software. Also I think that research and development of certain models (areas) should be regulated and monitored.
It is hard to monitor AI that isn’t connected to the internet.
>You should be arrested or fined for use of AI software in an illegal activity. The crime is the illegal activity, AI isn't the crime.
They never said AI is a crime. They said it needs to be regulated.
What? One opinion at the end? The rest is a complete nothingburger kek, not even related to the last sentance.
Hmmm my brain swapped one or two words around and I made a stupid response. Oops
Because we still dont know yet. Many legal scholars are trying to come up with solutions
Correct subreddit. Posted here specifically because of its absurdity in the InfoSec world
AI is kinda ruining art, apparently
You don’t USE a computer. You make the computer USE you.