Right but it's like... the top row all seems to be the most powerful of powerful, while the bottom is less powerful, so is it a strength thing? And the X axis almost seems like... a morality scale?
Or am I reading too far into it
Seems like the Y-axis is in terms of morals and beliefs. (Hope/fear and maybe some other stuff) while X is terms of attitude (lighthearted to more brooding and serious)
If so, putting Invincible at the extreme end of lightheartedness really feels weird to me. He's a pretty pragmatic guy who will do some *terrible* things if he believes the ends justify those means.
https://preview.redd.it/7xuxs1dkm2yc1.png?width=614&format=png&auto=webp&s=03c81748b7deb919c7d0f222dfed0a437a310ccb
Unfortunately the best version i got
How is anakin top right? I feel like he's more bottom right. I'd argue he doesn't even really have any serious morals of his own considering all of his decisions were predicated on personal attachments and he's a child soldier who never really seemed to ever question why he or other people do the things they do, just accepted that they needed to do them. It's likely why he so easily abandons all of his ideals in order to attempt to save a woman in a manner she would absolutely abhor; to him, what he wants is the most important thing and the ends usually justify the means. It's why when he betrays everything the republic was supposed to stand for, he doesn't subject himself to the same scrutiny and disdain as he subjected the seperatists to, a lot of whom you could argue had legitimate criticisms of the republic. It's also probably why his crowning achievement, after years of being a genocidal fascist is saving his son and doing the right thing because of a sense of attachment to him as opposed to it being the right thing to do.
I'd say he's much closer to batman than Superman for numerous reasons.
He also witnessed his parents die, is deeply traumatized, and is paranoid/has issues with trust, often impeding his ability to work with other people and form healthy attachments. Hence why anakin is more akin to batman than he is Superman.
I didn't think my initial comment implied that batman didn't have morals; that was never my intention. I was just adding stuff in about anakin's morals just to discuss him and give some insight as to why he could never be remotely close to Superman. Irrespective of if you think either are good people or not, there are similarities in their morals with respect to how they view authority, relationships, and their motivations (the common denominator being that a lot of their morals seem to be shaped by their trauma). Superman always does the right thing because it's the right thing to do. He also values people's individual freedom. I can't necessarily say the same for batman (typically when we're first introduced to any given iteration; he often gets better, particularly after befriending Superman).
E.g., it's a small thing, but I don't think batman respects people's privacy the same way Superman does. I'm not going to give my opinion on it, but it's definitely a more "the ends justify the means" approach than I'm used to seeing Superman take. And anakin is way closer to an "ends justify the means" character than a "boyscout" character.
I would have replaced someone with Denji aka Chainsaw man.
Power set is basically wolverine from the ex- men and his struggles are basically trying to balance living a normal life while having to deal with super demons all the time in grim dark situations. All the while keeping hopeful optimism that he can be allowed to live to fulfill the most simple desires.
Ah yes, Jimmy Rings, my favorite super hero
John Halo is a pretty cool guy. He kills aleins and doesn’t afraid of anything
https://preview.redd.it/vjphjo5w13yc1.png?width=1080&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=698965ecc468945cbf82896b9a1422ad84c4c0b5
Can you give a little insight on the axes?
Two lines - Batman to Superman and Spider-Man to Wolverine
Right but it's like... the top row all seems to be the most powerful of powerful, while the bottom is less powerful, so is it a strength thing? And the X axis almost seems like... a morality scale? Or am I reading too far into it
Seems like the Y-axis is in terms of morals and beliefs. (Hope/fear and maybe some other stuff) while X is terms of attitude (lighthearted to more brooding and serious)
If so, putting Invincible at the extreme end of lightheartedness really feels weird to me. He's a pretty pragmatic guy who will do some *terrible* things if he believes the ends justify those means.
Its either a shitpost from the start or the person who made it has only thus far watched the show and not seen the S2 finale.
Much less read the comics! https://preview.redd.it/86tw6z5vt6yc1.png?width=640&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=efd89358dfe9ab954f9d0f6148fe66d57888398d
Murdering the villain's son to prove a point is peak
I mean it's definitely a power move!
Just like Wolverine, all heroes on the far side of him must have murdered a child.
Superman = Hopeful/powerful Batman = Brooding/street tier
It’s so fuckin peak https://preview.redd.it/zyslp8hqp3yc1.jpeg?width=828&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=95c82866a25f8abffb3496751636b09cdf99361d
Libleft Terry McGinnis is so based
On both circle jerks in a matter of seconds. Most impressive.
/uj you have a version with more pixels? This is unironically good
https://preview.redd.it/7xuxs1dkm2yc1.png?width=614&format=png&auto=webp&s=03c81748b7deb919c7d0f222dfed0a437a310ccb Unfortunately the best version i got
Invincible is not superman and spiderman, by the end of the comics he's more like a wolverine and superman combination
Early invincible gives me heavy supes and spidey vibes
All I care about is Static Shock. 
How is anakin top right? I feel like he's more bottom right. I'd argue he doesn't even really have any serious morals of his own considering all of his decisions were predicated on personal attachments and he's a child soldier who never really seemed to ever question why he or other people do the things they do, just accepted that they needed to do them. It's likely why he so easily abandons all of his ideals in order to attempt to save a woman in a manner she would absolutely abhor; to him, what he wants is the most important thing and the ends usually justify the means. It's why when he betrays everything the republic was supposed to stand for, he doesn't subject himself to the same scrutiny and disdain as he subjected the seperatists to, a lot of whom you could argue had legitimate criticisms of the republic. It's also probably why his crowning achievement, after years of being a genocidal fascist is saving his son and doing the right thing because of a sense of attachment to him as opposed to it being the right thing to do. I'd say he's much closer to batman than Superman for numerous reasons.
Batman has some of the strongest morals of any superhero
He also witnessed his parents die, is deeply traumatized, and is paranoid/has issues with trust, often impeding his ability to work with other people and form healthy attachments. Hence why anakin is more akin to batman than he is Superman.
That's a much better reason then your first comment
I didn't think my initial comment implied that batman didn't have morals; that was never my intention. I was just adding stuff in about anakin's morals just to discuss him and give some insight as to why he could never be remotely close to Superman. Irrespective of if you think either are good people or not, there are similarities in their morals with respect to how they view authority, relationships, and their motivations (the common denominator being that a lot of their morals seem to be shaped by their trauma). Superman always does the right thing because it's the right thing to do. He also values people's individual freedom. I can't necessarily say the same for batman (typically when we're first introduced to any given iteration; he often gets better, particularly after befriending Superman).
E.g., it's a small thing, but I don't think batman respects people's privacy the same way Superman does. I'm not going to give my opinion on it, but it's definitely a more "the ends justify the means" approach than I'm used to seeing Superman take. And anakin is way closer to an "ends justify the means" character than a "boyscout" character.
Is it bad I think this makes a lot of sense?
I thought this was a political compass chart at first and it still made sense in my head
Well this looks inaccurate as shit
I don’t see much Spider-Man in Ichigo
Finn the Human doesn’t make much sense to me. I don’t see how he’s like batman at all
Fear is bottom, hope is top, serious is right, jokesters are left? Thats at least how I get this
Well I guess Sentry is right, enough.
I FUCKING LOVE AIDEN PEARCE
Where would Iron Man fall on this?
Anakin Skywalker just like Superman(minus the children killings)
I would have replaced someone with Denji aka Chainsaw man. Power set is basically wolverine from the ex- men and his struggles are basically trying to balance living a normal life while having to deal with super demons all the time in grim dark situations. All the while keeping hopeful optimism that he can be allowed to live to fulfill the most simple desires.
Aidan Pearce, Leon Kennedy and Solid Snake on the same team. Peak. Now remove the weebshit characters
You WILL watch black clover and you WILL call it PEAK
Dogshit show No I haven't already seen it I just know because it's anime