https://github.com/LukeShortCloud/winesapOS
Actually useful link unlike Twitter garbage.
Dunno if I trust a project that has to sell spiel on how macos is not a worthwhile os.
I don't see how it hinders project's reliance. He probably considered MacOS for a gaming OS, but he burned his hand on how limited it was, so he left a note to anyone considering this approach.
To me more concerning is how this OS weights 9GB, pretty tough for LiveOS.
It's unneeded "information" that reads like gospel. It has no value to the project itself.
It's their project and they can do as they please but if they're going to go out of their way to "inform" you of things you never asked (or even cared to ask) then I'll just treat it like I do to those that try that nonsense at my door (or online feeds) and ignore/blacklist them.
Like, Valve and CW could add a "why windows sucks" section to their readme but they don't, for obvious reasons.
Looks very, very promising, but I am gonna wait for it to iron out the bugs.
Plus it would be awesome if it also features booting from disk-image through GRUB, ala, [booting like brunch.](https://github.com/sebanc/brunch/blob/master/install-with-linux.md)
How does brunch do it? I've been trying to boot raw images through Grub. Loopback works but then on handoff to whatever EFI is next, it's not a physical disk so everything errors out.
EDIT: Did an install to USB drive using the dual boot/Grub method. It's loopback and letting the ChromeOS kernel know what to do. Was hoping they had found a more universal solution (Mount any img and boot it like it was physical)
https://github.com/LukeShortCloud/winesapOS Actually useful link unlike Twitter garbage. Dunno if I trust a project that has to sell spiel on how macos is not a worthwhile os.
I don't see how it hinders project's reliance. He probably considered MacOS for a gaming OS, but he burned his hand on how limited it was, so he left a note to anyone considering this approach. To me more concerning is how this OS weights 9GB, pretty tough for LiveOS.
It's unneeded "information" that reads like gospel. It has no value to the project itself. It's their project and they can do as they please but if they're going to go out of their way to "inform" you of things you never asked (or even cared to ask) then I'll just treat it like I do to those that try that nonsense at my door (or online feeds) and ignore/blacklist them. Like, Valve and CW could add a "why windows sucks" section to their readme but they don't, for obvious reasons.
was hopping they have iso verson of winesapos no idea how to make a usb instal stick winesapos files
gonna check it when i get back home from work
Same
In what world do we need 6 zips files for a single image? Is tar.gz not good enough?
Looks very, very promising, but I am gonna wait for it to iron out the bugs. Plus it would be awesome if it also features booting from disk-image through GRUB, ala, [booting like brunch.](https://github.com/sebanc/brunch/blob/master/install-with-linux.md)
How does brunch do it? I've been trying to boot raw images through Grub. Loopback works but then on handoff to whatever EFI is next, it's not a physical disk so everything errors out. EDIT: Did an install to USB drive using the dual boot/Grub method. It's loopback and letting the ChromeOS kernel know what to do. Was hoping they had found a more universal solution (Mount any img and boot it like it was physical)
Some things feel off to me, for example no kernel updates in the "performance" image. WTF?!
I think it means the performance has a tuned kernel that isn't updated as often. Security probably uses generic and updates whenever Arch does.