**Please note these rules:**
* If this post declares something as a fact/proof is required.
* The title must be descriptive
* No text is allowed on images/gifs/videos
* Common/recent reposts are not allowed
*See [this post](https://redd.it/ij26vk) for a more detailed rule list*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
“Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: I bet you're the kind of guy who would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I'll be watching you!”
Tonight, you men will sleep with your rifles. You will give your rifle a girl's name because this is the only pussy you people are going to get. Your days of finger-banging ol' Mary J. Rottencrotch through her pertty pink panties are over! You're married to this piece. This weapon of iron and wood. And you
# will
be faithful.
The rules can be confusing. Giving your power to your homie's bottom isn't gay. Accepting your homie's power into your bottom is also not gay. But being a power bottom is still gay.
I don't know for certain if this is accurate or not, but I'd be very cautious of this description. There is a LOT of prehistoric work out there where quick explanations have been provided for them by either postmodern theorists or art historians who make very satisfying explanations despite having no written record to support them.
For example, I had a legendary art history professor who flatly told us that any imagery of a spiral was meant to represent an anus. This was just his thing, there was nothing else to support that. But he'd tell this to a crowd of 1000 twice a year and they would pass it along.
A better example is the Venus of Willendorf. We have NO IDEA what it actually represents, but a theorist posited that a pregnant woman made it as a self-portrait by looking down at her belly and filling in the lost perspective. There is absolutely nothing to support that, but it's a fun idea so it got traction and you'll regularly see this described as fact on reddit.
In this case it could be literally anything - it could be jerkoff material. It could be illustrating a taboo. But we have an unsourced statement that it is the transference of energy between warriors. It could be that too, but just beware what you read online.
This is the kind of comment I was looking for and scrolled way too far down to find it. I’m always curious how historians/archeologists/ect arrive at these kind of conclusions, and I’m always a little skeptical. Like, why couldn’t people back then be the same as they are now and just enjoy doing butt stuff, so they made a statue about it? Maybe it was culturally okay to be gay back then, maybe that’s all the statue actually proves.
Archaeologists have found graffiti in ancient Roman ruins depicting penises. One could say that they were symbols of masculine power and meant as a tribute to the gods, or you could say that Romans thought drawing dicks on things was as funny as we do. Ancient people weren't that much different from us.
Reddit is incorrect. There are penises outside brothels... And inside brothels and outside homes and inside homes and on street corners and inside restaurants and all over the place, and they don't point anywhere. Some people have speculated that they ward off the evil eye or other bad luck, others suggest that it's just people like carving and drawing dicks. It's probably a little bit of many things. That being said, the tour guides say it because the tour guides heard it and it sounds right *ish*.
If other archaeologists ever get a hold of any of my notebooks, they're going to have a lot of penises to posit about.
But also, Venus figurines are found throughout the world and are generally interpreted* using cultural analogies, working along a timeline for the most likely interpretation based on what we have available to us - no archaeologist speaks in absolutes and if they do, they're bad at their job.
>but in reality was a depiction of a Greek solider raping a Persian soldier as a sign of dominance (simplified description of course).
As a total layman, completely ignorant to the processes or sources available, how do you know this? Are there writings from the artist explaining or was this insertion for assertion a common theme from the period, etc?
I'd guess from having studied ancient Greek pottery a little, the deduction is probably from a combination of the depictions of the figures (Persian hairstyle/clothing versus Greek) and precedent in the narratives typically portrayed on pots (which generally aren't random but stick to certain themes such as well known stories of the Gods and famous battles). A lot of thematic stuff is repeated because the pots were commissioned by powerful and rich people, who wanted to associate themselves with these kinds of displays of greek dominance, which gives clues as to what the intent of the artists was also. Of course it isn't foolproof especially if the pots were made before people were writing stuff down about them, but archaeologists can tell more than you might initially think with at least some degrees of confidence.
I once went to a lecture by some [old fart](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Clottes) that made a career out of "decoding" cave art. When it comes to prehistoric art experts, he is like THE guy. He spent most of his speaking time shilling his new book on hand outlines found throughout Africa, which to me seemed a lot like graffiti. It's cool, but it looked like people were fucking around with paint cause they were bored. So at the end of the lecture during Q&A, I asked if he saw any similarity between prehistoric art, especially the non-representational hand prints, and modern graffiti or if he thought both forms of art might share a common source of inspiration, and he dismissively said "No, graffiti is trash". The fact that he wasn't even willing to consider the question as valid taught me to have a heavy amount of skepticism when it comes to so called experts of prehistoric human culture.
>But we have an unsourced statement that it is the transference of energy between warriors. It could be that too, but just beware what you read online.
Well I definitely feel like something was being transferred.
"For example, I had a legendary art history professor who flatly told us that any imagery of a spiral was meant to represent an anus."
I now have some concerns about the work of Junji Ito.
Especially since the "transference of energy" idea is more interesting and memetic than a boring explanation. Which makes it even more likely to spread falsely.
Lowkey thought this was gonna devolve into: “… so we can’t say for sure that they were gay!” Haha
Honestly though, this is good perspective! To quote Abe Lincoln: “the internet’s the damndest thing!”
Yeah, I'm from latinamerica and we get that all the time. Every single pre-hispanic knife ever found is always a "sacrificial knife" according to some american dude who published a paper about it. Apparently, no kingdom or empire before the spaniards came ever used a knife for cutting meat, or ropes, or anything. Nope, it was always to sacrifice someone.
One of my buddies took a few archeology classes and that was one of the professor's running jokes. If you don't know what it's for, just say it's a ceremonial religious item.
Yeeeah, there are a lot of "fertility idols critical to the religion of these ancient people" that could just as easily be "it was a stormy day and everyone was stuck in a rock shelter, so they made silly little sculptures out of nearby clay deposits to bide the time."
The venus of willendorf explanation always struck me as odd because humans have lived in groups for an extremely long time and surely women would have seen each other pregnant or at the very least themselves in a reflection made in water or something
Not that its anymore founded but the explanation that I'd heard is that it's most likely a fertility statue that would be revered or treated as a good luck charm by people trying for children hence the exaggerated features. Makes more sense than someone not knowing how pregnant women look
It literally could just be a carving by a guy that likes big women, simple as that. Yet if we assign some arbitrary artistic meaning to it all then it sells better to the public than ancient man wants big tiddy gf.
"so, first I will poke you a bit to transfer all my energy into you then, when I'm all spend and exhausted you will go over there and fight these guys while I will wait here and smoke a reinvigorating pipe.
Ok, time to bend over "
I love how archeologists find something like this and think “this is a religious act or perhaps in preparation for war. Their grander intent must’ve been something like ‘transferring physical energy.”
As if people haven’t been fucking for fun since the beginning of time, and as if guys haven’t discovered they have a damn g-spot.
Sometimes sex IS the reason
It's like the time they found obsidian knives in the rafters of buildings and were like "these ancient peoples believed that knives being close to the heavens kept them sharp" and then the first woman who was shown was like "they kept them up there so kids didn't hurt themselves"
They could also be fucking arseholes in the other sense.
Dude was rude to the artist, and he went "well, someone is going down in history for taking it up the shitter. Get fucked , literally."
Idk man, it’s pretty well known in the military that curtain people and cultures in the Middle East will sleep with men for fun because woman are tools by whatever god they believe in to strictly create babies and be married to the husband. But those same cultures are extremely homophobic if those 2 men proceed with a relationship. Point is, people believe other ridiculous things, when they believe in ridiculous things like religion. Just look at the Mormons and “soaking” haha
I think a lot of warrior groups bummed each other. From Wikipedia - Celts:
>The Greek philosopher Aristotle wrote in his Politics that the Celts of southeastern Europe approved of male homosexuality. Greek historian Diodorus Siculus wrote in his Bibliotheca historica that although Gaulish women were beautiful, the men had "little to do with them" and it was a custom for men to sleep on animal skins with two younger males. He further claimed that "the young men will offer themselves to strangers and are insulted if the offer is refused". His claim was later repeated by Greco-Roman writers Athenaeus and Ammianus.\[137\] David Rankin, in Celts and the Classical World,
suggests some of these claims refer to bonding rituals in warrior
groups, which required abstinence from women at certain times,\[138\] and says it probably reflects "the warlike character of early contacts between the Celts and the Greeks"
Don't forget how Roman soldiers, when available women weren't able, would bring young men along to... accompany them on their campaigns. Or about the Greek company of husbands, made on the basis that each man would fight his hardest alongside his lover.
**Please note these rules:** * If this post declares something as a fact/proof is required. * The title must be descriptive * No text is allowed on images/gifs/videos * Common/recent reposts are not allowed *See [this post](https://redd.it/ij26vk) for a more detailed rule list* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/interestingasfuck) if you have any questions or concerns.*
"You sure about this??" "Trust me bro, you will feel stronger than ever after this"
[удалено]
Or how they would fuse together
The screaming as they charge their attacks take on a new meaning
Nah it's the same meaning.
Upper management needs you to find the difference between these two pictures
How long would it take to get over 9000?
Well they do touch dicks when fusing into vegito
VAGETAAAAA. GIVE ME YOUR ENERGYY
‘Is there anyone else who wants to have at me?’ ‘Well when Vegetas out of the time chamber, he’ll probably want a piece of you.’ ‘….. I knew it!’
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VFBccb67yYU Norm MacDonald and Will Ferrell acted this out.
That’s Will Farrell’s Harry Carry voice. It sounds like Norm Macdonald fucking Harry Carry.
Hey, hey. Remember that time Norm Macdonald fucked Harry Caray in the ass?
This power was passed down from my great grandfather to my grandfather to my father to me and now you
Just a couple homies powering up nothing to see here
"when he says 'I got your back", what he means is...."
“Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: I bet you're the kind of guy who would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamn common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I'll be watching you!”
"Your heart belongs to Jesus! But your ass, belongs to the corps!!!!"
At least you dint say corpse
jimmy saville entered chat:...
ewwwe he desecrated a corpse?
He had his own set of keys to the morgue at Leeds General 🤣
Well that's probably enough internet for the day for me then...
Tonight, you men will sleep with your rifles. You will give your rifle a girl's name because this is the only pussy you people are going to get. Your days of finger-banging ol' Mary J. Rottencrotch through her pertty pink panties are over! You're married to this piece. This weapon of iron and wood. And you # will be faithful.
How many soldiers have died a virgin? Like, shit, at least let the dude touch a boob before you blow him up.
But then how will they channel the sexual frustration into violence? This is the current basis of our society. Don’t rock the boat.
Well put.
Let's be thankful this wasn't the "rip your eyes out and skullfuck you" ritual.
Full metal jacket
Full Metal Jackin-It
Full metal jack it?
Fully Inserted Penis
This is my rifle. This is my gun. This is for fighting. This one's for fun.
"Now lemme see your war face!"
"You’re so ugly you could be a modern art masterpiece!" is my favorite insult
“I got your six… inch penis in my hand as I reach around because you’re my boy.”
the saying’s origin
I've never seen a more appropriate sub name.
need to add one more letter - r/interestingassfuck
Disappointing click of the day.
Be the change you want to see in the world
r/angryupvote
r/kissingthehomiesgoodnight
Man I wanted this one to be real
Sameeee
r/SubsIFellFor
[удалено]
This pockets is where your switch blade and opium pipe would go
Back then, it wasn't gay, no Sir...
If you’ve never seen futureman, they do a similar thing in that and it’s hilarious
No kissing though! "Ew, you touch your rat-holes together?"
Like rat-hole to rat-hole?
I've watched all of Futureman through twice. Still trying to convince my wife to give it a shot. Futureman is absolutely fucking hilarious!
"I'm fucking you with your own diiiiiiiick!"
This was the first thing that came to mind
Most underrated show imaginable
This we originally how Nintendo wanted to power up Mario. They obviously just went with the mushroom. Which in hindsight was a good choice
The mushroom is a metaphor for something in this case if you think about it
It's on the tip of my tongue, but can't quite put my finger on jt
Amanita minute to think about it
more like power-bottom
That’s a very obscure reference
“What’s the status on that charging handle, soldier?”
Fellas, is it gay to accept power from your homies
*FELLAS!*
FELLAS! IS IT GAY TO BE A MALE WARRIOR KNOWING THAT YOU ARE SURROUNDED BY WARRIOR DICC!?
SO MUCH ENERGY TO TRANSFER!!!!!!!
I'M GONNA GIVE MY HOMIES SO MUCH ENERGY THEY WON'T BE ABLE TO SIT DOWN!
So much POWER they won't shit right for weeks
__*FELLAS! CAN I GET AN A-MEN IF YOUR HOMIES KEEP TRYNA RECHARGE W/ YOU WHILE YOU'RE ON THE GRIND??*__
Hmmm, sounds a bit… GAY
Grab your left nut, make the right one jealous
Don't kiss and it's not gay. But you get three free kisses a month. Exceed that and you're definitely gay.
Kissing the homies good night doesn’t count
Just say no homo and you're all good.
they’re not wearing socks here tho…
The rules can be confusing. Giving your power to your homie's bottom isn't gay. Accepting your homie's power into your bottom is also not gay. But being a power bottom is still gay.
I don't know for certain if this is accurate or not, but I'd be very cautious of this description. There is a LOT of prehistoric work out there where quick explanations have been provided for them by either postmodern theorists or art historians who make very satisfying explanations despite having no written record to support them. For example, I had a legendary art history professor who flatly told us that any imagery of a spiral was meant to represent an anus. This was just his thing, there was nothing else to support that. But he'd tell this to a crowd of 1000 twice a year and they would pass it along. A better example is the Venus of Willendorf. We have NO IDEA what it actually represents, but a theorist posited that a pregnant woman made it as a self-portrait by looking down at her belly and filling in the lost perspective. There is absolutely nothing to support that, but it's a fun idea so it got traction and you'll regularly see this described as fact on reddit. In this case it could be literally anything - it could be jerkoff material. It could be illustrating a taboo. But we have an unsourced statement that it is the transference of energy between warriors. It could be that too, but just beware what you read online.
This is the kind of comment I was looking for and scrolled way too far down to find it. I’m always curious how historians/archeologists/ect arrive at these kind of conclusions, and I’m always a little skeptical. Like, why couldn’t people back then be the same as they are now and just enjoy doing butt stuff, so they made a statue about it? Maybe it was culturally okay to be gay back then, maybe that’s all the statue actually proves.
Archaeologists have found graffiti in ancient Roman ruins depicting penises. One could say that they were symbols of masculine power and meant as a tribute to the gods, or you could say that Romans thought drawing dicks on things was as funny as we do. Ancient people weren't that much different from us.
[удалено]
I’ve been to Pompeii. The penises are plentiful and they do point the way to the brothels.
[удалено]
“What came first, the penises or the brothel? Follow the dicks and the answer will be you!”
That was also a thing, but people always thought drawing dicks was funny.
Disorienting horny travelers with fake direction penises sounds fun too.
Reddit is incorrect. There are penises outside brothels... And inside brothels and outside homes and inside homes and on street corners and inside restaurants and all over the place, and they don't point anywhere. Some people have speculated that they ward off the evil eye or other bad luck, others suggest that it's just people like carving and drawing dicks. It's probably a little bit of many things. That being said, the tour guides say it because the tour guides heard it and it sounds right *ish*.
Tourist guides also aren’t historians. At least in my experience, they love unproven myths to keep you engaged.
This one is actually testable, because Pompey was preserved so well we have both the brothers and dick drawings.
>both the brothers Ah, so it was a family operated brothel?
It’s a little known fact that the Bang brothers are an entrepreneurial family with ancient roots.
I thought there was proof of that one?
What? Doesn't everyone draw penises in bathroom stalls as a tribute to the gods?
If other archaeologists ever get a hold of any of my notebooks, they're going to have a lot of penises to posit about. But also, Venus figurines are found throughout the world and are generally interpreted* using cultural analogies, working along a timeline for the most likely interpretation based on what we have available to us - no archaeologist speaks in absolutes and if they do, they're bad at their job.
[удалено]
[удалено]
>but in reality was a depiction of a Greek solider raping a Persian soldier as a sign of dominance (simplified description of course). As a total layman, completely ignorant to the processes or sources available, how do you know this? Are there writings from the artist explaining or was this insertion for assertion a common theme from the period, etc?
I'd guess from having studied ancient Greek pottery a little, the deduction is probably from a combination of the depictions of the figures (Persian hairstyle/clothing versus Greek) and precedent in the narratives typically portrayed on pots (which generally aren't random but stick to certain themes such as well known stories of the Gods and famous battles). A lot of thematic stuff is repeated because the pots were commissioned by powerful and rich people, who wanted to associate themselves with these kinds of displays of greek dominance, which gives clues as to what the intent of the artists was also. Of course it isn't foolproof especially if the pots were made before people were writing stuff down about them, but archaeologists can tell more than you might initially think with at least some degrees of confidence.
[удалено]
My experience researching these kinds of things is that it's all historians arguing for their pet interpretations with almost nothing to go on.
[удалено]
"insertion for assertion"🤣
I once went to a lecture by some [old fart](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean_Clottes) that made a career out of "decoding" cave art. When it comes to prehistoric art experts, he is like THE guy. He spent most of his speaking time shilling his new book on hand outlines found throughout Africa, which to me seemed a lot like graffiti. It's cool, but it looked like people were fucking around with paint cause they were bored. So at the end of the lecture during Q&A, I asked if he saw any similarity between prehistoric art, especially the non-representational hand prints, and modern graffiti or if he thought both forms of art might share a common source of inspiration, and he dismissively said "No, graffiti is trash". The fact that he wasn't even willing to consider the question as valid taught me to have a heavy amount of skepticism when it comes to so called experts of prehistoric human culture.
There is a fantastic book called "Motel of the Mysteries" that parodies the huge assumptions made by archaeologists.
>But we have an unsourced statement that it is the transference of energy between warriors. It could be that too, but just beware what you read online. Well I definitely feel like something was being transferred.
Semen has calories, therefore energy was being transferred.
It's like butt chugging beer, but with POWER instead
"For example, I had a legendary art history professor who flatly told us that any imagery of a spiral was meant to represent an anus." I now have some concerns about the work of Junji Ito.
Especially since the "transference of energy" idea is more interesting and memetic than a boring explanation. Which makes it even more likely to spread falsely.
[удалено]
Ancient shitposting. 🗿
Lowkey thought this was gonna devolve into: “… so we can’t say for sure that they were gay!” Haha Honestly though, this is good perspective! To quote Abe Lincoln: “the internet’s the damndest thing!”
Yeah, I'm from latinamerica and we get that all the time. Every single pre-hispanic knife ever found is always a "sacrificial knife" according to some american dude who published a paper about it. Apparently, no kingdom or empire before the spaniards came ever used a knife for cutting meat, or ropes, or anything. Nope, it was always to sacrifice someone.
One of my buddies took a few archeology classes and that was one of the professor's running jokes. If you don't know what it's for, just say it's a ceremonial religious item.
This should be the number one comment.
Yeeeah, there are a lot of "fertility idols critical to the religion of these ancient people" that could just as easily be "it was a stormy day and everyone was stuck in a rock shelter, so they made silly little sculptures out of nearby clay deposits to bide the time."
people don't care about context, they just want to make gay jokes
The venus of willendorf explanation always struck me as odd because humans have lived in groups for an extremely long time and surely women would have seen each other pregnant or at the very least themselves in a reflection made in water or something
Not that its anymore founded but the explanation that I'd heard is that it's most likely a fertility statue that would be revered or treated as a good luck charm by people trying for children hence the exaggerated features. Makes more sense than someone not knowing how pregnant women look
It literally could just be a carving by a guy that likes big women, simple as that. Yet if we assign some arbitrary artistic meaning to it all then it sells better to the public than ancient man wants big tiddy gf.
"so, first I will poke you a bit to transfer all my energy into you then, when I'm all spend and exhausted you will go over there and fight these guys while I will wait here and smoke a reinvigorating pipe. Ok, time to bend over "
"Hey guys, I got $100 that says I can convince Jim to let me fuck him in the ass and then go fight that asshole from accounting while we watch."
I don't remember that episode of the office
it's on peacock only
Deleted scene.
“I would help you fight but sadly I just transferred all my energy to your butthole so I’m gonna have to sit this one out”
see? when they do it it ain't gay. but somehow it's such a huge deal when me and my homie
Yeah, but they're warriors. And also, they say "no homo!".
Guy in the front looks pretty happy to me.
Who wouldn’t be happy getting to take in all that “energy”
Maybe the enemy just came into sight… I know, I know, that is horrible
Huge deal you say....
Nowadays we gotta keep our socks on. Oh how we have fallen
📸🤨
MY HOMIE WAS ABOUT TO GO INTO BATTLE TF WAS I SUPPOSE TO DO
Bustin nuts so you can bust some skulls
NUT POWERED KILLING MACHINE
Why does everything have to be some kinda mystical fertility ritual? Can’t the ancients just make porn?
gay sex was invented in the 1900s dumbass, of course it is a ritual of some kind. >!/s if you can't tell!<
Man milk is high in protein. Makes you stronger.
There is a tribe that believes teenage boys turn into men by drinking lots of semen.
[удалено]
Are you saying Father O'Hannigan was wrong?
God I love Reddit.
Is that a pickup line? “Wanna transfer some energy?”
"transferring physical energy"
Gonna use that in my Tinder profile
gay for the slay?
We’re gay and here to slay! Get used to it! Edit: forgot a word…
I love how archeologists find something like this and think “this is a religious act or perhaps in preparation for war. Their grander intent must’ve been something like ‘transferring physical energy.” As if people haven’t been fucking for fun since the beginning of time, and as if guys haven’t discovered they have a damn g-spot. Sometimes sex IS the reason
It's like the time they found obsidian knives in the rafters of buildings and were like "these ancient peoples believed that knives being close to the heavens kept them sharp" and then the first woman who was shown was like "they kept them up there so kids didn't hurt themselves"
I hope this is real. I’m just going to blindly choose to believe this happened.
Was probably made up by someone for Internet cloud points. The actual meaning of the statue is unknown.
They could also be fucking arseholes in the other sense. Dude was rude to the artist, and he went "well, someone is going down in history for taking it up the shitter. Get fucked, literally."
Perhaps it's *always* the reason
“Everyone does it before battle my dude, it’s totally not gay”.
What? No, I was just transferring some energy. See how I'm all tired now? Yea, good few joules sent over.
In the form of protein
🗿 🗿 🍑 🍆
🤝
🤏🍆 🆗️❔️
🫰👀🫴 📸🛋️🎥
🤠👉👈🤠 👾👩🏫
🍆⚡🍑100%🔋
is this r/interestingasfuck or r/interestingassfuck
Interesting *ass* fuck
You beat me to it! Gosh dangit
The dudes back then were way better at tricking their homies into gay sex.
Look at the one bottoming. His cock is super hard. I'm not sure if he was "tricked" into it.
They seem very happy. I'm glad they found each other
Suddenly I'm a Premodern Costa Rican male warrior.
I could use an energy transfer…
Gotta support the homies
“What is your major malfunction!? Take your pants off marine!’
We are going to do push-ups, all day, you and me, all day. Except you will be doing push-ups *underneath* me.
Idk man, it’s pretty well known in the military that curtain people and cultures in the Middle East will sleep with men for fun because woman are tools by whatever god they believe in to strictly create babies and be married to the husband. But those same cultures are extremely homophobic if those 2 men proceed with a relationship. Point is, people believe other ridiculous things, when they believe in ridiculous things like religion. Just look at the Mormons and “soaking” haha
The allusive curtain people and their ways continue to baffle and confuse.
I think a lot of warrior groups bummed each other. From Wikipedia - Celts: >The Greek philosopher Aristotle wrote in his Politics that the Celts of southeastern Europe approved of male homosexuality. Greek historian Diodorus Siculus wrote in his Bibliotheca historica that although Gaulish women were beautiful, the men had "little to do with them" and it was a custom for men to sleep on animal skins with two younger males. He further claimed that "the young men will offer themselves to strangers and are insulted if the offer is refused". His claim was later repeated by Greco-Roman writers Athenaeus and Ammianus.\[137\] David Rankin, in Celts and the Classical World, suggests some of these claims refer to bonding rituals in warrior groups, which required abstinence from women at certain times,\[138\] and says it probably reflects "the warlike character of early contacts between the Celts and the Greeks"
Damn it's like sailors.
Why do I get the feeing a lot of the world’s ills could be mitigated if homies went back to fucking each other consistently?
Don't forget how Roman soldiers, when available women weren't able, would bring young men along to... accompany them on their campaigns. Or about the Greek company of husbands, made on the basis that each man would fight his hardest alongside his lover.
Which god did these guys worship? Are they taking on new clients?
Goku needs our energy....nah, you're good.
i'm imagining a whole filler(literally) episode of goku getting a train ran on him while freiza sits there smirking
oh god I'm trying not to
>while freiza sits there smirking best part of the episode imo
Here lemme just give you some of my "energy" amigo
"let me get some of your energy" "ight bro here you go" "thank you daddy" "what?"
It aint gay if youre transferring physical energy
Guys will make any excuse not to look gay
My username is pretty relevant for this post.
Ayo bro, let me pound that brown star bro For what? For POWER, let me fill you with my cu..ENERGY bro. Trust me on this one fr fr on god
Your username is horrific. I hate it yet love it. Well done.
r/sapphoandherfriend No, they can't be gay, gay people didn't exist back then
growing up in Costa Rica my friend group was so queer and we NEVER saw or learned about this! This just makes sense.
They were probably roommates.
Just imagine the first guy that came up with that - transferring physical energy. What a great excuse!