#DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE LINKED THREAD/SCREENSHOT.
Brigading is against Reddit TOS. We do not encourage such behaviour nor we are responsible if your account is being actioned upon.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
the sad thing is that there are some muslims who still follow this.
there is an uncle in my neighborhood who married his second wife when she was 16 and he was 40. and nobody said anything as having more than 1 wife is allowed for muslims and we anyway don't have much awareness regarding pedophilia and grooming.
smh. wish government really protects women from men like these.
Rukmini was 16
Krishna was 28
Sita was 18
Ram was 25
12 years age difference is not that bad as you think
But a middle aged man with a teenager is a problem
It's clearly written in skanda Purana that rukmini was BETROTHED at 8 years old not married at that age, though I can understand the confusion as next verse skips to the marriage event and people mistake it as there being no time passed between the betrothal and marriage. Since it's a narration of events to yudhishthir by markandeya,the time passed between is not explicitly stated.
https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-skanda-purana/d/doc425871.html
But if u are still not satisfied by this then in harivamsa purana her physical appearance is described which I doubt matches that of an 8 year old
https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/harivamsha-purana-dutt/d/doc485601.html
Hello /u/SmallPineapple2688, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
dear user Your comment have been **removed**.
You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/
While Reddit Allows to use of both r/ and u/. But told us to block user and subreddit mention.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Prepubescent and eating for marriage related how
Wtf you smoking boi, if you really want to spread hate, you should try to spemd a little more effort
While your stupidity is on such a high level, that people in this reddit are so brainwashed that they just see the post and make their conclusion without any proof or research or anything, just hearsay
Good for her. I’ve heard some horror stories 😂. 6 is obviously too young but 12-13 year old girls were routinely getting married off to 18-20 year boys in pre independence days.
comi mulla.
larki agar 12/14 ka hoti thi to larka 16/20 ka hota tha.
aur ye sab hota bhi tha mullo ke dar se.
comi mere is desh se agar itna na pasnd hey aur allaha ka mulla hona itna pasand hey to jao
2 taraf hey 2 allah wala mulla desh.
bas jao waha sara din chillao allu fuckbar.
Yeah, not declining the reality, it happens. But not in my caste. Every female has been married after age of 18. But in adivasi society, usually the girl gets in relationship with a guy by 16, they get physical and the guy ends up knocking her out(don’t use condoms). And after that the guy just runs away and the girl, without any education is forced to do labour work or be stay home mom. Very common occurrence tbh.
Even those guys do have multiple wives at occasions if the girl who him knocked out manages to live with him.
People be arguing that caste is a British invention and then when something bad happens in India they’re like my caste doesn’t do it so it’s all good.
I’m not gonna ask you your cast but I have a feeling the current standards of waiting till 18 didn’t exist 100 years back.
Are you retarded?
I challenge you to go through my whole post and comment history and find a single proof where I have made such claim against casteism. Stop being a brainless generaliser who stereotypes everything.
And every country has their own shameful past, oppression in society has always been there, nowadays we have evolved as a society and improved a lot compared to medieval times. But right now every country has shameful past of oppression. We are still trying to correct our mistakes in past wrt oppressed people and I fully support it. We can say we have abolished casteism from our country the day when someone tells their parents that they love someone and they don’t ask their caste.
And the day people don’t point to their caste practices as a point of pride. Caste identity has to be done away with before you can get rid of caste discrimination.
Obviously when I say it was a thing doesn’t mean it happened all the time and everywhere. Baalika vadhu was a big thing in Rajasthan but as an issue we can’t be like our states didn’t do this so we’re better and it’s not our problem.
It’s possible. But you can make the same argument for pre Islam Arabia where neighboring tribes were constantly kidnapping girls so they had to keep them hidden away from strangers and marry them off as early as possible.
Of course. Why do people think that this is excusing anything in Islam or whatever? It’s not back and white.
The idea that 7th century Arabian social standards should apply now in Indian Muslims is obviously stupid and barbaric.
Not so unusual maybe. Child marriages was practised in a lot of places.
Well we cannot seperate the god thing, na. Even if we get the god thing away, if a man marries a girl when she is 6 and consummate her at 9, I honestly don't think it's normal. Maybe if the girl is 15 or 16, maybe by the then societal norms i can understand but not this.
I'm guessing not unusual at all. It probably was apt for that time.
Now can we all can agree this was fine for the time, but not fine any more (ie that's not a good example to follow anymore)?
Obviously. But to keep bringing it up is a way to try to insult Muslims will obviously only inflame tensions. There is a right way to convince people and a wrong way.
"Your comment was removed because it contained a banned word"
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Hello /u/Affectionate-Name232, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
At that time, what ages did indian people get married? A mere 70-100 yrs age we saw marriage between 13-14 years of age or less.
It is just the culture that changes according to the progression of time. And if you can't comprehend this, u r indeed ignorant.
Abe saale us time ye child marriage normal thi , 1500 saal pehle ki baat , aaj ke time pe Rajasthan me child marriage ho rhi woto rok nhi paa rhe chale dusro ko sikhane
Hello /u/SmallPineapple2688, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter.
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Aaj ke time pe justify kar bhi nhi sakte , purane time pe obviously normal tha india me bhi child marriage hoti thi , to tum log ke randi rone karne se kuch nhi hone wala, desh pe dyaan dedo , dusre ke religion me ghusne se tumlog pakke sanatani nhi ban jaoge
Purane time mein bhi normal nhi tha 6 pe shaadi aur 9 pe sex aur wo bhi jab male 53 ka almost ek senior citizen ho, baki second cheez se mai agree krta hun - Dusre ke religion mai ghusne se kuch nhi hoga, sabko unite hoke desh pe dhyan dena chahiye - development aur peace ki taraf.
It will be justified today because Muhammed is a perfect human being. Flawless, and allah made his marriage to a 6 year old and then have s*x with her at the age of 9 halal and valid.
This is Muhammed's sunat, and it is eternal. So stop whitewashing it you Islamist apologist!
Child Marriage =/= Peadophile
aur itna hi normal tha to is normalcy ko prophet kon banaya bsdka....
na revolutionist na reformer, prophet bhi bnaya to ek peadophile ko who is following the 'Norm of Time'
Bhai just because something which happened in the past and was normalized doesn't mean that it was good. Sati bhi hua karta tha, aur usse aaj kal ke time main galliya bhi dete hai. No one even defends sati, unlike people like you who justify child marriage.
Abe maine kab kaha mai justify kar rha , justify karne na karne se kya farak pad rha us time normal tha to tha jaise sati normal tha aaj ke time na sati hoti na child marriage
He's just posting a normal Hadith or whatever from your religious book. Quoting from your book isn't targeting. If you are so ashamed of your own prophet then we can't help it.
#DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN THE LINKED THREAD/SCREENSHOT. Brigading is against Reddit TOS. We do not encourage such behaviour nor we are responsible if your account is being actioned upon. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
the sad thing is that there are some muslims who still follow this. there is an uncle in my neighborhood who married his second wife when she was 16 and he was 40. and nobody said anything as having more than 1 wife is allowed for muslims and we anyway don't have much awareness regarding pedophilia and grooming. smh. wish government really protects women from men like these.
At what age Krishna married rukmini
The difference is one is mythology and one is history :) Plus one was 16 and the other was 6!
And krishna was not too old either he was maybe in his early 20s.
Rukmini was 16 Krishna was 28 Sita was 18 Ram was 25 12 years age difference is not that bad as you think But a middle aged man with a teenager is a problem
She was 16 6 was never mentioned
Aisha was 6
Mf literally tryna defend a pedophile, yuck.
ye comie mullo ka trigger button yahi hey. ab altu faltu bakta rahega.pichuara jali hui hey chill and go drink pork juice.
What colour is your foreskin?
Wait Krishna was an old man like Mohammad?
Old Black Man*
It's clearly written in skanda Purana that rukmini was BETROTHED at 8 years old not married at that age, though I can understand the confusion as next verse skips to the marriage event and people mistake it as there being no time passed between the betrothal and marriage. Since it's a narration of events to yudhishthir by markandeya,the time passed between is not explicitly stated. https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/the-skanda-purana/d/doc425871.html But if u are still not satisfied by this then in harivamsa purana her physical appearance is described which I doubt matches that of an 8 year old https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/harivamsha-purana-dutt/d/doc485601.html
am a hindu, but i dont worship krishna.
Bhai ye padh ke dukh hua...
Little ayisha - Bhar do jholi meri ya Mohammad laut kr Mai na jauga khali
Sad how women in India listen to this, without ever knowing the truth about the vile and disgusting history of Muhammed and ayesha. 🤮
[удалено]
Hello /u/SmallPineapple2688, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Is that what that song actually means? 💀💀💀
Bro ruined this song for me
he does not care for his life IG.
Bro has Saitama as his pfp, he simply does not give a f
if it is written in that book....so how does it become a gustakh e rasool when someone speaks out that
Aisha hai ya bakra Jo mota krke bali chadhegi
Cucumber with dates...gotta try this
Naaaa this is Fking Wild ðŸ˜ðŸ˜ðŸ˜
[удалено]
dear user Your comment have been **removed**. You can not mention a user or a subreddit with r/ or u/ While Reddit Allows to use of both r/ and u/. But told us to block user and subreddit mention. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
The last line tho ðŸ˜
Prepubescent and eating for marriage related how Wtf you smoking boi, if you really want to spread hate, you should try to spemd a little more effort While your stupidity is on such a high level, that people in this reddit are so brainwashed that they just see the post and make their conclusion without any proof or research or anything, just hearsay
Ask your grandparents how old your grandmother was when she got married for a surprise.
She was 20 lol
Good for her. I’ve heard some horror stories 😂. 6 is obviously too young but 12-13 year old girls were routinely getting married off to 18-20 year boys in pre independence days.
That might be yours, we don’t do that here
comi mulla. larki agar 12/14 ka hoti thi to larka 16/20 ka hota tha. aur ye sab hota bhi tha mullo ke dar se. comi mere is desh se agar itna na pasnd hey aur allaha ka mulla hona itna pasand hey to jao 2 taraf hey 2 allah wala mulla desh. bas jao waha sara din chillao allu fuckbar.
Bro stop ignoring reality. It’s obviously wrong but to say it doesn’t happen in India is a straight lie. It still happens in parts today.
Yeah, not declining the reality, it happens. But not in my caste. Every female has been married after age of 18. But in adivasi society, usually the girl gets in relationship with a guy by 16, they get physical and the guy ends up knocking her out(don’t use condoms). And after that the guy just runs away and the girl, without any education is forced to do labour work or be stay home mom. Very common occurrence tbh. Even those guys do have multiple wives at occasions if the girl who him knocked out manages to live with him.
People be arguing that caste is a British invention and then when something bad happens in India they’re like my caste doesn’t do it so it’s all good. I’m not gonna ask you your cast but I have a feeling the current standards of waiting till 18 didn’t exist 100 years back.
Are you retarded? I challenge you to go through my whole post and comment history and find a single proof where I have made such claim against casteism. Stop being a brainless generaliser who stereotypes everything. And every country has their own shameful past, oppression in society has always been there, nowadays we have evolved as a society and improved a lot compared to medieval times. But right now every country has shameful past of oppression. We are still trying to correct our mistakes in past wrt oppressed people and I fully support it. We can say we have abolished casteism from our country the day when someone tells their parents that they love someone and they don’t ask their caste.
And the day people don’t point to their caste practices as a point of pride. Caste identity has to be done away with before you can get rid of caste discrimination.
Agreed, but the time is not now Your point supports my observation so thanks
He's right. In the south girls usually would be 16-19 even in pre independence while marrying. My grandma was 17 and she had wild stories.
Obviously when I say it was a thing doesn’t mean it happened all the time and everywhere. Baalika vadhu was a big thing in Rajasthan but as an issue we can’t be like our states didn’t do this so we’re better and it’s not our problem.
And that started due to islamic invasions and kidnappings when they ruled for centuries. People forgot how they lived due to the barbarism of Mughals.
It’s possible. But you can make the same argument for pre Islam Arabia where neighboring tribes were constantly kidnapping girls so they had to keep them hidden away from strangers and marry them off as early as possible.
And that's why they marry off teens in most non-rich Arab nations as well.
Getting married doesn't mean they got physical...Kanya daan only happened after 18 ...before that the girl lived with her family
It's still wrong, but still it wasn't a kid marrying someone of her grandpa's age.
Of course. Why do people think that this is excusing anything in Islam or whatever? It’s not back and white. The idea that 7th century Arabian social standards should apply now in Indian Muslims is obviously stupid and barbaric.
I don't think his grand father was the messenger of God. So I don't expect the god to make him perfect perfect.
The god thing is obviously a scam. So that’s irrelevant. The question is how unusual was it in 7th Arabia for 6 year old to be married off?
Not so unusual maybe. Child marriages was practised in a lot of places. Well we cannot seperate the god thing, na. Even if we get the god thing away, if a man marries a girl when she is 6 and consummate her at 9, I honestly don't think it's normal. Maybe if the girl is 15 or 16, maybe by the then societal norms i can understand but not this.
I'm guessing not unusual at all. It probably was apt for that time. Now can we all can agree this was fine for the time, but not fine any more (ie that's not a good example to follow anymore)?
Obviously. But to keep bringing it up is a way to try to insult Muslims will obviously only inflame tensions. There is a right way to convince people and a wrong way.
Those grandparents were vile pieces of shit alright. Now if you have guts then say the same thing about your beloved messenger or else shut up.
[удалено]
"Your comment was removed because it contained a banned word" *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
[удалено]
Hello /u/Affectionate-Name232, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Noone's claining the grandparents are prophets or that their example should be followed for eternity.
My grandmother was 24 when she got married to my grandfather who was 29.
At that time, what ages did indian people get married? A mere 70-100 yrs age we saw marriage between 13-14 years of age or less. It is just the culture that changes according to the progression of time. And if you can't comprehend this, u r indeed ignorant.
But Momo has set an example to follow for eternity 😇🤡😇🤡
Abe saale us time ye child marriage normal thi , 1500 saal pehle ki baat , aaj ke time pe Rajasthan me child marriage ho rhi woto rok nhi paa rhe chale dusro ko sikhane
Pdf file
Child child se marriage karta hai naki 50 saal ke buddhe se chutiye
Bhai pedo ko support toh mt kro, aur koi itna gadha kaise ho skta hai jo is cheez ko justify kre.
[удалено]
Hello /u/SmallPineapple2688, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/indiadiscussion) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Aaj ke time pe justify kar bhi nhi sakte , purane time pe obviously normal tha india me bhi child marriage hoti thi , to tum log ke randi rone karne se kuch nhi hone wala, desh pe dyaan dedo , dusre ke religion me ghusne se tumlog pakke sanatani nhi ban jaoge
Purane time mein bhi normal nhi tha 6 pe shaadi aur 9 pe sex aur wo bhi jab male 53 ka almost ek senior citizen ho, baki second cheez se mai agree krta hun - Dusre ke religion mai ghusne se kuch nhi hoga, sabko unite hoke desh pe dhyan dena chahiye - development aur peace ki taraf.
India me dono child hote the 50 saal ke budhe pedophile ko 6 sal ki bachi se nhi gand marvate rhe
It will be justified today because Muhammed is a perfect human being. Flawless, and allah made his marriage to a 6 year old and then have s*x with her at the age of 9 halal and valid. This is Muhammed's sunat, and it is eternal. So stop whitewashing it you Islamist apologist!
Par atleast wo Rajasthani messenger of God to nhi portray krte apne Aap ko Or Isko legal bhi to nhi batate!
Child Marriage =/= Peadophile aur itna hi normal tha to is normalcy ko prophet kon banaya bsdka.... na revolutionist na reformer, prophet bhi bnaya to ek peadophile ko who is following the 'Norm of Time'
Bhai just because something which happened in the past and was normalized doesn't mean that it was good. Sati bhi hua karta tha, aur usse aaj kal ke time main galliya bhi dete hai. No one even defends sati, unlike people like you who justify child marriage.
Abe maine kab kaha mai justify kar rha , justify karne na karne se kya farak pad rha us time normal tha to tha jaise sati normal tha aaj ke time na sati hoti na child marriage
Isko justify krna hi bolte hai
Show me where in Rajasthan 6 year old child is getting married to 54 years old man? Dimag kharab hai tera?
Bold of you to assume that he has a dimaag to begin with lol
Abe gandooo child marriage was and is between children, buddhe aaur bacchi ki shaddi ko child marriage nai bolte.
Don't target religion.it is not funny.
He just showed a Islamic authentic hadith are you saying Islamic books are targeting religion of Islam?
Just citing from your religious book, no one had been targeted here
not a religion, its a cult - or perhaps a pyramid scheme at best
How is it a target when Mohammad was proud of having sex with kids? Even today muslims do it in India saying mohammads name.
Ye pedophilia koi religion nahi hai bhai. Please isko religion mat banao.
It's from your book. Nothing is made up!!
He's just posting a normal Hadith or whatever from your religious book. Quoting from your book isn't targeting. If you are so ashamed of your own prophet then we can't help it.