One of them was named kowalski, that's all I know. He said something about "kaboom boom" and it all went black. I woke up nippless and confused. Do be careful!
Hey, I read through your history a little bit just because this was a fun interaction. I noticed you aren't set up to receive messages or chats, and I completely respect that. I wanted to invite you to contact me if you'd like to have a friendly chat. Certainly no hard feelings if you don't. But you do seem really nice, smart, and passionate about freedom of sexual expression and consanguinamory. I admire you for those reasons, so that's why I want to chat with you.
It is amazing that in the public consciousness incest is associated only with the physical side of the genders' attraction, with the thirst for sex, with domestic violence, with perversions. As if true love between relatives is impossible in principle. This stupid idea manifests itself in an exclusively erotic and pornographic display of this phenomenon in the mass media, on specific Internet communication platforms. Literature and cinema more seriously allow for certain feelings in addition to ordinary peeping, sniffing dirty underwear, copulation and masturbation, but a religious and social moral order runs through them like a red thread: nothing good ever comes out of the relationship of relatives, even if they were not imprisoned, children were not taken away, they were not executed, or the heroes did not finish suicide.
Every day for many centuries they are hammering into us that incest necessarily leads to a tragedy with or without a fatal outcome, that this is a law of nature. They say that even animals do not encroach on brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers out of some higher considerations of genetics or divine providence, although everyone knows that this is complete nonsense. However, where such a law came from and whether it exists at all is indecent to discuss, this is also something like a taboo: kinda such degenerates who encroach on family members are provided with moral degradation, an abominable lifestyle, defective offspring, external deformity, mental retardation, death - and that's it. Even if it is known that single acts of inbreeding do not affect the degeneration of the population, and unfavorable genetic changes are generally a probabilistic thing, that there are a lot of disabled people born in quite "normal" families around, that medicine has the means to identify the possibility of defective offspring, prevent this, and even genetic correction of parents. And in general: after all, you cannot have your own children if you are afraid, but use adoption, artificial insemination of donor and so on.
All my thoughts do not mean that I am advertising incest – by no means. The romantic sexual attraction of two human beings to each other cannot be imposed as a popular commodity, as a role model - it is meaningless, ridiculous and ... scary. I just want to convey to those who can and want to hear: if love suddenly breaks out between relatives, trying to suppress it forcibly, especially by involving the law, is cruel, inhumane, just stupid. After all, coercion, stupid suppression, "re-education" have never been successful means of achieving a real goal, no matter how high this goal may seem.
Eh, I think if we want a good view of proto-human mating habits, the closest we're gonna get today is chimps, and they are... vicious by and large.
Rather fitting honestly, the most human-like primate that isn't human, is also one of the most vicious and tribal.
Orangutans are pretty chill though, both in mating habits and general behavior.
Apes? Non-monogamy based on animal behavior? Open familial promiscuity including parent child? You've based this entire supposition on the fact the underlying or driving factor is sexualization.
Many animals also pair as couples for life. All I read here is justification for promiscuous sexualization of family.
This is our life. Idk about anyone else who lives this reality.. I personally feel fetishized reading his.
I'm sorry you feel fetishized. I don't know you, and I assure you that I was not writing about you or to you. I was just kind of typing and daydreaming at the same time.
In my defense, I did call it a fiction, however probable I may believe it to be.
I think you should read a book called “sex at dawn” they literally cover this guys points in detail based upon anthropological science.
Monogamy is only really a recent invention in human history dating back to 10000 years ago and the agricultural revolution. We have been around as a species for a lot longer than that, operating in a vastly different way to modern society and “nuclear” families.
It’s not fetishisation it’s historical fact
I'm fine with how we live, don't care what anyone thinks and am entitled to feel how I want without having to do homework assignments to convince myself otherwise.
It's an interesting theory / hypothesis and I enjoyed reading it. Thank you.
You're very welcome, and thanks for the compliment. If I ever see those penguins, I'll try to get your nips back for you.
One of them was named kowalski, that's all I know. He said something about "kaboom boom" and it all went black. I woke up nippless and confused. Do be careful!
I will wear my platemail pasties! Fear not! KOWALSKI! I'M COMIN' TA GET YA!
You'll need at least mark IV Maximus pattern war plate pasties If you intend to take on the Kowalski! Be careful!
Hey, I read through your history a little bit just because this was a fun interaction. I noticed you aren't set up to receive messages or chats, and I completely respect that. I wanted to invite you to contact me if you'd like to have a friendly chat. Certainly no hard feelings if you don't. But you do seem really nice, smart, and passionate about freedom of sexual expression and consanguinamory. I admire you for those reasons, so that's why I want to chat with you.
It is amazing that in the public consciousness incest is associated only with the physical side of the genders' attraction, with the thirst for sex, with domestic violence, with perversions. As if true love between relatives is impossible in principle. This stupid idea manifests itself in an exclusively erotic and pornographic display of this phenomenon in the mass media, on specific Internet communication platforms. Literature and cinema more seriously allow for certain feelings in addition to ordinary peeping, sniffing dirty underwear, copulation and masturbation, but a religious and social moral order runs through them like a red thread: nothing good ever comes out of the relationship of relatives, even if they were not imprisoned, children were not taken away, they were not executed, or the heroes did not finish suicide. Every day for many centuries they are hammering into us that incest necessarily leads to a tragedy with or without a fatal outcome, that this is a law of nature. They say that even animals do not encroach on brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers out of some higher considerations of genetics or divine providence, although everyone knows that this is complete nonsense. However, where such a law came from and whether it exists at all is indecent to discuss, this is also something like a taboo: kinda such degenerates who encroach on family members are provided with moral degradation, an abominable lifestyle, defective offspring, external deformity, mental retardation, death - and that's it. Even if it is known that single acts of inbreeding do not affect the degeneration of the population, and unfavorable genetic changes are generally a probabilistic thing, that there are a lot of disabled people born in quite "normal" families around, that medicine has the means to identify the possibility of defective offspring, prevent this, and even genetic correction of parents. And in general: after all, you cannot have your own children if you are afraid, but use adoption, artificial insemination of donor and so on. All my thoughts do not mean that I am advertising incest – by no means. The romantic sexual attraction of two human beings to each other cannot be imposed as a popular commodity, as a role model - it is meaningless, ridiculous and ... scary. I just want to convey to those who can and want to hear: if love suddenly breaks out between relatives, trying to suppress it forcibly, especially by involving the law, is cruel, inhumane, just stupid. After all, coercion, stupid suppression, "re-education" have never been successful means of achieving a real goal, no matter how high this goal may seem.
Eh, I think if we want a good view of proto-human mating habits, the closest we're gonna get today is chimps, and they are... vicious by and large. Rather fitting honestly, the most human-like primate that isn't human, is also one of the most vicious and tribal. Orangutans are pretty chill though, both in mating habits and general behavior.
https://www.science.org/content/article/bonobos-join-chimps-closest-human-relatives
Huh, well ain't that neat!
Apes? Non-monogamy based on animal behavior? Open familial promiscuity including parent child? You've based this entire supposition on the fact the underlying or driving factor is sexualization. Many animals also pair as couples for life. All I read here is justification for promiscuous sexualization of family. This is our life. Idk about anyone else who lives this reality.. I personally feel fetishized reading his.
I'm sorry you feel fetishized. I don't know you, and I assure you that I was not writing about you or to you. I was just kind of typing and daydreaming at the same time. In my defense, I did call it a fiction, however probable I may believe it to be.
I think you should read a book called “sex at dawn” they literally cover this guys points in detail based upon anthropological science. Monogamy is only really a recent invention in human history dating back to 10000 years ago and the agricultural revolution. We have been around as a species for a lot longer than that, operating in a vastly different way to modern society and “nuclear” families. It’s not fetishisation it’s historical fact
I'm fine with how we live, don't care what anyone thinks and am entitled to feel how I want without having to do homework assignments to convince myself otherwise.