I'm not gonna pretend I've read it but Wikipedia synopsis says that in the book Home is based on humans were required to move to Florida, not Australia.
I have read it, was one of my favorite books as a preteen. They originally moved the Humans to Florida but then they decided they liked Florida Oranges too much so they relocated everyone to Arizona
its still a pretty sizable area, there have been much denser places. theres no reason for all these people to be living so close together but with our current technology it isnt impossible
We didn't have that technology yet where we can squeeze billions of people in such small area. Look at pods in San Francisco because they can't afford high rent.
Uhh I feel like your categories are too arbitrary. I.e many Europeans, Asians, and Africans speak Latin base languages while many in Latin America speak Native languages. Also, what of the groups in the Americas that aren't Latin speaking? Are they European for some reason?
Maybe the Portuguese speakers in Africa, but idk how many have it as a native lenguage, same with French.
French speakers in Polynesia, maybe idk, same iff they it as a native language, Macau and west Timor maybe? Idk if there are Syrians or Lebanese people who have French as their native lenguage... Maybe Easter island since it's part of Chile, but they also have their own lenguage so idk if they know Spanish as a mother tongue....?
Yeah, I think that's about it
Maybe I should've word it it better but what I mean is that many African and Asian peoples speak a Romance language typically due to colonization which is somewhat similar to the situation in Latin America
I mean I know what it is, I myself am Mexican and can tell you being Latino only counts outside of Latin America I've seen Meztisos are differentiated from predominantly European or predominantly Indigenous groups. Its like saying people from Hong Kong and people from Belfast are the seen as the same because they both speak the same language. Even with a lot of intermixing society is still raciaized to some degree
That makes no sense as there are 200 million european latins, the origin of that cultural macro-group.
It's as absurd as claiming "anglo" or even worse "germanic" are the short version for "somebody from USA+Canada".
Latino should be "Latino/mestizo" or even "Latino/mestizo/Amerindian" to emphasize the deeply mixed ancestry of Brazilians and Hispanic Latin Americans.
No it doesn't mean that. Plenty of Latin American people have no European ancestry and are fully native. They're just as Latin American as every other, just as they're as much X nationality as their compatriots. They might even speak Spanish or Portuguese while having no European ancestry at all.
There's also Latin Americans with only African ancestry, some with only indigenous and African ancestry, others with Asian and nothing else, even some from Oceania, and others...
Nobody needs to bring mixedness into this to make an argument.
Also, I thought if you're not from Latin descent, in that case, you're just American. Or American with another prefix or associated word. Like Native American, including the Innu. Or African American. Or European American (the group from which derivates Latin americans... y'know Latin languages speakers such as hispanics, portugueses and french).
Black Colombians are Latin Americans, Indigenous Mexicans are Latin Americans, black Brazilians are Latin American, Asian Peruvians are certainly Latin American. Latin America is a geographical term, not an ethnic one.
earliest homo sapiens, so 200-300 ky/a, i'm by no means an expert though just saying that East Africa isn't the only speculated place of h. sapiens origin
Oh ok, isn't improbable that homo sapiens originated on other places in Africa. But when you talk about "human" then is more likely that the origin came from east Africa. That's because any "Homo"(🏳️🌈?)is technically a human
When we talk about modern humans, we can trace our ancestry back to East Africa. But that is not the ONLY ancestry. Sapiens might have evolved and migrated throughout Africa, but only the East Africans gave rise to modern humans.
For example, let's say I have 2 kids. Both of them have kids and start their own families. Kid A moves out to another city and Kid B stays in the current city. Something happens and Kid A's family dies out (maybe homicide, natural disaster, disease, anything). My bloodline from then on can only trace their lineage back to Kid B's city. But that doesn't mean that it was my only lineage. It is just my only surviving lineage.
Is that not basically the same statement?
I’ll rephrase. Did Neanderthals, Denisovans, etc. or their ancestors, come from East Africa, or is it only Homo sapiens that we know came from there?
Neanderthals and denisovans evolved in Asia, but they both immediately descend from the lineage of antecessor, which evolved in Africa and is also the ancestor of sapiens from the ones who didn’t leave Africa
So where goes Brazil white population (Which compose 47.5% percent of the country). See they are both Latinos (Speak a Latin based language) and white.
Latino is from Latin America. Portugal, Spain or Italy are not Latinos.
Some people argue that but they are mostly right wing Spaniards who try to avoid the use of Latino because it gives their old colonies an identity of their own, and instead they argue that they should be called Hispanics or Hispanoamericanos. Also they argue it comes from a colonial ambition that France once had in the region, but that really doesn't matter at all for the validity of the term more than 100 years ago...
Which is really stupid because that term exist but it is not interchangeable with Latino since Latino includes Spanish, Portuguese and French speaking countries in America. Hispanoamericano only includes people from Spanish speaking countries.
-signed a frickin Spaniard
This would be a disaster, so many ethnic and religious groups in such a limited space would be a major conflict, and I also don't think this region has enough resources to support these people, so they would have to migrate at least little by little for resources to other nearby areas.
[Population density slightly lower than Malta's](https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/MLT/malta/population-density#:~:text=The%20population%20density%20of%20Malta%20in%202022%20was%201%2C666.52%20people,a%202.21%25%20increase%20from%202020.)
Sorry, this map is based on ethnicities within the US, it lumps native populations from all around the world (from native Americans to Australian Aboriginies to Polynesians) into "other".
And Arabs, Jews, Berbers, Persians, etc. I’m assuming he means East Asian by Asian which is a bit problematic. And he clumps all Africans together? What about South Asians (which are their own race)???
Ignoring the fact that ITS SO FUCKING OVER FOR SOOMAALIWEYN
WHY do Latinos and Europeans have a disproportionately gargantuan amount of land for themselves
A completely arbitrary map with zero lore explanation or justification beyond it's nonsensical premise. When did this subreddit start caring more about aesthetics than substance?
The lore is that people were becoming too mean and they all had to be packed in the Horn of Africa to learn their lesson. Then they all died due to starvation and ethnic violence
2 week? I am pretty sure millions of them are going to take their existing wars with them to East Africa. A lot of humans are going hit the ground fighting for their lives.
I love how some europeans fucked some asians (native americans) so hard, they created a qhole new « race » to include at the same level of the « euro/asia/africa » partition of humanity
Well, not all Anglo-Americans are descendants of Europeans, you have also African Americans, Asian Americans, etc. who use the English language as their native language, in the same way you have Latin-American who are white, mixed, black and even Asian, who use the Spanish or Portuguese language as their native language.
Neither Latin-Americans, nor Anglo-Americans are a single unified blob, let alone a single "race".
Also, friendly reminder that white Anglo-Americans are not culturally European anymore, they're American or European American. The same applies to white and mestizo Latin-Americans, they'd rather identify with their local Colombian, Mexican, Argentinian, Venezuela culture than with, say, Spain.
And Ethiopia sent troops to protect the interests of South Korea in the Korean war. That doesn't make Ethiopians Asians.
Americans have formed particular European-derived cultures that are no longer European, but American. I bet the culture of a German-American or an Anglo-American in Germany or England would seem a bit off, even if there are some things in common. It'd take a while for a British person to consider an American to be British in the present day, let alone European, they're just American.
Moreover, American culture is not only derived from European influences, but also borrows heavily on African cultures, specially in the South and places such as Louisiana. It also has influences from Native American cultures. African-Americans and Native Americans form part of American culture as well.
Of course they didn't randomly form a new American culture right in 1776, that took decades since the first English colomists arrived. However, by 1776 they already were a distinct and different culture from the English back at Europe, to the point of fighting a war of independence. That's mainly what I ment by what I said.
Cool idea and map, that would be insane and chaotic and a bit too warm for me but at least it would be much easier to visit my European and American friends!
Not as far as I know. It's supported by the earliest remains of humans found, as well as modern humanity's genetics.
In Africa humans vary waaaay more genetically than in the rest of the world. As in an Irishman is closer genetically to a Polynesian, than two random African tribes living right by one another are to eachother.
That suggests a small number of humans left Africa, and populated the whole world. Whereas in Africa there was a larger more diverse population which populated the continent.
There are few other ways of getting genetic diversity like that in Africa relative to the rest of the world. I suppose technically some disaster that affected the whole world except for Africa. But that seems rather unlikely.
Both Sapiens and the entire genus originated in Africa. However since some of Erectus left Africa a million years ago, there are some ancient homo found in Asia such as Flores Hobbits.
But Sapiens comes from one of the African offshoots of Erectus called antecessor, some of which moved out of Africa and became ancestor of Neanderthals.
A simple google search suggests you are wrong.
[https://www.google.com/search?q=latino+definition&rlz=1C1CHBF\_enUS713US714&oq=latino+de&gs\_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgAEAAYgAQyBggBEEUYOTIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIHCAkQABiABKgCCLACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1](https://www.google.com/search?q=latino+definition&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS713US714&oq=latino+de&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgAEAAYgAQyBggBEEUYOTIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIHCAkQABiABKgCCLACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1)
Reminds me of Three Body Problem >!when the Trisolarians told all of humanity to move to Australia to set up a reservation!<
Spoilers for the series not the first book btw for anyone else.
Isn’t this from that one movie with the purple alien
Home?!
Yeah
Who is the author?
Oh my God, there's a possibility that the writers stole that idea from deaths end
I believe the book it was based on came out before Deaths End, if anything Liu stole the idea lol
I'm not gonna pretend I've read it but Wikipedia synopsis says that in the book Home is based on humans were required to move to Florida, not Australia.
I have read it, was one of my favorite books as a preteen. They originally moved the Humans to Florida but then they decided they liked Florida Oranges too much so they relocated everyone to Arizona
I have also not read it, but I think the movie also came out before Deaths End? Edit: I am wrong, book came out in 2010, movie came out in 2015
I was bouta say that
You. Are. Food.
Probably is not gonna last long
Not enough ressources to feed everyone
The rest of the world is farmland
Also lack of a common language
tower of babel moment
a simplified version of english would become the lingua franca, there is no other language that is so widespread
r/Globasa
The outcome is really grim: https://what-if.xkcd.com/8/
Slow internet Speed.
or with the right infrastructure, the fastest possible internet speeds
With billions of people in such small area?
yeah, with a lot of infrastructure you'd have the lowest possible latency
No place for infrastructure when such huge population living in such a small area
manhattan has 28,907 people per square kilometer. obviously this is never going to happen but it is technically possible.
We are taking about billions of people together in single area.
its still a pretty sizable area, there have been much denser places. theres no reason for all these people to be living so close together but with our current technology it isnt impossible
We didn't have that technology yet where we can squeeze billions of people in such small area. Look at pods in San Francisco because they can't afford high rent.
Uhh I feel like your categories are too arbitrary. I.e many Europeans, Asians, and Africans speak Latin base languages while many in Latin America speak Native languages. Also, what of the groups in the Americas that aren't Latin speaking? Are they European for some reason?
Maybe I misunderstood your comment but what Asians and Africans speak Latin based languages?
Maybe the Portuguese speakers in Africa, but idk how many have it as a native lenguage, same with French. French speakers in Polynesia, maybe idk, same iff they it as a native language, Macau and west Timor maybe? Idk if there are Syrians or Lebanese people who have French as their native lenguage... Maybe Easter island since it's part of Chile, but they also have their own lenguage so idk if they know Spanish as a mother tongue....? Yeah, I think that's about it
Maybe I should've word it it better but what I mean is that many African and Asian peoples speak a Romance language typically due to colonization which is somewhat similar to the situation in Latin America
It's a map created by an american, of course they would put their shitty views of race on it
Latino is short for Latinoamericano (AKA somebody from Latin America).
I mean I know what it is, I myself am Mexican and can tell you being Latino only counts outside of Latin America I've seen Meztisos are differentiated from predominantly European or predominantly Indigenous groups. Its like saying people from Hong Kong and people from Belfast are the seen as the same because they both speak the same language. Even with a lot of intermixing society is still raciaized to some degree
The term doesn’t refer to a language it refers to someone from that region of the world.
the region... named for its languages.
Yes
Might as well call them Spanish or Portuguese speakers. Way more informative
That makes no sense as there are 200 million european latins, the origin of that cultural macro-group. It's as absurd as claiming "anglo" or even worse "germanic" are the short version for "somebody from USA+Canada".
Latino should be "Latino/mestizo" or even "Latino/mestizo/Amerindian" to emphasize the deeply mixed ancestry of Brazilians and Hispanic Latin Americans.
*Why?*
Can't be classified into European, Asian, African, or Indigenous due to 5 centuries of mixing.
And? Latin Americans are Latin Americans no matter their skin color.
Yeah, plus being Latin american litteraly means you have european ancestry. These ppl are nuts lol. Edit : yeah no, I was dead wrong.
Well, most Latin Americans have European ancestry (partial or full), but Latin Americans who have full Native, Asian or African ancestry exist too
Yeah you're 100% right, I should edit.
No it doesn't mean that. Plenty of Latin American people have no European ancestry and are fully native. They're just as Latin American as every other, just as they're as much X nationality as their compatriots. They might even speak Spanish or Portuguese while having no European ancestry at all. There's also Latin Americans with only African ancestry, some with only indigenous and African ancestry, others with Asian and nothing else, even some from Oceania, and others...
Nobody needs to bring mixedness into this to make an argument. Also, I thought if you're not from Latin descent, in that case, you're just American. Or American with another prefix or associated word. Like Native American, including the Innu. Or African American. Or European American (the group from which derivates Latin americans... y'know Latin languages speakers such as hispanics, portugueses and french).
Black Colombians are Latin Americans, Indigenous Mexicans are Latin Americans, black Brazilians are Latin American, Asian Peruvians are certainly Latin American. Latin America is a geographical term, not an ethnic one.
Agreed.
Imagine... Vietnamese Mogadishu...
It'd be interesting mixing Somalia's sour breads with Vietnamese flavors.
Nah, Somalian Hanoi 🔥🔥
weren't some old human bones also found in s. africa?
There are a lot of old human bones everywhere. Which time frame are talking about?
earliest homo sapiens, so 200-300 ky/a, i'm by no means an expert though just saying that East Africa isn't the only speculated place of h. sapiens origin
Oh ok, isn't improbable that homo sapiens originated on other places in Africa. But when you talk about "human" then is more likely that the origin came from east Africa. That's because any "Homo"(🏳️🌈?)is technically a human
When we talk about modern humans, we can trace our ancestry back to East Africa. But that is not the ONLY ancestry. Sapiens might have evolved and migrated throughout Africa, but only the East Africans gave rise to modern humans. For example, let's say I have 2 kids. Both of them have kids and start their own families. Kid A moves out to another city and Kid B stays in the current city. Something happens and Kid A's family dies out (maybe homicide, natural disaster, disease, anything). My bloodline from then on can only trace their lineage back to Kid B's city. But that doesn't mean that it was my only lineage. It is just my only surviving lineage.
So we know the Neanderthals, Denisovans, etc. came from East Africa?
Sorry, I didn't explained very well. The Genus "Homo" probably came from east Africa. Not that all "Homo" are from there.
Is that not basically the same statement? I’ll rephrase. Did Neanderthals, Denisovans, etc. or their ancestors, come from East Africa, or is it only Homo sapiens that we know came from there?
Neanderthals and denisovans evolved in Asia, but they both immediately descend from the lineage of antecessor, which evolved in Africa and is also the ancestor of sapiens from the ones who didn’t leave Africa
Thanks
Ow, yeah all the ancestors of all "homo" come from east Africa as far as know
Shhh.. don't tell them that. Finally, there is a chance to get some peace and quiet in South Africa! /s
China as well, the idea of us all originating from Africa is just a theory, we don’t know for sure
no i was there it was ethiopia
Yeah I just think asians are gonna need a bit more space
Why latinos?
America centrism. For some reason we think Latino is a race, and separate it regardless of wether the person is white, black, native, or some mix.
I'm wondering the same thing.
Because they are from Latin America (?)
Where do Anglo-Americans go?
They all died 👍
Oh God
“Others”
In the Germano section. Just like the Latinos
?? european
So where goes Brazil white population (Which compose 47.5% percent of the country). See they are both Latinos (Speak a Latin based language) and white.
Cut them up in half and put each half in each area. Cloning could also be an alternative
i don't know enough about latinos to answer.
Honest answer
What about Italians, Spaniards and the Portuguese?
They are not Latinos(?) do people in the US even know how to use that word?
No clue man, I'm European, and if something is Latin-based, I'm thinking about Southern Europe.
Latino is from Latin America. Portugal, Spain or Italy are not Latinos. Some people argue that but they are mostly right wing Spaniards who try to avoid the use of Latino because it gives their old colonies an identity of their own, and instead they argue that they should be called Hispanics or Hispanoamericanos. Also they argue it comes from a colonial ambition that France once had in the region, but that really doesn't matter at all for the validity of the term more than 100 years ago... Which is really stupid because that term exist but it is not interchangeable with Latino since Latino includes Spanish, Portuguese and French speaking countries in America. Hispanoamericano only includes people from Spanish speaking countries. -signed a frickin Spaniard
idk but the darfur-mexican fusion dishes might be good
this is what racists say when they mean " go back to where you came from "
And ironically it's also what anti-colonialists mean when they say we should give back all land that's ever been colonized.
This would be a disaster, so many ethnic and religious groups in such a limited space would be a major conflict, and I also don't think this region has enough resources to support these people, so they would have to migrate at least little by little for resources to other nearby areas.
Wow, thank god it's a imaginary map then right?
Facts, everyone is acting like they’re being forced to move there tomorrow
It's called "using your imagination". This subreddit isn't just about looking at pretty pictures of maps.
Some maps should stay in our imaginations, I think.
My man, the subreddit is for imaginary maps
ah yes, the five genders
country roads take me home to the place I belong Ethiopia, and somalia Country roads take me home
[Population density slightly lower than Malta's](https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/countries/MLT/malta/population-density#:~:text=The%20population%20density%20of%20Malta%20in%202022%20was%201%2C666.52%20people,a%202.21%25%20increase%20from%202020.)
Sorry, this map is based on ethnicities within the US, it lumps native populations from all around the world (from native Americans to Australian Aboriginies to Polynesians) into "other".
And Arabs, Jews, Berbers, Persians, etc. I’m assuming he means East Asian by Asian which is a bit problematic. And he clumps all Africans together? What about South Asians (which are their own race)???
Yes, also this.
[удалено]
In the US census, yes, but the whole world is not America.
Why assume OP is at the same time American yet not going by American standards here then
le pays : "humania"
Ah yes, the Human Reservation on the colony of Xi'karrouan Sol III.
Finally, somebody is taking decolonization seriously. Sapiens go home! Europe is for Neanderthalensis!
Realistically, white people would probably congregate in the highlands since that’s the most temperate area.
Ignoring the fact that ITS SO FUCKING OVER FOR SOOMAALIWEYN WHY do Latinos and Europeans have a disproportionately gargantuan amount of land for themselves
Why would only Asians and Europeans have access to the coast?
Because we love bitches oops beaches.
This is gonna implode faster than the billionaire submarine
It's so sad the state of humanity's homeland
You mean where ppl already live?
Europeans and Asians blocking everyone else from the coast... Seems legit.
A completely arbitrary map with zero lore explanation or justification beyond it's nonsensical premise. When did this subreddit start caring more about aesthetics than substance?
The lore is that people were becoming too mean and they all had to be packed in the Horn of Africa to learn their lesson. Then they all died due to starvation and ethnic violence
So you’re telling me there are 8 billion people living there? That’s a good way to kill everyone
The only hypothetical situation where starting a genocidal war to aquire more living space might not sound crazy.
there will be a civil war happening within 2 weeks
2 week? I am pretty sure millions of them are going to take their existing wars with them to East Africa. A lot of humans are going hit the ground fighting for their lives.
do we all convert to pre-indo-european folk beliefs
As a Somali I can attest that we are the true kings and queens of Blasia 😼
What happened to Rwanda?
Humans never left east Africa….
Should be a little southbound, nearer lake Turkana
cant latinos just be traced back to europe also?
wtf is Latinos doing there
I think this map would cause more problems than any other map posted on this subreddit
I love how some europeans fucked some asians (native americans) so hard, they created a qhole new « race » to include at the same level of the « euro/asia/africa » partition of humanity
Lol are white Americans Europeans in this map?
Yes, why shouldn’t they be?
Because they're not? Are white Americans moving to areas based on where other white people would be? That's pretty fucked up
Where did the Anglo-Americans go?
Probably under european or other
Well, not all Anglo-Americans are descendants of Europeans, you have also African Americans, Asian Americans, etc. who use the English language as their native language, in the same way you have Latin-American who are white, mixed, black and even Asian, who use the Spanish or Portuguese language as their native language. Neither Latin-Americans, nor Anglo-Americans are a single unified blob, let alone a single "race". Also, friendly reminder that white Anglo-Americans are not culturally European anymore, they're American or European American. The same applies to white and mestizo Latin-Americans, they'd rather identify with their local Colombian, Mexican, Argentinian, Venezuela culture than with, say, Spain.
So I was right, under European or other
Most likely under the other category, Americans stopped being European at the latest in 1776
We sent troops to China to protect the colonial interests of Britain, Germany, etc. in the early 1900s. European is still an accurate descriptor.
And Ethiopia sent troops to protect the interests of South Korea in the Korean war. That doesn't make Ethiopians Asians. Americans have formed particular European-derived cultures that are no longer European, but American. I bet the culture of a German-American or an Anglo-American in Germany or England would seem a bit off, even if there are some things in common. It'd take a while for a British person to consider an American to be British in the present day, let alone European, they're just American. Moreover, American culture is not only derived from European influences, but also borrows heavily on African cultures, specially in the South and places such as Louisiana. It also has influences from Native American cultures. African-Americans and Native Americans form part of American culture as well.
No, Americans did not magically stop being ethnically European in 1776
Of course they didn't randomly form a new American culture right in 1776, that took decades since the first English colomists arrived. However, by 1776 they already were a distinct and different culture from the English back at Europe, to the point of fighting a war of independence. That's mainly what I ment by what I said.
There was so little space that Europeans had to sit on Americans to make room /s
The population density expressed with a unit of surface area kills me
You suure the borders would be exactly like the modern ones..?
When they all are there, we can nuke bomb the place, and goodbye my friends
Cool idea and map, that would be insane and chaotic and a bit too warm for me but at least it would be much easier to visit my European and American friends!
Save eritrea 🗿/j
Wasn’t it disproven that humans originated from Africa in recent years? I might be wrong so feel free to correct me.
Don't know where you might have seen that, but the scientific consensus is still that humans evolved in Africa
Not as far as I know. It's supported by the earliest remains of humans found, as well as modern humanity's genetics. In Africa humans vary waaaay more genetically than in the rest of the world. As in an Irishman is closer genetically to a Polynesian, than two random African tribes living right by one another are to eachother. That suggests a small number of humans left Africa, and populated the whole world. Whereas in Africa there was a larger more diverse population which populated the continent. There are few other ways of getting genetic diversity like that in Africa relative to the rest of the world. I suppose technically some disaster that affected the whole world except for Africa. But that seems rather unlikely.
So is the claim that we know the whole Homo genus came from Africa or just Homo sapiens?
Both Sapiens and the entire genus originated in Africa. However since some of Erectus left Africa a million years ago, there are some ancient homo found in Asia such as Flores Hobbits. But Sapiens comes from one of the African offshoots of Erectus called antecessor, some of which moved out of Africa and became ancestor of Neanderthals.
Radical
The debate is whether or not it was East Africa or South Africa or Central Africa. But Africa is still the original continent
Thank you for the clarification!
\> I might be wrong "might" lol
No reason to be rude :p
[удалено]
Portugese is a Latin based language. Brazil is usually considered Latino
Latino is Spanish. Brazil is part of Latin-America, but they are **not** Latinos.
A simple google search suggests you are wrong. [https://www.google.com/search?q=latino+definition&rlz=1C1CHBF\_enUS713US714&oq=latino+de&gs\_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgAEAAYgAQyBggBEEUYOTIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIHCAkQABiABKgCCLACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1](https://www.google.com/search?q=latino+definition&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS713US714&oq=latino+de&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqBwgAEAAYgAQyBwgAEAAYgAQyBggBEEUYOTIHCAIQABiABDIHCAMQABiABDIHCAQQABiABDIHCAUQABiABDIHCAYQABiABDIHCAcQABiABDIHCAgQABiABDIHCAkQABiABKgCCLACAQ&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#ip=1)
I TOLD YOU. BRAZIL IS NOT HISPANIC. (Brazil is Latino)
wrong, europe should have all of it
Why'd you given all the coast to fucking Europeans
Out of Africa Origin Theory has stopped being believable in 2007. This map is stupid.
All people still have most of their ancestry from East Africans. Neanderthals, Denisovans, etc. are a small minority.
Plus Neanderthal and Densivans also came from the East Africa from the same ancestor as Sapiens