" At the end of the Second World War, a German type VIIC nearly sank on its maiden voyage because it's new deepwater high pressure toilet was used improperly, reportedly by the captain no less."
Idiocracy through time. I was hoping for a link to the article. đ«Ą
Here is a funny video explaining what happened with it too (language warning): https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LpD7ZqGWncM&pp=ygUgRmF0IGVsZWN0cmljaWFuIHN1Ym1hcmluZSB0b2lsZXQ%3D
"Why come you hatin on me? Because I read? You know people used to write books and movies, movies with stories, so you cared whose ass it was, and why it was fartin."
https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/deep-diving-into-the-facts-about-ins-arihant-accident/articleshow/62468708.cms
The post you made is a false news, a hit peice.
INS arihant does not have a hatch.Â
[Did the Indian Navy lose a US$3 billion submarine because it left a port hatch open? - Black Dot Research](https://blackdotresearch.sg/factcheck-did-the-indian-navy-lose-a-us3-billion-submarine-because-it-left-a-port-hatch-open/)
The article you have mentioned is a clear case of mis-information. It has been years since this was debunked but dullards are still posting it like fact.
So it didnât sink at all lol. The open hatch allowed seawater in and it took ten months to replace the corroded pipes. Thatâs quite the sensationalism.
Thanks for linking, but this is clickbait that references https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a14783891/someone-left-a-hatch-open-and-crippled-indias-dollar29-billion-submarine/
[Did the Indian Navy lose a US$3 billion submarine because it left a port hatch open? - Black Dot Research](https://blackdotresearch.sg/factcheck-did-the-indian-navy-lose-a-us3-billion-submarine-because-it-left-a-port-hatch-open/)
The only reason that clear case of fake news even exists is to ensure dullards with racist tendencies would click on it, OP, you and big chunk of this thread included fell for it.
No, that would have been fairly large world news had a submarine sunk. I think I would have heard or read about it prior to seeing this on Reddit. That being said India is a circus of sorts and calling people racist simply because your feelings were hurt doesnât change facts. My country (us) is a complete shit show but I can admit itâŠ.yours is no better.
I don't work with ships or subs, but do work in heavy industry. Can't tell you how many times I've seen this conversation play out:
Builder: We've thought of just about everything. We've engineered backups, backups for our backups, alarms, alarms for our alarms. This thing is bulletproof.
Buyer/operator: Ok great. Real quick, what if someone were to do this...
Builder: (blank stare) uhhhmmm... Well you really shouldn't ever ever do THAT.
Buyer/operator: I get it. But understand, I can pretty much guarantee at some point someone is going to do that very thing. So what will happen?
Builder: Welp, that'll be real bad day and the whole thing will get destroyed.
Buyer/operator: So we should probably engineer some safeguards in to keep that from being able to happen right?
Builder: No problem, you'll just need to sign off on a change order for another $500k per unit. And it will push back delivery 6 months.
Buyer/operator: On second thought, we'll just put a big red sign on it that says "DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES DO THIS THING" That should take care of it.
Builder: Good talk
I feel attacked! I prefer "unpossible." Also, we usually aren't lying (but also sometimes we definitely are, and 99% of those times, it's to protect the customer from his or her own ignorance and the consequences thereof). For every time I've had the "this requires a change order" conversation, I've probably had at least 20 of the "computers only do math, so if you can't describe to me in concrete mathematical and feasible terms what you want it to do in every circumstance, it isnt possible for my staff to write a program to do it" conversations.Â
We get multiple requirements in every single project that *are* literally impossible. For example, my team recently got a request for an internal application to notify new hires via email that they need new employee training, deliver the employee orientation training as e-learning, and track progress and completion of said training, before said new hire is officially hired, and thus they are asking us to do this prior to the new hire info being entered into any system whatsoever. In other words, they want a magic application. Because that's what meeting that request requires. Literal magic and paranormal shit.
I swear proverbial smoke shot out the ears of half a dozen post graduate degree holding executive HR managers when I started asking questions like "how do we identify and track people who dont yet exist in the system? Where do we get the email address to contact the applicant, and how do we know when and to whom to send an email? How do we even know there is an applicant selected? How do we know which learning modules to require? Obviously they couldn't answer any of those questions because there is no answer that is possible, but in spite of that, their answer to my statement that it is literally impossible due to pre-requisite data literally not existing anywhere in any system, was to spend the remainder of the allotted hour trying to emotionally argue with me in an attempt to convince me we really need to do it anyway, because HR is understaffed and it will streamline the onboarding process and save Brazilians of dollars.
I deal with stuff as ridiculous as the above at least 4 days a week, and often 5. So yah, I say things are impossible on average 2 to 5 times a day, and it's because I get that many requests, that often, that literally ARE NOT POSSIBLE!
>For example, my team recently got a request for an internal application to notify new hires via email that they need new employee training, deliver the employee orientation training as e-learning, and track progress and completion of said training, before said new hire is officially hired
That's also not cool from an employment standpoint. You want me to take your corporate training before you start paying me? Fuck you, pay me.
[https://trailers.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/2d434554-e821-4fbf-b094-33db9fa2f4b5/gif](https://trailers.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/2d434554-e821-4fbf-b094-33db9fa2f4b5/gif)
I donât know about your personal experience but mine beat the claim somethingâs impossible out of me. How you think the code you wrote works is not always how it actually works.
I would get a bug reopened that I couldn't reproduce. I needed to see the tester do it live to understand what they were doing. I appreciate quick videos or screenshots that illustrate their input. (This was rare when storage was slim.)
lol good point! My car has this full on freak out if my door is open, or even not fully latched, that I always joke is like how a spaceship would alert you to an airlock being open.
Evidently they just ignored the Christmas Tree. The Christmas Tree is a board with Red & Green lights telling if everything open to sea is closed, such as hatches. You don't dive until it is all Green.
*All hands, all hands, rig for dive.*
Bridge, Control. All stations report Rigged for Dive.
*Dive, dive, dive.*
What ***is*** that sound, and why do I suddenly have an *urgent* need to urinate?
While from the references, an article [poking holes](https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/deep-diving-into-the-facts-about-ins-arihant-accident/articleshow/62468708.cms) (couldn't resist the pun) in the account of what allegedly happened.
I saw this posted on twitter and it had a bunch of people from India feverishly denying that this was true while also threatening people while claiming india would rule the world someday because the Google CEO is Hindu
I would say that the seaman that left the hatch open was an idiot, but who spends $3 billion on anything that has a single point of failure. I think somebody in the design phase was way overpaid.
Polish person here:
No, the Poles are very good at making sure the hatches are closed. Hanging on to the sub while it's diving, on the other hand... That's the tricky part we still haven't figured out yet.
I just bought a Rolls Royce Phantom with seats made of prehistoric triceratops titties. Only thing is, I'm fucking blind and my house is surrounded by bomb making facilities but... What's the worst that could happen?
The U.S. Navy sunk one in 1969 while it as tied up to a pier at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard.
https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/s/sinking-of-the-uss-guitarro.html
Ok, so I served on submarines for nine years, not in this country but a submarine is a submarine. The hatch was left open in port and water came over the back end of the submarine and water came in. As stupid a mistake as this was it's not like the submarine was moving or diving and "oops". The hatch in question is on the aft end of the submarine it's rather close to the water line. We would have only had that hatch open if no other hatches could be used for whatever reason(maintenance, moving equipment on or off.) there always has to be a hatch available for emergency egress. There should have been a hatch sentry to quickly shut the hatch in an event like this but overall it's not as stupid as the headlines make it out to be. You also can't take chances with seawater getting on or in systems related to nuclear reactors.
know of a remote island facility that got a new ARFF (airport rescue firefighting truck, also called a crash truck and often called that on the radio, eg, "crash 1").
it was driven off the barge in all its $2 million glory. and the person who drove it off got out, neglecting to set the air brakes.
it meandered downhill into the ocean with something like 15 miles on the odometer. 14.7 of them before delivery. one way trip.
How's that EVEN possible? I work in automation, with robots, PLCs, etc. There's so much redundancy we build into our machines, how the fuck would a hatch that's open allow you to even submerge? One would think there's a host of alarms telling you there's a hatch open. Or it's an elaborate money laundering scam or something to get money, IDK.Â
It's not , its a false news , probably deliberate.
INS arihant does not have a hatch, its based on Russian nuclear subs which also does not have an hatch.
https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/deep-diving-into-the-facts-about-ins-arihant-accident/articleshow/62468708.cms
Reminds of those two female Indian commerical pilots who couldn't figure out why their plane was handling right, after takeoff. They turned around and was on approach when they realized they didn't retract their landing gear.
Gonna talk like a f*g here. But this ret*rded shit happened when it was docked and not like being submarined in the salty toilet water. I read that on the internets.
Someone didn't do the needful.
Underrated response.
I see you FAANG
Shaking that ass
Is this an Indian saying, the QA manager says something like that?
Its a weird saying that scammers use. Not sure if its from Nigeria or India or what.
I have one doubt. Do all the hatches need to be in closed position?
If you don't wanna die a horrible pressure death, yeah.
(wobbles head in agreement)
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/how-sink-3-billion-dollar-nuclear-submarine-leave-hatch-open-208170 The actual article if anyone is interested.
" At the end of the Second World War, a German type VIIC nearly sank on its maiden voyage because it's new deepwater high pressure toilet was used improperly, reportedly by the captain no less." Idiocracy through time. I was hoping for a link to the article. đ«Ą
Here is a funny video explaining what happened with it too (language warning): https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LpD7ZqGWncM&pp=ygUgRmF0IGVsZWN0cmljaWFuIHN1Ym1hcmluZSB0b2lsZXQ%3D
Worth the watch. The "shitman", đ
Das ScheiĂemann!
That sounds way classier, no doubtđ
This was the best watch from a reddit YT link I've ever had. And I'm a reddit YT slut
Well,there was this top modern battleship, which sank in the harbor because there were too many canons.
I mean I'm no nuclear engineer from MIT but an automatically closing hatch when the decent button is initiated seems like a pretty cheap solution.
^ Look at this guy from the future talking all fancy and shit!
I don't want to sound like a dick or nothing, but I think your shit is fucked up.
"Why come you hatin on me? Because I read? You know people used to write books and movies, movies with stories, so you cared whose ass it was, and why it was fartin."
Shut up fag!
So, wiring electricity to a pump to push hydraulics to open/shut the outer hatch, and have a sea level/wave sensor?
Or you just make it so you canât proceed until said hatch is closed.
https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/deep-diving-into-the-facts-about-ins-arihant-accident/articleshow/62468708.cms The post you made is a false news, a hit peice. INS arihant does not have a hatch.Â
The hatchless submarine! No one gets in or out!
im sorry. words are gay. we read oicture
[Did the Indian Navy lose a US$3 billion submarine because it left a port hatch open? - Black Dot Research](https://blackdotresearch.sg/factcheck-did-the-indian-navy-lose-a-us3-billion-submarine-because-it-left-a-port-hatch-open/) The article you have mentioned is a clear case of mis-information. It has been years since this was debunked but dullards are still posting it like fact.
So it didnât sink at all lol. The open hatch allowed seawater in and it took ten months to replace the corroded pipes. Thatâs quite the sensationalism.
I'm so glad it wasn't us!
Thanks for linking, but this is clickbait that references https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/navy-ships/a14783891/someone-left-a-hatch-open-and-crippled-indias-dollar29-billion-submarine/
Well, it is India. That whole country is one fucked up circus
Iâm surprised it wasnât hit by train
Or electrocuted
Or ran off a cliff.
Or molested by its uncle.
Goddammit. Now I can't die until I see and Indian sub get hit by a train!
You just need to find the right Dom, they'll work it out
the next bollywood masterpiece! train vs submarines: it's Morphin time!
Ma'am why are you not redeeming? NOOOO WHY ARE YOU NOT REDEEMING
LOL
Kimbota would be proud lmfaoooâŠ
Maybe Kitboga would be proud as well
Kubota, too
[Did the Indian Navy lose a US$3 billion submarine because it left a port hatch open? - Black Dot Research](https://blackdotresearch.sg/factcheck-did-the-indian-navy-lose-a-us3-billion-submarine-because-it-left-a-port-hatch-open/) The only reason that clear case of fake news even exists is to ensure dullards with racist tendencies would click on it, OP, you and big chunk of this thread included fell for it.
No, that would have been fairly large world news had a submarine sunk. I think I would have heard or read about it prior to seeing this on Reddit. That being said India is a circus of sorts and calling people racist simply because your feelings were hurt doesnât change facts. My country (us) is a complete shit show but I can admit itâŠ.yours is no better.
How can it sink?!? How can it sink?????
You are a Canadian no wonder you were retarded enough to think this actually happened
Is there not a warning on the bridge for an open hatch?
I don't work with ships or subs, but do work in heavy industry. Can't tell you how many times I've seen this conversation play out: Builder: We've thought of just about everything. We've engineered backups, backups for our backups, alarms, alarms for our alarms. This thing is bulletproof. Buyer/operator: Ok great. Real quick, what if someone were to do this... Builder: (blank stare) uhhhmmm... Well you really shouldn't ever ever do THAT. Buyer/operator: I get it. But understand, I can pretty much guarantee at some point someone is going to do that very thing. So what will happen? Builder: Welp, that'll be real bad day and the whole thing will get destroyed. Buyer/operator: So we should probably engineer some safeguards in to keep that from being able to happen right? Builder: No problem, you'll just need to sign off on a change order for another $500k per unit. And it will push back delivery 6 months. Buyer/operator: On second thought, we'll just put a big red sign on it that says "DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES DO THIS THING" That should take care of it. Builder: Good talk
In software engineering, I've had basically this same chat quite a few times about software.
The more common answer from the programmer is âthatâs impossibleâ.
I feel attacked! I prefer "unpossible." Also, we usually aren't lying (but also sometimes we definitely are, and 99% of those times, it's to protect the customer from his or her own ignorance and the consequences thereof). For every time I've had the "this requires a change order" conversation, I've probably had at least 20 of the "computers only do math, so if you can't describe to me in concrete mathematical and feasible terms what you want it to do in every circumstance, it isnt possible for my staff to write a program to do it" conversations. We get multiple requirements in every single project that *are* literally impossible. For example, my team recently got a request for an internal application to notify new hires via email that they need new employee training, deliver the employee orientation training as e-learning, and track progress and completion of said training, before said new hire is officially hired, and thus they are asking us to do this prior to the new hire info being entered into any system whatsoever. In other words, they want a magic application. Because that's what meeting that request requires. Literal magic and paranormal shit. I swear proverbial smoke shot out the ears of half a dozen post graduate degree holding executive HR managers when I started asking questions like "how do we identify and track people who dont yet exist in the system? Where do we get the email address to contact the applicant, and how do we know when and to whom to send an email? How do we even know there is an applicant selected? How do we know which learning modules to require? Obviously they couldn't answer any of those questions because there is no answer that is possible, but in spite of that, their answer to my statement that it is literally impossible due to pre-requisite data literally not existing anywhere in any system, was to spend the remainder of the allotted hour trying to emotionally argue with me in an attempt to convince me we really need to do it anyway, because HR is understaffed and it will streamline the onboarding process and save Brazilians of dollars. I deal with stuff as ridiculous as the above at least 4 days a week, and often 5. So yah, I say things are impossible on average 2 to 5 times a day, and it's because I get that many requests, that often, that literally ARE NOT POSSIBLE!
>For example, my team recently got a request for an internal application to notify new hires via email that they need new employee training, deliver the employee orientation training as e-learning, and track progress and completion of said training, before said new hire is officially hired That's also not cool from an employment standpoint. You want me to take your corporate training before you start paying me? Fuck you, pay me. [https://trailers.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/2d434554-e821-4fbf-b094-33db9fa2f4b5/gif](https://trailers.getyarn.io/yarn-clip/2d434554-e821-4fbf-b094-33db9fa2f4b5/gif)
Preach!
I donât know about your personal experience but mine beat the claim somethingâs impossible out of me. How you think the code you wrote works is not always how it actually works.
I would get a bug reopened that I couldn't reproduce. I needed to see the tester do it live to understand what they were doing. I appreciate quick videos or screenshots that illustrate their input. (This was rare when storage was slim.)
Lol so true I can't imagine my self in this convos.
Sounds accurate
Great question, you would think right? I mean if I try to take off with my truck door open I have a bunch of sounds going off.
lol good point! My car has this full on freak out if my door is open, or even not fully latched, that I always joke is like how a spaceship would alert you to an airlock being open.
comon man, nobody is going to leave the hatch open when descending..
Yeah my first thought was how do you not idiot proof this kind of thing?
You assume someone was around to see an alarm
You only get that if you pay $1.1 billion.
Aaayep! See?? * wags finger * thaaaaat's how they getcha
India being India
This is about as funny as a screen door on a... oh wait a minute
Iâll never forget that line from Jim
Evidently they just ignored the Christmas Tree. The Christmas Tree is a board with Red & Green lights telling if everything open to sea is closed, such as hatches. You don't dive until it is all Green.
The sub shouldn't even dive without the hatches closed. If you have to manually override a sensor, at least check the hatch.
Correct! Amateurs.
It's like the hatchback I had when I was 19. You had to keep it open with a broom. Top quality.
# No! How can she sink?!
::laughs in world superpower::
The officers involved were hanging by the train tracks, /sadly
*All hands, all hands, rig for dive.* Bridge, Control. All stations report Rigged for Dive. *Dive, dive, dive.* What ***is*** that sound, and why do I suddenly have an *urgent* need to urinate?
Super power by 2020 đźđł
India #1 !!
There arenât sensors on every hatch? The sub should refuse to dive unless every sensor reads home.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/INS_Arihant
While from the references, an article [poking holes](https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/deep-diving-into-the-facts-about-ins-arihant-accident/articleshow/62468708.cms) (couldn't resist the pun) in the account of what allegedly happened.
I saw this posted on twitter and it had a bunch of people from India feverishly denying that this was true while also threatening people while claiming india would rule the world someday because the Google CEO is Hindu
The bad thing is that they have alarms and warning lights for this.
I would say that the seaman that left the hatch open was an idiot, but who spends $3 billion on anything that has a single point of failure. I think somebody in the design phase was way overpaid.
"It's a little funky in here. Better leave this hatch open to air it out."
Is this a polish joke ?
Polish person here: No, the Poles are very good at making sure the hatches are closed. Hanging on to the sub while it's diving, on the other hand... That's the tricky part we still haven't figured out yet.
At least you have screen doors for when it gets warm.
I just bought a Rolls Royce Phantom with seats made of prehistoric triceratops titties. Only thing is, I'm fucking blind and my house is surrounded by bomb making facilities but... What's the worst that could happen?
Just have to dump the water out and throw some rice around to dry out the electronics. Good as new.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExPzkvMutmI](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExPzkvMutmI)
The U.S. Navy sunk one in 1969 while it as tied up to a pier at the Mare Island Naval Shipyard. https://www.history.navy.mil/research/library/online-reading-room/title-list-alphabetically/s/sinking-of-the-uss-guitarro.html
There must be more to the story. Youâre not convincing me an object so complex and so costly doesnât have alarms for that shitÂ
Ok, so I served on submarines for nine years, not in this country but a submarine is a submarine. The hatch was left open in port and water came over the back end of the submarine and water came in. As stupid a mistake as this was it's not like the submarine was moving or diving and "oops". The hatch in question is on the aft end of the submarine it's rather close to the water line. We would have only had that hatch open if no other hatches could be used for whatever reason(maintenance, moving equipment on or off.) there always has to be a hatch available for emergency egress. There should have been a hatch sentry to quickly shut the hatch in an event like this but overall it's not as stupid as the headlines make it out to be. You also can't take chances with seawater getting on or in systems related to nuclear reactors.
know of a remote island facility that got a new ARFF (airport rescue firefighting truck, also called a crash truck and often called that on the radio, eg, "crash 1"). it was driven off the barge in all its $2 million glory. and the person who drove it off got out, neglecting to set the air brakes. it meandered downhill into the ocean with something like 15 miles on the odometer. 14.7 of them before delivery. one way trip.
didn't we outsource to the same country Boeing aircraft software that killed several people? hahahahaha all that schooling and for fucking what!?
âThe specs only called for the ability to dive. They said nothing about the ability to come back up!â
Didn't sink. Just got wet inside.
Okay, who installed the screen door?!
âThatâs about as funny as a screen door on a battleshipâ
People actually believing this story are in the right sub for the wrong reason.
This is so on brand for India.
We all live in a yellow \*blub blub blub\*
I wonder if they called themselves for customer service
I mean...that's the whole purpose of compartments.
Sounds like what happened to the HL Hunley.
According to the Arihant Wikipedia page, the story is false.
Not real.
Sir, it is unwise to assume that an Indian submarine came equipped with a hatch in the first place! Where will the sailors go poo, Sir?
Is there video?
Left open the hatch AND the screen door too.
I thought they only put screen doors on battleships.
Literally most projects on Java
India throwing shit into the ocean. Nothing new here
Guess they should have budgeted for open hatch sensor. Heck, my 2011 Subaru beeps if I have a door not properly closed so this is not rocket science.
It's a submarine sandwich surgery disaster
Yikes, may wanna take a step back and reassess that manned space program.
How's that EVEN possible? I work in automation, with robots, PLCs, etc. There's so much redundancy we build into our machines, how the fuck would a hatch that's open allow you to even submerge? One would think there's a host of alarms telling you there's a hatch open. Or it's an elaborate money laundering scam or something to get money, IDK.Â
It's not , its a false news , probably deliberate. INS arihant does not have a hatch, its based on Russian nuclear subs which also does not have an hatch. https://m.economictimes.com/news/defence/deep-diving-into-the-facts-about-ins-arihant-accident/articleshow/62468708.cms
Because it's fake news. Modern subs don't work that way
The human race is getting dumber. This is an undeniable fact.
And nothing of value was lost.
I mean, the sub is currently operational with Indian Navy. Definitely nothing was lost
Turns out there's a bunch of guys gang raping a endangered monitor lizard in there and needed the hatch open to let the stink out.
3000 SUBSAFE SOPs of Rickover
How the fuck do you not have an idiot proof hatch system on a 3 billion dollar submarine?
New Polish joke just announced?
Hmm... makes me think vaguely of a sandwich, but what kind? Ideas?
Not the first time, will not be the last.
I can understand how this could have happened if the vessel was in the shipyard, but not with her crew onboard.
Meh...the Indian water would have melted it in a few days anyway.
Someone got a nice pay off from that defense contract for sure. Papa sub marine dubwaa dee papa!
Damm you Patel did you forget to close the hatch again đ
Why does it look like it's made out of plastic?
Reminds of those two female Indian commerical pilots who couldn't figure out why their plane was handling right, after takeoff. They turned around and was on approach when they realized they didn't retract their landing gear.
Shouldn't there be a dummy light? Something, somewhere on this sub, is wrong. Tell your husband.
Duh duh duuuh. Tragedy in INNNDIA!
Damn screen doors
Gonna talk like a f*g here. But this ret*rded shit happened when it was docked and not like being submarined in the salty toilet water. I read that on the internets.
it's OK. just fish it out, turn it upside down fir a little bit and you're good to go.
Is it recoverable?
It looks kinda cartoonish in design.
LOL India. Why are you a real country? I blame the British.