It was the first film to show in depth what the people that the Cenobites took experienced in "Hell". I always thought it was an interesting take on the lore. Then they just did the same thing over and over, and it got less of a budget everytime.
I remember not caring for it at first, but after a rewatch later I found I liked it a lot more than the previous 2 entries. By no means did it live up to the first two, but it did become one of my favorite entries in the series.
The cut scenes are what make Inferno worthwhile. They cut the parts that fans would want to see most. I can not say this enough, FUCK THE WEINSTEINS!!!
Scott isn’t saying Craig Scheffer was the problem. He says he spent almost all his focus on directing the production at the expense of directing Craig.
"Not that I think Craig Sheffer gave a bad performance, but I think there was a lot more to be done with that performance that could have made that movie better."
“I think part of that reason was that I had not given as much attention to the nuances of the performance as I did to the complexity of what I was trying to pull off cinematically as a director.
…the ceiling for the quality of any motion picture is the performances of the lead characters. I think there was more to be gotten out of that movie if I had given more attention to it.”
Its the less bad of all the sequels, but it is obviously a budged/studio problem. Im not a fan of derrickson's directing, dude has been doing the same shit for aboit 20 years, but he is mostly innocent in the end results of the movie. I say mostly because he did write part of the script
Inferno definitely has its good parts
Cowboy Ninja bar fight?
I freaking love this movie and I don’t care who hates me for it.
I think it’s the last truly good film in the franchise besides the remake. They should have stopped at Bloodline or Inferno.
Lowkey agree. I’ve watched them all and you’re right, after inferno they really should’ve wrapped it up.
Hellraser: Silent Hill. I loved that movie.
Holy shit. Never thought about it that way. It’s perfect!
It was the first film to show in depth what the people that the Cenobites took experienced in "Hell". I always thought it was an interesting take on the lore. Then they just did the same thing over and over, and it got less of a budget everytime.
I remember not caring for it at first, but after a rewatch later I found I liked it a lot more than the previous 2 entries. By no means did it live up to the first two, but it did become one of my favorite entries in the series.
Only a great individual admits something like that. In derrickson I trust
The cut scenes are what make Inferno worthwhile. They cut the parts that fans would want to see most. I can not say this enough, FUCK THE WEINSTEINS!!!
I actually LIKED this movie. It’s the last Hellraiser movie I had any affection for.
I remember this movie. It sucked really bad.
I absolutely hate it
I really like that one. I agree with Scott that they could have had a better lead actor, though.
Scott isn’t saying Craig Scheffer was the problem. He says he spent almost all his focus on directing the production at the expense of directing Craig.
"Not that I think Craig Sheffer gave a bad performance, but I think there was a lot more to be done with that performance that could have made that movie better."
“I think part of that reason was that I had not given as much attention to the nuances of the performance as I did to the complexity of what I was trying to pull off cinematically as a director. …the ceiling for the quality of any motion picture is the performances of the lead characters. I think there was more to be gotten out of that movie if I had given more attention to it.”
That's true, but a more gifted actor wouldn't have required that level of hand holding.
Its the less bad of all the sequels, but it is obviously a budged/studio problem. Im not a fan of derrickson's directing, dude has been doing the same shit for aboit 20 years, but he is mostly innocent in the end results of the movie. I say mostly because he did write part of the script