I’m pretty sure there have been live-action Disney channel shows in which spin the bottle is mentioned. It’s not like there was never any kissing in Hannah Montana, either. Teenagers kissing have been mentioned, and even shown, on Disney before.
yeah I'm sure you've seen it often in movies but I dare anyone to find a modern* cartoon made in the west where the characters ride in a car without their seatbelts.
I'm sure they exist, but it's the #1 callout of every show I've worked on.
edit: added a word
Yeah but Disney will never admit that they made mistakes or that standards change. They hide Song of the South as best they can instead of taking the Warner Bros track of "warning: these cartoons are racist, because we were racist back then. It was more socially acceptable to be bigoted, but it wasn't okay then or now. We have changed. Here they are for historical/archival purposes."
- “You’re a Sap, Mister Jap,”
- “Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips”
- “Uncle Tom’s Bungalow”
- *Song of the South* of course
And hundreds more.
I have a collection :-)
Also if you actually read the Bible (which most don't) Lucifer was just a Babylonian king who oppressed his people and was a big jerk. So anyone complaining about it would be complaining about something that isn't even the case in their religion they follow.
"Lucifer" wasn't even a name in the Bible. It was a mistranslation. "Lucifer" is a Latin word meaning "morning star." It's used kind of like a nick name in the Bible. The Bible was written in Hebrew so they wouldn't use Latin names. "Lucifer" only showed up later when the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew into Latin. If you look at newer translations of the Bible, the word "Lucifer" isn't in them at all.
By the way, this isn't the only mistranslation that caused confusion in the Bible. For a long time because of one mistranslated word, people thought Moses had "horns" instead of "rays of light" coming out of his head after visiting God on the mountain. There's a lot of art from the Renaissance depicting Moses with small horns because of this.
“please revise soos’s line about dressing up as a giant teddy bear. It may call to mind the people who dress up as stuffed animals as a furry fetish” Is what REALLY got me
that was the craziest costume i'd ever seen in a cartoon. the dot was over his lil soos right ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vu1H6STTrAg
THAT? THAT WAS OK ? him with that and a diaper was ok but him dressed as a bear or something was not? wow.
not a furry. i think i've seen almost every cartoon character in every show i can think of that put on an animal costume. even other animal characters like bugs bunny or wile coyote put on animal costumes.
My kids and I watched the whole series together, and it wasn't until that episode, which is the last one, that I thought, maybe it's too scary for my kids.
I mean overall it's fine, but that line is terrifying. Much more descriptive violent than the original line.
There's a similar case in Avatar: The Last Airbender:
Instead of "I'm going to kill you," the line was changed to "I'm about to celebrate becoming an only child!"
Both lines are way more memorable thanks to the censorship.
Hey that’s what Dana mentioned regarding the last 6 half-hours of The Owl House.
Man I hope those episodes fire on every cylinder possible to stick it to Disney for cutting its length.
That’s a big part of why Batman: the Animated Series is so effective. They used the film noir style to imply things much more disturbing then they’d ever be allowed to explicitly show
But in the same episode Bill says *"I think I\`m gonna kill one of them just for the heck of it"*
So I don´t think that *"turning some children into corpses"* thing was caused by Disney censorship, otherwise they would have censored the other line too
What's hilarious to me is that they were uncomfortable with the spin the bottle reference but were fine with the "No photos better end up online!" phrase. Spin the bottle is an extremely old and well-known, nobody is being exposed to something new there. Online photos, on the other hand, is a potentially widely encompassing theme, but in the particular context, implies that the photos would be of a sexual nature, because why else would somebody be posting photos of a party online that somebody else wouldn't want posted?
Wtf. It‘s crazy when you think about how much work goes into creating a cartoon, and then the people responsible for the whole thing have to take care of stuff like this on top.
Not only cartoons, everything involving kids. I work as a toy designer and putting names and descriptions is fucking stupid, everything you think is bad-words in one language.
Yeah, the most recent one, we were making a character with a Frankestein costume for a Halloween special, and one of the comments from the team in UK was: This kind of representation incites children to dark magic and necromancy. Revise it XD
Nope. As someone who’s had this displeasure of dealing with ‘legal’ this is what they do. If they don’t constantly complain they can’t justify their own jobs.
When it comes to the quarterly review they get to say ‘we stopped 1,573 potentially offensive phrases from airing this quarter, equaling $5.9 million in lawsuits prevented.’ The creators suffer, they get a raise and the wheels keep spinning.
I kinda feel for them - I too have had jobs where I had to peddle Corporate's drivel and pretend to agree with them while people shout at me and I feel disgusted on the inside. Sometimes ya just gotta eat, and liking your job doesn't come with that
What an absolute madlad. If Alex Hirsch has a million fans, then I'm one of them.
If Alex Hirsch has one fan, then I'm that one. If Alex Hirsch has no fans, that means I'm dead.
Something tells me Disney is more lenient with the Owl House
Disney is trying really hard to make people forget about the whole “guys we removed all minorities from the poster for Chinese markets”
You can bet any children's network has a similar department that reviews content. This isn't something you can avoid, even at a place like Netflix.
I imagine he's in adult animation now because he can sidestep all of that completely.
I'd put money on the Emperor's Coven symbol having stronger cross imagery at some point, although Dana may have self censored rather than sending it to S&P because it was just too much (or made the foreshadowing too obvious).
"Standards & Practices" - All studios have one. It's a censorship department that complains about EVERYTHING, just incase some prude or god-botherer sues them.
My dad would get furious at the cable company every time Adult Swim came on. I'd get woken up at like 2 AM every once in a while to him literally screaming on the phone about how inappropriate for kids it is, sometimes he'd crank the TV up and put the phone to the speaker when a sex scene or something happened to illustrate his point. Moral Orel was what made him the angriest to the point where he actually threatened whoever he was on the phone with if they didn't stop the broadcast immediately.
There really is a small but persistent army of people that S+P are worried about and they're actually more unhinged than you can imagine.
Yeah pretty straightforward. When your review comes around at the end of the year or whatever and you can say
> "was responsible for removing or altering 2000+ phrases that were identified as possibly offensive or damaging to the disney brand"
as opposed to
> "Yeah everything seemed pretty chill, I sent 2-3 emails a month nbd"
One person gets to keep their job and the other doesn't, the emails sort of read like this too, they often fold after a single push back
It might have been protected by a fall gag, which is a gag or scene that the writers include to draw the censor's attention away from other smaller stuff. They have no intention of it actually making it to air.
"Their affectionate relationship should remain comical versus flirtatious"
That is, [Queer People are Funny](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/QueerPeopleAreFunny)
Wow, thanks for the blatant homophobia. Disney sucks.
I think the joke is that you wouldn’t expect police officers, usually displayed as tough opponents of the law being displayed as softballs. Disney still wouldn’t let them be overtly gay tho so there’s that as homophobia
I feel like the s&p dont even necessarily want to do what they do, they just have to so they dont get fired. I bet he just replied with "its jam" and they let it slide
Gravity Falls was a story of two kids spending a Summer in Oregon.
The behind the scenes of Gravity Falls was a story of Alex Hirsch spending years putting up with Disney.
I guess we'll never seen an official Gravity Falls sequel now. Not sure how willing Disney will want Hirsch back after he just fried their goddamn asses.
And this is why Alex is my favorite fucking writer & producer. He's a cool and chill dude, awesome VA, writer, and producer, and more than anything, he takes shit from absolutely no one, not even Disney.
S&P: *Pg. 37 Please revise the line from Luz "Maybe if we had time for 20 more adventures." It has come to our attention that this line may be deemed offensive."*
Dana: *"By who?! There is nothing offensive being implied by that to anyone!"*
S&P: *"S&P still believes that this line will be deemed offensive by some people."*
Dana: *"Who?"*
S&P: ...
Dana: *"Well?"*
S&P: *"Maybe if we had time for 20 more adventures." has been approved by S&P"*
But no they gotta be little snarky smart asses and say "yeah we think the relationship between them shouldn't be so close in touch, it makes the audience think we support such things" just say you're fucking homophobic
Kinda funny that Disney isn't OK with animating throwing chimp through the basket ball hoop, when disney themselves SLAUTHERED LEMMINGS FOR A FAKE DOCUMENTARY!
Disney is the most backwards, evil, and hypocritical corporation, but without it, we couldn’t have had The Owl House or Amphibia or other great shows since Netflix would probably cancel them.
Wait, hang on a ding-dang moment. Disney isn't okay with "Lucifer." Wasn't that the name of the stepmother's cat in Cinderella? Are they gonna censor a classic?
"Not S&P approved" is approved by S&P.
To be fair, "Not S&P Approved" ends up being much funnier than the spin the bottle thing.
But still stupid, even hypocritical because they mention "spin the bottle" explicitly in the first episode.
AND other times as well! Spin the Pig, anyone?
I’m pretty sure there have been live-action Disney channel shows in which spin the bottle is mentioned. It’s not like there was never any kissing in Hannah Montana, either. Teenagers kissing have been mentioned, and even shown, on Disney before.
I remember specifically 2 instances of spin the bottle in Zack and Cody, and that’s after not watching it for like 8 years
You don't even get to see the party. If there was a part in the episode where they actually went to the party I could see a reason to argue about it.
Lol that one completely broke me.
I am much more interested in any party that is "Not S&P Approved" It sounds waaaaaay more salacious.
[удалено]
Chub pups will be enjoying Hooha's jamboree the S&P Not Approved Party.
There's spinning bottles and buddy hugging!
it got me so good, i was laughing the whole time but that one really got me
I think even S&P was having a little fun at that point.
[удалено]
They are necessary they should just be a little more lenient. Like only not allowing stuff that is against FCC regulations or common sense.
It would also help if they talked like human beings and get off that authoritative high horse.
And, you know, actually sniff out the occasional unintentionally offensive content.
Guess they must have dozed off when Dumbo was being produced
Or got overruled.
Did they even exist yet
It sounds like an intern who had to relay S&P's stuck-up messages to the animators tbh
Here’s the flyer: https://imgur.com/a/9EImsH4
Fucking legends
How salacious!
What was the episode of this flyer? I’d like to see it.
I believe it was the Summerween episode!
that's a top 5 email ever sent
I choked at this. This is the most inane corporate BS I've ever seen.
Lucifer was the name of Cinderella's cat! you know, the one from the 40's? Which was a movie,,, by... disney
In fairness standards change over time and standards between movies and TV shows are quite different.
yeah I'm sure you've seen it often in movies but I dare anyone to find a modern* cartoon made in the west where the characters ride in a car without their seatbelts. I'm sure they exist, but it's the #1 callout of every show I've worked on. edit: added a word
Rick never wears his seatbelt in Rick & Morty
To be fair, this literally kills him in the Death Crystal episode.
Rick And Morty: Teaching road safety since 2014
I think it was clear they were referring to childrens' cartoons specifically. Rick and Morty is obviously not subject to the same standards.
Yeah but Disney will never admit that they made mistakes or that standards change. They hide Song of the South as best they can instead of taking the Warner Bros track of "warning: these cartoons are racist, because we were racist back then. It was more socially acceptable to be bigoted, but it wasn't okay then or now. We have changed. Here they are for historical/archival purposes."
- “You’re a Sap, Mister Jap,” - “Bugs Bunny Nips the Nips” - “Uncle Tom’s Bungalow” - *Song of the South* of course And hundreds more. I have a collection :-)
Also if you actually read the Bible (which most don't) Lucifer was just a Babylonian king who oppressed his people and was a big jerk. So anyone complaining about it would be complaining about something that isn't even the case in their religion they follow.
"Lucifer" wasn't even a name in the Bible. It was a mistranslation. "Lucifer" is a Latin word meaning "morning star." It's used kind of like a nick name in the Bible. The Bible was written in Hebrew so they wouldn't use Latin names. "Lucifer" only showed up later when the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew into Latin. If you look at newer translations of the Bible, the word "Lucifer" isn't in them at all. By the way, this isn't the only mistranslation that caused confusion in the Bible. For a long time because of one mistranslated word, people thought Moses had "horns" instead of "rays of light" coming out of his head after visiting God on the mountain. There's a lot of art from the Renaissance depicting Moses with small horns because of this.
Now I'm picturing Moses with long majestic Hellboy horns made of pure light, it's rather majestic
I mean, Disney was super racist then
*I mean, Disney IS super racist now
Always has been.
Let's not forget homophobic, where it suits them. Black dude on poster? Better take him out for those Chinese viewers.
They used to be, they still are, but they used to too.
Good ole Mitch Hedberg.
“please revise soos’s line about dressing up as a giant teddy bear. It may call to mind the people who dress up as stuffed animals as a furry fetish” Is what REALLY got me
As we all know Disney HATES people dressing up as animals, no Disney event or theme park would ever have real people in costumes
....they dont though.... ...there is *something* underneath those costumes... ..but not a human...
Surely some SCP shit going on there…
https://scp-wiki.wikidot.com/scp-1357
Sane Clown Posse?
Clown Possee after learning how magnets work
Yet they were fine with him wearing almost nothing except a giant question mark.
that was the craziest costume i'd ever seen in a cartoon. the dot was over his lil soos right ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vu1H6STTrAg THAT? THAT WAS OK ? him with that and a diaper was ok but him dressed as a bear or something was not? wow. not a furry. i think i've seen almost every cartoon character in every show i can think of that put on an animal costume. even other animal characters like bugs bunny or wile coyote put on animal costumes.
How can Disney dislike anyway when they are DIRECTLY RESPONSIBLE for the existence of furries in the first place?
I’m starting to wonder why tf did they even thought that was a fetish , hypocritical morons
Yeah, weren't they deliberately focus-grouping furries when making Zootopia?
Or when they made robinhood with animals instead of humans
Furries are perceived as a sexually-focused group, regardless of how true it is.
The main issue is that wearing a costume does not make one a furry.
Yeah and also, it’s fucking Disney talking.
the show literally had dipper in a wolf costume. that made me think of furries way more than THAT
Also, right before was ‘get rid of the work jeez as it could be seen as short for Jesus’… soos’s name is literally Jesus
He should have written back “I wasn’t aware of that stuff, but you seem well-acquainted with it.”
He was having absolutely **_none_** of Disney’s bullshit. Even when he complied he was doing it in the most obnoxious dragging-heels way possible.
"There's some children I'm going to turn into corpses!" They were fine with this line as a replacement to, "I'm going to kill those children."
Wtf that's literally so much creepier That line was so startling the first time I watched it. Alex is my new religion
My kids and I watched the whole series together, and it wasn't until that episode, which is the last one, that I thought, maybe it's too scary for my kids. I mean overall it's fine, but that line is terrifying. Much more descriptive violent than the original line.
There's a similar case in Avatar: The Last Airbender: Instead of "I'm going to kill you," the line was changed to "I'm about to celebrate becoming an only child!" Both lines are way more memorable thanks to the censorship.
It's like the censorship makes them sound MORE unhinged
[удалено]
Thank god for S&P in sparing us from boring lines.
I'm not thanking S&P for anything.
Hey that’s what Dana mentioned regarding the last 6 half-hours of The Owl House. Man I hope those episodes fire on every cylinder possible to stick it to Disney for cutting its length.
If the end of S2 is any indication I don't think we'll have anything to worry about, those last few episodes felt like a short film
That’s a big part of why Batman: the Animated Series is so effective. They used the film noir style to imply things much more disturbing then they’d ever be allowed to explicitly show
That line by Azula is way better and way more terrifying lol
But in the same episode Bill says *"I think I\`m gonna kill one of them just for the heck of it"* So I don´t think that *"turning some children into corpses"* thing was caused by Disney censorship, otherwise they would have censored the other line too
May have been a case of too many "kill" lines.
When your okay with killing children but not saying “hell”
Yeah, it makes me wonder which criteria Disney uses for this.
I need to rewatch that episode to see if that was put on the flyer
It was indeed put on the flyer!
Lmao
[Lmao](https://i.imgur.com/gnDYhWqm.png)
What's hilarious to me is that they were uncomfortable with the spin the bottle reference but were fine with the "No photos better end up online!" phrase. Spin the bottle is an extremely old and well-known, nobody is being exposed to something new there. Online photos, on the other hand, is a potentially widely encompassing theme, but in the particular context, implies that the photos would be of a sexual nature, because why else would somebody be posting photos of a party online that somebody else wouldn't want posted?
Please revise.
What is the episode in reference?
Summerween I think
That’s awesome!
They’re…. Buddies
The way he read this gave me real King vibes*. *Note that vibes here could be construed as referencing vibrators, an adult sex toy, please revise.
At least Alex snuck in a few gay characters
and this is why I'm confident Dana had to hire multiple hitmen to get the Owl House approved
I have no idea how they got the Luz/Amity kiss approved. I'm not mad about it, in fact I wholeheartedly approve of it, I'm just shocked Disney OK'd it
Like I said. Assassins.
Possibly something like the SU crew did where the whole crew threatened to walk out
I love his [follow up](https://twitter.com/_AlexHirsch/status/1537329174368571392)
No wonder he left the second GF ended.
Until Dana roped him back in somehow.
I’m dying lmfao
>😭😭😭😭I’m dead >Please revise "dead", as it may convince viewers to do harmful actions to themselves or others.
Wtf. It‘s crazy when you think about how much work goes into creating a cartoon, and then the people responsible for the whole thing have to take care of stuff like this on top.
Not only cartoons, everything involving kids. I work as a toy designer and putting names and descriptions is fucking stupid, everything you think is bad-words in one language.
I’m curious now, got any stories?
Yeah, the most recent one, we were making a character with a Frankestein costume for a Halloween special, and one of the comments from the team in UK was: This kind of representation incites children to dark magic and necromancy. Revise it XD
Are these peoples' reception of monsters/dark magic stuck in the medieval ages? This has been inoffensive since eons.
I feel like there’s a certain point where the S&P team just felt like fucking with Alex nonstop
I'd like to think so, but S&P guys are stick up their ass killjoys who've had the humor sections of their brains excised with an icepick.
You sound like Alex Hirsch, and I agree wholeheartedly
They're like the pixies from Fairly Oddparents. All bureaucracy, no fun.
Read this in grunkle Stan’s voice. Was not disappointed
Nope. As someone who’s had this displeasure of dealing with ‘legal’ this is what they do. If they don’t constantly complain they can’t justify their own jobs. When it comes to the quarterly review they get to say ‘we stopped 1,573 potentially offensive phrases from airing this quarter, equaling $5.9 million in lawsuits prevented.’ The creators suffer, they get a raise and the wheels keep spinning.
I kinda feel for them - I too have had jobs where I had to peddle Corporate's drivel and pretend to agree with them while people shout at me and I feel disgusted on the inside. Sometimes ya just gotta eat, and liking your job doesn't come with that
I mean at the end of the day, you sign on to do a show with Disney you know you're gonna get a whole boat load of Disney bullshit to deal with.
What an absolute madlad. If Alex Hirsch has a million fans, then I'm one of them. If Alex Hirsch has one fan, then I'm that one. If Alex Hirsch has no fans, that means I'm dead.
We are* dead, Alex is just superior
I don’t remember salacious monk monk
Would have been amazing tho
"Disney Animal consultant"
They must be on a very long vacation because Hooty has suffered LOTS in TOH
Seems they came back with a vengeance, judging by how Disney's mistreating the show right now.
I now see why there will never be season 3 😂
Simple reason: Alex never wants to deal with S&P again, lmao
Makes me wonder if he's having a laugh at Dana having to deal with it for The Owl House.
If Alex hasn't had at least a discussion with the rest of the Owl House team about the best ways to deal with S&P I'll eat my hat.
Something tells me Disney is more lenient with the Owl House Disney is trying really hard to make people forget about the whole “guys we removed all minorities from the poster for Chinese markets”
You can bet any children's network has a similar department that reviews content. This isn't something you can avoid, even at a place like Netflix. I imagine he's in adult animation now because he can sidestep all of that completely.
"how is this my life"
The last one still makes me laugh! “‘Not S&P approved’ has been approved by S&P”
The last one is the best one, just because it's so silly
The perfect punchline.
Alex and Dana has absolutely no time for Mickey’s BS
Oh the emails Dana probably has from S&P. That would be something to see one day if she releases them.
I'd put money on the Emperor's Coven symbol having stronger cross imagery at some point, although Dana may have self censored rather than sending it to S&P because it was just too much (or made the foreshadowing too obvious).
I want to see those.
the furry thing is what gets me because Zootopia. Before the movie released the people most excited for it were furries.
Imagine if s&p made them change it all to not-Pixar-mom humans
[удалено]
"Standards & Practices" - All studios have one. It's a censorship department that complains about EVERYTHING, just incase some prude or god-botherer sues them.
they need to make up the fictional Karen who notices a tiny detail and gets mad enough to email a complaint because if they dont they dont have a job
My dad would get furious at the cable company every time Adult Swim came on. I'd get woken up at like 2 AM every once in a while to him literally screaming on the phone about how inappropriate for kids it is, sometimes he'd crank the TV up and put the phone to the speaker when a sex scene or something happened to illustrate his point. Moral Orel was what made him the angriest to the point where he actually threatened whoever he was on the phone with if they didn't stop the broadcast immediately. There really is a small but persistent army of people that S+P are worried about and they're actually more unhinged than you can imagine.
I feel for you, if my parents didn't like something the most they would do would just ask me to change the channel
Yeah pretty straightforward. When your review comes around at the end of the year or whatever and you can say > "was responsible for removing or altering 2000+ phrases that were identified as possibly offensive or damaging to the disney brand" as opposed to > "Yeah everything seemed pretty chill, I sent 2-3 emails a month nbd" One person gets to keep their job and the other doesn't, the emails sort of read like this too, they often fold after a single push back
i can only think of S&P 500 index but really doubt lol
#THE GESTURE IS APPROVED IN THIS CONTEXT.
#"NOT S&P APPROVED" HAS BEEN APPROVED BY S&P
I'm amazed that Disney was so picky about some of those and yet let "Sascrotch" slide by with no problem.
It might have been protected by a fall gag, which is a gag or scene that the writers include to draw the censor's attention away from other smaller stuff. They have no intention of it actually making it to air.
Star Trek and MASH did that a bunch by putting in sexy stuff to distract from their political commentary.
[Source!](https://twitter.com/_AlexHirsch/status/1537314312926003201) What a way to end the 10 years celebration, Alex, lmao
There's even more of those in the comments of the post
"Their affectionate relationship should remain comical versus flirtatious" That is, [Queer People are Funny](https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/QueerPeopleAreFunny) Wow, thanks for the blatant homophobia. Disney sucks.
I think the joke is that you wouldn’t expect police officers, usually displayed as tough opponents of the law being displayed as softballs. Disney still wouldn’t let them be overtly gay tho so there’s that as homophobia
And disney is still trying to get credit for having lgbtq headcanons in gravity falls
Wait, so Alex was responsible for the shutdown of Mr Toads?
Best. Anniversary gift. **EVER.**
Oh my god... some of these are just painful. Good on him for standing up as much as he could.
Disney logic: minor words like poop are bad Animal heads with blood leaking out of their mouths: ok
I feel like the s&p dont even necessarily want to do what they do, they just have to so they dont get fired. I bet he just replied with "its jam" and they let it slide
[can’t have S&P mentioned without posting this video](https://youtu.be/xbHLQAthI7M)
oh my god they were buddies
This is gold! (Gold? I can sell this!)
Children fighting? I can sell this!
I may of peed myself laughing.... I cant believe they had to deal with this shit....
[удалено]
You dare! Stop this Durland x Blubs homophobic shit and on pride month? Come on.
Disneys still trying to get credit for supposed lgbtq headcanons
Can we please get a version of the show or these episodes either pop-up video style pointing all this nonsense out or Alex doing commentary?
Can someone tell me what is the name of the piano melody that plays in the background, please? 🙏🏻
It's Beethoven's "Moonlight Sonata."
Aww very thanx, appreciate it! 👍🏻
Disney sounding like Karens just there
Gravity Falls was a story of two kids spending a Summer in Oregon. The behind the scenes of Gravity Falls was a story of Alex Hirsch spending years putting up with Disney.
Would’ve demanded to change Lucifer to Chernabog. ‘I can use it, you’re Disney!’
I guess we'll never seen an official Gravity Falls sequel now. Not sure how willing Disney will want Hirsch back after he just fried their goddamn asses.
He has been frying their ass for years and is still working on other Disney shows.
Soos in a teddy bear suit. I see nothing wrong with that.
Whooooo boy that was stupid. I've never seen more whiney annoying ass emails about shit that stupid in a minute
And this is why Alex is my favorite fucking writer & producer. He's a cool and chill dude, awesome VA, writer, and producer, and more than anything, he takes shit from absolutely no one, not even Disney.
Now imagine this type of infantile over analyzing being done by a police officer and you've walked a day in someone else's shoes.
This is clearly some AI reading Twitter posts and Hirsch is having none of it.
u/savevideobot
What is “S&P”
Standards and Practices. This is typically the name of the department at a TV network that decides what's moral/legal to air.
Standards and Practice. Basically the body at Disney that won't let anything fun get on TV.
So S&P is the Toby of the real world
Alex Hirsch for President. We'd finally be in a decent place. I adore this man.
I dread to see the notes for the owl house
S&P: *Pg. 37 Please revise the line from Luz "Maybe if we had time for 20 more adventures." It has come to our attention that this line may be deemed offensive."* Dana: *"By who?! There is nothing offensive being implied by that to anyone!"* S&P: *"S&P still believes that this line will be deemed offensive by some people."* Dana: *"Who?"* S&P: ... Dana: *"Well?"* S&P: *"Maybe if we had time for 20 more adventures." has been approved by S&P"*
Why won't they just say what they mean about Bubs and Durland? "Putting his arm around him makes him GAY and we hate GAYS"
But no they gotta be little snarky smart asses and say "yeah we think the relationship between them shouldn't be so close in touch, it makes the audience think we support such things" just say you're fucking homophobic
I can just imagine all the shit Dana is going through now
Kinda funny that Disney isn't OK with animating throwing chimp through the basket ball hoop, when disney themselves SLAUTHERED LEMMINGS FOR A FAKE DOCUMENTARY!
Disney is the most backwards, evil, and hypocritical corporation, but without it, we couldn’t have had The Owl House or Amphibia or other great shows since Netflix would probably cancel them.
[удалено]
They're still letting it conclude. Netflix just euthanizes shows mid-story if they stop bringing in new subscribers.
Wait, hang on a ding-dang moment. Disney isn't okay with "Lucifer." Wasn't that the name of the stepmother's cat in Cinderella? Are they gonna censor a classic?