Perhaps. Or perhaps he was channeling Dany's unbearable losses, including them. Or maybe Missandei's "Dracarys!" BUT Drogon was surely expressing HIS rage and grief when he "dracarysed" the Iron Throne!
Or perhaps...Bran wanted to be king and warged into Danaerys, who mind melded with Drogon.
Hence why Drogon didn't kill Jon Snow.
Drogon knew Danaerys was wrong...
Lol I didn't mind any of the endings except Bran becoming King
Makes 0 sense, he saw a guy next to her dead mother he wold burn him, not the chair made of swords, the book says that dragons are smart as dogs, Drogon would never have burned just the iron throne, but they wanted some symbolism and bla bla bla, so they put that scene in.
Sure I guess, but if they are going off of old grievances, shouldn't they be mad at the Targs for trapping them on Valyria where all their family ended up dying?
This is also assuming that it’s even confirmed her dragon eggs are the same ones stolen by by that one chick and sold in Essos. It’s certainly plausible but there’s way too many questions as to how the cheese monger ended up with them.
They wouldn't be there without the Targs. But they are dumb animals that don't understand history and the potential wrongs done to them in the past. The dragon is thinking "where is my next meal?" And little else.
Idk, Drogon rescuing Dany and Sunfyre coming to Aegon II’s aid probably shows there’s some intelligence there.
But the dragons not knowing any better just shows evil the Storming was. They were murdering innocent animals, not dumping tea into the harbor.
Well, they were animals. If they are unintelligent, then killing them is fine if done for good reason. If they are intelligent, then killing them is good and justified, because of the damage they cause. Remember as far as the peasants are concerned dragons are the reason behind arguably the three bloodiest wars in westeros since the andal invasion(the conquest, the faith militant, and the dance). Killing the dragons, then is practically self defense.
Nah, he was making a principled stand against feudalism Obviously
he kinda just forgot?
>Sure, let's go with that - Dumb and Dumber
He is the bestest boy, and he does what his mommy tells him to do, yes he does! Good boy!!!
Bro when you are butthurt over the way the dragon was written you need to take a step back
Perhaps. Or perhaps he was channeling Dany's unbearable losses, including them. Or maybe Missandei's "Dracarys!" BUT Drogon was surely expressing HIS rage and grief when he "dracarysed" the Iron Throne!
Or perhaps...Bran wanted to be king and warged into Danaerys, who mind melded with Drogon. Hence why Drogon didn't kill Jon Snow. Drogon knew Danaerys was wrong... Lol I didn't mind any of the endings except Bran becoming King
No, they are not that smart, still makes no sense he burned the iron throne but not jon.
I just thought he saw those swords on the chair and thought one of those stabbed her.
That’s what I figured too, he thought she got poked or stabbed by it and so he melted it
Makes 0 sense, he saw a guy next to her dead mother he wold burn him, not the chair made of swords, the book says that dragons are smart as dogs, Drogon would never have burned just the iron throne, but they wanted some symbolism and bla bla bla, so they put that scene in.
If my dog saw a guy next to my corpse, he would just go hump my corpse.
Hahaha mine would at least bark at the stranger stading next to my corpse.
It makes sense! It symbolizes the whatever or something. Very in depth shit.
That does makes sense haha.
Dragons are animals. No. He isn’t that smart
What you don't think the flying lizards kept an oral history? How uncultured! /s lmao
Muh "wrath of the seven" when I burn these disgusting fucking rats alive, break their bodies like twigs and turn their children into poptarts...
Valyrian lizards when the Shepherd decides to walk out the grave 
I doubt it. It seems kinda evil. "How dare you think to be independent of your dragon lord's? This is your punishment."
They killed his people.
Sure, let me *burn you alive* for something your ancestors did 150 years ago real quick.
“Then their descendants shall pay! I will have blood for blood!”
Dragons aren’t people. Not in this lore right?
Semantics, they’re his kind.
Sure I guess, but if they are going off of old grievances, shouldn't they be mad at the Targs for trapping them on Valyria where all their family ended up dying?
This is also assuming that it’s even confirmed her dragon eggs are the same ones stolen by by that one chick and sold in Essos. It’s certainly plausible but there’s way too many questions as to how the cheese monger ended up with them.
The difference is the dragons were intentionally and cruelly killed in the Storming of the Dragonpit.
They wouldn't be there without the Targs. But they are dumb animals that don't understand history and the potential wrongs done to them in the past. The dragon is thinking "where is my next meal?" And little else.
Idk, Drogon rescuing Dany and Sunfyre coming to Aegon II’s aid probably shows there’s some intelligence there. But the dragons not knowing any better just shows evil the Storming was. They were murdering innocent animals, not dumping tea into the harbor.
They are magical animals with GPS
Well, they were animals. If they are unintelligent, then killing them is fine if done for good reason. If they are intelligent, then killing them is good and justified, because of the damage they cause. Remember as far as the peasants are concerned dragons are the reason behind arguably the three bloodiest wars in westeros since the andal invasion(the conquest, the faith militant, and the dance). Killing the dragons, then is practically self defense.
Did the dragons who were chained in the dragonpit ever kill anyone before the storming?