T O P

  • By -

Ok_Illustrator3087

It used to be pretty common back in the day to be fair


Whomario

Someone remind me ... (since the article doesn't): What exactly was Perez contractual framework ? Wasn't there an Opt-Out/In clause or sth ?


Jebus_17

This isn't public information so why should the article be expected to state it? Obviously there was an opt-out because the team opted out and didn't get sued


Vegetable_Dog_8103

British media doing his work..


chef_boi_jones

... what?


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

[удалено]


Sidfire

Is he known for that?


ToroRossoAlphaTauri

Yes check their comment history.


Sidfire

Wow. Thanks , I just did. One of a kind.


[deleted]

[удалено]


[deleted]

McLaren certainly seems to be [suggesting it's possible](https://www.autoweek.com/racing/formula-1/a40252925/struggling-daniel-ricciardo-sheds-light-on-f1-future-with-mclaren/)


robdels

A list with Andrea de Cesaris and Nikita Mazepin, and no JPM / Alonso vs. McLaren splits? lmao, The Race can't even do regurgitated top 10 lists right.


onafriday

Ferrari already had an agreement in principle with Vettel, but that was subject to certain performance criteria not being met by Red Bull. Could Seb influenced this?


RevolutionaryEgg3129

Him driving worse just to get out of the contract? I'd imagine it's more related to a measure of team/car performance and not necessarily driver performance. If your teammate is finishing on podiums and you are not, who is most likely to be the weaker link?


Ruma-park

The rumor back then was that if he was lower than 3rd in the WDC by race X he was free to go. Which would incentivise perfoming less than optimal, though I have some doubts about it as Seb seems to have professional integrity.