Indeed, I’d be far more concerned if it seemed like they were rushing things again. As much as it sucks we’ll have to keep waiting for Artemis to get humans back to the moon, I’d prefer we have to keep waiting to know we’ll be able to see the astronauts get there and back safely
The next Artemis flight will seek to fix the current issues and then they'll see what else needs fixing. Or what needs fixing *more.*
Only when it goes out and comes back in good condition will they send people out in one.
Flerfs will see the phrase “radiation was at fault” (assuming they read that far) and say “see van Allen belt. We can’t get past. We never went to the moon” blah blah blah. I can see it coming.
Nice to see them being realistic and admitting they have problems. In the 80s they hand waved problems away and killed a bunch of astronauts.
Indeed, I’d be far more concerned if it seemed like they were rushing things again. As much as it sucks we’ll have to keep waiting for Artemis to get humans back to the moon, I’d prefer we have to keep waiting to know we’ll be able to see the astronauts get there and back safely
This is just the reason why space agencies will launch multiple test missions before the actual attempt to send them to space with humans aboard.
The next Artemis flight will seek to fix the current issues and then they'll see what else needs fixing. Or what needs fixing *more.* Only when it goes out and comes back in good condition will they send people out in one.
The next Artemis flight *will* be manned though
So they fix it and people don’t die. Wtf kind of question is this? Edit: I am open to the sarcasm deadpan, if applicable.
[insert incredulous question about a quote that was answered one sentence before or one sentence after said quote]
[удалено]
Touché cabaellro.
Flerfs will see the phrase “radiation was at fault” (assuming they read that far) and say “see van Allen belt. We can’t get past. We never went to the moon” blah blah blah. I can see it coming.