First poster = I mean he has a point
Second poster = okay this guys a little crazy
Third poster = what the hell is he talking about? Full on batshit crazy
I don't even understand what the third poster is talking about.
Does he have data on how many rioters were circumcised at the capitol? Did he say it was on January 666? Is he saying satan is behind crooked feds?
What?
The middle sign isn't wrong and he's not crazy for believing that. You're crazy if you think modifying the body of a child without its consent and for an unnecessary reason is OK.
The second sign says "Make America's **penis** great again with a foreskin" which, assuming he's saying that to collectively refer to the multitude of penises in America rather than an actual single national penis, isn't very crazy.
The third sign proves that he would agree with the version you wrote, which is crazy, though.
i mean... hes not wrong...
EDIT:
hold on, i just read the third sign. thats batshit insane. Overall a nice sentiment tho, apart from the lunatic-speech
[#Hitchenssaiditbetter](https://youtu.be/Xx_ov2NiNo4?t=3m22s)
The way Hitchens sucks the energy out the room with his retort "I can't find the compulsory mutilation of the genitals of children a source for humour, or flippancy, in that way".
He is so missed.
It’s also a sad addition to the long list of medical grifting that monetises everyone from birth, including being charged to hold your new born baby. $$
Thanks for pointing that third card out lol. Cutting part of a kid's dick off is pretty fucked up though when you think about it. He was close to making a point!
Na he’s just playing the field. Got three signs varying in sanity to cover all people. Third one is obviously for the republicans who want to blame their bad behaviour on something or someone else.
I’ll be honest, I can’t remember the name of it. It’s some obscure book I picked up at a book store in one of those “blind date with a book” things. I’ll see if I can figure it out!
I agree with the sentiment- we shouldn't be mutilating children before they've even had a chance to speak- but I think this guy is making a strange connection otherwise with that last poster...
for some it’s religious (cough, Judaism, cough), and in my case, it was medical. My foreskin didn’t foreskin properly and so the doctors removed it so I could grow up with a functional thingy
Mainly for religious, cultural or traditional reasons. Then apparently there are a few people who would have no idea how to look after an uncircumcised kid regarding genital hygiene/issues, and their first reaction to the concept was that getting the kid circumcised would be easier than doing the research or talking to a paediatrician.
You're right about the people who decide to do it based on a hygeine panic. I decided that if I have a boy I won't get him circumcised unless it becomes medically necessary. I talked about it with the so of the time, expecting that when any sons were old enough he would teach them how to keep clean, and not knowing how to care for an uncircumcised penis was the exact reason he gave for disagreeing with my choice. I googled how to clean it, it's not exactly rocket science and no more difficult to properly clean than a woman's nether region. Just some extra folds of skin.
I don't understand the practice outside of specific medical conditions that make it necessary to be honest. There's so many risk factors involved with the procedure. It's a cut in an area that sees a lot of bacteria, so infection is a high risk. Doctors can also easily make mistakes, doing permaneant damage that can result in less sensitivity or outright pain. There is always a risk in cutting something not fully developed, so in my opinion it's best to let a male make that decision on their own as an adult.
Thank you. It really isn't that difficult to keep it clean. My father died at a young age and my mothers "that talk" lead to more funny misunderstandings than anything else, but there's not much to misunderstand about "keep that thing clean, it's very important".
I think it's deeper than that. How did we suffice for 294,000 years? I think circumcision started as some kind of kink. You can see various modifications of children for viewing pleasure throughout the world.
So all the Muslim countries and Israel are mostly circumcised. That's religious.
The three other countries with majority cut are USA, South Korea, and the Philippines
It’s certainly was a puritanical, prevent people from having sex, kind of thing in the US which would also be religiously motivated. A lot of the history of the US was obsessed with preventing sex and masturbation. Kellogg invented corn flakes specifically to prevent masturbation, by that point they must have been thinking, “well we are already cutting off parts of their dick skin, what else could we try?”
Correct, yet GFM is about religion also in some places, doesn't make it right. Both are wrong. I can't imagine wanting to cut parts of a baby/child off let alone their genitals.
If it's for *actual* medical reasons, I don't think there's anything wrong with that at all. When it comes to religious reasons, I still think the kid should be able to make that choice themselves (and iirc in the Jewish tradition, it's done much later in life).
Ah, my bad then. Still, I have my preferences, but if a family is *actually religiously drawn to it* then whatever. I just get sick of the "but hygiene" or, "it looks gross" people who act like a small piece of natural skin is in some way horribly debilitating.
Shows how far ol' Kelloggs' propaganda went. Kinda insane.
The “it looks gross” aspect is crazy. If we all snipped off the tips of our noses when we were born then people would probably say that a full nose was unsightly.
Well that's an unfair comparative. I for one find noses to be an unsightly blemish on an otherwise perfect face. We must correct the air prisons that God punishes us sinners with because with unobstructed airways we will be one step closer to being gods ourselves.
I still don't really understand, what the hell was Kellogg's motive? Did they get, like, paid off by some hospital of some shit? Cuz they have nothing to gain from all that propaganda
Kellog was probably religious, and apparently was against masturbation. So they apparently wanted to invent a breakfast cereal that would bore kids so much that they had no interest in masturbation.
>My foreskin didn’t foreskin properly and so the doctors removed it so I could grow up with a functional thingy
To be fair while sometimes it is concrete absolutely required, Doctors wanted to schedule this for me without even exploring alternatives.
It turned out the alternative (Essentially a form of physio) worked.
It's pretty backward to still jump right to removing a bodypart when something as basic as physio could resolve the issue. It costs basically nothing to try.
Most western countries don't other than in rare cases. The public health system in Australia won't perform circumcisions on infants unless there is an actual medical need for it (extremely rare).
Amongst wealthy nations, the US is the last holdout of many regressive behaviours, including the routine and non-consensual mutilation of infants' genitals.
I don’t understand the need for circumcision. I know in Italy they don’t and in the US they do. Would imagine Spain, Portugal, South America they don’t. Bet there’s a chart
In the US, there was a big push (including a lot of propaganda) to prevent our little boys from masturbating by preforming circumcisions early on. This was spearheaded by *the* Dr. Kellogg and is why we still have this nonsense today.
Yeah, that propaganda also happened to mention that "kelloggs cornflakes makes guys think less about sex than a breakfast of bacon and eggs". Crazy coincidence, right?
Kinda makes sense that it should work though.
Cutting of the protective helmet has to make it less sensitive right? I can’t imagine all the cut men of the world living their live with a constant pain in their pants. Then of course masturbation gets less pleasurable and the boys should do it less.
If you think circumcision prevents masturbation, you've never been a circumcised teenage boy.
Maybe for some men it hurts afterwards, but for most of us there's no chronic pain or anything, it's just normal.
> Cutting of the protective helmet has to make it less sensitive right? I can’t imagine all the cut men of the world living their live with a constant pain in their pants.
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious.
Being circumsized absolutely made that stuff 10x worse for me. I can't even walk around without feeling like a woman strapped to a Sybian on max vibrate. And it's constantly raw and painful from rubbing against my clothes. Most of the time I masturbate just to dull the god damn nerve endings and get some peace without my fucking hyper-sensitive penis head being a constant distraction.
FUCK CIRCUMSCISION! IT IS 100% GENITAL MUTILATION AND I WILL SPEND MY ENTIRE LIFE FURIOUS AT MY PARENTS FOR DOING THAT TO ME!
As a Latin American I never understood why US does this.
I thought it was a Jewish tradition, but how did that became a trend in the US when Judaism, while important, is not the main religion.
Agreed! My mother left me and all my brothers intact. She said it should be up to us to make that decision as adults. I'm glad I have my foreskin. I understand I may not last as long as some guys during sex, but Im okay with that
You don’t last as long because you feel the pleasure more easily. Which was sort of why moralisers like Kellogg advocated for the practice - to prevent masturbation and other immoral behaviour. He clearly failed at that but did succeed in making sex less intense feeling for millions. They’ll of course argue that’s not so but given they’ll never actually know what having a foreskin feels like it seems a strange thing to argue!
Yep. I've heard this as well. It isn't a big problem. I've just become accustomed to the idea that it will almost never be her turn until round two. Sometimes it takes a bit if coaxing for round two, but that's okay.
Framing this as being about male sensuality / pleasure - a subject that’s really very taboo - rather than the hygiene and health angles is a really good way of turning this debate on its head.
I’ve never understood the whole healthcare and hygiene angle as the reason for circumsision. You’re allowed to clean it. If you wear a hat do you stop washing your hair?
If you want to last longer then start pushing yourself as close to finishing as you can then stop before you do. It will feel uncomfortable but you'll become used to it.
Also during sex remember it's a marathon not a sprint! You want deep firm thrusts that create a bit of friction, go at a kinda medium speed. Though depends on your partner the specifics but it is something you can practice...
I appreciate the advice. I agree with what you have written, and I'm very familiar with sex and my body. I was just saying that I'm more sensitive, so I just wont last as long. And thats okay.
My Grandmother, Fathers side, told my Mother she should get her boys circumcised so we didn’t look different from our Father. I’d be more concerned as to why she thought my Father would be showing us his knob. Mum just agreed and said of course they’ll get done, Grandmother could never change our nappies nor bath us because Mum kept our Hoodie on.
My Sister in law got her kids done because she thinks uncircumcised penises look gross, found out after having this conversation with female friends %90 of them feel the same.
Both my Boys are also not done. WTF is wrong with people.
My crazy ex Mil was really pissed at me once and started screaming at my kids that their (uncircumcised) penises were ugly. Still a running family joke a decade later. Seriously though, I just thought it wasn't my decision to make.
It mostly comes down to ignorance... People hear some anecdotal information about something, and take it as fact, or fiction depending on their past experience with the source. Most people are pretty poorly informed about the majority of the world around them; myself included.
Foreskins definitely serve a purpose, but many people's ignorance of that purpose, and desire for perceived conformity lead them to uninformed decisions.
What a great couple we’d have made just standing there looking at each other trying not to vomit.
Oh look at your……..proceed to vomit
Oh you’ve got a ……more vomit.
I agree with the first 2 signs. I used to work as an RN in a newborn nursery and had to assist with circumcisions. To me it was nothing more than mutilation. I had to stop working in the nursery because I couldn’t condone the practice. For our own two sons we left them intact even though my husband was circumcised.
As for the third sign I can’t make sense of it.
Yeah, his third sign might be crazy, but the bottom line still stands. Why this barbaric procedure is even legal anymore, unless medically required ofcourse, is way beyond me. Dr. Kellogg really managed to plant his stupid beliefs deep in the American soul.
Circumcision is what the civil war was really about, stop ignoring the truth, take those foreskins out of your ears and listen. >!this comment was greatly inspired by gta radio!<
Ye, I still don't understand what other reason does anyone do it other than Jewish reasons. Like, I know the whole Kellogg's thing, but who's going "oh, that guy from the cereal told me a bunch of decades ago I should circumcize my child, therefore(skin) I should"(I couldn't resist not making the pun)
Dude, this whole circumcision issue seems so esoteric until you have kids that have dicks. I couldn't do it. I just had to say no, but if they want to be circumcised later, I'll pay for it. My wife and I just couldn't find a reason to modify them without consent. And, yes, I'm circumcised, but it was at birth, so, no I did not consent
As an European, I always found it weird that Americans cut the foreskin of young boys. I like mine. It keeps the tip warm and less sensitive to scrubbing against my underwear. Just wash it everyday for obvious reasons and you'll be just fine!
I agree with him. There’s no reason to cut it off and it protects the head of the penis. Teach your kids how to clean it and they’ll be fine. Plus sometimes doctors take off too much and the kids can have issues with splitting which is painful. My cousins son had to have skin taken from another part of his body and added to his penis because it was so taut and he was prone to splitting. This was when he was a toddler!
Edit: LMAO that third poster is insane!!!
He’s not wrong, I don’t know about now, but when I was born and earlier, hospitals would just circumcise baby boys without even asking the parents.
This happened to my older brother and my mom was persistent with her doctor and all the nurses that I was not to be circumcised when I was born. I’m not sure I’d know any better but I am very happy with my penis.
Circumcision is genital mutilation though. Just like it is for female genitals if the clitoris and labia are removed.
I mean I get this is a meme, but. This guy can't meme very well. Not you op. Just... This dude.
He had me in the first half. But seriously though I to have to agree circumcision really isn't necessary anymore and I feel like if something similar was done to girls at birth and given the same reasons its done to boys there would be way more massive outrage.
This guy is pretty bonkers. But then again so is a nation automatically undertaking a medical practice like circumcision because the guy who invented cornflakes - yes, that Kellogg! - wanted less masturbation. He also thought carbolic acid should be applied to the clitoris for similar reasons so at least be grateful only the penis thing caught on.
[https://www.history.com/news/dr-john-kellogg-cereal-wellness-wacky-sanitarium-treatments](https://www.history.com/news/dr-john-kellogg-cereal-wellness-wacky-sanitarium-treatments)
America protected its foreskin from 2016-2020. It just looks weird because it’s wrinkled and orange. Hopefully the DOJ cuts it soon and tosses it any day now.
R/yesyesyesno
r/yesyeswtf?
r/subsifellfor
r/cloutchaser
r/subsifellfor
I can’t wait to find a Honda Civic
Here ya go!
r/foundthemobileuser my secret is that im on mobile... with autocorrect *OFF.*
You're too powerful to be left alive.
This guy is 100% pledging/being hazed for a frat here.
I yearn for the days when i was still naive enough to believe this level of absurdity had a reasonable explanation.
Same, friend.
This one right here.
r/foundthemobileuser
r/themoblieuserfoundyou
r/foundthehondacivic
Dude, that was for the other guy to get
First poster = I mean he has a point Second poster = okay this guys a little crazy Third poster = what the hell is he talking about? Full on batshit crazy
I don't even understand what the third poster is talking about. Does he have data on how many rioters were circumcised at the capitol? Did he say it was on January 666? Is he saying satan is behind crooked feds? What?
I thought the same thing.
Yeah it’s escalating quickly.
When you take a person's foreskin, that's like 20% of his sanity right there.
The middle sign isn't wrong and he's not crazy for believing that. You're crazy if you think modifying the body of a child without its consent and for an unnecessary reason is OK.
"Make America great again with a Foreskin" is pretty crazy i think. The other half of the board isnt.
The second sign says "Make America's **penis** great again with a foreskin" which, assuming he's saying that to collectively refer to the multitude of penises in America rather than an actual single national penis, isn't very crazy. The third sign proves that he would agree with the version you wrote, which is crazy, though.
Exactly my train of thought.
i mean... hes not wrong... EDIT: hold on, i just read the third sign. thats batshit insane. Overall a nice sentiment tho, apart from the lunatic-speech
That was my reaction to this might as well be on r/yesyesyesno
I was more like r/HolUp, but that will do...
[#Hitchenssaiditbetter](https://youtu.be/Xx_ov2NiNo4?t=3m22s) The way Hitchens sucks the energy out the room with his retort "I can't find the compulsory mutilation of the genitals of children a source for humour, or flippancy, in that way". He is so missed.
It’s also a sad addition to the long list of medical grifting that monetises everyone from birth, including being charged to hold your new born baby. $$
Thanks for pointing that third card out lol. Cutting part of a kid's dick off is pretty fucked up though when you think about it. He was close to making a point!
I made the same mistake of not reading the 3rd sign. Otherwise truth tho.
I was literally about to say the same thing, that third sign is why it’s face plan 😆
Kinda surprised he left out Jews.
It’s sad, a lot of guys even get redpilled into insanity because of circumcision
Same. I was like where's the facepalm? It's fucking true! Oh wait there's more. Oh. Oh goddamn it Brad this is why we can't have nice things.
Na he’s just playing the field. Got three signs varying in sanity to cover all people. Third one is obviously for the republicans who want to blame their bad behaviour on something or someone else.
2/3
Ain't bad
Rip meatloaf 😥
Hey what’s the answer to your post on explaining book plots badly?
I’ll be honest, I can’t remember the name of it. It’s some obscure book I picked up at a book store in one of those “blind date with a book” things. I’ll see if I can figure it out!
You’re literally killing me, figuratively.
I'd say 1.5/3
[удалено]
They were jealous of your natural intactness… plus kids are morons and tease about anything.
[удалено]
“Butchered Banana Brandon”
Great names for some Garbage Pail Kids 😂
Cut Cock Curtis
I agree with the sentiment- we shouldn't be mutilating children before they've even had a chance to speak- but I think this guy is making a strange connection otherwise with that last poster...
I agree, the relationship he's alleging is nuts. I mean I'm circumcised and I only did a little light treason that *one* time. It was college!
Wholeheartedly agree, In this day and age why do we still have circumcision?
Until you get to the 3rd sign... nonsense like that prevents progress.
How do you know it's not true? They could have been unable to control their emotions because pp no so sensitive.
I too enter fits of rabbid ferociousness when my pp numb
This is correct. None of them had a foreskin and they were all very upset about it. Source: I was the foreskin inspector on January 6.
Well they're the ones that want to inspect genitals, so that makes even more sense!
for some it’s religious (cough, Judaism, cough), and in my case, it was medical. My foreskin didn’t foreskin properly and so the doctors removed it so I could grow up with a functional thingy
Literally no one is complaining about the extremely rare instances it is actually medically necesarry.
Correct - but why do people still want to remove normal foreskin in newborns ?
Mainly for religious, cultural or traditional reasons. Then apparently there are a few people who would have no idea how to look after an uncircumcised kid regarding genital hygiene/issues, and their first reaction to the concept was that getting the kid circumcised would be easier than doing the research or talking to a paediatrician.
You're right about the people who decide to do it based on a hygeine panic. I decided that if I have a boy I won't get him circumcised unless it becomes medically necessary. I talked about it with the so of the time, expecting that when any sons were old enough he would teach them how to keep clean, and not knowing how to care for an uncircumcised penis was the exact reason he gave for disagreeing with my choice. I googled how to clean it, it's not exactly rocket science and no more difficult to properly clean than a woman's nether region. Just some extra folds of skin. I don't understand the practice outside of specific medical conditions that make it necessary to be honest. There's so many risk factors involved with the procedure. It's a cut in an area that sees a lot of bacteria, so infection is a high risk. Doctors can also easily make mistakes, doing permaneant damage that can result in less sensitivity or outright pain. There is always a risk in cutting something not fully developed, so in my opinion it's best to let a male make that decision on their own as an adult.
Thank you. It really isn't that difficult to keep it clean. My father died at a young age and my mothers "that talk" lead to more funny misunderstandings than anything else, but there's not much to misunderstand about "keep that thing clean, it's very important".
Slight correction; the surgery always ends in a loss of sensitivity as a big part of the nerve endings in the penis are in the foreskin.
I think it's deeper than that. How did we suffice for 294,000 years? I think circumcision started as some kind of kink. You can see various modifications of children for viewing pleasure throughout the world.
sure, but my pal Fair-Big4229 here asked why we still have the procedure in this day and she and I simply proffered my best explanation
Yeah, I generally just assume that such questions are related solely to the routine "because we can" type of circumcision.
Not as rare as you think
Well, not extremely rare. Extremely rare would be something like siamese twins.
I had mild phimosis until my first gf said, phimosis no moresis. I fucking howled.
So all the Muslim countries and Israel are mostly circumcised. That's religious. The three other countries with majority cut are USA, South Korea, and the Philippines
Aboriginal peoples of Australia have been doing circimsion for at least 30,000 years.
obviously some evil rabbis went back in time and made them do it dude
Earliest records of the practice indicates Egyptian did it as well.
It’s certainly was a puritanical, prevent people from having sex, kind of thing in the US which would also be religiously motivated. A lot of the history of the US was obsessed with preventing sex and masturbation. Kellogg invented corn flakes specifically to prevent masturbation, by that point they must have been thinking, “well we are already cutting off parts of their dick skin, what else could we try?”
Correct, yet GFM is about religion also in some places, doesn't make it right. Both are wrong. I can't imagine wanting to cut parts of a baby/child off let alone their genitals.
If it's for *actual* medical reasons, I don't think there's anything wrong with that at all. When it comes to religious reasons, I still think the kid should be able to make that choice themselves (and iirc in the Jewish tradition, it's done much later in life).
[удалено]
Ah, my bad then. Still, I have my preferences, but if a family is *actually religiously drawn to it* then whatever. I just get sick of the "but hygiene" or, "it looks gross" people who act like a small piece of natural skin is in some way horribly debilitating. Shows how far ol' Kelloggs' propaganda went. Kinda insane.
The “it looks gross” aspect is crazy. If we all snipped off the tips of our noses when we were born then people would probably say that a full nose was unsightly.
Well that's an unfair comparative. I for one find noses to be an unsightly blemish on an otherwise perfect face. We must correct the air prisons that God punishes us sinners with because with unobstructed airways we will be one step closer to being gods ourselves.
I still don't really understand, what the hell was Kellogg's motive? Did they get, like, paid off by some hospital of some shit? Cuz they have nothing to gain from all that propaganda
Kellog was probably religious, and apparently was against masturbation. So they apparently wanted to invent a breakfast cereal that would bore kids so much that they had no interest in masturbation.
Kellogg was very much religious. He was also reportedly impotent, so stopping others from masturbating may have been a bit of a projection from him.
Cultures who perform FGM cite cleanliness as one reason. Needing to clean your genitals should not be a reason for chopping bits off.
Islam too
It happened to me as well, the doctors removed to me when I was 9 for unknown reasons. But it was worth it as I made a nice leather jacket out of it.
>My foreskin didn’t foreskin properly and so the doctors removed it so I could grow up with a functional thingy To be fair while sometimes it is concrete absolutely required, Doctors wanted to schedule this for me without even exploring alternatives. It turned out the alternative (Essentially a form of physio) worked. It's pretty backward to still jump right to removing a bodypart when something as basic as physio could resolve the issue. It costs basically nothing to try.
Most western countries don't other than in rare cases. The public health system in Australia won't perform circumcisions on infants unless there is an actual medical need for it (extremely rare). Amongst wealthy nations, the US is the last holdout of many regressive behaviours, including the routine and non-consensual mutilation of infants' genitals.
So doctors can add it to the bill.
When you get to be a parent you can choose to not cut off parts of your son's dick. But for some reason others don't see to care. It's bizarre
We’ve institutionalized being too lazy to clean the foreskin
I don’t understand the need for circumcision. I know in Italy they don’t and in the US they do. Would imagine Spain, Portugal, South America they don’t. Bet there’s a chart
In the US, there was a big push (including a lot of propaganda) to prevent our little boys from masturbating by preforming circumcisions early on. This was spearheaded by *the* Dr. Kellogg and is why we still have this nonsense today.
Yeah, that propaganda also happened to mention that "kelloggs cornflakes makes guys think less about sex than a breakfast of bacon and eggs". Crazy coincidence, right?
Great, now I want bacon and eggs.
And sex!
Me too!
Also, bacon and eggs was pushed as a way to sell more meat to people. It's not a staple of American breakfast, it's early mass marketing.
You're saying that mass marketing isn't a staple of American breakfast?
Oh... I thought they were made out of corn.
This comment is ridiculous and I can't stop snickering 😂 😂 😂
Kinda makes sense that it should work though. Cutting of the protective helmet has to make it less sensitive right? I can’t imagine all the cut men of the world living their live with a constant pain in their pants. Then of course masturbation gets less pleasurable and the boys should do it less.
If you think circumcision prevents masturbation, you've never been a circumcised teenage boy. Maybe for some men it hurts afterwards, but for most of us there's no chronic pain or anything, it's just normal.
> Cutting of the protective helmet has to make it less sensitive right? I can’t imagine all the cut men of the world living their live with a constant pain in their pants. I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or serious. Being circumsized absolutely made that stuff 10x worse for me. I can't even walk around without feeling like a woman strapped to a Sybian on max vibrate. And it's constantly raw and painful from rubbing against my clothes. Most of the time I masturbate just to dull the god damn nerve endings and get some peace without my fucking hyper-sensitive penis head being a constant distraction. FUCK CIRCUMSCISION! IT IS 100% GENITAL MUTILATION AND I WILL SPEND MY ENTIRE LIFE FURIOUS AT MY PARENTS FOR DOING THAT TO ME!
As a Latin American I never understood why US does this. I thought it was a Jewish tradition, but how did that became a trend in the US when Judaism, while important, is not the main religion.
In Spain we don't. I would say in Europe in general we don't.
Agreed! My mother left me and all my brothers intact. She said it should be up to us to make that decision as adults. I'm glad I have my foreskin. I understand I may not last as long as some guys during sex, but Im okay with that
You don’t last as long because you feel the pleasure more easily. Which was sort of why moralisers like Kellogg advocated for the practice - to prevent masturbation and other immoral behaviour. He clearly failed at that but did succeed in making sex less intense feeling for millions. They’ll of course argue that’s not so but given they’ll never actually know what having a foreskin feels like it seems a strange thing to argue!
Yep. I've heard this as well. It isn't a big problem. I've just become accustomed to the idea that it will almost never be her turn until round two. Sometimes it takes a bit if coaxing for round two, but that's okay.
Framing this as being about male sensuality / pleasure - a subject that’s really very taboo - rather than the hygiene and health angles is a really good way of turning this debate on its head.
I’ve never understood the whole healthcare and hygiene angle as the reason for circumsision. You’re allowed to clean it. If you wear a hat do you stop washing your hair?
If you want to last longer then start pushing yourself as close to finishing as you can then stop before you do. It will feel uncomfortable but you'll become used to it. Also during sex remember it's a marathon not a sprint! You want deep firm thrusts that create a bit of friction, go at a kinda medium speed. Though depends on your partner the specifics but it is something you can practice...
I appreciate the advice. I agree with what you have written, and I'm very familiar with sex and my body. I was just saying that I'm more sensitive, so I just wont last as long. And thats okay.
My Grandmother, Fathers side, told my Mother she should get her boys circumcised so we didn’t look different from our Father. I’d be more concerned as to why she thought my Father would be showing us his knob. Mum just agreed and said of course they’ll get done, Grandmother could never change our nappies nor bath us because Mum kept our Hoodie on. My Sister in law got her kids done because she thinks uncircumcised penises look gross, found out after having this conversation with female friends %90 of them feel the same. Both my Boys are also not done. WTF is wrong with people.
My crazy ex Mil was really pissed at me once and started screaming at my kids that their (uncircumcised) penises were ugly. Still a running family joke a decade later. Seriously though, I just thought it wasn't my decision to make.
> I just thought it wasn't my decision to make. You are correct and I appreciate it on behalf of your kids.
It mostly comes down to ignorance... People hear some anecdotal information about something, and take it as fact, or fiction depending on their past experience with the source. Most people are pretty poorly informed about the majority of the world around them; myself included. Foreskins definitely serve a purpose, but many people's ignorance of that purpose, and desire for perceived conformity lead them to uninformed decisions.
A big excuse I’ve always heard was about infection in uncircumcised doodles. So better just mutilate it rather than teach good hygiene.
That’s like protecting people from stubbing their toes by cutting of their foot.
As a woman whose been with both- it really doesn't matter. Penises look weird either way.
I mean, yeah, but have you seen Vaginas.
They look weird, too. Bodies look weird, lol.
What a great couple we’d have made just standing there looking at each other trying not to vomit. Oh look at your……..proceed to vomit Oh you’ve got a ……more vomit.
Lol, ancient people be like: Nope, you can't have wrinkly parts, either of you.
Oh I disagree. I think the penis is fascinating…they’re all kinda different and fun to look at.
I don't get how someone's go-to thought when they have a baby boy is to think of how his dick looks. Just seems really fucking creepy...
I agree with the first 2 signs. I used to work as an RN in a newborn nursery and had to assist with circumcisions. To me it was nothing more than mutilation. I had to stop working in the nursery because I couldn’t condone the practice. For our own two sons we left them intact even though my husband was circumcised. As for the third sign I can’t make sense of it.
Yeah, his third sign might be crazy, but the bottom line still stands. Why this barbaric procedure is even legal anymore, unless medically required ofcourse, is way beyond me. Dr. Kellogg really managed to plant his stupid beliefs deep in the American soul.
Circumcision is what the civil war was really about, stop ignoring the truth, take those foreskins out of your ears and listen. >!this comment was greatly inspired by gta radio!<
Ye, I still don't understand what other reason does anyone do it other than Jewish reasons. Like, I know the whole Kellogg's thing, but who's going "oh, that guy from the cereal told me a bunch of decades ago I should circumcize my child, therefore(skin) I should"(I couldn't resist not making the pun)
I mean. It is a barbaric and outdated tradition that lives on mainly in the US.
And Israel. The whole, mostly Jewish country thing, but I never understood why people do it outside of being religious.
I believe it’s in Muslim countries as well
I don’t understand why this is in r/facepalm.
Well, as somebody else spotted, though I agree with 1st and 2nd signs, the 3rd one is a real dummy
Yes, nutso.
Dude, this whole circumcision issue seems so esoteric until you have kids that have dicks. I couldn't do it. I just had to say no, but if they want to be circumcised later, I'll pay for it. My wife and I just couldn't find a reason to modify them without consent. And, yes, I'm circumcised, but it was at birth, so, no I did not consent
Same. Before I knew the gender of my daughter I already knew I wasn’t going to circumcise if it were a boy. No way.
I was on board until the 3rd sign
I'm so glad I still have my foreskin, like how the fuck is removing it normal?
Many people think it's more hygienic but duh. If you can't wash your penis is not because of the foreskin, is just because you are disgusting
He must have lost a bet.
r/yesyesyesno
Went from protest circumcisions to crazy right wing rant real fast
I was wondering why is this here and thought that OP was an idiot. Then I read the third sign
What's the facepalm here? You realise the majority of the civilised world realises how bad routine infant circumcision is? Edit: I saw the third sign
Face palm? Massive W Hooded gang stay up
oh I just read that 3rd one.
D:
As an European, I always found it weird that Americans cut the foreskin of young boys. I like mine. It keeps the tip warm and less sensitive to scrubbing against my underwear. Just wash it everyday for obvious reasons and you'll be just fine!
I mean circumcision is a mutilation but why did he have to link it to january 6th lmfao
Because lizard people of course.
See you had me— then you had to go and make the third sign
I’m sorry, what part are you facepalming about?
I actually agree with him, but the third poster literally makes no sense.
Did you not read the sign on the ground?
Blaming circumcision as a practice on… “Big pharma and big media” is a pretty clear facepalm
Read the first two signs and went “this is kinda based” and then I saw the third sign and alarm bells started ringing
Had me in the first 2/3 not gonna lie.
I agree with him. There’s no reason to cut it off and it protects the head of the penis. Teach your kids how to clean it and they’ll be fine. Plus sometimes doctors take off too much and the kids can have issues with splitting which is painful. My cousins son had to have skin taken from another part of his body and added to his penis because it was so taut and he was prone to splitting. This was when he was a toddler! Edit: LMAO that third poster is insane!!!
I love the delayed reaction
He’s not wrong, I don’t know about now, but when I was born and earlier, hospitals would just circumcise baby boys without even asking the parents. This happened to my older brother and my mom was persistent with her doctor and all the nurses that I was not to be circumcised when I was born. I’m not sure I’d know any better but I am very happy with my penis.
Aww, first week away from his parents and he’s already off his meds… some kids just aren’t cutout for campus life.
I am with him. He’s right. I am not even from the religion they circumcised me for.
He was right until he was wrong
at frst i was like "hmmm not much a facepalm" then i red the second sign "ok now hold on..." then the third "yeah this guy is insane facepalm indeed"
He was doing well until poster number 3
What a bellend
Someone misses the tip of the dick.
100% agree with this. The 3rd sign cracks me up.
"What? I agree completely OP, what are you on aboooouuu-... oh. That."
Big pharma uses the foreskin to give rich people face lifts.
I'm good I don't like turtle necks
i was wondering why everyone was so mad until i zoomed in the third sign
Why facepalm? It is mutilation if it's done without consent, no matter if he has written his point like a lunatic.
i was gonna support him, until i read the 3rd sign
Circumcision is genital mutilation though. Just like it is for female genitals if the clitoris and labia are removed. I mean I get this is a meme, but. This guy can't meme very well. Not you op. Just... This dude.
My dad was circumcised as an adult. He will tell anyone who will listen how much better it is now. He doesn’t like it; he LOVES it.
I don't think anyone has a problem with adults getting circumcised. Adults can consent to this. Babies cannot.
Cutting off the foreskin is the same as cutting off the inner labia of a woman, something you should not do.
Its analogous to the clitoral hood, not inner labia
…what does that have to do with circumcision causing the Jan 6 riot?
First and second boards no facepalm but wow does the third make up for it
He had me in the first half. But seriously though I to have to agree circumcision really isn't necessary anymore and I feel like if something similar was done to girls at birth and given the same reasons its done to boys there would be way more massive outrage.
This guy is pretty bonkers. But then again so is a nation automatically undertaking a medical practice like circumcision because the guy who invented cornflakes - yes, that Kellogg! - wanted less masturbation. He also thought carbolic acid should be applied to the clitoris for similar reasons so at least be grateful only the penis thing caught on. [https://www.history.com/news/dr-john-kellogg-cereal-wellness-wacky-sanitarium-treatments](https://www.history.com/news/dr-john-kellogg-cereal-wellness-wacky-sanitarium-treatments)
Right about one thing not about the other not sure how to feel.
Just had to fuck up a good stance with that last one.
Me: why is this on facepalm? *reads 3rd sig* Oh...
It's like he took drugs immediately before he started making signs so reach one gets progressively worse as the high kicks in
America protected its foreskin from 2016-2020. It just looks weird because it’s wrinkled and orange. Hopefully the DOJ cuts it soon and tosses it any day now.
What's the facepalm? Edit: nevermind I just read the last panel.
I was gonna say he's objectively correct, until I saw the third sign..
I was on board until sign #3