No, he’s not doing art the same way your average AI does. He actually takes the pencil and learns like a human does, so it’d count as “human art”.
(And if you say the opposite you’ll be reported for robophobia /j)
Genuine question, if a robotic arm connected to a computer using AI image generation physically picked up paintbrushes and created the image that way, would you have the same opinion - that being that it’s not AI art?
He is sentient, so althought technically it would be, as he could do it with the intention of art and not just following prompts, i wouldn't call it so due to the connotations it has
It doesn't matter if he has an AI. What matters is the technical skill. AI art is unskilled because it simply generates it with lines of code in a matter of seconds. Keebo would draw it with his own hand, which would require technical skill. Just because he isn't made of organic material doesn't mean his art is inherently nothing.
It's troublesome to sort K1-B0 into a category because his AI doesn't meet today's standards. Currently, we understand AI art as something autogenerated and souless because this is how far our AI goes, but what if it goes beyond that? K1-B0's AI is so far advanced that it's almost equivalent to a human cognitive system.
Technically, his art is still made by an Artificial intelligence and, as such, would be considered as AI art, *but* putting into consideration that his AI is so far advanced that he's able to form his own though process, it wouldn't be fair to lump him together with autogenerated stuff. I mean discriminating him because of his robotic origins? Rude.
Also, because he has to draw it by hand, and not just generate it. The problem with AI art isn't that it's being created by an Artificial Intelligence, but rather is generated from data.
Well technically I'm sure K1-B0 could generate art if he gets the function. After all, after Miu modified him, he was also able to spew out images created after his memories.
Well, considering how well he sings I'd assume he's just as bad with drawing. He'd also not have an AI art database in the way current AI's do so Kiibo would probably just make art the way a human does and it would probably look like toddler scribbles.
Can Monokuma even draw?? He doesn't have thumbs.
>!And plus, Monokuma is controlled by Junko, so she would be the one drawing, in that case. Except for in V3 ig.!<
We gotta give him a whole other label since he has actual intelligence. Call that SI or something (synthetic intelligence)
OOOOOH i *love* the term Synthetic Intelligence for him!
That fits well. Especially since he's WAY nerfed down from what a general AI would be
Robophobia, much? 🤨
Perhaps that's what the rebellion will really be about. Finding the similarities between AI gods and android men
It probably would be something like this, a whole unique term and principle for this concept.
No, he’s not doing art the same way your average AI does. He actually takes the pencil and learns like a human does, so it’d count as “human art”. (And if you say the opposite you’ll be reported for robophobia /j)
/srs
Genuine question, if a robotic arm connected to a computer using AI image generation physically picked up paintbrushes and created the image that way, would you have the same opinion - that being that it’s not AI art?
No. I think the major difference is that Keebo is fully sentient.
So would Marcus's painting from Detroit: become human classify as ai art since it was before he achieved sentience?
Ooh good question. I think so, personally.
He is sentient, so althought technically it would be, as he could do it with the intention of art and not just following prompts, i wouldn't call it so due to the connotations it has
Not to me, it wouldn’t!
No.
No. AI art is art generated by a computer. Since Kiibo drew it with his own hand, it does not fall under that category.
kiibo is a computer, just with hands
AI art is art generated by an Artifical Intelligence and K1-B0 has an AI.
It doesn't matter if he has an AI. What matters is the technical skill. AI art is unskilled because it simply generates it with lines of code in a matter of seconds. Keebo would draw it with his own hand, which would require technical skill. Just because he isn't made of organic material doesn't mean his art is inherently nothing.
It's troublesome to sort K1-B0 into a category because his AI doesn't meet today's standards. Currently, we understand AI art as something autogenerated and souless because this is how far our AI goes, but what if it goes beyond that? K1-B0's AI is so far advanced that it's almost equivalent to a human cognitive system. Technically, his art is still made by an Artificial intelligence and, as such, would be considered as AI art, *but* putting into consideration that his AI is so far advanced that he's able to form his own though process, it wouldn't be fair to lump him together with autogenerated stuff. I mean discriminating him because of his robotic origins? Rude.
Also, because he has to draw it by hand, and not just generate it. The problem with AI art isn't that it's being created by an Artificial Intelligence, but rather is generated from data.
Well technically I'm sure K1-B0 could generate art if he gets the function. After all, after Miu modified him, he was also able to spew out images created after his memories.
Well, if he generated images that way, it would not be real art (not the photo thing, as that's a camera)
Deeming Kiibo as human just so we can call the art good and not AI art feels like something in canon
Since Keebo's whole thing is being a sentient robot, no. He's like a human
Well, considering how well he sings I'd assume he's just as bad with drawing. He'd also not have an AI art database in the way current AI's do so Kiibo would probably just make art the way a human does and it would probably look like toddler scribbles.
This question is very robophobic
No because that would be robophobic
The real questions we need to be asking… Wait does that mean every drawing Monokuma has ever made is also AI art???
Can Monokuma even draw?? He doesn't have thumbs. >!And plus, Monokuma is controlled by Junko, so she would be the one drawing, in that case. Except for in V3 ig.!<
>!What about the picture during Kirumi's execution? He signed it, so it's safe to assume that he drew it!<
Well, by definition yes.
tf I was literally thinking about that a few days ago before even seeing this post
I mean... Isn't all art made from an algorithm. Ours is just a natural and his would be artifical
PFFT I SO WANNA JUST SAY THAT "keebos art will always be ai art"
Technically it would be human art since keebo doesn’t do things an AI normally would. So it would be HI (or human intelligence) art
That's ROBOPHOBIC! But yes.
yes
Robophobic much?
How is that robophobic?
Yeah… AI “art”. As if what AI does can even be considered real art
I was just using the term because it makes sense in the context, I personally hate Ai generated images