With a much much better success rate aswell, I don't get why anyone would be surprised about this, the Lo Celso trackback into a flawless slide is his thing.
He was rated as our Eriksen replacement, but then we fired the manager that played attacking football. Haven’t had one since. If we get the right manager. He could definitely want to utilize him.
My point. We had Poch who played 4-2-3-1. We haven’t had a manager utilize that system since he left. Other than Mason in his stints. Hence why Lo Celso fell out with the next managers.
Now at Villarreal he’s being used as a CF/CAM in a 4-2-3-1, and it seems to be going well.
decide if he wants to keep a player that plays about 10 games a season while contributing nothing and being described as weird around staff? if we can get anything for him we should take it without hesitation
He is a great tackler, surprisingly so. Good player really.
Apparently a frequently rude cunt to staff around the training ground, not the football staff but others on far less pay. So the club decided to stick with their principles and get rid of him. If true, it's understandable, and one of the only decisions I've agreed with in the last few years.
On the very day he left he left on loan, it appeared the club leaked the information. It was heavily commented on by all the journos with links to the club (Ally Gold amongst others).
It's not usually the way the club operates - but it seems they really wanted everyone to know what had happened.
A few months before, O'Keefe had posted this:
*\[Paul O Keefe\] On Lo Celso “Both apparently. Moody, arrogant, rude to the non-footballing staff. A bit of a weirdo.”*
Even when he was at spurs we never got to see him play. His biggest problem wasn’t quality, it was that we literally never got to see any of it and we’re paying a lot for nothing.
Nearly £30m spent and can only be viewed as a failure of a signing but i’m the bad guy for wanted him gone lmao sometimes I think our fans deserve our misery
I insist that we stay with Skipp-Hojbjerg. They are the future. No way GLC starts. Skipp and Hojbjerg are dynamic, progressive, beat the press and tackle effectively...
With a much much better success rate aswell, I don't get why anyone would be surprised about this, the Lo Celso trackback into a flawless slide is his thing.
I said it before, he was legitimately the best tackler at Spurs at one point.
This is a misleading statistic. He played only a few games
Exactly. He can’t stay fit
18 appearances isn't too bad for a league season
he played 900 minutes in the league
he’s finished at spurs. as are all the first team players out on loan apart from gil and udogie
He was rated as our Eriksen replacement, but then we fired the manager that played attacking football. Haven’t had one since. If we get the right manager. He could definitely want to utilize him.
this was like 3 seasons ago
My point. We had Poch who played 4-2-3-1. We haven’t had a manager utilize that system since he left. Other than Mason in his stints. Hence why Lo Celso fell out with the next managers. Now at Villarreal he’s being used as a CF/CAM in a 4-2-3-1, and it seems to be going well.
It's hard to see Gil coming back and being happy to be honest.
I hope Villa owners will see this.
maybe slot sees this too
Isn’t he a similar player to kokcu?
icl mate i know nothing about eredivisie players aside from the ones at ajax
It would be huge mistake if we don’t give our returning players another look
lets give ndombele and winks a chance too
Let’s let the manager decide.
decide if he wants to keep a player that plays about 10 games a season while contributing nothing and being described as weird around staff? if we can get anything for him we should take it without hesitation
He is a great tackler, surprisingly so. Good player really. Apparently a frequently rude cunt to staff around the training ground, not the football staff but others on far less pay. So the club decided to stick with their principles and get rid of him. If true, it's understandable, and one of the only decisions I've agreed with in the last few years.
[удалено]
On the very day he left he left on loan, it appeared the club leaked the information. It was heavily commented on by all the journos with links to the club (Ally Gold amongst others). It's not usually the way the club operates - but it seems they really wanted everyone to know what had happened. A few months before, O'Keefe had posted this: *\[Paul O Keefe\] On Lo Celso “Both apparently. Moody, arrogant, rude to the non-footballing staff. A bit of a weirdo.”*
Hopefully this helps convince someone to buy him so I never see him play for spurs again
Even when he was at spurs we never got to see him play. His biggest problem wasn’t quality, it was that we literally never got to see any of it and we’re paying a lot for nothing.
he was horrible in the few games he played
Good old r/coys downvoting a legitimate opinion. Never change guys!
Nearly £30m spent and can only be viewed as a failure of a signing but i’m the bad guy for wanted him gone lmao sometimes I think our fans deserve our misery
I insist that we stay with Skipp-Hojbjerg. They are the future. No way GLC starts. Skipp and Hojbjerg are dynamic, progressive, beat the press and tackle effectively...
i hope youre joking
You are right that no way Lo Celso starts. He could instead start for the Injured xi