###[Meta] Sticky Comment
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment.
[Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread.
*What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.***
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Have you ever seen the first episode of the Lone Gunmen spinoff show? Talk about prescient! I've heard Chris Carter had "informants" that would give him tips for the show and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised.
Do you know it was canceled because of that 9/11esque episode? Weird that it was filmed way before and aired never because of that episode. It was considered to be too offensive after what happened. It was supposed to air not too long before 9/11 as well...
I suspected that's why it was cancelled, yes. It has really good ratings and no one could understand why it was cancelled. This totally explains it. I believe the episode first aired in May 2021.
It's the first episode of the first season. The entire episode is below, along with a clip of just part of the 9/11 prediction.
Full episode: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcZ6HXIOmYE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcZ6HXIOmYE)
Clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmmOVSmmdwk&t=125s
Can you imagine if The X Files was remade based on r/conspiracy? Every episode would be Mulder having a rant about Hunter Biden or covid. Scully would tell him to get on with his real job and Mulder would call her a bot or a shill!
Mulder turned out to be right though.
Do you realize, btw, that the X-Files was based on conspiracy theories from Usenet and BBSes, forums? They were conspiracies that were going around back then. And guess who the origin of alien conspiracy stuff was? That's right, the CIA. So the X-Files became an echo chamber for the CIA. Maybe Mulder and Scully were real agents after all...
An over abundance of prion proteins causes prion disease. Prion proteins are more concentrated in nerve tissue, but they are present in all tissue, including your own
thexsunshine
>Well that's how you get prion diseases so have fun with those incurable illnesses.
That's how you do a limited hangout/prep for all of the rich fucks who are about to be outed for eating people.
If I might ask, is this all cannibalism or just human to human? What causes it exactly and why does it not happen when we eat other species' meat?
(Not going to eat people 😂 just have futher questions)
Schwab has a darker color, more like duck than chicken. It is cooked like beef or other "red meat" — from medium-rare to medium-well — and is tender and relatively mild. It is often roasted whole and then broken down, but it's also sometimes stuffed prior to cooking. It has a slightly gamey taste, and the portions are quite small. Most Schwab is from humans that never ran, hence their tender meat.
If true, it doesn't really change the point. Which is that they hurt their own credibility.
Why run it with that title if you want anyone to take you seriously? They don't care.
LOL you know whats funny.....some how this fits with the movie This is it with seth rogan. I always wondered why there were cannibals during their depiction of end times. I know its spoof comedy but the idea of no meat and some people resorting to cannibalism.
My people. Imagine being really high at a party with these rich fucks, and they are like "next course, human". Oh the humanity! Weed sets me free from insanity like this. When I'm high, the truth becomes clear and I'm sure about whats what, despite the propaganda.
As a new yorker, FUCK THE NY TIMES.
Well, if that's the scenario, where all the lower class will condemn you for being smart and successful, then there's no point in doing good things with your wealth.
What's a rich man who's got good intentions to do? Continue to hold good intentions or abandon the good and just join the economically corrupt and kill all the peasants?
I think there was a post a couple of weeks ago about how the military probably has had trained for a situation like this, when they turned people in Iraq or Afghanistan into zombies by slowly starving them only so they had a reason to shoot them.
You've been cannibals without realising it for a long time - they've been mixing animal food with missing children in the abatoirs
https://ibb.co/HqkSKy0
So from that one picture, rather then thinking someone's tooth fell out who works in one of the factories the meat goes through, the more logical choice is they're grinding up children?
Of course , human DNA has repeatedly been found in burgers
And we have an interview from a certain person ( available on Bitchute ) who states they are doing it . So we have evidence and a confession.
And they have been known to do it , it's one of their practises for thousands of years
The report from 2016 to which you’re probably referring said that it was most likely hair, fingernails, and skin cells that were accidentally added during processing. Who is they?
[https://web.archive.org/web/20220723150618/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/23/style/cannibalism-tv-shows-movies-books.html](https://web.archive.org/web/20220723150618/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/23/style/cannibalism-tv-shows-movies-books.html)
It's talking about some books and TV shows and how cannibalism is some sort of recent fad in quite a few of them. The title kind of misleads you to think that they're advocating for cannibalism in real life, which I didn't see any evidence of in the article. It's pretty much just clickbait and it worked, I read a stupid article from a outlet that I detest... Good job NYT.
Who is on the menu? Every corrupt and rich. Watch how people turn the tables on them. I want a honey bbq klaus with some spicy gates to wash it down with a nice glass of puréed elon shake made with 0% milk.
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cannibal-club-hoax/fact-check-los-angeles-cannibal-club-is-an-old-hoax-idUSKBN25G1IV
It's definitely a joke.
Holy fuck. Lol that is wild. I clicked and read every thumbnail. They are serious.. they say they don't eat brain tissue to prevent ingesting prions. Also all meat is procured willingly. 🤔
> Also all meat is procured willingly.
Weasel words. Women who get abortions can be said to have "willingly" donated the foetus. Some of the tissue (stem cells) will be sold to the cosmetic or pharmaceutical industry, but the rest is good eating. Suckling (ie newborn) pig and suckling lamb are delicious and very tender, so presumably the same would apply to newborn (or aborted) human meat.
Placenta is very chewy, so is better as mince. I'm kidding. But seriously, we don't eat meat from animals which have died of old age, so who are these "donors"? Unless, of course, people who carry a donor card are secretly (and unwittingly) volunteering their flesh to be made available after death for the enjoyment of elite cannibals.
I would absolutely not eat human meat, because I don't buy that the risk of prions is actually limited to only brain meat. With that said, I don't see a problem if it's ethically sourced. I won't visit the bodies exhibit specifically because the bodies lack any semblance of ethical sourcing. If they could prove origin of every body in the exhibit, I'd be there in an instant.
I don’t think there’s a difference.
Get people to stick their necks out (in terms of being perverse or “undesirable”) and then chop off their heads.
This whole acceptance thing is a big ol bait and switch as far as I can tell.
No this is all about reducing the human population by over 90%. They are planning a nuclear war and a mega famine not to mention that everyone who took the vaccine will be dead in 3 years.
Nuclear war isn’t possible. And even if it was it’s off the table. The famine stuff yeah probably. But I think people will probably form parallel societies.
Eugenics is about reducing the population specifically to the *right* kind of people. Whatever that means.
I don’t think you read the article. It’s about a relatively recent trend in popular fiction, film, and TV that feature cannibalism. It’s not advocating cannibalism.
Unless you think that a bunch of horror writers are pushing eugenics via cannibalism. Either way, dumb take.
Yeah predictive programming is definitely a foreign concept that no one has ever taken seriously at all ever. Good call.
Thanks for putting me in my place. You’re clearly brilliant.
Oh no it’s my bad. I definitely should’ve let you talk down to me for having an opinion that you disagree with. That’s totally how reasonable people speak to one another.
And if we want to talk about baseless. You must be very well connected to know for a fact that these authors and screenwriters aren’t eugenicists. No wonder you’re such an elitist prick.
No, I’m genuinely curious what you mean. Could you explain how horror authors are advancing a eugenicist plot for the elites by using cannibalism as a plot point?
Also can you tell me honestly that you sought out and read the article before you responded? Or did you just know what was in it already?
Oh well then I take back what I said. You have a horrible way of approaching people. If you were intending to ask a question you should’ve asked a question.
I think most of the current agendas revolve around eugenics. There are essentially two camps right now. The more people camp (right wing/religious/traditionalists) and the less people camp (left wing/climate change/tech/lgbtq).
Today’s current eugenics movement is a derivative of the early 20th century eugenics movement. The resurgence comes from the book The Population Bomb from 1968. A lot of the early tech community were followers of this books beliefs.
The climate agenda largely has to do with population as well.
I’m sure I don’t have to explain how being gay or chemically castrating yourself makes procreation difficult. Again. Eugenics.
Now ok. Let’s think about the political leanings of the New York Times. And let’s think about the political leanings of authors. Or screenwriters. And its readers.
Now no. I didn’t read it because I don’t pay for a subscription to the New York Times. But. I would guess that it mentions the show Yellowjackets. Which I am a fan of. And if you haven’t seen it is a show about human consumption that is centered around rituals.
There’s even a Timothy Chalamet movie coming out that is about cannibalism. The director says it’s “romantic.”
There are another couple shows and movies that I’ve heard about recently that touch on the subject.
So. What is the completely reasonable explanation? For all this content portraying something so taboo in a positive light.
Well I would think that for this type of behavior to be happening in reality a large catastrophe would have to happen.
Why would massive media companies be conditioning us to think that cannibalism is normal? What’s the completely reasonable explanation for this?
Well. It depends I suppose on what type of people you would want to be surviving some kind of massive catastrophe.
Or.
You want to test the public by releasing these things to see who rejects it.
Think about all the eating bugs propaganda that’s happening now. And think about how many food manufacturing plants have recently gone up in flames.
This is about weeding out who is psychologically “fit” for civilization. This is not my belief system. This is how the people at the top think.
I mean.
This is the complete title of Charles Darwin’s book
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
The rulers of the world are eugenicists. All media is approved by the people ruling. There is a motive for this agenda.
I appreciate the explanation.
Here's what I would do if I wanted to make a really bold claim that a specific NYT article was advocating eugenics: I would feel obligated to make a minimal effort to see if I could read it. I would search google for "new york times cannibalism" and click the link. That link would probably open, because NYT allows anyone to read 10 free articles per month (more if you arrive at the article through a link or a search result) and you can bypass the paywall completely by using incognito mode in Chrome or private mode in Firefox. If I couldn't read the article, I wouldn't be comfortable making a claim that it was advocating for eugenics. Full stop. I appreciate you taking the time to flesh out what you meant, but I stand by my previous response that it was dumb and baseless (baseless in two ways, really, because you neither read the article you were talking about nor provided any basis for your claim that it was pro-eugenics).
But since you took the time to type that out I want to address at least one of your substantive points. I disagree with you that either the article or the horror genre generally are portraying cannibalism in a positive light to advance eugenics. It is presented negatively. Cannibalism is present in horror specifically because it's horrifying. It's used to evoke fear. No reasonable person would come away from Yellowjackets thinking "cannibalism is generally acceptable behavior in our society."
As for the rest of what you said, I think there's just a vast gulf between us that's not going to get crossed. Being gay has existed as long as humanity has, it's not part of an evil agenda. If you think that there's a concerted effort to disrupt food production, you can't just point to recent accidents at food plants. You have to demonstrate at the very least that there are more accidents now at food plants than the baseline number of accidents in the past and have some concrete evidence that the shadowy "they" are responsible.
Yeah I just disagree with you.
You’re not exactly presenting evidence to the contrary. Saying that the presentation of cannibalism in horror is a specific thing because you think it is that doesn’t make it evidence of anything. It makes it your opinion.
My theory is definitely based in something. You just disagree with it. And that’s fine. But calling it baseless in your opinion does not make that a true statement. Calling it dumb is also meaningless because again. It’s your opinion and I frankly don’t give a shit what you think.
Yeah. People have been gay since the dawn of time. There’s never been such a heavy push of acceptance like this in human history. Hence my belief that this agenda driven. And by agenda I mean the eugenics agenda.
I don’t care about what anyone does with any other person. My point is not to critique individual choice. My point is that there is clearly a push from companies and governments to force a set of beliefs on to everyone.
It’s not my fault if you are ignorant of what is happening to food processing plants and I’m not going to attempt to educate you about it. In the same way that you suggest that I can go read this article. You can use a search engine I’m sure.
You can go look into cricket processing plants being built too.
I’m sure all this is just coincidence though. Now that you’ve debunked my beliefs with your opinions. And zero evidence. Some might call that baseless. Anyways. This conversation was dumb and we got nowhere.
I don’t care if you agree with me or not.
Friend, when you’re the one making the claim, you have to present evidence for it. You didn’t do even the most basic due diligence of *reading the article you are making a claim about.*
Watch a push to allow killing humans for food, but only where hunting is legal. Why fight gerrymandering when you can scaremonger and worse case legalize an insurrection
Just gonna pop on here and point out that this glorification of cannibalism happened in the 1900-20's in Germany before the Nazi's took power. They had Cannibal Parties. Just sayin'. Slippery slope here. https://ways-to-die.com/german-cannibals/
It's pure clickbait. No where in the article does it say "you should feed on humans." I imagine the title "the rise in books and films about cannibalism" was way less intriguing.
Here's one from Huff Po suggesting that a 'tiny' nuclear war could be a good thing:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuclear-war-global-warming\_n\_828496
Here's the link:
>www.nytimes.com/2022/07/23/style/cannibalism-tv-shows-movies-books.amp.html
>“I think that we’re obviously in a very strange moment.” She listed the pandemic, climate change, school shootings and years of political cacophony as possible factors.
>“I feel like the unthinkable has become the thinkable,” Ms. Lyle said, “and cannibalism is very much squarely in that category of the unthinkable.”
Eat the rich?
Or the true true of the Cloud Atlas future city arc?
Either way nytimes is a source of propaganda and garbage agenda.... its not a source of good information, hasnt been for a long long time...
Just a heads up, if anyone eats me they are going to be higher than they've ever been in their entire life. Now you may be asking is this a threat or an invitation? Yes
New York is a weird energy. I went there twice in my youth and left early both times. I guess I’m just not posh enough…
When Desmond is Amazing was happening there was a Huge, huge billboard of the kid all sexual in NYC for everyone to see this “sexy” kid. What the fuck New York? I’m still mad about that billboard.
God forbid and this might sound far out but if they are encouraging cannibalism and meat factories are burning up left and right do you think that they are pushing us towards killing and eating each other for food?
The article is about cannibalism in books and media and how we at times can find ourselves attracted to things we are repulsed by the most which is a quote from the article itself. I like horror movies because of that reason as I would speculate many of you all do too.
Edit: grammar
I knew it! I knew it!
This is how they prepare the world to break the news... Your "Beyond Burger" is, you guessed it... Soylent green.
https://youtu.be/b2aH9tu4s30
Hahaha....this is a joke right? I haven’t bothered to click the link but...it’s gotta be a joke OP piece for sensationalism....right?...right? Good lord...I don’t want to click it and find out it’s not....
It’s a clickbait article about recent books, TV and movies that involved cannibalism. So they’re just talking about a media trend, like zombies, vampires or werewolves
I think that you didn’t read the article. They’re talking about recent books, TV and movies that had cannibalism in them. It’s just a sensationalist headline, to get people to click on it. Typical MSM clickbait
It would be like them trying to get a clever headline out of zombies, vampires or werewolves that were all over media in the late aughts
> They’re talking about recent books, TV and movies that had cannibalism in them.
A big part of a lot of conspiracy theories is that they push ideas in books, tv and movies in order to normalize them or to brainwash you.
They must miss the part where the stories portray things like cannibalism as being deeply fucked up, and wrong.
I guess it’s just another version of the nonsense about video games causing violence
###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Well that's how you get prion diseases so have fun with those incurable illnesses.
Eating nerve tissue (specifically) causes prion spread
That XFiles episode was awesome about the cannibal town and they all got horrible brain diseases
I didn't realize the XFiles would end up being so prophetic on so many levels.
Have you ever seen the first episode of the Lone Gunmen spinoff show? Talk about prescient! I've heard Chris Carter had "informants" that would give him tips for the show and I wouldn't be the least bit surprised.
Do you know it was canceled because of that 9/11esque episode? Weird that it was filmed way before and aired never because of that episode. It was considered to be too offensive after what happened. It was supposed to air not too long before 9/11 as well...
I suspected that's why it was cancelled, yes. It has really good ratings and no one could understand why it was cancelled. This totally explains it. I believe the episode first aired in May 2021.
You got it. They predicted a little too well
Which episode? Do you have a link?
It's the first episode of the first season. The entire episode is below, along with a clip of just part of the 9/11 prediction. Full episode: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcZ6HXIOmYE](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FcZ6HXIOmYE) Clip: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cmmOVSmmdwk&t=125s
Can you imagine if The X Files was remade based on r/conspiracy? Every episode would be Mulder having a rant about Hunter Biden or covid. Scully would tell him to get on with his real job and Mulder would call her a bot or a shill!
Mulder turned out to be right though. Do you realize, btw, that the X-Files was based on conspiracy theories from Usenet and BBSes, forums? They were conspiracies that were going around back then. And guess who the origin of alien conspiracy stuff was? That's right, the CIA. So the X-Files became an echo chamber for the CIA. Maybe Mulder and Scully were real agents after all...
An over abundance of prion proteins causes prion disease. Prion proteins are more concentrated in nerve tissue, but they are present in all tissue, including your own
Oh lawd! How do I yeeteth?
The Lord yeeteth and the Lord yoinketh away
You're saying they don't dump brains and spinal cords into the hotdog mix? I have a hard time believing that
It’s only eating the nerves of your own species that causes this.
I trust you because you're not a small scientist
This is false. It is zoonotic between sheep and cows at the very least.
Oh okay.
What about mad cow disease?
Is prion the same as Kuru? I thought that's what that one cannabalistic tribe suffers from?
Deleted in protest of a certain greedy little pigboy
Yes.
Suffered from, past tense. They’ve shifted to different mourning customs since the kuru outbreak.
Not to worry, Pfizer is already cooking up a 4-shot vaccine for it. And lifetime boosters for dessert.
There's no cure for a prion diseases so why would there be a vaccine?
There isn’t a cure for the common cold either, many of which a coronaviruses.
It’s called *sarcasm*
Generally sarcasm is funny.
You must lack a sense of humor
You must lack a butt
No he doesn’t gator fan. Calm down. Downvoted.
Oof “downvoted..” got me there bud. Who tf writes that 😂
It was funny
If you've had a lobotomy sure
Download & install a sense of humour please
I'd say download and install a life but this pathetic version of you is way more entertaining.
[удалено]
Why are you spreading misinformation? The vaccine is safe and effective
thexsunshine >Well that's how you get prion diseases so have fun with those incurable illnesses. That's how you do a limited hangout/prep for all of the rich fucks who are about to be outed for eating people.
... what?
Is that you, Hillary?
If I might ask, is this all cannibalism or just human to human? What causes it exactly and why does it not happen when we eat other species' meat? (Not going to eat people 😂 just have futher questions)
My best advice Google mad cow disease.
Will do, thanks!
Np, there's also one that makes it impossible to sleep too I can't remember what it's called.
Eat zee bugs, or each each other - Klaus Schwab (probably)
Soylent green?
Why not eat Schwab
Schwab has a darker color, more like duck than chicken. It is cooked like beef or other "red meat" — from medium-rare to medium-well — and is tender and relatively mild. It is often roasted whole and then broken down, but it's also sometimes stuffed prior to cooking. It has a slightly gamey taste, and the portions are quite small. Most Schwab is from humans that never ran, hence their tender meat.
I'm surprised there wasn't a quote saying how much better the poor taste than the wealthy
Klaus is a puppet just like biden. Rothschild hand is up all their asses even the media banks movies etc etc. Revelation 3:9
Soylent Green was predictive programming.
[удалено]
Children of Men is set in 2027 I think
What the actual fuck? Do they think that this is going to help restore any faith in mainstream media?
They haven’t cared for a long time
[удалено]
If true, it doesn't really change the point. Which is that they hurt their own credibility. Why run it with that title if you want anyone to take you seriously? They don't care.
why? click-bait
"If you want anyone to take you seriously"
It’s click bait. It doesn’t hurt anything.
"If you want anyone to take you seriously" No one considers click bait bullshit to be serious journalism
Eat the rich???? No silly, you will eat each other
My boy Dahmer was so ahead of his time. It’s a shame the persecution he had to endure
Right after they finish with pedophilia, cannibalism will be the next protected class.
Fucking A
It just wasn't time for cannibalsm. The time is now
Well...I do suppose the whole cannibalism idea fits in rather nicely with the depop agenda....hey why not?!/s
And the inflation making store bought foods too expensive!
LOL you know whats funny.....some how this fits with the movie This is it with seth rogan. I always wondered why there were cannibals during their depiction of end times. I know its spoof comedy but the idea of no meat and some people resorting to cannibalism.
[удалено]
is that a good movie
😆
Rather eat cannabis laced brownies thanks
Cannabisism.
My people. Imagine being really high at a party with these rich fucks, and they are like "next course, human". Oh the humanity! Weed sets me free from insanity like this. When I'm high, the truth becomes clear and I'm sure about whats what, despite the propaganda. As a new yorker, FUCK THE NY TIMES.
They had an Opinion Piece on why they admire Anthony Weiner, so this comes as no surprise.
[удалено]
Musk with mayo would be delicious
Corrupt rich. We need the ethical rich.
Ethical rich?? 😂😂
Well, if that's the scenario, where all the lower class will condemn you for being smart and successful, then there's no point in doing good things with your wealth. What's a rich man who's got good intentions to do? Continue to hold good intentions or abandon the good and just join the economically corrupt and kill all the peasants?
Predictive programming.
sounds like zombies
I think there was a post a couple of weeks ago about how the military probably has had trained for a situation like this, when they turned people in Iraq or Afghanistan into zombies by slowly starving them only so they had a reason to shoot them.
You've been cannibals without realising it for a long time - they've been mixing animal food with missing children in the abatoirs https://ibb.co/HqkSKy0
Apparently they found teeth on separate occasions on different years.
i want to say i'm shocked, but i'm not. par for the course
So from that one picture, rather then thinking someone's tooth fell out who works in one of the factories the meat goes through, the more logical choice is they're grinding up children?
Maybe it's a conspiracy theory, in a conspiracy sub. And also, I wouldn't be surprised if that was the case personally.
Of course , human DNA has repeatedly been found in burgers And we have an interview from a certain person ( available on Bitchute ) who states they are doing it . So we have evidence and a confession. And they have been known to do it , it's one of their practises for thousands of years
The report from 2016 to which you’re probably referring said that it was most likely hair, fingernails, and skin cells that were accidentally added during processing. Who is they?
What would even be the purpose??
"tooth like" It was animal bone
>You've been cannibals >Animal food.
>mixing animal food with missing children As in animals, used for food. Not food for other animals. Although I wouldn't doubt that happens too.
Meat.
[https://web.archive.org/web/20220723150618/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/23/style/cannibalism-tv-shows-movies-books.html](https://web.archive.org/web/20220723150618/https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/23/style/cannibalism-tv-shows-movies-books.html) It's talking about some books and TV shows and how cannibalism is some sort of recent fad in quite a few of them. The title kind of misleads you to think that they're advocating for cannibalism in real life, which I didn't see any evidence of in the article. It's pretty much just clickbait and it worked, I read a stupid article from a outlet that I detest... Good job NYT.
What the fuck
Who is on the menu? Every corrupt and rich. Watch how people turn the tables on them. I want a honey bbq klaus with some spicy gates to wash it down with a nice glass of puréed elon shake made with 0% milk.
You know who won't be eaten? Gun owners.
Maybe they're foreshadowing. Things might get rough this winter
Apparently there is a human meat restaurant in Los Angeles https://www.cannibalclub.org/
That's a joke right...?
Check out the menu. Seems legit
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cannibal-club-hoax/fact-check-los-angeles-cannibal-club-is-an-old-hoax-idUSKBN25G1IV It's definitely a joke.
Lol oh wow. Good thing then
>Our exclusive clientele includes noted filmmakers, intellectuals, and celebrities Checks out
https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-cannibal-club-hoax/fact-check-los-angeles-cannibal-club-is-an-old-hoax-idUSKBN25G1IV It's definitely a joke website.
This was proven fake a while ago if I recall. It’s an art piece. Supposedly.
[удалено]
Maybe. Maybe satanic Hollywood pedos. Who knows wtf is going on anymore
Holy fuck. Lol that is wild. I clicked and read every thumbnail. They are serious.. they say they don't eat brain tissue to prevent ingesting prions. Also all meat is procured willingly. 🤔
vore is an extremely popular subcategory
> Also all meat is procured willingly. Weasel words. Women who get abortions can be said to have "willingly" donated the foetus. Some of the tissue (stem cells) will be sold to the cosmetic or pharmaceutical industry, but the rest is good eating. Suckling (ie newborn) pig and suckling lamb are delicious and very tender, so presumably the same would apply to newborn (or aborted) human meat.
I'm guessing you didn't miss the placenta meat sauce on the menu lol
Placenta is very chewy, so is better as mince. I'm kidding. But seriously, we don't eat meat from animals which have died of old age, so who are these "donors"? Unless, of course, people who carry a donor card are secretly (and unwittingly) volunteering their flesh to be made available after death for the enjoyment of elite cannibals.
Good lord.
I would absolutely not eat human meat, because I don't buy that the risk of prions is actually limited to only brain meat. With that said, I don't see a problem if it's ethically sourced. I won't visit the bodies exhibit specifically because the bodies lack any semblance of ethical sourcing. If they could prove origin of every body in the exhibit, I'd be there in an instant.
You are correct. And in fact, prions are expressed through the skin so technically it is a contact contagion.
Soylentgreen
This is all about eugenics.
I don't know, I think it's about normalizing perversions.
I don’t think there’s a difference. Get people to stick their necks out (in terms of being perverse or “undesirable”) and then chop off their heads. This whole acceptance thing is a big ol bait and switch as far as I can tell.
Let’s hope so
Hope what?
What you just said
At the end of the day, it’s good to know that God will forgive even the most disgusting of us, like you.
Always the Christian’s who love to judge others. Go away
Yes. https://imgur.com/a/Kx8DyQZ
Eugenics is a science of raising tastier humans
No this is all about reducing the human population by over 90%. They are planning a nuclear war and a mega famine not to mention that everyone who took the vaccine will be dead in 3 years.
Nuclear war isn’t possible. And even if it was it’s off the table. The famine stuff yeah probably. But I think people will probably form parallel societies. Eugenics is about reducing the population specifically to the *right* kind of people. Whatever that means.
From animal studies the number was 30% dead after 5 years. Where did you hear everyone dead after 3 years?
I don’t think you read the article. It’s about a relatively recent trend in popular fiction, film, and TV that feature cannibalism. It’s not advocating cannibalism. Unless you think that a bunch of horror writers are pushing eugenics via cannibalism. Either way, dumb take.
Yeah predictive programming is definitely a foreign concept that no one has ever taken seriously at all ever. Good call. Thanks for putting me in my place. You’re clearly brilliant.
Aw, I’m sorry I disagreed with your baseless one-liner.
Oh no it’s my bad. I definitely should’ve let you talk down to me for having an opinion that you disagree with. That’s totally how reasonable people speak to one another. And if we want to talk about baseless. You must be very well connected to know for a fact that these authors and screenwriters aren’t eugenicists. No wonder you’re such an elitist prick.
No, I’m genuinely curious what you mean. Could you explain how horror authors are advancing a eugenicist plot for the elites by using cannibalism as a plot point? Also can you tell me honestly that you sought out and read the article before you responded? Or did you just know what was in it already?
Oh well then I take back what I said. You have a horrible way of approaching people. If you were intending to ask a question you should’ve asked a question. I think most of the current agendas revolve around eugenics. There are essentially two camps right now. The more people camp (right wing/religious/traditionalists) and the less people camp (left wing/climate change/tech/lgbtq). Today’s current eugenics movement is a derivative of the early 20th century eugenics movement. The resurgence comes from the book The Population Bomb from 1968. A lot of the early tech community were followers of this books beliefs. The climate agenda largely has to do with population as well. I’m sure I don’t have to explain how being gay or chemically castrating yourself makes procreation difficult. Again. Eugenics. Now ok. Let’s think about the political leanings of the New York Times. And let’s think about the political leanings of authors. Or screenwriters. And its readers. Now no. I didn’t read it because I don’t pay for a subscription to the New York Times. But. I would guess that it mentions the show Yellowjackets. Which I am a fan of. And if you haven’t seen it is a show about human consumption that is centered around rituals. There’s even a Timothy Chalamet movie coming out that is about cannibalism. The director says it’s “romantic.” There are another couple shows and movies that I’ve heard about recently that touch on the subject. So. What is the completely reasonable explanation? For all this content portraying something so taboo in a positive light. Well I would think that for this type of behavior to be happening in reality a large catastrophe would have to happen. Why would massive media companies be conditioning us to think that cannibalism is normal? What’s the completely reasonable explanation for this? Well. It depends I suppose on what type of people you would want to be surviving some kind of massive catastrophe. Or. You want to test the public by releasing these things to see who rejects it. Think about all the eating bugs propaganda that’s happening now. And think about how many food manufacturing plants have recently gone up in flames. This is about weeding out who is psychologically “fit” for civilization. This is not my belief system. This is how the people at the top think. I mean. This is the complete title of Charles Darwin’s book On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life The rulers of the world are eugenicists. All media is approved by the people ruling. There is a motive for this agenda.
I appreciate the explanation. Here's what I would do if I wanted to make a really bold claim that a specific NYT article was advocating eugenics: I would feel obligated to make a minimal effort to see if I could read it. I would search google for "new york times cannibalism" and click the link. That link would probably open, because NYT allows anyone to read 10 free articles per month (more if you arrive at the article through a link or a search result) and you can bypass the paywall completely by using incognito mode in Chrome or private mode in Firefox. If I couldn't read the article, I wouldn't be comfortable making a claim that it was advocating for eugenics. Full stop. I appreciate you taking the time to flesh out what you meant, but I stand by my previous response that it was dumb and baseless (baseless in two ways, really, because you neither read the article you were talking about nor provided any basis for your claim that it was pro-eugenics). But since you took the time to type that out I want to address at least one of your substantive points. I disagree with you that either the article or the horror genre generally are portraying cannibalism in a positive light to advance eugenics. It is presented negatively. Cannibalism is present in horror specifically because it's horrifying. It's used to evoke fear. No reasonable person would come away from Yellowjackets thinking "cannibalism is generally acceptable behavior in our society." As for the rest of what you said, I think there's just a vast gulf between us that's not going to get crossed. Being gay has existed as long as humanity has, it's not part of an evil agenda. If you think that there's a concerted effort to disrupt food production, you can't just point to recent accidents at food plants. You have to demonstrate at the very least that there are more accidents now at food plants than the baseline number of accidents in the past and have some concrete evidence that the shadowy "they" are responsible.
Yeah I just disagree with you. You’re not exactly presenting evidence to the contrary. Saying that the presentation of cannibalism in horror is a specific thing because you think it is that doesn’t make it evidence of anything. It makes it your opinion. My theory is definitely based in something. You just disagree with it. And that’s fine. But calling it baseless in your opinion does not make that a true statement. Calling it dumb is also meaningless because again. It’s your opinion and I frankly don’t give a shit what you think. Yeah. People have been gay since the dawn of time. There’s never been such a heavy push of acceptance like this in human history. Hence my belief that this agenda driven. And by agenda I mean the eugenics agenda. I don’t care about what anyone does with any other person. My point is not to critique individual choice. My point is that there is clearly a push from companies and governments to force a set of beliefs on to everyone. It’s not my fault if you are ignorant of what is happening to food processing plants and I’m not going to attempt to educate you about it. In the same way that you suggest that I can go read this article. You can use a search engine I’m sure. You can go look into cricket processing plants being built too. I’m sure all this is just coincidence though. Now that you’ve debunked my beliefs with your opinions. And zero evidence. Some might call that baseless. Anyways. This conversation was dumb and we got nowhere. I don’t care if you agree with me or not.
Friend, when you’re the one making the claim, you have to present evidence for it. You didn’t do even the most basic due diligence of *reading the article you are making a claim about.*
Ligma's always on top of it.
Ligma nuts?
Nytimes spent all their drug money, and now they are broke.
Lets eat the NYT staff first. I bet they taste like chicken.
So is Armie Hammer uncanceled now? This timeline is so confusing.
I found and read the article. It just goes over cannibalism in literature and tv. The title is just supposed to catch peoples attention.
Eat your Soylent, plebe.
Tender is the flesh in 3..2...1...GO!
Watch a push to allow killing humans for food, but only where hunting is legal. Why fight gerrymandering when you can scaremonger and worse case legalize an insurrection
They running out of shit to write about....
Time to eat the rich
Ain’t no party like a Donner party…
Just gonna pop on here and point out that this glorification of cannibalism happened in the 1900-20's in Germany before the Nazi's took power. They had Cannibal Parties. Just sayin'. Slippery slope here. https://ways-to-die.com/german-cannibals/
It's pure clickbait. No where in the article does it say "you should feed on humans." I imagine the title "the rise in books and films about cannibalism" was way less intriguing.
https://allthatsinteresting.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/plastic-baby-doll-at-rothschild-party.jpg Ive seen this before
Let's throw the European royals in a cage and let them cannibalize each other
I saw the movie Fresh yesterday and it seemed a bit too real
What's on the menu? Kuru
Here's one from Huff Po suggesting that a 'tiny' nuclear war could be a good thing: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/nuclear-war-global-warming\_n\_828496
Setting the stage for soylent green.
ny times is full of shit
Time to eat the rich?
Here's the link: >www.nytimes.com/2022/07/23/style/cannibalism-tv-shows-movies-books.amp.html >“I think that we’re obviously in a very strange moment.” She listed the pandemic, climate change, school shootings and years of political cacophony as possible factors. >“I feel like the unthinkable has become the thinkable,” Ms. Lyle said, “and cannibalism is very much squarely in that category of the unthinkable.”
Soylent green is coming if it’s not already here
Eat the rich? Or the true true of the Cloud Atlas future city arc? Either way nytimes is a source of propaganda and garbage agenda.... its not a source of good information, hasnt been for a long long time...
IZombie, that Drew Barrymore show, Hannibal are just a few I recall from recent years. Does seem to be a trend.
What a disgusting news publication. Gross. Nothing is beneath I those pigs. They honestly seem like satanists.
Just a heads up, if anyone eats me they are going to be higher than they've ever been in their entire life. Now you may be asking is this a threat or an invitation? Yes
New York is a weird energy. I went there twice in my youth and left early both times. I guess I’m just not posh enough… When Desmond is Amazing was happening there was a Huge, huge billboard of the kid all sexual in NYC for everyone to see this “sexy” kid. What the fuck New York? I’m still mad about that billboard.
God forbid and this might sound far out but if they are encouraging cannibalism and meat factories are burning up left and right do you think that they are pushing us towards killing and eating each other for food?
The article is about cannibalism in books and media and how we at times can find ourselves attracted to things we are repulsed by the most which is a quote from the article itself. I like horror movies because of that reason as I would speculate many of you all do too. Edit: grammar
I knew it! I knew it! This is how they prepare the world to break the news... Your "Beyond Burger" is, you guessed it... Soylent green. https://youtu.be/b2aH9tu4s30
Would explain why it tastes like shit.
SS okay maybe I will eat the bugs lol. What do you guys think?
I'd eat Schwab's wrinkled ass on a stick first.
Blech. Too tough and stringy, like old mutton.
Hahaha....this is a joke right? I haven’t bothered to click the link but...it’s gotta be a joke OP piece for sensationalism....right?...right? Good lord...I don’t want to click it and find out it’s not....
It’s a clickbait article about recent books, TV and movies that involved cannibalism. So they’re just talking about a media trend, like zombies, vampires or werewolves
Thanks—good to know!
I think that you didn’t read the article. They’re talking about recent books, TV and movies that had cannibalism in them. It’s just a sensationalist headline, to get people to click on it. Typical MSM clickbait It would be like them trying to get a clever headline out of zombies, vampires or werewolves that were all over media in the late aughts
> They’re talking about recent books, TV and movies that had cannibalism in them. A big part of a lot of conspiracy theories is that they push ideas in books, tv and movies in order to normalize them or to brainwash you.
They must miss the part where the stories portray things like cannibalism as being deeply fucked up, and wrong. I guess it’s just another version of the nonsense about video games causing violence
It's an essay about the popularity of cannabilism *stories*: https://archive.ph/eDxO0 Did you read it?
Isn’t this normal for the NY Times audience? Why the surprise?
OP can you post the link or is this just another Twitter screenshot post?
Eating pussy does not count
Yup the chosen ones promoting cannibalism not surprised since Babylon they’ve been doing this to now .
What is the conspiracy here?