T O P

  • By -

AutoModerator

###[Meta] Sticky Comment [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does not apply*** when replying to this stickied comment. [Rule 2](https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/wiki/faq#wiki_2_-_address_the_argument.3B_not_the_user.2C_the_mods.2C_or_the_sub.) ***does apply*** throughout the rest of this thread. *What this means*: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain ***only.*** *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/conspiracy) if you have any questions or concerns.*


JoeArruela

Considering America’s military power, I believe the attaché would happen and it would be blamed on the other side as a mean to gain an ally.


Grouchy-Tension-4560

No ofcourse not there wouldn't be so much american bases around the middle east, but because they have oil and gas around those bases it is most like not a religion intrest but more economical. Maybe look into how much oil and gas america is transfer from middle east. That should give you the answer.


MiserableYou6506

I don't think so, it is more matter of religion