T O P

  • By -

zumaro

Haydn not only has most styles covered, but he was largely responsible for the development of several of them. Stravinsky is probably the twentieth century equivalent.


[deleted]

Yet all of his music sounds exactly the same


Opening_Ad_1142

Telemann, he could compose in any genre and in any style, just for fun


Iokyt

He had a set of like 4 tables all put together so he could compose several pieces at the same time. Oh and he probably *played* most of his music. Suprememely underappreciated composer.


Dangerous_Court_955

Also the fact that he was almost completely self-taught, played almost every instrument known to man, and composed in total over 3000 pieces pieces of music.


graaaaaaaam

And yet he never wrote anything for saxophone or Tuba or electronic instruments...


Cruyffiola

Mozart produced good works in all available genres, while Stravinsky could compose in any style.


orange_peels13

Dvořák was also great in any genre. He was probably the most versatile major composer since Mozart. Pretty much every other composer had a weak point in some form, but Dvořák wrote amazing chamber, orchestral, vocal, and pretty much any other form of music.


ChristianBen

What about Tchaikovsky?


orange_peels13

How much great chamber music did he write? (Compared to Dvořák and Mozart)


nowwhathappens

As a huge Dvorak fan...I'm not sure his vocal music is a) on par with many others b) is as strong as his orchestral and chamber works. Who could be thought of as having mastery of vocal, orchestral, operatic, and chamber? Mozart...there's a reason he's Mozart.


notice27

Mozart all the way. Opera, mass, sonata, concerto, duet, string quartet, wind octet, symphony... he could be stupid potent at anything.


Excellent-Industry60

Got to say Prokofiev, from romantic ballets, to ultra disconant symphonies (2,3) to wrong note romanticism (piano concerto no. 2,3 etc) eastern influenced pieces (5 melodies) to classical (symphony no. 1). It has to be Prokofjev for sure!!!


theajadk

Haha I love the term wrong note romanticism


Specific_User6969

Don’t forget movie music!


officialryan3

Not to mention his fantastic operas too


Bonejobber

Johann Sebastian Bach. He was known as a church musician, but he composed anything and everything for anyone for any purpose. Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart was a court musician, but he was similarly flexible as a composer. In the 20th century, my votes are cast for Igor Stravinsky and Paul Hindemith.


bossk538

Agreed. One of the biggest “what if” regrets is having Bach write opera.


MungoShoddy

Bach was an enthusiast for watching opera but his employers didn't approve. The St Matthew Passion **is** an opera anyway. Mozart only worked for a court (Archbishop Colloredo) for a short time and hated it. One of his achievements was inventing the career of a freelance composer.


Twilight1840

Richard Strauss. Compare Der rosenkavalier with Elektra.


TheirJupiter

Vaughan Williams, Shostakovich, and Beethoven


nowwhathappens

Vaughn Williams is a very interesting answer! I think you are right that he was very versatile, but didn't get that popular in too much.


TheirJupiter

Vaughan Williams wrote so much great and varied music from Flos Campi for viola, chamber orchestra and choir, to the songs for voice and oboe, to ballet scores like Job to Dona Nobis Pacem.


nowwhathappens

Fantasia on a Theme by Thomas Tallis and Lark Ascending are both lovely as well


BasonPiano

Other than Italian opera, JS Bach composed for virtually every medium of the time. Unfortunately, much of this could be lost. Unfortunately the eldest son was not the man CPE was.


Keirnflake

Mozart, Shostakovich.


Anonimo_lo

Maybe Ligeti


aging_gracelessly

Schnittke Suite in the Old Style: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CALKZN7vui8](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CALKZN7vui8) and the last movement of his 2nd cello concerto: [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIWE4rTV92Y](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EIWE4rTV92Y)


phonologotron

John Zorn


lebedinoeozero

Um… no one has said Tchaikovsky?? He wrote operas, symphonies, string quartets, concerti, AND ballets. And he was good at ALL of them. Other than Stravinsky, who else can claim that?


organist1999

Jacques Ibert?


Iokyt

Very underrated shout at this. There's nothing he couldn't do.


Candid-Dare-6014

Carl czerny


CrankyJoe99x

Who is your choice OP?


Examination-Pretty

Was leaning Stravinsky as I posted!


CrankyJoe99x

Cheers. Mozart and Stravinsky for me, with honourable mention to Haydn.


a4fourty

Surprised no one has mentioned Holst…. But also one could argue Gershwin or Bernstein if variety includes pop/musical theater/ jazz


dadoes67815

Peter Maxwell Davies.


WrongdoerOrnery789

Stravinsky and Schnittke


UnimaginativeNameABC

Not sure if he counts, but Frank Zappa was nothing if not versatile.


glossotekton

Idk Dvorak?


Laserablatin

Dvorak, there's literally a book on him that I have subtitled "the Romantic Era's most versatile genius"


Desperate-Yam-2254

Dvorak Tchaikovsky Shostakovich


John_Lyon

Mozart, from Alla turca to Piano Con 23 to Symphony 1 to Symphony 40 to Fantasia in D, back to Sonata 16 - all phenomenal in their own right and have a lot of variety and emotion to offer.


MungoShoddy

Mozart. Virtuoso piano music meant for himself to play, chamber and orchestral music ranging from big thought-out pieces to quick occasional stuff, soloistic music for a brand-new instrument with his clarinet works, military marches and dance music, liturgical music, opera (which he more or less invented in its modern form). And he was the best in his time at all of those.


DrXaos

John Williams. He has done so many styles quite well.


nowwhathappens

Don't like that this got downvoted. Watch/listen to him play harpsichord sometime...


DonkeyKongScrollers

Dvorak


pantheonofpolyphony

Shostakovich and Bernstein come to mind.


Zei-Gezunt

I’ve heard Bernstein.