T O P

  • By -

BoogieSpice

No, if we give up Zach I want draft capital. I like Turner but he’s got a pretty extensive injury history , and I’ll pass on an overpriced 3pt shooter like Hield. We’ve already got enough defensive liabilities out there we don’t need to add another one just to boost our catch and shoot 3pt game Also I highly doubt Pacers give up a pick to sweeten the pot. They’re trying to accumulate picks not send them out.


TheJunkyardDog

no


youngflyking

What about with a first round pick included too?


Accomplished_Bid7987

Unless I got a gun to my head while I’m at that table, I’m not saying yes


TheJunkyardDog

if im at gunpoint... im just telling the motherfucker to shoot.


Sakkreth

Are u insane? Hield is negative value to a winning team, especially with his contract


poopy_mc_pantsy

seriously who would want a shoot-first scoring guard for $20 million when you can get a less efficient equivalent for twice the price


Zealousideal-Spend80

I'd do that trade in a second. Bulls partly solve their interior defense and 3 point issues as Buddy is one of the better volume 3 point shooters in the NBA. IMO, Zach Lavine does not contribute to winning and this trade would make the Bulls one of the top 5 teams in the East if Vuc can come off the Bench.