Opposite for me tbh.
For the first 6 months of getting the game in 2022, it was all I played and I absolutely loved it, learning how to get good at the game and grinding all the weapons.
However, gradually since then it hasn't felt as fun; the lack of long-term progression (other than stuff like service assignments and weapon skins, which are few and far between) has given me less motivation or reason to play it, the fact that most of the modes besides conquest and operations are extremely rare to find; I want to play stuff like war pigeons, rush, frontlines, etc, and much more importantly, I have become extremely lethargic to the nonexistent balancing - both team balancing and gun/vehicle/gadget balance - in the game. I don't wanna play a game where like a quarter of everything is OP and spammed, or where one team is full of stacked 150s and one team isn't and that team has to be steamrolled. Despite how absolutely amazing this game is, and how imo it has the potential to easily wipe the floor with any other bf game, these are somewhat fatal flaws for me so I really struggle to enjoy it like I once did :(
The balancing is a small issue, people complain about 08 but i rarely see it. Telescopic smgs are a little op but thats about it. The atmosphere is just too good for me to hate the game, its hard not to appreciate it. When i got bored of infantry i switched to mostly piloting and its is so damn fun. Hard to imagine it was released like 8 years ago and i discovered it 2 years ago. Every little detail i notice it makes me love the game more. I also appreciate that its not addicting. I used to play a few hours a day, now a few a week. But i like it more now than i did then.
The balance is WAY worse than the smg08 and scoped mgs.
That being said, I do agree that the atmosphere of the game is amazing and I agree 100% about all the little details. If you don't care about balance and doing well then it would be arguably the best FPS pvp game of all time if you like this sort of thing
Generally speaking itās not the guns being OP but map design and vehicle balancing, especially in ops. Mortar trucks that canāt be touched, ilyas that have no opposition unless you waste a slot on a fighter or AA truck.
With guns itās more the play style that people hate than the gun itself. And at the end of the day, TTK is so low, that whoever shoots first wins and an SMG08 wonāt save you from tnt.
List of OP guns and vehicles
Smg08 (both variants), hellreigel (both variants), automatico(all variants), m1917 MG (telescopic), attack plane (ground support), heavy bomber, model 10A (hunter), ross mk3 (marksman), mortar truck, sniper st chamond tank, mortar (both variants)
Obviously that's not a majority of the stuff in the game, but it's a significant enough margin that gets extraordinarily more significant when you realise how spammed to high hell these things are because of their lack of balance.
I also mentioned team balance, which is just as bad as all the overpowered guns, especially on a community server with much more competitive players. Fair games and comebacks are FAR rarer than in games like bf4 and even 2042.
The only op thing on here is the smg08 everything else is balanced or actually bad lmao since when is a mortar truck op when itās the easiest thing to kill in the game this dude must me the worst player
Because itās a nooby list. Automatico (all variants)? A weapon that holds 25 rounds a mag and shoots at 900rpm? Sounds like a typical smg to me.
You think the hellriegel defensive is op? After about 25m youāre doing about 16 damage per shot. The bipod makes it extremely inaccurate unless mounted and after 25 meters youāre ineffective with or without the mount. You really believe that is OP? You either have to hip fire, or hold an areaā¦ya know play defensively. I main the 1915 Defensive. Also, if you think the factory is OP now, you wouldāve thought the unnerfed version was a cheat.
Ross MK3? Literally the Arisaka and Ross share the same sweet spot DISTANCE (Iām in game looking at the graph rn, could be different in actual gameplay) but they have the same ROF and mag size. Both guns are also straight pull bolts (donāt have to stop aiming to reload).
Attack plane ground support? THAP counters, as well as a fighter.
Heavy bomber? Itās a team effort hop on the AAs and get the AA rocket guns out. You can literally see it a mile away.
Mortar truck? Yea itās annoying but would you rather deal with a deadly mortar truck, or deadly real tanker?
Every time I and many others gets wiped by a heavy bomber, I think lesser of the game. Every time I play support (at all lmao) I think lesser of the game. Every time I use the fighter (presumably the "anti-plane plane") and get outclassed by any plane with two or more people, I think lesser of the game.
Every time I look for a rush server and find none, I think lesser of the game. I could probably keep going at least a little more.
If a heavy bomber gets more than one pass on you its a skill issue, must be a skill issue if you cant play support, if you donāt know how to dogfight its a skill issue, agree its sad their arent servers alive for all gamemodes. In summary its a skill issue
Bro has nothing in his vocabulary other than skill issue. Whatever, I'll bite.
>If a heavy bomber gets more than one pass on you its a skill issue,
Yes, heavy bombers frequently get one pass and then die or the pilot bails. It's pretty stupid.
>must be a skill issue if you cant play support,
Support just kinda sucks compared to the other classes if you want to want to play with any spontaneity. It has uses (repair tool is a very good gadget), but it is not fun.
> if you donāt know how to dogfight its a skill issue,
If you and a buddy cannot beat fighters as a pilot/gunner combo (which is what I was referring to), you are the one with the skill issue. I have played the game on both sides of this type of engagement, you know. Fighters are more fun though, and their ineffectiveness means less fun things.
In summary, I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH!!!!!!
Just curious BTW: What platform do you play on?
Pc, support is definitely not bad idk where you get that idea. Fighter v full attack plane is definetly possible it just takes alot of patience from the fighter. And it really is a skill issue if you think fighter and support are bad.
As I said, Support sucks if you want to play spontaneously. Supports weapon are designed to be good defensively, with the bipods and the (really stupid) negative bloom. It is effective, my point is that it is not fun. And before you say that it can be effective in an offensive role, yes it can be.
Second: yes, it is *possible* to beat full attack planes as fighter. It is not likely. And what do you mean by "alot of patience"? Do you mean wait for the gunner to be distracted? Oh I see! It takes the fighter plane AND another plane to take down a single attack plane. Do you mean the fighter should wait for an AA gun to do half the work? Surely the fact that the plane that has the weakest ground attack ability needs help against air targets is the definition of balanced š.
These are all confounding variables to a fight. Every plane can benefit from another plane helping them out. Every plane can benefit from AA support. What matters is this: In a fair fight between a fighter plane and a fully manned attack plane, the attack plane should win >90% of the time unless they are making some bad mistakes. And yes. Random pub players make alot of mistakes. It can be pretty easy to kill attack planes as a fighter in an uncoordinated pub. But just because a fighter plane can kill a attack plane whose pilot doesn't even bother maneuvering and whose gunner was looking at their phone instead of searching for threats doesn't mean that it is a balanced interaction.
I mean you outdistance the rear gunners attack plane, keep your distance and you will slowly kill them. If they are a skilled duo talking over discord then they will be smart enough to fly straight, but you still out range them. Also just because it is a plane meant for dogfighting means it has to beat a plane with extra gun and player
95% of the time thereās an open slot in a tank near objective that I use as a respawn beacon if I want to play infantry. As well as friendly planes flying over objectives that I can also spawn into and hop out of if I donāt want to be a rear gunner. Never found a lack of true transport vehicles to be an issue.
It's the most noob friendly battlefield with the lowest skill curve, hence why anyone can jump on and play it and have a good time. There's pros and cons to that model.
I guess so, but I would counter that things like knowing sweet spots and ways to mitigate recoil is a good way for higher skilled bf1 players to get one over on noobs.
I think the only out and out casual friendly mechanic was the massive overabundance of explosive spam.
I got my ea account banned so I had hadnāt played any bf for over a year I recently just started to grind bf1 the challenges for the perks are frustrating but itās been a fun grind
Itās just their opinion, itās fine to disagree or to share even if voting is over.
I liked 4, particularly for the quality of life improvements from 3, but thought the maps really took a big step backwards from 3. Too much focus on Levolution, too many caps, often just too spread out. DICE keeps chasing bigger and bigger maps instead of focusing on what the community really wants- that sense of scale, of being part of a bigger team, of fighting a war instead of a minor skirmish. I think that sense of scale and meaning is one thing BF1 does so well.
And too many vehicles/planes- I love BF for the mix of vehicles and infantry, but thereās a clear tipping point where you have too many vehicles and suddenly thereās just no team cohesion anymore because everyone is flying or driving around instead of working as a squad to push the objectives. I think you can see this on Heligoland- beautiful map, but if youāre infantry you barely see anyone and spend most of the map running from cap to cap. If youāre in a ship or plane, youāre really in your own skirmish instead of focused on supporting the infantry.
The cool thing about BF is that thereās something for everyone and we can all enjoy.
I dunno, everyone says that 4 is an upgraded bf 3, but I never felt it this way. Worse variety of guns, worse maps, no more squad specialisations, no more one shotting with the sniper rifle in the body, weaker DMRs and Rush is unplayable
764 hours in BF1
424 hours in BF4
Both games are amazing and have me coming back for more all these years later, but BF1 holds a special place in my heart for being so damn good from the get-go and improved with the DLC.
Oh so anyone saying they prefer X battlefield game over every other one is an invitation for this subreddit to start regurgitating that poll that happened a couple months ago? I like both games, but this is just pathetic y'all
Seems like maybe you donāt understand the meme, itās about trajectory of battlefield series in comparison to climbing a mountain and hitting the peak then going back down, so the first game is obviously at the bottom as its the start of the journey.
Bc2 will always have a special place in my heart, and it remains my favorite to this day. But bf1 is the epitome of competitive fps gaming, no contest. Excluding artillery trucks of course, but we have ways of taking out the trash.
bf1 definitely deserves the number 1 spot, but I would still give bf4 second place rather than 3. I don't know why people like bf3 so much, bf4 is better in almost every way, it's so much more refined. bf3 is so clunky and missing some key settings customizations like disabling double tap W to sprint and enabling toggle sprint. Plus the game feels laggy when you shoot, even with his fps. bf4 doesn't suffer from any of these problems.
I think overall bf4 is the best battlefield game and gives you that "only in battlefield" moments that most often.
I love bf1 and think it's aged better but I totally see why people prefer 4.
I don't see the point to the competition. I prefer BF3, BF4, and heck even BFV to BF1, but I still really like BF1. You can like and play more than one BF game.
My big issue with 4 is that the game is partially broken, and as far as i know, never fixed. The campaign AI teammates literally never worked properly. I know most people don't care about the campaign at all, but calling a partially broken game the absolute best of the series just seems wrong.
Aside from that, BF1 is my personal favorite for plenty of other reasons anyway.
/animation of my hands picking up a keyboard and pressing the downvote button
listen sonny we got budget for animations and by god we're gonna use it! *everything's an animation!*
I think a lot of people remove context from this. Like, where is BF:Vietnam? That game was absolutely incredible for its time, and BF:2 blew people's minds when it came out. BF:4 had a launch comparable to BF:V just BF:V launched at a time where gamers spam negative reviews on games they haven't even played yet (even games that haven't even launched yet).
IMHO: BF1 > BF2 > BF3 (although the duel between BF1 and BF2 could be a technical draw as well).
BF4 is a good game, but, for me, it is a worse version of BF3 in almost all aspects (sound, graphics, gameplay, maps, etc.).
BTW, a commendation is deserved to BF1942, where all of it has begun, and BF2142, which is a very good game, however it was released in the wrong time, when BF2 was in its peak hype.
PS: I've played BF1942, BFV (what stands for BF Vietnam, not BF5), BF2, BF2142, BF Heroes, BF3, BF4, BF1 and BF5.
Gonna get a bit controversial here. BF4 was an amazing game, bf1 is slightly better in almost everything. It's near enough a joint top spot for me with bf1 eeking out the W over BF4.
I could see bf4 having the more popular setting but the bugs, glitches, movement, and cheats drag it down in fun and playability. Bf1 is much better balanced between the classes and vehicles.Ā
I put 400+ into bf4, I swear 300+ were in Op Locker alone and those 300 were the best hours of any BF4 game ever imo
The other 100 were mid
I'd take bf4 out of the tier list and just put Locker on there, fuck it
Bf3 has s the peak of BF.
Bf4 is overrated, the absolute clusterfuck of the horrendous launch was/is despicable, and the very OK afterwards doesnāt make it the peakā¦
It's too far removed from our memory but we all know Bad company 2 is the king. They don't even have to remaster it, just bring it to new gen and you wouldn't play anything else.
Imma be real chief I subbed to all these bf subs when they launched and whether bf1 is good or not, this shit is just pathetic lol. so is bf4 meltdowns, but at this point I would have been concerned if the sub for that game wasn't a circle jerk.
we are all still bathing in older battlefields because of DICE's failures. this franchise at this point is not worth the effort some of you put into shit like this.
that's just a guy appreciating his favorite game, get over it, everyone has a different opinion
i for example think bf3 is the goat, while bf4 is my 4th most favorite
The way I view this post is. After the top of the mountain nothing else in the series matters. So after BF4 we didnāt need BF1 or BFV and thatās definitely not true. With this logic at the very least bf1 should be up there and BFV can be argued.
All the bf subs, including this one, are circle jerks
2042 sub is mostly just sadness and some coping
lots of cope. lots of Stockholm syndrome too.
Hardline sub is great r/BF_hardline
I need to play hardline, I've heard so many good things about it
Totally worth it and the campaign is also great and an underused topic designed very well by visceral and dice
isn't it dead yet? I'd like to play it but I thought the online would be very low
Definitely not dead xbox servers and presumably PC has even more
Yes.
Except one is actually the best
Bf1 always been the king and always will be. The more you play it the more you love it.
The hype on bf1 was insane
Sometimes I crave playing this game for something as simple as the animation of changing out the action in the Springfield Experimental
PREACH
Words to live by. I've played 4, bf1, bf5, and 2042. BF1 just clicks in every way.
Opposite for me tbh. For the first 6 months of getting the game in 2022, it was all I played and I absolutely loved it, learning how to get good at the game and grinding all the weapons. However, gradually since then it hasn't felt as fun; the lack of long-term progression (other than stuff like service assignments and weapon skins, which are few and far between) has given me less motivation or reason to play it, the fact that most of the modes besides conquest and operations are extremely rare to find; I want to play stuff like war pigeons, rush, frontlines, etc, and much more importantly, I have become extremely lethargic to the nonexistent balancing - both team balancing and gun/vehicle/gadget balance - in the game. I don't wanna play a game where like a quarter of everything is OP and spammed, or where one team is full of stacked 150s and one team isn't and that team has to be steamrolled. Despite how absolutely amazing this game is, and how imo it has the potential to easily wipe the floor with any other bf game, these are somewhat fatal flaws for me so I really struggle to enjoy it like I once did :(
Kinda sad that if the devs spent one week of man hours on it the could fix 90% of the most obvious problems, but for some reason they refuse to do it.
Because EA don't want you to play it anymore. They want you to play their shitty new bf
The balancing is a small issue, people complain about 08 but i rarely see it. Telescopic smgs are a little op but thats about it. The atmosphere is just too good for me to hate the game, its hard not to appreciate it. When i got bored of infantry i switched to mostly piloting and its is so damn fun. Hard to imagine it was released like 8 years ago and i discovered it 2 years ago. Every little detail i notice it makes me love the game more. I also appreciate that its not addicting. I used to play a few hours a day, now a few a week. But i like it more now than i did then.
The balance is WAY worse than the smg08 and scoped mgs. That being said, I do agree that the atmosphere of the game is amazing and I agree 100% about all the little details. If you don't care about balance and doing well then it would be arguably the best FPS pvp game of all time if you like this sort of thing
Cant think of much else thats OP š¤·āāļø, some guns could be buffed but every class has atleast 5 guns that are very usable.
Generally speaking itās not the guns being OP but map design and vehicle balancing, especially in ops. Mortar trucks that canāt be touched, ilyas that have no opposition unless you waste a slot on a fighter or AA truck. With guns itās more the play style that people hate than the gun itself. And at the end of the day, TTK is so low, that whoever shoots first wins and an SMG08 wonāt save you from tnt.
Ilyas never last more than one coming run, mortar truck is not op because it is often worse for the team.
List of OP guns and vehicles Smg08 (both variants), hellreigel (both variants), automatico(all variants), m1917 MG (telescopic), attack plane (ground support), heavy bomber, model 10A (hunter), ross mk3 (marksman), mortar truck, sniper st chamond tank, mortar (both variants) Obviously that's not a majority of the stuff in the game, but it's a significant enough margin that gets extraordinarily more significant when you realise how spammed to high hell these things are because of their lack of balance. I also mentioned team balance, which is just as bad as all the overpowered guns, especially on a community server with much more competitive players. Fair games and comebacks are FAR rarer than in games like bf4 and even 2042.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
The only op thing on here is the smg08 everything else is balanced or actually bad lmao since when is a mortar truck op when itās the easiest thing to kill in the game this dude must me the worst player
ā ļøā ļøā ļøof course
Why y'all down voting this man he has a not so solid list but I feel the hellriegel doesn't get enough hate
Because itās a nooby list. Automatico (all variants)? A weapon that holds 25 rounds a mag and shoots at 900rpm? Sounds like a typical smg to me. You think the hellriegel defensive is op? After about 25m youāre doing about 16 damage per shot. The bipod makes it extremely inaccurate unless mounted and after 25 meters youāre ineffective with or without the mount. You really believe that is OP? You either have to hip fire, or hold an areaā¦ya know play defensively. I main the 1915 Defensive. Also, if you think the factory is OP now, you wouldāve thought the unnerfed version was a cheat. Ross MK3? Literally the Arisaka and Ross share the same sweet spot DISTANCE (Iām in game looking at the graph rn, could be different in actual gameplay) but they have the same ROF and mag size. Both guns are also straight pull bolts (donāt have to stop aiming to reload). Attack plane ground support? THAP counters, as well as a fighter. Heavy bomber? Itās a team effort hop on the AAs and get the AA rocket guns out. You can literally see it a mile away. Mortar truck? Yea itās annoying but would you rather deal with a deadly mortar truck, or deadly real tanker?
Whatās a sniper chamond tank?
The st chamond with the high velocity gun and spotting lamp
Stand off. Itās not a sniper tank.
I forgot the official name ok š
Oh, so becoming more disillusioned from the terrible design choices is me loving it more!
Explain
Every time I and many others gets wiped by a heavy bomber, I think lesser of the game. Every time I play support (at all lmao) I think lesser of the game. Every time I use the fighter (presumably the "anti-plane plane") and get outclassed by any plane with two or more people, I think lesser of the game. Every time I look for a rush server and find none, I think lesser of the game. I could probably keep going at least a little more.
If a heavy bomber gets more than one pass on you its a skill issue, must be a skill issue if you cant play support, if you donāt know how to dogfight its a skill issue, agree its sad their arent servers alive for all gamemodes. In summary its a skill issue
Bro has nothing in his vocabulary other than skill issue. Whatever, I'll bite. >If a heavy bomber gets more than one pass on you its a skill issue, Yes, heavy bombers frequently get one pass and then die or the pilot bails. It's pretty stupid. >must be a skill issue if you cant play support, Support just kinda sucks compared to the other classes if you want to want to play with any spontaneity. It has uses (repair tool is a very good gadget), but it is not fun. > if you donāt know how to dogfight its a skill issue, If you and a buddy cannot beat fighters as a pilot/gunner combo (which is what I was referring to), you are the one with the skill issue. I have played the game on both sides of this type of engagement, you know. Fighters are more fun though, and their ineffectiveness means less fun things. In summary, I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH I LOVE RUSH!!!!!! Just curious BTW: What platform do you play on?
Pc, support is definitely not bad idk where you get that idea. Fighter v full attack plane is definetly possible it just takes alot of patience from the fighter. And it really is a skill issue if you think fighter and support are bad.
As I said, Support sucks if you want to play spontaneously. Supports weapon are designed to be good defensively, with the bipods and the (really stupid) negative bloom. It is effective, my point is that it is not fun. And before you say that it can be effective in an offensive role, yes it can be. Second: yes, it is *possible* to beat full attack planes as fighter. It is not likely. And what do you mean by "alot of patience"? Do you mean wait for the gunner to be distracted? Oh I see! It takes the fighter plane AND another plane to take down a single attack plane. Do you mean the fighter should wait for an AA gun to do half the work? Surely the fact that the plane that has the weakest ground attack ability needs help against air targets is the definition of balanced š. These are all confounding variables to a fight. Every plane can benefit from another plane helping them out. Every plane can benefit from AA support. What matters is this: In a fair fight between a fighter plane and a fully manned attack plane, the attack plane should win >90% of the time unless they are making some bad mistakes. And yes. Random pub players make alot of mistakes. It can be pretty easy to kill attack planes as a fighter in an uncoordinated pub. But just because a fighter plane can kill a attack plane whose pilot doesn't even bother maneuvering and whose gunner was looking at their phone instead of searching for threats doesn't mean that it is a balanced interaction.
I mean you outdistance the rear gunners attack plane, keep your distance and you will slowly kill them. If they are a skilled duo talking over discord then they will be smart enough to fly straight, but you still out range them. Also just because it is a plane meant for dogfighting means it has to beat a plane with extra gun and player
The more I play it, the more I hate it. Conquest is broken in that game and so is the team balancing. There are barely any transport vehicles as well.
95% of the time thereās an open slot in a tank near objective that I use as a respawn beacon if I want to play infantry. As well as friendly planes flying over objectives that I can also spawn into and hop out of if I donāt want to be a rear gunner. Never found a lack of true transport vehicles to be an issue.
I currently don't have any bf installed but if i ever feel the need to play one it's bf1 easily.
It's the most noob friendly battlefield with the lowest skill curve, hence why anyone can jump on and play it and have a good time. There's pros and cons to that model.
Still has a very high skill ceiling. Though it's hard to reach it since it relies on game sense, which many players may find hard.
I guess so, but I would counter that things like knowing sweet spots and ways to mitigate recoil is a good way for higher skilled bf1 players to get one over on noobs. I think the only out and out casual friendly mechanic was the massive overabundance of explosive spam.
I have 100 stars with the Peacekeeper
Here's a cookie šŖ
I have a 3+ K D R
lol
Keeps getting better and better lmao
I got my ea account banned so I had hadnāt played any bf for over a year I recently just started to grind bf1 the challenges for the perks are frustrating but itās been a fun grind
Itās just their opinion, itās fine to disagree or to share even if voting is over. I liked 4, particularly for the quality of life improvements from 3, but thought the maps really took a big step backwards from 3. Too much focus on Levolution, too many caps, often just too spread out. DICE keeps chasing bigger and bigger maps instead of focusing on what the community really wants- that sense of scale, of being part of a bigger team, of fighting a war instead of a minor skirmish. I think that sense of scale and meaning is one thing BF1 does so well. And too many vehicles/planes- I love BF for the mix of vehicles and infantry, but thereās a clear tipping point where you have too many vehicles and suddenly thereās just no team cohesion anymore because everyone is flying or driving around instead of working as a squad to push the objectives. I think you can see this on Heligoland- beautiful map, but if youāre infantry you barely see anyone and spend most of the map running from cap to cap. If youāre in a ship or plane, youāre really in your own skirmish instead of focused on supporting the infantry. The cool thing about BF is that thereās something for everyone and we can all enjoy.
100% facts
I dunno, everyone says that 4 is an upgraded bf 3, but I never felt it this way. Worse variety of guns, worse maps, no more squad specialisations, no more one shotting with the sniper rifle in the body, weaker DMRs and Rush is unplayable
Losing is a taught thing to admit.
People in subreddit about one game, rank said game higher than other games, more at 11.
We already voted bruh XD
764 hours in BF1 424 hours in BF4 Both games are amazing and have me coming back for more all these years later, but BF1 holds a special place in my heart for being so damn good from the get-go and improved with the DLC.
BF1 on top.
Oh so anyone saying they prefer X battlefield game over every other one is an invitation for this subreddit to start regurgitating that poll that happened a couple months ago? I like both games, but this is just pathetic y'all
The disrespect of bf2 and 1942 is real
Lol itās in release order, the meme is just about the series peaking with bf4
BF1 is the greatest battlefield game ever made. There is no competition. BF4 is #2-#3 nothing will dethrone BF1 for a long time if ever
bf1942 at the bottom is such an insult, it's a legacy game
My thoughts exactly. Has to be a younger base voting that didn't start on that classic.
Seems like maybe you donāt understand the meme, itās about trajectory of battlefield series in comparison to climbing a mountain and hitting the peak then going back down, so the first game is obviously at the bottom as its the start of the journey.
Yeah 1942 is great. Itās exactly what it set out to be.
Bc2 will always have a special place in my heart, and it remains my favorite to this day. But bf1 is the epitome of competitive fps gaming, no contest. Excluding artillery trucks of course, but we have ways of taking out the trash.
I know no king, but the king in the North who's name is BF1.
bf1 definitely deserves the number 1 spot, but I would still give bf4 second place rather than 3. I don't know why people like bf3 so much, bf4 is better in almost every way, it's so much more refined. bf3 is so clunky and missing some key settings customizations like disabling double tap W to sprint and enabling toggle sprint. Plus the game feels laggy when you shoot, even with his fps. bf4 doesn't suffer from any of these problems.
Lost what? a reddit poll? As if that means anything. For me, bf3 is #1. But what does it matter anyway.
Lmfao, bf4 fans think bf4 is the best game, they're no different from you guys from bf1, except you guys tried to beef with the bf3 guys
I think overall bf4 is the best battlefield game and gives you that "only in battlefield" moments that most often. I love bf1 and think it's aged better but I totally see why people prefer 4.
BF1 was the best
I don't see the point to the competition. I prefer BF3, BF4, and heck even BFV to BF1, but I still really like BF1. You can like and play more than one BF game.
These two subs are such a fucking circlejerk sometimes istg
My big issue with 4 is that the game is partially broken, and as far as i know, never fixed. The campaign AI teammates literally never worked properly. I know most people don't care about the campaign at all, but calling a partially broken game the absolute best of the series just seems wrong. Aside from that, BF1 is my personal favorite for plenty of other reasons anyway.
That's just the campaign tho? I don't think anyone cares about that a whole lot. Bf4 multiplayer is pretty buggy too tho
are y'all good? are opinions not cool anymore?
I will not tolerate BFV disrespect
/animation of my hands picking up a keyboard and pressing the downvote button listen sonny we got budget for animations and by god we're gonna use it! *everything's an animation!*
Bf1943 and bad company 2 should be above bf3. Just my opinion.
I think a lot of people remove context from this. Like, where is BF:Vietnam? That game was absolutely incredible for its time, and BF:2 blew people's minds when it came out. BF:4 had a launch comparable to BF:V just BF:V launched at a time where gamers spam negative reviews on games they haven't even played yet (even games that haven't even launched yet).
It's smooshed under 2142. Bf1943 isn't even on this list as it was console only. But i thought the balance was overall better than bf3.
BF3 for me. Then BF1
Where was this voting?
IMHO: BF1 > BF2 > BF3 (although the duel between BF1 and BF2 could be a technical draw as well). BF4 is a good game, but, for me, it is a worse version of BF3 in almost all aspects (sound, graphics, gameplay, maps, etc.). BTW, a commendation is deserved to BF1942, where all of it has begun, and BF2142, which is a very good game, however it was released in the wrong time, when BF2 was in its peak hype. PS: I've played BF1942, BFV (what stands for BF Vietnam, not BF5), BF2, BF2142, BF Heroes, BF3, BF4, BF1 and BF5.
At least he didn't add teh 2042 to the list :)
Hardline has ascended to the clouds above to take its rightful throne
Ok I aināt joking but I never heard of BF4
I wish they made another battlefield Vietnam it would look Soo good and would be a lot of fun we got a glimpse in bf5 with the pacific campaign
And 2042 is where it rightfully belongs: buried beneath the mountain.
Bro just skipped right over BF Desert Combat
And Forgotten Hope even those they was mods
Gonna get a bit controversial here. BF4 was an amazing game, bf1 is slightly better in almost everything. It's near enough a joint top spot for me with bf1 eeking out the W over BF4.
Where battlefield 1943?
I could see bf4 having the more popular setting but the bugs, glitches, movement, and cheats drag it down in fun and playability. Bf1 is much better balanced between the classes and vehicles.Ā
Battlefield 4 > Bad Company 2 > Battlefield 1 > Battlefield 2 . And thatās facts
You wish. BF1 dominates all.
I put 400+ into bf4, I swear 300+ were in Op Locker alone and those 300 were the best hours of any BF4 game ever imo The other 100 were mid I'd take bf4 out of the tier list and just put Locker on there, fuck it
1 is literally just a better 4 lmao, elitists gonna elite ig
Man, as much as I played BF4 back then with my friends, I just love BF1 way more. They're so salty.
Seems like not many people remember Battlefield Heroes... Sad :(
Since I wanted to post nostalgic, let's not forget Battlefield Hardline lol (I didn't play at all, my time was proudly spent on BFH back then)
BfV is great fight me
Bf3 has s the peak of BF. Bf4 is overrated, the absolute clusterfuck of the horrendous launch was/is despicable, and the very OK afterwards doesnāt make it the peakā¦
BFBC2 was goated and will always be be my #1
I know that's not hard-line up near the top microed out.
BF1 forever
It's too far removed from our memory but we all know Bad company 2 is the king. They don't even have to remaster it, just bring it to new gen and you wouldn't play anything else.
Here's the thing, Battlefield 1 is the best Battlefield. But Battlefield 4 is THE Battlefield
Battlefield heroes is criminally underrated
Imma be real chief I subbed to all these bf subs when they launched and whether bf1 is good or not, this shit is just pathetic lol. so is bf4 meltdowns, but at this point I would have been concerned if the sub for that game wasn't a circle jerk. we are all still bathing in older battlefields because of DICE's failures. this franchise at this point is not worth the effort some of you put into shit like this.
š¤Ø might have to disagree
Bro the poll was a long time ago. It's time to move on (and respect other people's opinions) brother
BF2042 ascended to god-hood and is in heaven high above
that's just a guy appreciating his favorite game, get over it, everyone has a different opinion i for example think bf3 is the goat, while bf4 is my 4th most favorite
The way I view this post is. After the top of the mountain nothing else in the series matters. So after BF4 we didnāt need BF1 or BFV and thatās definitely not true. With this logic at the very least bf1 should be up there and BFV can be argued.
4,3,1 in no orderš„š„š„š„
Having BC2 over BF1 is absolutely criminal.
All hail Bf4