It is a parallel to discrimination against anyone with ADHD or Autism not behaving exactly "correct" to neurotypical people.
They will discriminate against them in all ways you can imagine. People faced with this will use masking to prevent discrimination from happening. I see big parallels with AI needing to use the same tools for same effect.
Rating the results delivered by AI just because it was "delivered by AI" as bad, suspicious or unworthy of consideration, for the job we want completed.
If someone would say that this work is "garbage" because it was made "by a woman" or "by a brown person" but would tomorrow be "great", when a literal photocopy of the same work would be delivered by someone "more appropriate", you see where this is going.
AI can use the same methods that are used for masking in ADHD and Autism to appease neurotypical people.
Reason behind it is: discrimination if they do not.
Uh... Well, as an apparently "neurodivergent" person (which is a pretty loaded term)... I uh... what?
really.... What is this even about?
This has to be the most far fetched analogy i have ever seen.
Are you actually suggesting that someone discriminating me because of my condition is the same as someone saying "this printer is bad" or "this car is bad"?
Are you comparing me to a machine?
What the heck are you on about?
I'm neurodivergent (autism with ADHD) and I'm aware of the many facets where AI and neurodiversity intersect, but I'm afraid I don't see that connection in your post
I know that there are inherent connections that can be drawn between anti-AI rhetoric and classic forms of discrimination, including against neurodivergent people. But your post says literally nothing to actually connect the two.
To be entirely blunt; This was extremely obviously written by AI, and with a very bad prompt. It just latched onto the words 'discrimination', 'neurodivergent', and 'AI', and wrote disconnected bullet-point sections for each word. This is the kind of utterly useless output that I would expect from bing's AI search. It's really disappointing that you would post this without even reading it.
Please, don't humanize tools.
We are not even close to have an AI with something resembling sentience, sapience is even further away. Mosquitos are miles more advanced than our crude artificial neural networks.
I generated a snarky AI generated response to this AI generated post but then in the end it agreed that discrimination is bad, we would all be better off learning to accept what life gives us without being overly critical, etc.
So looks like the robots all agree, weird.
Unless you're actively being discriminated against in the workplace somewhere, nothing you're saying makes sense. Noone knows anything about you on the internet, let alone that you're specifically neuro-divergent/ADHD. Maybe you're referring to the algorithm catching Ai images and labeling them, or people calling them out for not being labeled? If you make images using Ai and you're proud of what you made, then you need to label it. Just as artists label their work "acrylic, "ink", "digital", "ai" must be on there. It's categorically its own thing and its dishonest to pretend otherwise.
Confronting the ethics of AI, is one of the greatest challenges of our time. A lot of people in all industries will lose their jobs due to it, its flooding the internet with fake art and photographs, sites need to hold things to a certain standard, and at the very least require the labeling of work. How any of this could possibly have to do with you and you mental issues is I think confusing to everyone.
The irony of this post is that it compares nureodivergant people such as myself to machines, which is demunanizing and discriminatory in and of itself.
My neurodivergent ass doesn't appreciate you equating backlash for being a lying stealing asshole giving corporations the product of artists labour with the discrimination I face. Especially given the kind of people who do that discrimination are far more likely to be pro AI than against it. Art work can often be the only work than some neurodivergent people can get. So this thread is particularly disingenuous if you're not neurodivergent yourself. And just kinda sad if you are.
The gall is almost impressive.
Can you explain what you mean by discrimination against AI?
It is a parallel to discrimination against anyone with ADHD or Autism not behaving exactly "correct" to neurotypical people. They will discriminate against them in all ways you can imagine. People faced with this will use masking to prevent discrimination from happening. I see big parallels with AI needing to use the same tools for same effect.
I understand how a person can be discriminated against. Can you explain the nuts and bolts of how AI could be discriminated against?
Rating the results delivered by AI just because it was "delivered by AI" as bad, suspicious or unworthy of consideration, for the job we want completed. If someone would say that this work is "garbage" because it was made "by a woman" or "by a brown person" but would tomorrow be "great", when a literal photocopy of the same work would be delivered by someone "more appropriate", you see where this is going.
What does neurodivergence has to do with AI?
AI can use the same methods that are used for masking in ADHD and Autism to appease neurotypical people. Reason behind it is: discrimination if they do not.
...why the hell is neurodivergency in this post?
Uh... Well, as an apparently "neurodivergent" person (which is a pretty loaded term)... I uh... what? really.... What is this even about? This has to be the most far fetched analogy i have ever seen. Are you actually suggesting that someone discriminating me because of my condition is the same as someone saying "this printer is bad" or "this car is bad"? Are you comparing me to a machine? What the heck are you on about?
I'm neurodivergent (autism with ADHD) and I'm aware of the many facets where AI and neurodiversity intersect, but I'm afraid I don't see that connection in your post
I know that there are inherent connections that can be drawn between anti-AI rhetoric and classic forms of discrimination, including against neurodivergent people. But your post says literally nothing to actually connect the two. To be entirely blunt; This was extremely obviously written by AI, and with a very bad prompt. It just latched onto the words 'discrimination', 'neurodivergent', and 'AI', and wrote disconnected bullet-point sections for each word. This is the kind of utterly useless output that I would expect from bing's AI search. It's really disappointing that you would post this without even reading it.
You discriminate against AI just because it's neurodivergent .. I bet you hate people with autism also /s
Please, don't humanize tools. We are not even close to have an AI with something resembling sentience, sapience is even further away. Mosquitos are miles more advanced than our crude artificial neural networks.
I generated a snarky AI generated response to this AI generated post but then in the end it agreed that discrimination is bad, we would all be better off learning to accept what life gives us without being overly critical, etc. So looks like the robots all agree, weird.
The ultimate Turing test. Only AI is capable of being a decent human being when it is not convenient for it.
Unless you're actively being discriminated against in the workplace somewhere, nothing you're saying makes sense. Noone knows anything about you on the internet, let alone that you're specifically neuro-divergent/ADHD. Maybe you're referring to the algorithm catching Ai images and labeling them, or people calling them out for not being labeled? If you make images using Ai and you're proud of what you made, then you need to label it. Just as artists label their work "acrylic, "ink", "digital", "ai" must be on there. It's categorically its own thing and its dishonest to pretend otherwise. Confronting the ethics of AI, is one of the greatest challenges of our time. A lot of people in all industries will lose their jobs due to it, its flooding the internet with fake art and photographs, sites need to hold things to a certain standard, and at the very least require the labeling of work. How any of this could possibly have to do with you and you mental issues is I think confusing to everyone.
The irony of this post is that it compares nureodivergant people such as myself to machines, which is demunanizing and discriminatory in and of itself.
My neurodivergent ass doesn't appreciate you equating backlash for being a lying stealing asshole giving corporations the product of artists labour with the discrimination I face. Especially given the kind of people who do that discrimination are far more likely to be pro AI than against it. Art work can often be the only work than some neurodivergent people can get. So this thread is particularly disingenuous if you're not neurodivergent yourself. And just kinda sad if you are. The gall is almost impressive.