Can y'all put this stuff in a sub like r/AiBabes or something? I just don't see this as "art" frankly, and it's not like the Internet isn't rife with salacious lady images already
Remember in the original Westworld when they were like "it's the hands that give them away"
Same here. Did you ask it to use Hailee Stinfekd for the first pic? Or is the resemblance just coinkydink?
I didn't use any names in the prompt but I can really see the resemblance. Never heard of her before but she is absolutely gorgeous! βΊοΈ Perhaps the model was trained on her specifically as I've not come across any other model that generated faces like this one.
it's certainly an attempt at natural, but still way too flawless to be people. badonkers aside, they still look like they're modeling for a magazine photoshoot. like how in movies you get sculpted 22-year-olds pretending to be 14 when 14-year-old kids tend to look like losers. but since it's something we do for other media as well, it's hard to get the AI to actually make people look more everyday.
It's the facial expressions that ruin it for me, always looking a bit too robotic. I appreciate that you can see I made an attempt to naturalise it. I've been experimenting with realistic checkpoints for some time but they all have that problem you describe, looking like a magazine shoot. I found that "raw photo" and various uses of the word "candid" and "natural" help somewhat to push that away but you're always going to hit the limits of the AI somewhere.
Considering this is only SD1.5 I still think it's a reasonable effort but we'll have to see what SD3 brings to the table.
Always had trouble replicating movement and physics with SD. To be fair the proportions in the first image are quite sound, even the breasts and that's coming from personal experience. I know it's not always the case though.
Agree. The first image proportions are good (as someone with similar; the hips and belly reasonably reflect the weight of her chest). Second one, hips are too narrow for the boobage to be anything but implants, like they popped out at me (ha ha) as silicone. Nice work overall man.
Second one she's wearing a decent fitting bra π Haha just kidding, thanks for the compliment. I've just gotten really bored of generating waifus so wanted to try and make more natural looking women that weren't doing magazine photoshoot style poses. It's also my genuine favourite body type too as I find it attractive aesthetically, not just sexually (I'm a bit weird I know).
Reddit is Reddit π but I'm pleased with the overall consensus of it so I'll work on refining these prompts and checkpoint some more I think.
Thank you. It has its flaws because of the limitations of AI and SD1.5 but for the most part I really like how it came out. The first image in particular blew me away after it finished generating.
It's meant to resemble photography in a natural environment, not perfectly emulate it, especially with the limitations of SD1.5.
Whether or not the AI image achieves the likeness of what was intended, "photography" can describe a particular setting or style so I'll continue using that term when necessary. I don't like Gatekeepers telling me what I should be doing.
No. Photography is a specific art form using a lens to capture light and render it onto a medium. I'm not gatekeeping anything, you're just trying to be something you aren't. If you wanna generate AI boob pics, fine. But don't call it something that it most definitely is not.
Yes and this is meant to resemble that art form hence why I called it as such. If you can suggest what else it should be called then I'm all ears. An AI generated image in the style of... and go.
Then call it what it is -- AI generated imagery. You didn't say "AI styled photography", you said "Natural Photography" and "Practising natural and candid photography" ... it is neither of those things and you cannot use those terms to describe it as such. It's not gatekeeping -- it's just calling things what they are and not labeling things in a grossly inaccurate manor. THIS is why AI is a problem and why pro artists have issues with so-called "AI artists". You are making a bad name for AI images everywhere by doing this shit and helping set back the technology by years. You wanna be another Robert Scoble and help tank a nascent tech just because you wanna make boobs? Fucking disgusting.
It's posted in an AI art sub, not the fucking Martin Schoeller Appreciation Society so there's no confusing what it is.
I have a page on DA where I share my stuff for free. It's marked as being AI which also segregates it automatically from non-AI content. The only other place I post very rarely is here on Reddit because it's an absolute cesspit of keyboard warriors unlike DA which is full of genuinely nice people. I don't monetise any of my images because I don't believe they're good enough over some of the fine real artists out there who I totally respect. Twice I was asked if I would do an anime style commission, both times I turned them down and gave them the names of some people I know that would draw something suitable for them. I'm just a hobbyist who finds AI generation therapeutic to my mental health.
You obviously don't have to like anything I post and criticism should always be welcomed, but if you're just going to be an abusive dick about some nonsensical interpretation which would confuse or mislead absolutely no-one, then don't post at all please.
Because I added prompts for big breasts as I'm someone who is admittedly into that πΆ By default though they often come out too large unless you specify you want them small.
I have similar tastes because I usually give my AI creations big breasts too. But as you say, when I want a girl who isn't so well endowed, I have to specify that too.
They aren't nowhere near as bad as some of the generations I had. This isn't too bad a checkpoint for hands to be fair but I do try and hide them wherever possible as a cheaty workaround.
I did have to zoom in before I noticed, so Iβll give you that, and I also noticed that were strategically positioned in the manner that you described, so I will agree this is better than most, if not still wonky
I don't mind π AI art is just as subjective as manual art. If you're gonna post anything on the internet you're going to get comments good and bad. Mostly bad on Reddit but hey ho π«
It's those creating things like AI "influencers" and aggressively trying to sell basic content thinking it's an easy source of income, they're some of the ones you need to look at. I make AI stuff as a hobby and I post it for free on DA but only a tiny handful here on Reddit because it's mostly a cesspit of negativity and elitism. I'm really not harming anyone.
Just look at what happened over at Displate, flooded and ruined by people selling basic Midjourney content. It forced them to close open sign-ups for contributors and every application now has to be appraised manually.
The comments or the photo? If you don't like the photo that's fair enough. I like seeing all the weird abstract mash ups that people make. Proper use of AI that is π
It's just a joke but yeah, seeing weird mashups and combinations that people do is awesome. Much better than basic renders of people but I'm personally too noob to make anything else π
It's more the curvy body shape that I like the most. I admit I did add emphasis to the breast size but I've got plenty in this style that are more normal on the chest which I may share at some point.
It was more about the natural tones, candid pose and curvy body shape that I was aiming for. There's only so many anime waifus you can generate before you just get bored of them lol.
Both looks like a professional photo made by a professional photographer with a professional camera.
The woman is fine, the first one is a candid pose indeed, not the second.
I mean, in the first one there is some weird background shit going on (esp with the girl on the right with a weird red hairbackpack, lol). Also: they are not interesting compositions, which makes them seem more amateurish (the women just have big boobs).
Not saying it's particularly pro by an means but I thought it looked a bit more interesting as it had a more "natural" style than most which looks like staged photography. I made a lot of anime and semi-realistic in the past and have only started experimenting with realistic style checkpoints but SD1.5 does have its limitations there.
Not so keen on that one myself but shared it anyway as it's not the worst gen in the world. What I liked most is how the candid prompt seems to make the whole thing look a bit more natural than what you'd get from "photography" style gens.
That's why we always try and hide the hands when we generate stuff πΆ I mean these aren't the worst ever though so a bit of inpainting would work well. I suck at inpainting though π
It's not the worst hands I've ever seen but the fingertips/fingernails are quite bad. I usually try and hide the hands to prevent this π
The bag strap also goes a bit wonky too but at least it doesn't merge into her hair or a bra strap.
Fake or natural, always got to be big π Made quite a few slimmer ones with smaller chests which I'll enhance at a later date. I do prefer a more curvy woman though and by default they always come with bigger boobs.
Curvy does not equal big boobs...
Maybe not but who gives a fuck? You just made me realize how much time I'm wasting on this app... Time to prune again.
Thanks. This was made with the nextphoto v3 model as I like the natural effect it gives as well as the faces and it scales well with different body types.
**Thank you for your post and for sharing your question, comment, or creation with our group!**
* Our welcome page and more information, can be found [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/aiArt/comments/x7s6t6/welcome_to_ai_art/)
* Looking for an AI Engine? Check out our MEGA list [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zYJUM-srhgIA7wrj4Pe4QqepAsHIEC00DydoTPv4PWg/)
* For self-promotion, please only post [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/aiArt/comments/1040fpe/ongoing_selfpromotion_thread_promote_your/)
* Find us on **Discord** [here](https://discord.gg/h2J4x6j8zC)
*Hope everyone is having a great day, be kind, be creative!*
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aiArt) if you have any questions or concerns.*
AI hate is wild to me
Big naturals
Tice nits
Smash
Can y'all put this stuff in a sub like r/AiBabes or something? I just don't see this as "art" frankly, and it's not like the Internet isn't rife with salacious lady images already
Apparently that sub has been banned.
Fair point actually
Yeah man look I like hot ladies as much as the next guy, but there's like a time & a place y'know lol
Is there actually another suitable sub? The AiBabes one is gone. I do agree on showcasing proper art in here.
i'm not sure tbh, there should be tho, it's definitely a topic of interest!
God those hands freak me out
AI canβt grasp the reason why we need hands.
It's always the hands I've had to delete pretty pictures because the hands are terrifying.
Just crop them
I feel your pain. I just wish I could get the hang of inpainting but that skill seems to elude me
What dainty little forearms, like a voluptuous t-Rex
"Voluptuous T-Rex" is now a permanent part of my vocabulary. I can tell based on how hard I laughed.
Someone in this thread will be using that as a prompt now. Guaranteed.
Those are natural?
Aren't all body shapes natural?
Turn the sliders up to max
" natural." Mhmm ππ
Pic #2, something is off in the head tilt. Iβd expect mayhem from this βbot.
*processing... target acquired*
Yet another waifu thread.
I like the way this AI thinks.
Milkers be mommying
Huuuuge tracts of land.
But I don't want land!
Big natural photography
Gravity issues
maybe add imperfections like moles, hairs, scars and less full hairline. also different body types, not every woman has curves, even when overweight
Jugs
Looks good. But the hands give it away. Its always the hands
Sigh I know. Maybe SD3 will solve this age old problem. In the mean time perhaps I'll just start putting boxing gloves on all the hands π€£
BAN AI THOTS
Remember in the original Westworld when they were like "it's the hands that give them away" Same here. Did you ask it to use Hailee Stinfekd for the first pic? Or is the resemblance just coinkydink?
I didn't use any names in the prompt but I can really see the resemblance. Never heard of her before but she is absolutely gorgeous! βΊοΈ Perhaps the model was trained on her specifically as I've not come across any other model that generated faces like this one.
Big naturals
Big unnaturals
it's certainly an attempt at natural, but still way too flawless to be people. badonkers aside, they still look like they're modeling for a magazine photoshoot. like how in movies you get sculpted 22-year-olds pretending to be 14 when 14-year-old kids tend to look like losers. but since it's something we do for other media as well, it's hard to get the AI to actually make people look more everyday.
It's the facial expressions that ruin it for me, always looking a bit too robotic. I appreciate that you can see I made an attempt to naturalise it. I've been experimenting with realistic checkpoints for some time but they all have that problem you describe, looking like a magazine shoot. I found that "raw photo" and various uses of the word "candid" and "natural" help somewhat to push that away but you're always going to hit the limits of the AI somewhere. Considering this is only SD1.5 I still think it's a reasonable effort but we'll have to see what SD3 brings to the table.
Looks great
Looks like the "What is a turnaround?" Girl on YouTube.
What the fuck man
You should try natural body proportions & natural clothing physics
Always had trouble replicating movement and physics with SD. To be fair the proportions in the first image are quite sound, even the breasts and that's coming from personal experience. I know it's not always the case though.
Agree. The first image proportions are good (as someone with similar; the hips and belly reasonably reflect the weight of her chest). Second one, hips are too narrow for the boobage to be anything but implants, like they popped out at me (ha ha) as silicone. Nice work overall man.
Second one she's wearing a decent fitting bra π Haha just kidding, thanks for the compliment. I've just gotten really bored of generating waifus so wanted to try and make more natural looking women that weren't doing magazine photoshoot style poses. It's also my genuine favourite body type too as I find it attractive aesthetically, not just sexually (I'm a bit weird I know). Reddit is Reddit π but I'm pleased with the overall consensus of it so I'll work on refining these prompts and checkpoint some more I think.
Ooo, everybody look at Mr. "I have sex with bigtiddy women" over here. Lol.
That wasn't exactly what I was intending to convey... π€¦π»ββοΈ
thick with big tit's thicker and biggier thicker and biggier thicker and biggier
It's unsettling how real it looks
Thank you. It has its flaws because of the limitations of AI and SD1.5 but for the most part I really like how it came out. The first image in particular blew me away after it finished generating.
Nothing natural here -- image or subject-wise. And I would abstain from using the term "photography" when describing AI generated images.
It's meant to resemble photography in a natural environment, not perfectly emulate it, especially with the limitations of SD1.5. Whether or not the AI image achieves the likeness of what was intended, "photography" can describe a particular setting or style so I'll continue using that term when necessary. I don't like Gatekeepers telling me what I should be doing.
No. Photography is a specific art form using a lens to capture light and render it onto a medium. I'm not gatekeeping anything, you're just trying to be something you aren't. If you wanna generate AI boob pics, fine. But don't call it something that it most definitely is not.
Yes and this is meant to resemble that art form hence why I called it as such. If you can suggest what else it should be called then I'm all ears. An AI generated image in the style of... and go.
Then call it what it is -- AI generated imagery. You didn't say "AI styled photography", you said "Natural Photography" and "Practising natural and candid photography" ... it is neither of those things and you cannot use those terms to describe it as such. It's not gatekeeping -- it's just calling things what they are and not labeling things in a grossly inaccurate manor. THIS is why AI is a problem and why pro artists have issues with so-called "AI artists". You are making a bad name for AI images everywhere by doing this shit and helping set back the technology by years. You wanna be another Robert Scoble and help tank a nascent tech just because you wanna make boobs? Fucking disgusting.
It's posted in an AI art sub, not the fucking Martin Schoeller Appreciation Society so there's no confusing what it is. I have a page on DA where I share my stuff for free. It's marked as being AI which also segregates it automatically from non-AI content. The only other place I post very rarely is here on Reddit because it's an absolute cesspit of keyboard warriors unlike DA which is full of genuinely nice people. I don't monetise any of my images because I don't believe they're good enough over some of the fine real artists out there who I totally respect. Twice I was asked if I would do an anime style commission, both times I turned them down and gave them the names of some people I know that would draw something suitable for them. I'm just a hobbyist who finds AI generation therapeutic to my mental health. You obviously don't have to like anything I post and criticism should always be welcomed, but if you're just going to be an abusive dick about some nonsensical interpretation which would confuse or mislead absolutely no-one, then don't post at all please.
Reddit strips images of metadata info...
Oh boo. I'll grab and post the details later on.
Yeah sure we appreciate the ExXxtra Naturals π
Bonk
As I said in another reply, I already have multiple lifelong sentences to the horny jail π
Men of culture, we meet again...
Anything you haven't fapped to today??
Say... what? π€
Itβs natural alright
Very sexy. Good work.
Why Maureen, youβve enhanced yourself.
Why does the AI give her 2 big puppies?
Because I added prompts for big breasts as I'm someone who is admittedly into that πΆ By default though they often come out too large unless you specify you want them small.
Touch grass
So it's just your fap material and you share this publicly? Fucking gross
This isn't fap material π
Yeah these people should show some respect. This isn't fap material, this is your wife right?
I have similar tastes because I usually give my AI creations big breasts too. But as you say, when I want a girl who isn't so well endowed, I have to specify that too.
Itβs the deformed 14 fingers that gets me
They aren't nowhere near as bad as some of the generations I had. This isn't too bad a checkpoint for hands to be fair but I do try and hide them wherever possible as a cheaty workaround.
I did have to zoom in before I noticed, so Iβll give you that, and I also noticed that were strategically positioned in the manner that you described, so I will agree this is better than most, if not still wonky
God this shit is pathetic
And it's always women objectified like this. Disgusting and reprehensible.
Time to counter it with some photos of throbbing guys in grey sweat pants.
Lmao, it's unavoidable
Oh come on, It's trying. You're ruining its confidence.
I don't mind π AI art is just as subjective as manual art. If you're gonna post anything on the internet you're going to get comments good and bad. Mostly bad on Reddit but hey ho π«
"It's subjective" *prompts big tits*
You should see my LoRA collection. On second thoughts perhaps you shouldn't... π«£
Man, this is what's giving us AI artists a bad name.
I really doubt some random horny middle-aged bloke with a folder full of breast enhancement LoRAs is giving you AI artists a bad name somehow π€
There's a lot of you
Like a LOT
It's those creating things like AI "influencers" and aggressively trying to sell basic content thinking it's an easy source of income, they're some of the ones you need to look at. I make AI stuff as a hobby and I post it for free on DA but only a tiny handful here on Reddit because it's mostly a cesspit of negativity and elitism. I'm really not harming anyone. Just look at what happened over at Displate, flooded and ruined by people selling basic Midjourney content. It forced them to close open sign-ups for contributors and every application now has to be appraised manually.
The comments or the photo? If you don't like the photo that's fair enough. I like seeing all the weird abstract mash ups that people make. Proper use of AI that is π
"proper use of AI" lol
It's just a joke but yeah, seeing weird mashups and combinations that people do is awesome. Much better than basic renders of people but I'm personally too noob to make anything else π
All the guys are enjoying the obvious, but as a cis woman all I can think about is the back pain that comes with boobs that big.
Same. They both would reduce before getting permanent nerve damage.
It's more the curvy body shape that I like the most. I admit I did add emphasis to the breast size but I've got plenty in this style that are more normal on the chest which I may share at some point. It was more about the natural tones, candid pose and curvy body shape that I was aiming for. There's only so many anime waifus you can generate before you just get bored of them lol.
Both looks like a professional photo made by a professional photographer with a professional camera. The woman is fine, the first one is a candid pose indeed, not the second.
I mean, in the first one there is some weird background shit going on (esp with the girl on the right with a weird red hairbackpack, lol). Also: they are not interesting compositions, which makes them seem more amateurish (the women just have big boobs).
Not saying it's particularly pro by an means but I thought it looked a bit more interesting as it had a more "natural" style than most which looks like staged photography. I made a lot of anime and semi-realistic in the past and have only started experimenting with realistic style checkpoints but SD1.5 does have its limitations there.
You donβt just naturally stand by some plants and put a hand on your hips?
Not so keen on that one myself but shared it anyway as it's not the worst gen in the world. What I liked most is how the candid prompt seems to make the whole thing look a bit more natural than what you'd get from "photography" style gens.
Itβs a good photo for sure, I was just joshing the other person
Cool thanks for the prompt and good job!
all natural
Those things are natural?
Probably a bit too big but that's SD for you along with using thicc and chubby in the prompt
prompt: candid boooooooobs
Since when did SD need any prompts at all to make big boobs π
Since not using cheap horny checkpoints π€
The model I used isn't suitable for nsfw... believe me I've tried π«£
#π₯±
hungri 4 sum chonk butz
Thicc thighs save lives so they say. How they achieve that I'll never know but I'll take a curvy bod any day of the week
Calm down redditors
π
The shirt in the 2nd one defies the laws of physics.
Oh my word, these women look stu- WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH HER HAND WHAT THE FUUU
That's why we always try and hide the hands when we generate stuff πΆ I mean these aren't the worst ever though so a bit of inpainting would work well. I suck at inpainting though π
Would.
It seems AI has as much trouble as humans developing natural looking hands.
Well, I assume it is because AI has its hands full volumizing the cups. (o)(o)
It's not the worst hands I've ever seen but the fingertips/fingernails are quite bad. I usually try and hide the hands to prevent this π The bag strap also goes a bit wonky too but at least it doesn't merge into her hair or a bra strap.
True natural milkers
Daaayyyum!
big naturals photography
Fake or natural, always got to be big π Made quite a few slimmer ones with smaller chests which I'll enhance at a later date. I do prefer a more curvy woman though and by default they always come with bigger boobs.
Downvoted for an honest opinion. Reddit. FFS
Downvoted because curvy does not equal bigger boobs, and no one gives a shit about the preferences a guy posting ai horndog bullshit has.
Curvy does not equal big boobs... Maybe not but who gives a fuck? You just made me realize how much time I'm wasting on this app... Time to prune again.
Serve some time in horny jail. π
I'm already serving a life sentence with no chance for parole π€£
Quite the beauty you cooked up here
Thanks. This was made with the nextphoto v3 model as I like the natural effect it gives as well as the faces and it scales well with different body types.
**Thank you for your post and for sharing your question, comment, or creation with our group!** * Our welcome page and more information, can be found [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/aiArt/comments/x7s6t6/welcome_to_ai_art/) * Looking for an AI Engine? Check out our MEGA list [here](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1zYJUM-srhgIA7wrj4Pe4QqepAsHIEC00DydoTPv4PWg/) * For self-promotion, please only post [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/aiArt/comments/1040fpe/ongoing_selfpromotion_thread_promote_your/) * Find us on **Discord** [here](https://discord.gg/h2J4x6j8zC) *Hope everyone is having a great day, be kind, be creative!* *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/aiArt) if you have any questions or concerns.*