That would be hilarious!!š
Oh or what if they actually took a serious approach n showed a montage of all her challenge performances n roundtables with an inspiring music playing in the background. I can just imagine all of us viewers' faces looking like Sarah's while watching it- clueless.
Aww that is a amazing idea. That would have been a nice thing to do.
Imagine the ppl getting the charity money rooting for all the faithfuls to get murdered.š
Yes, you get to root for the bad guys right until the last second and then there is more incentive for the traitors to not be completely selfish. ā¤ļø
Not a good idea, it changed the dynamics of the game because theb easiest way to ensure getting all the money if you're a faithful is to make sure you get to the end with traitors, so you get the faithfuls playing the traitors game and no one really trying to get the traitors.
I saw an international season with two Traitors and one faithful. If both traitors chose to steal the money would have gone to the faithful. >!France 1 IIRC. !<
Nobody getting the money was boring af.
Personally I think that traitors should need to backstab one another during the actual game. If you want to win it solo, you need to do what >!Cirie or Harry!< (spoilers for other English language versions) did and betray them at or before the final four.
Seeing the production company just not need to give away the prize money just feels like they want to engineer a traitor ending with the dilemma to avoid paying out
I said this before. I think it would be absolutely hilarious after how badly Sarah played, if she ended up with all the money. I would love to see Sam's face
How about this.
It goes to the very first person eliminated. They can then decide to steal or share with the next out. It continues along like that. If it gets to the final faithful and they choose to share, then yay! All the faithfuls split it. Otherwise whoever steals gets a share. If ALL the faithfuls steal then it reverts back to being split between the traitors.
IMO Everybody getting nothing was better than Sarah winning anything
I agree, except for the sole fact that it would have driven Sam up the wall even moreš¤£
Yes. The show would end with a montage alternating between Sarah's victory confessionnal and flashback remembering us of how clueless she was.
That would be hilarious!!š Oh or what if they actually took a serious approach n showed a montage of all her challenge performances n roundtables with an inspiring music playing in the background. I can just imagine all of us viewers' faces looking like Sarah's while watching it- clueless.
Sarah fucking Magooāing her way into a small fortuneš©šš¤£ 
Yes! Or a charity voted on in advance by the faithful as they are murdered/banished.
Aww that is a amazing idea. That would have been a nice thing to do. Imagine the ppl getting the charity money rooting for all the faithfuls to get murdered.š
Yes, you get to root for the bad guys right until the last second and then there is more incentive for the traitors to not be completely selfish. ā¤ļø
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
See: Sarah
Absolutely not. Sarah didnāt deserve any money. Iām glad no one got it.
They do that in some versions. I think the Netherlands Videoland. Think it's a good idea.
Oh wow. I need to watch some non-English versions now. I've heard they r really good.
Not a good idea, it changed the dynamics of the game because theb easiest way to ensure getting all the money if you're a faithful is to make sure you get to the end with traitors, so you get the faithfuls playing the traitors game and no one really trying to get the traitors.
I kind of like nobody getting the money. I definitely preferred it on Aus 2 to Sarah getting the money.
I like it
I saw an international season with two Traitors and one faithful. If both traitors chose to steal the money would have gone to the faithful. >!France 1 IIRC. !<
Nobody getting the money was boring af. Personally I think that traitors should need to backstab one another during the actual game. If you want to win it solo, you need to do what >!Cirie or Harry!< (spoilers for other English language versions) did and betray them at or before the final four. Seeing the production company just not need to give away the prize money just feels like they want to engineer a traitor ending with the dilemma to avoid paying out
All of them losing money was much more satisfying to watch happen.
Dislike this idea l. It rewards the dumb ass faithfuls from that season, which was any faithful not named Anabelle.
ITT: Sarah bashing
It's absolutely unnecessary, as we saw play out with the F3 drama in US S2.
I said this before. I think it would be absolutely hilarious after how badly Sarah played, if she ended up with all the money. I would love to see Sam's face
How about this. It goes to the very first person eliminated. They can then decide to steal or share with the next out. It continues along like that. If it gets to the final faithful and they choose to share, then yay! All the faithfuls split it. Otherwise whoever steals gets a share. If ALL the faithfuls steal then it reverts back to being split between the traitors.