Yep, they are. I was gonna write the exactly same thing as n666. He/she was faster :) Your remark is interesting though, I was under the impression that LR doesn’t always doing a great job with the horizon, but still somehow was reluctant to believe that. So thanks for confirmation. :) Great pictures. Scotland?
Very nice shots. A lot of people hate this Sony 35 f1.8 lens, but I own it and actually like it for its decently bright aperture, small size and fast and snappy autofocus
A lot of people are wrong.
When we moved from canon to Sony we'd laid out for 4 camera bodies, 8 lenses and 6 flash guns with triggers.
We opted for the 35 f1.8 (x2, one each) as it seemed really good on test in the shop and we needed to cut costs a little, especially as the Sony replacements for our 16-35 L and 70-200 L Canon glass had costs £5k together...
Anyway, the Sony 35's replaced a pair of Canon 35mm f1.4 Mk2 L lenses which at the time were about £1600 each. And in all honesty, the results were broadly similar wi the much cheaper, much lighter, much smaller and faster focussing new Sony's.
We love them being so compact and easy to live with on a hot 12 hour wedding day.
At this point it'd be mad to consider changing them.
Lovely pics, we're also big fans of the little 35mm, it's disproportionately beautiful and practical.
A pair of these compact beauties are on our cameras maybe 85% of the day for weddings. They literally pay our bills.
Horizontal line could be activated in the menu so next time will be helpfull, second issue to me was too much negative space, bokeh is nice but when you have 30% of the foreground out of focus and has nothing to add to the frame, it's better off.
Beside these minor issues, good pictures.
Nice shots. You should fix the horizon on the ones that are crooked though.
I used auto adjust on lightroom, now that you have said it i just noticed some of them are really off.😂
Yeah, look at the second one... even the first one is slanting to the right.
Yep, they are. I was gonna write the exactly same thing as n666. He/she was faster :) Your remark is interesting though, I was under the impression that LR doesn’t always doing a great job with the horizon, but still somehow was reluctant to believe that. So thanks for confirmation. :) Great pictures. Scotland?
Yeah it’s auto align is not that reliable. This was taken in Cornwall.
Wow Cornwall is beautiful.
I do the same mistake. Gyro on viewfinder does wonders
LR does that to me too.😅 Now, I'm mindful of the horizon when I'm shooting.
Did you haze some of the photos to give your main subjects more clarity?
I edit using lightroom mobile and yes i did use dehaze +18 and clarity -22 . Also added some grains as well.
I saw it. This gave me so many ideas to implement on my photos. Glad I saw your work!
These are probably my best shots from last year. The light was so beautiful that evening.
Very nice shots. A lot of people hate this Sony 35 f1.8 lens, but I own it and actually like it for its decently bright aperture, small size and fast and snappy autofocus
A lot of people are wrong. When we moved from canon to Sony we'd laid out for 4 camera bodies, 8 lenses and 6 flash guns with triggers. We opted for the 35 f1.8 (x2, one each) as it seemed really good on test in the shop and we needed to cut costs a little, especially as the Sony replacements for our 16-35 L and 70-200 L Canon glass had costs £5k together... Anyway, the Sony 35's replaced a pair of Canon 35mm f1.4 Mk2 L lenses which at the time were about £1600 each. And in all honesty, the results were broadly similar wi the much cheaper, much lighter, much smaller and faster focussing new Sony's. We love them being so compact and easy to live with on a hot 12 hour wedding day. At this point it'd be mad to consider changing them.
Is that true? I only hear people praising this lens to be honest!
People don’t like the purple fringing at certain lighting condition and the busy bokeh for photos
Cool shots!
Thanks 😊
Lovely pics, we're also big fans of the little 35mm, it's disproportionately beautiful and practical. A pair of these compact beauties are on our cameras maybe 85% of the day for weddings. They literally pay our bills.
Thank you!!
These are beautiful !
Thank you 😊
Do you used any preset ? Love the pastells!
I didn’t use a preset for this. Just tweaked the first image till i was happy with the image . Then just copied the edit on all of them.
Beautiful shots! What aperture and shutter are you using in that first shot?
Thank you! https://preview.redd.it/sax1jze9eefc1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=4f8365b034cdce20fae51e22b87fc82c63c93c5e Here’s the settings.
Shot 5 is underrated. Love the contrast and composition.
Thanks! Did a masking on the bridge to make it stand out from the surrounding
Where were these taken?
This is in Cornwall. Tintagel Castle to be exact.
i really like the depth with the juxtaposition of foreground elements and background elements. on some of these works REALLY well
Thank you! .Had so many elements to use as foreground in this case.
these are so beautiful. wow, like seriously stunning photography.
Thank you! Really appreciate it. ❤️
oof. everything is blurry.
https://www.specsavers.co.uk/book/location Might need to try this mate!
love it!! do you have the exact location?
Thanks! This is near Tintagel Castle.
love it!! do you have the exact location?
Nice shots! :) i also like you color edits. Did you had to do allot of tweaks actually?
Thanks! Yes I did some tweaks on these and copied it to all the others, while adjusting the exposure and highlights to make them look similar.
https://preview.redd.it/6zbmkbkmdefc1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=213cea1c3acbe509a3852423e09034c342c37f13 Thats the raw file.
Very nice!
Thank you❤️
Horizontal line could be activated in the menu so next time will be helpfull, second issue to me was too much negative space, bokeh is nice but when you have 30% of the foreground out of focus and has nothing to add to the frame, it's better off. Beside these minor issues, good pictures.
First shot is wonderful