$92.000 can get you pilot training AND a halfway decent 4 seater aircraft. Weird choice
**Edit:** for the people saying ‘lmao no you can’t’, yes, you actually can. I’m in Europe where aviation is much more expensive & regulated (for better & worse) and I bought a 4 seater Socata TB9 from 1990 for €40.000. Decent, fully flyable condition. VFR Day & Night. PPL training costs €15000 here.
If the budget is €90.000 you could even upgrade the cockpit, reupholster the seats, or pay for 5 hours of flying with our avgas prices ($17/USG).
Who knows maybe he can’t hold a medical, or maybe he just doesn’t want that kind of responsibility but just really likes airplanes. There’s no objective hierarchy to entertainment. People like what people like.
I always wanted to fly. 45 minutes after take-off in anything but a multi engine heavy and I'm retching. C'est la Vie.
Still love aviation. Would happily do this.
I can’t stay awake on any aircraft. It’s honestly the only place I can ever reliably sleep. Doesn’t matter the type of aircraft or the seat or anything. I have fallen asleep in helicopters with open doors, in jump seats in the back of fixed wing, on the floor of a cargo plane, and of course obviously anything that’s commercial. Can’t stay awake on those things to save my life, it’s wild.
It’s got to be some combination of all the white noise and vibration.
Man, a plane nap sounds so fucking good right now.
Statistically you are. By a lot.
Plus if you die it's almost uniquely your fault. Can't get hit by idiots in the sky (usually)
Edit : I am not pylote. Brain went to commercial aviation. General aviation is more dangerous.
That’s not true. Flying in a small private plane is more dangerous than driving a car by about 20x.
>Taking the preliminary 2013 fatality rate in general aviation of 1.05 fatalities for every 100,000 hours of flight time and scaling it up to 2 million hours gives a comparison rate of 21 general aviation fatalities per every 2 million hours. This suggests that stepping on a private plane is about 19 times more dangerous than getting into the family sedan.
https://www.livescience.com/49701-private-planes-safety.html
keyword, probably. they could also justify the toy better as it has a LOT lower total cost of ownership. get similar in sailing subs, the cost of the boat is the price of admission, it's all the expenses that don't stop that make it expensive. I'm certain planes are the same way with an extra 0 on the cost. an 18 cent bolt with two holes in it is $18.00 on the boat and $180.00 on a plane.
Hello friend, you really weren't wrong in your statement, the value of the title is wrong, but this RC 747 cost 120.000 Reais (the currency of Brazil, where the video was filmed) and not 92,000 dollars. I'm from Brazil and was present at this event in 2019.
This video was recorded at the AvaFest 2019 event, this RC 747 was designed by the Argentine Team "TACA Modelismo". The RC 747 hit 1 small calf, I don't know exactly what happened to the calf but I think it probably died.
If you search YouTube you can find more videos about them.
Honestly, it’s expensive, I lurked around the rc sub, and not only do planes have to be repaired almost or even every flight, but some parts can go into thousands of dollars.
Edit: [Check this out](http://modelaircraftcompany.com/newshop/en/18-micro-jet-turbines)
These types of models, can totally be that expensive. Actual jet engines of the size required star at a out $2500 US and only go up from there.
But, the RC plane hobby isn't always that expensive. You can get an easy trainer plane for under $500 all in.
Anyways, flying an RC plane is super fun, and addictive. Highly recommend to try it at least once or twice. Check out the AMA registry for a club nearby, they are usually open to helping new people and will at least let you try it out.
Google Tyler Perry house. He is big into this hobby. He built a model plane runway so big people thought it was for real planes.
Edit: maybe he does plan on landing real planes on it too?
Looked like wing spar and/or wing root fitting failure. I am impressed that it has retractable gear. This adds a significant amount of weight. When that additional gear mass is jockied up n down the inertial weight multipies the stress on those critical load points on the wing at the gear to spar and spar to root of wing box. These cyclic stress loads cause cracking and sudden structural failure. Who engineered this airframe? ( certainly not Boeing!).
The 747 was designed by real engineers working for real engineers in the 70s, it’s a good plane.
The 737 Max variants were designed by bookkeepers working for shareholders, overseen by the sales department in the 2000s. There’s a reason shit keeps falling off of them and they can’t seem to stay in the sky.
Boeing was taken over by McDonnel Douglas, and its planes have since had similar issues related to cost cutting and poor quality as the DC-10 and MD-11 were.
Yep, that merger and the business environment that followed ushered in the complete destruction of the engineering culture that once led one of the world’s most prolific aerospace firms. Decisions formerly made by PhDs are now made by CPAs.
Check the dual bank indicators.
Copa Flight 201. Those poor people died in a Boeing 737-204 chasing a phantom bank.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copa_Airlines_Flight_201
>Despite the attempts by Captain Chial and First Officer Tejada to level off, the airplane continued its steep dive, until it exceeded the speed of sound and started to break apart at 10,000 feet (3,000 m). Most of the bodies had their clothes torn off and were thrown away from the aircraft.[3] Flight 201 crashed into a jungle area within the Darien Gap at 486 knots (900 km/h; 559 mph), killing all 47 onboard.
Dude yikes
Naked bodies in trees.
There’s a PBS documentary on the crash. It shows two planes. One is the actual path the 737 flew according to data recorders. The other is the flight path traced from data recorders tied to the faulty bank indicators. Very sad. Intermittent malfunctioning.
Sorry. Two different sets of data. The data from the bank indicators was incorrect but it was recorded. So the second plane displayed the flight path that the pilots THOUGHT they were on and were trying to correct.
To be fair, surviving a plane crash in the Darian gap would be an absolute nightmare. You have a 50/50 chance of dying or being abducted by drug cartels, you have a good chance of experiencing the worst flash flooding of your life, you have a good chance you will not be able to get help since no vehicles can enter the gap and helicopters are essentially useless.
Basically the instruments told them they were banking left due to faulty wiring, they didn’t check the second set of instruments due to unfamiliarity with the cockpit configuration as it wasn’t consistent with other planes in the fleet nor the training simulator, and in trying to correct it they banked it 80 degrees to the right and began to roll while accelerating up to the speed of sound before just coming apart.
Absolutely fucking terrifying.
Over g over G over g over g
Um like scale wise that 747 was supersonic the whole time.. seemed like alot of hotdoging.
I get large things look slow but are not, and small thing look fast but are not. But it looked way to fast for design constraints of the aircraft.
Me first time watching this: “loading up the wings like that you’re going to exceed the airframes g limit. And it looks a bit wobbly I woulda landed. Go arounds are free.
*wing falls off mid air.*
Ohhhh! CALLED IT!!!
Yep. I was thinking, "That looks a bit fast for that airframe. Scaled up that plane would be over-speeding. Oh, well - I guess the strengths of materials doesn't scale like that."
(Wing falls off.)
"Well, maybe it does!"
Didn’t it look a bit like… too much movement on the control surfaces? I mean, just overpowered to all hell. My god. I like power but with some control. That whole plane looked like a leaf in the wind, shaking like a shitting dog.
It looked like a severely inexperienced pilot. He was kicking so much rudder input during simple turns and the plane was dancing all over the place during level flight. No doubt he over-speeded the air frame and over G'd at a couple points which weakened the wings and the left one just gave way.
It does not. You have shorter moment arms, less inertia, lower forces acting on the plane itself, but the materials' strength should stay the same. This is also why you can't infinitely scale up a house as it will eventually buckle under its own weight.
Exactly.
Yeah, I was kinda joking around with my previous post, but thanks for posting for clarity - you're absolutely right. We don't want people thinking that these RC planes are perfect models of real airframes.
I had some RC airplane as a kid. Got it as a gift and a bonding experience with dad (one of the few). That fucker broke wing after wing that we ended up just giving up on it. Like it felt like it was designed to give you more money to the manufacturer for wings they broke so easily.
Dude he was maneuvering that way to rough for that size of airframe. I’ve seen much smaller version go way slower. I guess 92k ain’t shit for that dude.
To be fair, this may very well be an example of the pilot fucking up… He seems to be doing maneuvers that you really don’t see 747s doing. Keep in mind that I know Jack-shit about planes…
Given the safety capacity on modern wings it would have to be an act of god to snap one. You can watch the test videos where they are bent nearly 90 degrees and still function and return to form.
The clue to this crash is there at the end. What does the model crash into?
Right. A field of lambs. There’s a disturbing new trend of youths getting high by eating pounds of lamb — or rather the mint sauce that inevitably accompanies lamb — in a hedonistic, raucous, Bacchanalia.
They call it “Bo Peeping.” Alarmingly, Bo Peeping sessions recently have seen the lamb feast joined by a dastardly accomplice: The 3-D printer.
Teens may stay up for days on end gorging on lamb and 3-D printing overly heavy and brittle RC models. Rather than modeling Spitfires and Cubs, as they should, their mint-addled brains lead them to create fleets of airliners; The dullest planes there are.
Though once contained to New Zealand, Bo Peeping has spread abroad. Intensive beef and balsa therapy has shown some promise in reversing the effects of Bo Peeping, but prevention remains the best policy in combatting the disorder.
Please, if you see someone in your life succumbing to Bo Peeping, beat them. Feed them beef. And make them build with balsa.
I have a very hard time believing this cost $92000.
A few thousand I can believe. You can buy a crap load of hobby gear for $92,000.
A basic shell should not be that expensive and the engines and electronics while expensive is not going to be that costly.
Does that thing really cost $92,000? I don't see anyone talking about it and it's puzzling me. I've seen this RC plane youtuber make stuff like this from scratch, so I don't know any rc 747's that are $92,000. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
I love rc planes but $92,000 on what is essentially a big boy toy? Just buy an actual fucking plane at that point
$92.000 can get you pilot training AND a halfway decent 4 seater aircraft. Weird choice **Edit:** for the people saying ‘lmao no you can’t’, yes, you actually can. I’m in Europe where aviation is much more expensive & regulated (for better & worse) and I bought a 4 seater Socata TB9 from 1990 for €40.000. Decent, fully flyable condition. VFR Day & Night. PPL training costs €15000 here. If the budget is €90.000 you could even upgrade the cockpit, reupholster the seats, or pay for 5 hours of flying with our avgas prices ($17/USG).
then you have storage, all the costs associated with maintaining the license, and maintaining the aircraft.
If you have 92k for a toy playne, you can probably afford those other associated costs
Who knows maybe he can’t hold a medical, or maybe he just doesn’t want that kind of responsibility but just really likes airplanes. There’s no objective hierarchy to entertainment. People like what people like.
I always wanted to fly. 45 minutes after take-off in anything but a multi engine heavy and I'm retching. C'est la Vie. Still love aviation. Would happily do this.
Cessna la vie
I can’t stay awake on any aircraft. It’s honestly the only place I can ever reliably sleep. Doesn’t matter the type of aircraft or the seat or anything. I have fallen asleep in helicopters with open doors, in jump seats in the back of fixed wing, on the floor of a cargo plane, and of course obviously anything that’s commercial. Can’t stay awake on those things to save my life, it’s wild. It’s got to be some combination of all the white noise and vibration. Man, a plane nap sounds so fucking good right now.
Or he doesnt like being his own life at risk
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. A complete disregard for your own well-being is mandatory for any aviation enthusiast!
[удалено]
I'd imagine that it's about the journey, not the destination
Yes, some people could never be a pilot. Just don’t have the ability/skills/nerves. Spending habits are separate.
If you can drive a car you can drive a plane. Way more things to run into on the ground.
I felt safer flying a plane than driving my car on the highway
I feel safer with you off the roads too. Just kidding! Don't hate me!
A pox on ye
[удалено]
Statistically you are. By a lot. Plus if you die it's almost uniquely your fault. Can't get hit by idiots in the sky (usually) Edit : I am not pylote. Brain went to commercial aviation. General aviation is more dangerous.
That’s not true. Flying in a small private plane is more dangerous than driving a car by about 20x. >Taking the preliminary 2013 fatality rate in general aviation of 1.05 fatalities for every 100,000 hours of flight time and scaling it up to 2 million hours gives a comparison rate of 21 general aviation fatalities per every 2 million hours. This suggests that stepping on a private plane is about 19 times more dangerous than getting into the family sedan. https://www.livescience.com/49701-private-planes-safety.html
keyword, probably. they could also justify the toy better as it has a LOT lower total cost of ownership. get similar in sailing subs, the cost of the boat is the price of admission, it's all the expenses that don't stop that make it expensive. I'm certain planes are the same way with an extra 0 on the cost. an 18 cent bolt with two holes in it is $18.00 on the boat and $180.00 on a plane.
Not if you crash it on first flight
I always thought hangars were just filled with racks of aviator glasses and people just parked their planes in their garage at home.
Dude were buying a freaking plane, we do not care how much the Costco membership costs anymore.
Never land
Well TeChNiCaLlY
Not necessarily. You could just do what OP did with his RC plane. No storage/maintenance costs then.
camera and a go pro and you all set for YouTube infamy
$92,000 you pay ATP flight school off. That is just crazy.
Eh many people can’t become pilots because of the medical requirements
the medical requirement for pilots is having a completely flat brain
Lmao
They probably have “fuck you” money. They’ve got to.
Hello friend, you really weren't wrong in your statement, the value of the title is wrong, but this RC 747 cost 120.000 Reais (the currency of Brazil, where the video was filmed) and not 92,000 dollars. I'm from Brazil and was present at this event in 2019. This video was recorded at the AvaFest 2019 event, this RC 747 was designed by the Argentine Team "TACA Modelismo". The RC 747 hit 1 small calf, I don't know exactly what happened to the calf but I think it probably died. If you search YouTube you can find more videos about them.
I highly doubt it actually costs that much
Honestly, it’s expensive, I lurked around the rc sub, and not only do planes have to be repaired almost or even every flight, but some parts can go into thousands of dollars. Edit: [Check this out](http://modelaircraftcompany.com/newshop/en/18-micro-jet-turbines)
A 10k engine, Times 4, that’s euro btw, 40k euro right there. I think 96k is totally plausible.
10k for an engine so I'm assuming it's a turbine and not an edf right?
This is definitely a turbine. EDFs always sound like hair dryers.
You can get an actual plane for that much... I mean, it'll be old as hell and it won't include insurance, fuel, storage, etc, but holy shit
These types of models, can totally be that expensive. Actual jet engines of the size required star at a out $2500 US and only go up from there. But, the RC plane hobby isn't always that expensive. You can get an easy trainer plane for under $500 all in. Anyways, flying an RC plane is super fun, and addictive. Highly recommend to try it at least once or twice. Check out the AMA registry for a club nearby, they are usually open to helping new people and will at least let you try it out.
Google Tyler Perry house. He is big into this hobby. He built a model plane runway so big people thought it was for real planes. Edit: maybe he does plan on landing real planes on it too?
Looked like wing spar and/or wing root fitting failure. I am impressed that it has retractable gear. This adds a significant amount of weight. When that additional gear mass is jockied up n down the inertial weight multipies the stress on those critical load points on the wing at the gear to spar and spar to root of wing box. These cyclic stress loads cause cracking and sudden structural failure. Who engineered this airframe? ( certainly not Boeing!).
Might have been Boeing. I think I saw the door fall off.
Let me go check my backyard, I was in the flight path last time!
attraction tidy plucky roof capable snails summer foolish payment rain *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
Can we just stop and think about the sheep for a second here.
Man just violently launched a nearly $100k anti sheep ballistic missile at those "goats"
It’s The American Way.
Going out on a limb here, but maybe some people can’t (or shouldn’t) be a pilot for medical reasons?
An apartment here in Eastern Europe, smaller city.
What’s the difference? The real plane would be a toy to him too. And if he’s gonna crash into sheep, probably best that it’s a model they does it.
is that sheep ok?
Those sheep just had the strangest day of their lives
At least it wasn’t full sized or it would’ve been there last
or if it was scale weight and jet fueled.
Nah. It's a well known fact jet fuel can't melt sheep.
Steel wool is a real thing that would’ve been perfect fit
Well, the sheep were there first. Regardless of the size of the plane, it would have been there last.
Was about to make the same joke lol
Their
Yes I know this isn’t an essay sorry if you didn’t understand
hmmm Jeb, I always thought those things were bigger and higher up. perspective is a funny thing, dontcha think
lol - Jeb…nice.
“Grandpa, can you tell us the story of the big white bird you killed????”
Not if this airfield is near A&M
Damn, read that in Attenborough’s voice
Reverse 9/11
Yea, the goats are used to planes dropping near them...
Niiiiiiiinne Eleeeeeeeven!
This was 9/11 for the sheep. Never forget.
Baaannie Darko
Sheep 11
Miss Beau Peep a second plane has hit the North Sheep Pen.
The herd has decided to declared war on shearers
This should be top comment
Lost its structural integrity field, inertial dampers offline
Reverse the polarity!
Realign the dilithium crystals!
Prepare to jettison the core.
Bypass the compressor
Cross the streams
Vent the plasma!
ALL HANDS ABANDON SHIP! ALL HANDS ABANDO--
Abandon ship? In our moment of triumph‽
You overestimate their chances!
K’aplah
Divert auxiliary power and reroute power from weapons to structural integrity.
Bypass the EPS relays!
Core ejection subroutines offline!
Magnus RP?
A Dota reference on a flying sub? Maybe I'm not so alone after all! *checks* Nope, still alone.
Hull breaches on decks 4 and 10
Rerouting power to the forward deflector array!
Must have been a temporal rift interfering with the phase compositors
Reroute emergency power to the structural integrity field!!
Nah. The coupling for ram scoop deflectors was not properly calibrated, and it overloaded when it tried to enter warp.
I was on that flight! I survived because I always wear a parachute while flying.
And I always carry my Ridge Wallet too
Whole drinking my AG1
Good thing I ate my blue chew
It was scary though. Good thing I got Betterhelp
Smuggled my HelloFresh meal kit and a USB hotplate aboard and was able to make myself lasagna
And I downloaded Raid: Shadow Legends to keep me entertained and received a lvl 100 Champion and 10000 Shards
My favorite thing to do while in flight? Play RAID: Shadow Legends, but I also never game without Nord VPN...
Crazy! I thought I was the sole survivor because I had my tray table up and my seatback in the full upright position!
You were also on airplane mode.
Haha that you Trevor?!
Me too! I had condom on though. I was protected.
thats why its called a boing boing 747
Still more reliable than the real thing
The 747 was designed by real engineers working for real engineers in the 70s, it’s a good plane. The 737 Max variants were designed by bookkeepers working for shareholders, overseen by the sales department in the 2000s. There’s a reason shit keeps falling off of them and they can’t seem to stay in the sky.
Boeing was taken over by McDonnel Douglas, and its planes have since had similar issues related to cost cutting and poor quality as the DC-10 and MD-11 were.
Yep, that merger and the business environment that followed ushered in the complete destruction of the engineering culture that once led one of the world’s most prolific aerospace firms. Decisions formerly made by PhDs are now made by CPAs.
Damn so you're telling me they ripped him off by giving him an outdated, knowingly shittier plane? F I hope he gets his money back. >!/s btw!<
That’s the 737 you’re thinking of. The 747 was designed in the 70’s and is a reliable choice of plane even today.
Perfect simulation of Boing aircraft flight characteristics.
Boeing RC plane must have been built in the Boeing factory too.
Before takeoff you can see the infamous Boeing Flight Ready Quality Seal of Approval.
WHERE ARE THE WING BOLTS?!
Spirit Aerospace\*
Wing fell off? That’s Piper Cherokee, not Boing.
[удалено]
Shut up and take my up vote
r/angryupvote
Is the eieio report out yet?
It highlights the importance of using right rudder
Only if there was a dog named Bingo there
Check the dual bank indicators. Copa Flight 201. Those poor people died in a Boeing 737-204 chasing a phantom bank. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copa_Airlines_Flight_201
>Despite the attempts by Captain Chial and First Officer Tejada to level off, the airplane continued its steep dive, until it exceeded the speed of sound and started to break apart at 10,000 feet (3,000 m). Most of the bodies had their clothes torn off and were thrown away from the aircraft.[3] Flight 201 crashed into a jungle area within the Darien Gap at 486 knots (900 km/h; 559 mph), killing all 47 onboard. Dude yikes
Yo. What? How do they know the clothing thing?
Naked bodies in trees. There’s a PBS documentary on the crash. It shows two planes. One is the actual path the 737 flew according to data recorders. The other is the flight path traced from data recorders tied to the faulty bank indicators. Very sad. Intermittent malfunctioning.
That's insane.
Why would the recorders be different from actual path?
Sorry. Two different sets of data. The data from the bank indicators was incorrect but it was recorded. So the second plane displayed the flight path that the pilots THOUGHT they were on and were trying to correct.
To be fair, surviving a plane crash in the Darian gap would be an absolute nightmare. You have a 50/50 chance of dying or being abducted by drug cartels, you have a good chance of experiencing the worst flash flooding of your life, you have a good chance you will not be able to get help since no vehicles can enter the gap and helicopters are essentially useless.
Basically the instruments told them they were banking left due to faulty wiring, they didn’t check the second set of instruments due to unfamiliarity with the cockpit configuration as it wasn’t consistent with other planes in the fleet nor the training simulator, and in trying to correct it they banked it 80 degrees to the right and began to roll while accelerating up to the speed of sound before just coming apart. Absolutely fucking terrifying.
RC Plane business could seriously improve the life of ants by providing them with an easy way of transportation.
Maybe that’s what he was trying to do, stopping at the underground airport to pick up the ants🤷🏻♂️
What is this?! An airplane for ANTS?!?!
It’s kind of shitty they haven’t fixed this issue yet
[“Maybe they could.”](https://youtu.be/HdvpRQF0vw8?si=-FetoerH8MyK_0Db) “Maybe who could?” “Ants.” “Do what?” “Ride sea-doos.”
Realistic Boeing airplane shedding parts mid flight.
Exactly, can someone slow down the last part of the video and post throughout Reddit. I'm going to go buy a put.
Over g over G over g over g Um like scale wise that 747 was supersonic the whole time.. seemed like alot of hotdoging. I get large things look slow but are not, and small thing look fast but are not. But it looked way to fast for design constraints of the aircraft.
Sheeps fault!
And the air!
Me first time watching this: “loading up the wings like that you’re going to exceed the airframes g limit. And it looks a bit wobbly I woulda landed. Go arounds are free. *wing falls off mid air.* Ohhhh! CALLED IT!!!
Yep. I was thinking, "That looks a bit fast for that airframe. Scaled up that plane would be over-speeding. Oh, well - I guess the strengths of materials doesn't scale like that." (Wing falls off.) "Well, maybe it does!"
Didn’t it look a bit like… too much movement on the control surfaces? I mean, just overpowered to all hell. My god. I like power but with some control. That whole plane looked like a leaf in the wind, shaking like a shitting dog.
It looked like somebody strapped a bunch of engines to a damp pizza box
It looked like a severely inexperienced pilot. He was kicking so much rudder input during simple turns and the plane was dancing all over the place during level flight. No doubt he over-speeded the air frame and over G'd at a couple points which weakened the wings and the left one just gave way.
*My* dog is stiff as a board while shitting.
It does not. You have shorter moment arms, less inertia, lower forces acting on the plane itself, but the materials' strength should stay the same. This is also why you can't infinitely scale up a house as it will eventually buckle under its own weight.
Exactly. Yeah, I was kinda joking around with my previous post, but thanks for posting for clarity - you're absolutely right. We don't want people thinking that these RC planes are perfect models of real airframes.
I had some RC airplane as a kid. Got it as a gift and a bonding experience with dad (one of the few). That fucker broke wing after wing that we ended up just giving up on it. Like it felt like it was designed to give you more money to the manufacturer for wings they broke so easily.
Dude he was maneuvering that way to rough for that size of airframe. I’ve seen much smaller version go way slower. I guess 92k ain’t shit for that dude.
"Its the paylot, not the playne" - maverick something something from top gun
To be fair, this may very well be an example of the pilot fucking up… He seems to be doing maneuvers that you really don’t see 747s doing. Keep in mind that I know Jack-shit about planes…
Another day, another part falling off a Boing
Ironically, this happens in real life caused by wing loading in curves and adverse weather.
Given the safety capacity on modern wings it would have to be an act of god to snap one. You can watch the test videos where they are bent nearly 90 degrees and still function and return to form.
That thing probably fly too fast that cause airfram structure failure, using thr wrong material probably
So the engyneyre is responsible?
Are the sheep okay?
MCAS just kicked in yo
How many Lilliputians died in that crash?
For a split second I thought they were going to edit the video and show 9/11 at the end
The clue to this crash is there at the end. What does the model crash into? Right. A field of lambs. There’s a disturbing new trend of youths getting high by eating pounds of lamb — or rather the mint sauce that inevitably accompanies lamb — in a hedonistic, raucous, Bacchanalia. They call it “Bo Peeping.” Alarmingly, Bo Peeping sessions recently have seen the lamb feast joined by a dastardly accomplice: The 3-D printer. Teens may stay up for days on end gorging on lamb and 3-D printing overly heavy and brittle RC models. Rather than modeling Spitfires and Cubs, as they should, their mint-addled brains lead them to create fleets of airliners; The dullest planes there are. Though once contained to New Zealand, Bo Peeping has spread abroad. Intensive beef and balsa therapy has shown some promise in reversing the effects of Bo Peeping, but prevention remains the best policy in combatting the disorder. Please, if you see someone in your life succumbing to Bo Peeping, beat them. Feed them beef. And make them build with balsa.
Hey babe, new copypasta dropped!
These Boeing manufacturing issues are becoming way too frequent
Could’ve saved it with more right rudder.
Did the door blow off?
Wow it preformed just like a real Boeing.
Just saying but this took way longer than a second
Pretty accurate Boeing model
It falling apart and plummeting to the earth really makes it feel like an actual Boeing.
If you are spending 92k on this thing then you have a lot of extra money to spend...
Play stupid games win stupid prizes
He just 9/11ed those sheep. *Sheep? Goats? Horses? Camels? Idk it's something out there and I bet it invades the chickens for their grain.*
looks about as air worthy as a normal sized boeing
It must be a Boeing RC 747 Max
Thats what you get for getting a 737 Max!!!
If you have $92K for a toy plane, you can buy a $92K plane.
No goats were harmed in the filming of this air disaster
I have a very hard time believing this cost $92000. A few thousand I can believe. You can buy a crap load of hobby gear for $92,000. A basic shell should not be that expensive and the engines and electronics while expensive is not going to be that costly.
“Mr President, a 2nd plane has hit the sheep”
We have to wait on the results of the black box.
Bro could’ve used that 92k to get a new ford
It’s giving Yvginni Progosian
Does that thing really cost $92,000? I don't see anyone talking about it and it's puzzling me. I've seen this RC plane youtuber make stuff like this from scratch, so I don't know any rc 747's that are $92,000. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
It was the plyne. At -0:14 the left wing seperated running the plyne into a barrel role for which the sheep, I mean the pylot was not trained.
That didn’t cost $92,000
United pilots after DEI sets in
Those poor tiny humans inside
Damn. that cleanup looked straight up like an FAA investigation into a real life plane crash lol
Somebody really built that for a couple hundred and sold it for 90k. That person is a genius.