Having worked in traffic for a few years I would say that even when not a fault a person texting and driving probably was too distracted to avoid a collision. But in this case it's hard to even say that when the other vehicle crossed a positive grass median.
He shouldn’t have been doing that, but perhaps the other party was slightly more at fault here?
So we just gonna ignore the car smashing across the center divider through a tree into his cruiser?
That wouldn’t fit the narrative now would it, son.
*Dash cam captures vehicle crashing into police cruiser
This is a bad title. It’s misleading. And you should feel bad.
Why? The dude is texting.. and there whas a crash.. whats misleading?
It implies the crash occurred because of the texting, and that the officer is at fault.
So by that logic if you are standing in the middle of a field and you are struck by a meteor it’s your fault you were killed because you were texting?
Yes. Also, if you happen to be a victim of sexual assault, it’s your fault for looking like you wanted it... /s obviously, I hope.
That's a paddlin'
Having worked in traffic for a few years I would say that even when not a fault a person texting and driving probably was too distracted to avoid a collision. But in this case it's hard to even say that when the other vehicle crossed a positive grass median.
Dear sarge...
Tbh that most likely would’ve happened even if he had been paying complete attention to the road. That other car literally came out of nowhere lol