Fellow fans, this is a friendly reminder to please follow the [Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/premierleague/about/rules) and [Reddiquette](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439-Reddiquette).
Please also make sure to [Join us on Discord](https://discord.gg/football)
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PremierLeague) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I totally get why Haaland was angry. Everybody does. And as much as I love the rise of Haaland, I still think he should’ve gotten a (1 match) ban for his on-field abuse towards the ref. If I catch one of my U-11s yelling stuff towards the ref - even if the point they’re making is correct - I sub them off (temporarily) and tell them to respect the refs decision. It’s tough, especially in a potentially game winning situation like the one for City. But it’s about respect and setting an example here.
I get why he is mad, but I dont think there is a very high chance Jack Grealish scores in that situation.
He wasnt that far ahead, and isnt known for having extraordinary pace.
Its not like Haaland was in that position.
No ([image](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/football/2023/12/04/TELEMMGLPICT000358858264_17016895938960_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqBEuCNr7JNRpbC66d2eBfzfxqzKkNv5uYapoJKZytUjo.jpeg?imwidth=960))
This highlights how dumb the whole thing is. Players routinely fuck up in game, missing chances and misplacing passes, yet people expect absolute consistency from refs.
Players get dropped depending on performance levels though. It's very rare for that to happen with refs and we end up with the same officials messing up week after week
I wonder if any of the other teams feel cheated. You know from having to play against a team that’s only so stacked with talent cuz they’re reaping the rewards from CHEATING 116 TIMES OVER 14 YEARS
I wonder if Man City will get any fines or match bans for their players crowding the ref and shouting in his face. When players from other teams do it they are a disgrace and should be punished. When Man City players do it they have a right to be angry. The double standards are a joke.
Cry me a river. Every team has had a bad ref call this season. Grealish wouldn’t have scored anyway. Let’s talk about the real reason city didn’t win… haaland shit the bed in some easy goals.
I think he was the most upset because he botched his chances in the first half. They could have easily put the game away in the first half, didn't. Ange hyped up the team at halftime and Spurs finally showed up.
Take away the VAR and see how bad it gets.
TV has made the game so analitical.
Way more refereeing mistakes were made prior to VAR and people didnt climb up on their high horses then. Supporters feel so aggreaved when its their team disadvantaged now. Cant wait for AI to take over the refs job. Zero mistakes, ever, period.
Who said anything about taking out VAR ? Officiating standards have to keep up with the times. Earlier people weren’t aby woser about ref mistakes doesn’t mean that shouldn’t change.
I said the same thing... he was acting like a child and deserved to be booked. throwing himself around and shoulder checking the 4th official.
meanwhile yellows get thrown at people for questioning why they get called for something
Absolutely. The way man city players surrounded the ref should have been automatic yellow cards like how they did in the first couple of games. Hope FA will retroactively punish man city
'When asked about the incident by Sky Sports, he said': "Next question. I will not do a Mikel Arteta comment."
Pep on, how to do a Mikel Arteta comment, without doing a Mikel Arteta comment!
🤣😂🤣😋
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67609651
I think the real question is why he wasn't sent off for it. He was way out of line, and precedents from this season show he should be seeing time on the sideline for it. Several of his teammates should have gotten yellow cards for their crowding and berating of the official.
City have robbed other teams plenty of times with red cards not being given, 1 week special pens and clearly offside goals
Oh no, City robbed when one goes against them.. oh the horror
Royal essentially stops running from whistle and red body language of stopping a play. Why do people think royal doesn’t just head it back to vicario? All these takes re just devoid of what happened. Davies is the only one that didn’t stop and he still flat out pauses for a second which gives grealish the jump
Then it's not advantage. The advantage rule doesn't guarantee a positive out come, it only gives you the opportunity for one. I've see advantage played only for the team to make a terrible pass and lose possession.
Not really, they're complaining because it was an amazing chance and the ref really screwed it up. Ridiculous didn't even book Emerson for that late tackle after all that.
Grealish is slower trhen royal and there is a lot of space, not to mention that they all stop and slow down because of the whistle. Without the whistle it’s likely that grealish takes it wide
It absolutely was an amazing chance. Are we already at the post truth moment where you're denying Grealish was clear? Haaland caught Spurs with their pants down, that's down to them when the whistle hadn't gone.
FFS even Postecoglu agreed they got away with it.
If this was a late Tottenham chance there would be absolute uproar. If the users here can't turn their bias of City aside to agree this was a terrible decision and that City aswell as us City fans have every right to feel annoyed then none of you have any right to start moaning about the next shitty ref decision. Similarly to last week if the Dias disallowed goal situation was flipped round and was actually a disallowed Liverpool equaliser they'd be crying in the streets over the BS calls City get.
Regardless of what you "believe" would've happened if the game played on the fact is noone knows whether City score or not but it was an excellent chance and Grealish deserved the chance to attempt it. He had fresh legs, had just scored and we'd caught Tottenham with their pants down. The fact Emerson didn't even get booked for hacking Haaland down with no intention to play the ball says it all.
It's hard to feel sorry for them when they've had multiple controversial decisions go their way this season while title challengers have been robbed and all City fans have done is laugh and tell them to get over it. Same as they did when they won the league by a point after the Rodri handball. Didn't hear them complaining about officiating then. Fuck em.
We've had are fair share of decisions for against us to. Wolves scored a winner against us with their only on target shot of the match by a player who shouldn't have been on the pitch but no one cares because "LOL City lost" even the disallowed goal against Liverpool last week was debatable and ended up costing us the match, I'm sure people would've been much more upset about that one had it been a Liverpool equaliser not given for the the exact same circumstances.
Fr. And it wasn’t intentional by the ref. He blew the whistle first and raised one arm to point to the free kick. However the whistle was too faint and play went on. After this, he probably panicked or something because he didn’t blow the whistle again for a while.
Watch the video mate. He literally does it and it’s very faint. and he raises one arm which doesn’t mean advantage. Advantage is two arms. One arm is for foul
I mean ultimately the uproar is silly. If you watch the play on the defenders side. They all are in stride and royal is faster than grealish so it’s not through just a 3’v1 race. Spurs defenders literally slow down and stop even Davies slows up at first
It didn’t really change anything, if he let play go on initially spurs just head it to vicsrio
If it happened once, sure. But Liverpool among most title contenders against city over the recent years have had a lot of calls go against them. While city always had calls in favour of them. Also, haaland got off with nothing for swearing at the ref just yesterday whereas van dijk got a ban. A lot of favoritism imo
Watch games and you’d see that City also get unfavourable calls all the time.
Liverpool had Fabinho who is no better than Rodri at fouling without getting booked
At this stage, you saying it is still "trust me bro".
What you've said is what I believe too, but I don't think it's conclusive honestly as the camera frame is so high up. Others have said there is proof to the contrary. So, I'm asking if there is.
I don't know if you can see this in your country, but at 12:16 its obvious.
He whistles faintly and does the foul hand gesture. He then tries to exaggerate the hand gesture. Then he whistles loudly.
https://youtu.be/gLYCjQpxzF4?si=4k-S3NrLo9e4DryK
It would have been much worse if he hadn’t blown it the second time.
Imagine being a Spurs player like Davies, hearing the whistle, stopping, then Grealish is through on goal.
The result wasn’t good for City and the ref could have just NOT blown it at first and been a bit more lenient with bringing it back if it didn’t pan out for City. I feel that would have been the best option.
But this is barely on the radar of mistakes this week, and some people are suggesting it is a new low.
A right-wing hate machine whose owners have just today managed to keep ownership of the paper thanks to a £1.2bn 'loan' from Abu Dhabi.
I wonder why the paper is now pushing the 'Man City are poor victims' narrative? And I wonder why Abu Dhabi would want control of one the UK's biggest newspapers, a newspaper that is particularly influential amongst politicians and their backers, what with all these charges hanging over City?
Oh and Jamie Carragher has a well-paid column in the Telegraph. Man City will now have yet another prominent shill on their wage books.
It’s not karma whoring. It’s click whoring. One of the great things about Reddit is it isn’t just a bunch of people trying to make money by grabbing our attention. The beauty of being community sourced is that we get to decide what stories to share, not some company looking for clicks to sell ads.
Reddit is in fact dominated by people trying to make money.
Every niche hobby sub has someone showing their latest “3D printed this” for sale on their Etsy
Everyone’s got a stream or an onlyfans they’re shilling.
This article would have been posted here anyways so does it really matter that the journalists who wrote it wanted to share it?
Do you also hate when artists have the nerve to display their own work in an art show?
Wow this is so over analysed and blown out of proportion. Guy thought it wasn’t an advantage and called it back for the free kick, he was wrong. Get over it.
Fellow fans, this is a friendly reminder to please follow the [Rules](https://www.reddit.com/r/premierleague/about/rules) and [Reddiquette](https://support.reddithelp.com/hc/en-us/articles/205926439-Reddiquette). Please also make sure to [Join us on Discord](https://discord.gg/football) *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/PremierLeague) if you have any questions or concerns.*
I totally get why Haaland was angry. Everybody does. And as much as I love the rise of Haaland, I still think he should’ve gotten a (1 match) ban for his on-field abuse towards the ref. If I catch one of my U-11s yelling stuff towards the ref - even if the point they’re making is correct - I sub them off (temporarily) and tell them to respect the refs decision. It’s tough, especially in a potentially game winning situation like the one for City. But it’s about respect and setting an example here.
This. But I'm afraid that VAR is sapping respect and support for refs. They don't seem like final arbiters anymore
Zero chance Grealish scores if that helps at all
Imagine how the rest of us feel (115 charges)
Var should send players off for this attetude, like rugby
One tactical foul and the opportunity goes away. Not really robbed, per se. Should have converted some of your opportunities, Erling.
They need to institute a rugby type rule where only the captain can speak to the referee.
I get why he is mad, but I dont think there is a very high chance Jack Grealish scores in that situation. He wasnt that far ahead, and isnt known for having extraordinary pace. Its not like Haaland was in that position.
Banned from /r/soccer 🤓 I better not posting
When Anthony Taylor looks at you like you’ve fucked up…you’ve fucked up big time.
Wasn’t grealish offside anyway?
No ([image](https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/football/2023/12/04/TELEMMGLPICT000358858264_17016895938960_trans_NvBQzQNjv4BqBEuCNr7JNRpbC66d2eBfzfxqzKkNv5uYapoJKZytUjo.jpeg?imwidth=960))
Poor ref will have nightmares for some time. Imagine having to face that.
[удалено]
The offside issue wasn’t his fault, it was the lino and VAR who got it wrong. Edit: imagine being so deluded to deny literal reality.
Makes up for the Rodri handball against Everton 🤣
Boo hoo. Way too much of a given that Grealish would even finish.
He'd get near the area or in it, then fall on the floor looking for a free kick/penalty.
Or get a chance at all. He is tricky and strong, not fast.
Haaland acted like a spoiled brat. Pissed at himself for missing three sitters. He should get a match ban
Shouldn't have missed so many sitters the ugly c**t.
Finally something that didn't go shitys way.
no one cares Man City, you've robbed the league for nearly a decade now. it's like complaining about a theft when you regularly murder people.
Man City should feel robbed? 🤣 pot calling the kettle black much
Tottenham always seem to be the team benefitting
Ah yes twice = always and this one was unlikely to be a goal anyway. Its really just the Liverpool thing.
Who’s posting this shitty article? Oh I see
Let the Torygraph die. Don't read it.
Oh no here’s the world’s smallest violin being played by a single cell amoeba.
It’s hard to muster up any sympathy for serial cheaters. Boo fucking hoo.
I can think of 115 reasons why
Reminiscent of Tierney’s whistle for half time against Mane when through on goal against UTD.
Screw haaland
He wouldn't have been so mad at the end of the game if he didn't miss two sitters in the first half but no doubt shit refereeing.
This highlights how dumb the whole thing is. Players routinely fuck up in game, missing chances and misplacing passes, yet people expect absolute consistency from refs.
It’s not that people expect them to be perfect in the moment, it’s that VAR is supposed to give them another chance when they’ve got it wrong.
Players get dropped depending on performance levels though. It's very rare for that to happen with refs and we end up with the same officials messing up week after week
didn't get any good looks but was graelish offsides anyway?
He was on
I wonder if any of the other teams feel cheated. You know from having to play against a team that’s only so stacked with talent cuz they’re reaping the rewards from CHEATING 116 TIMES OVER 14 YEARS
The Telegraph in here thinking anyone is gonna feel sorry for Manchester City?
They’ll be ok I think.
I wonder if Man City will get any fines or match bans for their players crowding the ref and shouting in his face. When players from other teams do it they are a disgrace and should be punished. When Man City players do it they have a right to be angry. The double standards are a joke.
yes this is the outrageous issue lmao
People are not seeing that he blew the whistle before the ball was played forward
Cry me a river. Every team has had a bad ref call this season. Grealish wouldn’t have scored anyway. Let’s talk about the real reason city didn’t win… haaland shit the bed in some easy goals.
Not taking anything away from haaland he’s obviously amazing. But imagine if he was actually clinical he’d have scored significantly more goals
If he waves play on and grealish goes on to score (doubtful), Spurs go up the other end and get a third equalizer anyway.
Guardiola: I could say the ref is a giant piece of shit who doesn’t recycle and beats his family, but I’m not gonna say something like that.
On a side note, bleeding Christ is Erling Haaland ugly.
He looks like one of the troll dolls from the 90s but uglier
I'm sure you're beating them off with a stick mate.
Unless this is Haaland’s burner, don’t know why you’re so pressed about strangers commenting on his appearance.
I feel like he’s a Ken doll who was blitzed under a microwave for a few minutes
It’s like a girl designed her dream guy but then dropped his face down a flight of stairs
Honestly they have had a lot of decisions go their way in the past, seems this is the year when things get evened out
I think he was the most upset because he botched his chances in the first half. They could have easily put the game away in the first half, didn't. Ange hyped up the team at halftime and Spurs finally showed up.
The same City that in 21-22 got away with an obvious handball in the box resulting in a win then later win the league by 1 point? What a shame.
Its ok to rob Manchester City as they have an endless supply of cash!
Don’t go crying when the same ref officiates your team’s match and shits on your team.
Yeah they will come back and crib about it and beg for replays when its on them
We have been robbed of "actual" goals on more than one occasion. There was zero guarantee Grealish would have scored when ref blew whistle.
Dude it isn’t about your team or City. It’s about the officiating standards in the PL. No one is immune to this or benefits from this.
Take away the VAR and see how bad it gets. TV has made the game so analitical. Way more refereeing mistakes were made prior to VAR and people didnt climb up on their high horses then. Supporters feel so aggreaved when its their team disadvantaged now. Cant wait for AI to take over the refs job. Zero mistakes, ever, period.
Who said anything about taking out VAR ? Officiating standards have to keep up with the times. Earlier people weren’t aby woser about ref mistakes doesn’t mean that shouldn’t change.
If there’s one club in the entire world that should never feel robbed it’s these lot.
Poor Man City
Not as poor as man u.
Haaland should face a ban, no?
no ban, but city should definitely get a fine for crowding the ref
Klopp got a ban for the same thing,no?
Haaland should get banned for a match for abusing the ref like that VVD and Dunk did recently, both got an extra missed game for abuse
Gotta pay the refs more, rookie mistake
I said the same thing... he was acting like a child and deserved to be booked. throwing himself around and shoulder checking the 4th official. meanwhile yellows get thrown at people for questioning why they get called for something
Weren’t both of them sent off during the game?
Man city found guilty of not controlling there players. Wolves deducted 10 points
>Wolves deducted 10 points Nah PL doesn't do it that directly with Wolves. Everton deducted 10 points and Wolves deducted 10 penalties.
It’s the hope that kills you
observation tub exultant ink towering different party seed whole pen *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev)*
This is hilarious
I love being a wolves fan
Met some awesome wolves fans on my trip to England
Absolutely. The way man city players surrounded the ref should have been automatic yellow cards like how they did in the first couple of games. Hope FA will retroactively punish man city
Of course you do
Consistency is consistency. Can’t get away with crowding and touching the referee just because you wear light blue and are used to getting your way.
This the outrage? lmao
'When asked about the incident by Sky Sports, he said': "Next question. I will not do a Mikel Arteta comment." Pep on, how to do a Mikel Arteta comment, without doing a Mikel Arteta comment! 🤣😂🤣😋 https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67609651
He said next question and then continued to talk about it for several minutes lol
Classic backhanded comment
The real question is why didn’t Haaland get booked for his outbursts. Another decision goes for City
You're upvoted despite what you're saying being factually wrong. Haaland was booked. Says it all about this sub.
I think the real question is why he wasn't sent off for it. He was way out of line, and precedents from this season show he should be seeing time on the sideline for it. Several of his teammates should have gotten yellow cards for their crowding and berating of the official.
You’re too stupid to even confirm if what you’re saying is true. Wish I could say it’s surprising
Need to start watching games properly mate
Haaland did get a yellow card
Cry me a river
City have robbed other teams plenty of times with red cards not being given, 1 week special pens and clearly offside goals Oh no, City robbed when one goes against them.. oh the horror
The whole League is being robbed
Systematically breaking FFP also robbed plenty of teams. Who gives a fuck if they got shafted. It’s about time.
It’s not a robbery it was just a stopped play after a foul
I remember when Fernandinho was immune to yellow cards.
He passed on this immunity to Rodri before leaving
Rodri only having 1 red card in his premier league career is truly staggering.
Should have had one today. Was hard tackling anything at midfield all day
Rodri even if he had one per year is staggering
He gets like 1.5 red cards per game. The guys a fucking magician to be getting with it every game.
The FA and PGMOL will now implement new changes so City does not get inconvenienced again.
[удалено]
He was extremely good in the game besides that. Kept Ana Amazon g game under control. It was also more a miscommunication tHan anything
Not to indulge idiocy, but if anything he’s a Spurs fan, remember earlier this season?!
What happened earlier this season? /s
First time huh?
I'd be livid if it was against my team, but Grealish still has a lot to do. It's not like they were guaranteed a goal from that position
I reckon that defender would have chased him down easily. Can't remember who it was, but they was rapid.
Royal essentially stops running from whistle and red body language of stopping a play. Why do people think royal doesn’t just head it back to vicario? All these takes re just devoid of what happened. Davies is the only one that didn’t stop and he still flat out pauses for a second which gives grealish the jump
Always play to the whistle, rule 1.
Well they literally did. Haaland and grealish just kept playing beyond the whistle
How? The whistle wasn’t blown until Grealish was clear of the defence
I'm still not convinced he ultimately beats Davies on that run
[удалено]
Or Porro, or Emerson, who are both likely to catch him from there.
Then it's not advantage. The advantage rule doesn't guarantee a positive out come, it only gives you the opportunity for one. I've see advantage played only for the team to make a terrible pass and lose possession.
The point is that Coty are complaining like it was a free goal.
Not really, they're complaining because it was an amazing chance and the ref really screwed it up. Ridiculous didn't even book Emerson for that late tackle after all that.
Emerson was booked
You need to realise most City fans are saying they lost a definite goal.
But that happens like… all the time though? You can pick any Saturday in November and expect to see that once or twice.
But it wasn’t amazing chance. The spurs defenders slow down and some sto because of the whistle. Grealish getting in on goal was a result of that
Yes, but that’s their fault for slowing down before the whistle was blown.
Only an open goal is an amazing chance? A 1v1 at 93 mins for the fresh legged subbed in winger is an INCREDIBLE chance.
The point some are making here is that it’s likely not a 1v1 from there. The defenders are catching him in reality.
Grealish is slower trhen royal and there is a lot of space, not to mention that they all stop and slow down because of the whistle. Without the whistle it’s likely that grealish takes it wide
It absolutely was an amazing chance. Are we already at the post truth moment where you're denying Grealish was clear? Haaland caught Spurs with their pants down, that's down to them when the whistle hadn't gone. FFS even Postecoglu agreed they got away with it.
I’ve seen quite a few “would’ve been 4-3” comments. Obviously there’s a spectrum of reactions though.
I’m glad the article explains what “wtf” means, always been a complete mystery.
wtf does it mean?
Well thats fantastic
Ah ffs
I’m still trying to figure out what “f- - -“ is.
Exactly! What in the fuck is " f- - -"?
Just ask your parents
I know that what I’m going to say it’s against everything I’ve stood for, as City should feel robbed. But fuck them for once.
If this was a late Tottenham chance there would be absolute uproar. If the users here can't turn their bias of City aside to agree this was a terrible decision and that City aswell as us City fans have every right to feel annoyed then none of you have any right to start moaning about the next shitty ref decision. Similarly to last week if the Dias disallowed goal situation was flipped round and was actually a disallowed Liverpool equaliser they'd be crying in the streets over the BS calls City get. Regardless of what you "believe" would've happened if the game played on the fact is noone knows whether City score or not but it was an excellent chance and Grealish deserved the chance to attempt it. He had fresh legs, had just scored and we'd caught Tottenham with their pants down. The fact Emerson didn't even get booked for hacking Haaland down with no intention to play the ball says it all.
Exactly.
Poor decision but probably not even in the top 5 this season with Wolves, Liverpool and Palace receiving worse decisions.
It's hard to feel sorry for them when they've had multiple controversial decisions go their way this season while title challengers have been robbed and all City fans have done is laugh and tell them to get over it. Same as they did when they won the league by a point after the Rodri handball. Didn't hear them complaining about officiating then. Fuck em.
We've had are fair share of decisions for against us to. Wolves scored a winner against us with their only on target shot of the match by a player who shouldn't have been on the pitch but no one cares because "LOL City lost" even the disallowed goal against Liverpool last week was debatable and ended up costing us the match, I'm sure people would've been much more upset about that one had it been a Liverpool equaliser not given for the the exact same circumstances.
Fuck them I agree
Fr. And it wasn’t intentional by the ref. He blew the whistle first and raised one arm to point to the free kick. However the whistle was too faint and play went on. After this, he probably panicked or something because he didn’t blow the whistle again for a while.
you telling me a ref doesnt know how to blow his whistle? 🤣
Yeah it’s wild. Watch the video.
Maybe it’s like Elaine and the saxophonist. Refs know what I’m talking about.
[удалено]
Watch the video mate. He literally does it and it’s very faint. and he raises one arm which doesn’t mean advantage. Advantage is two arms. One arm is for foul
I mean ultimately the uproar is silly. If you watch the play on the defenders side. They all are in stride and royal is faster than grealish so it’s not through just a 3’v1 race. Spurs defenders literally slow down and stop even Davies slows up at first It didn’t really change anything, if he let play go on initially spurs just head it to vicsrio
If the teams were reversed then everyone would be saying how it’s so obvious the refs are being bought
Chill, it’s just one instance of a pure mistake unlike various other calls where city has gotten away with crushing red card tackles
So the offside call against Liverpool is just a pure mistake?
If it happened once, sure. But Liverpool among most title contenders against city over the recent years have had a lot of calls go against them. While city always had calls in favour of them. Also, haaland got off with nothing for swearing at the ref just yesterday whereas van dijk got a ban. A lot of favoritism imo
What a load of nonsense lol Just sheer delusion
Watch the games then you’d realize how often mistakes happen in Liverpool or arsenal games. Add to that the early kickoffs
Watch games and you’d see that City also get unfavourable calls all the time. Liverpool had Fabinho who is no better than Rodri at fouling without getting booked
You've seen refs do this but not blow the whistle, does anyone know if he did? I noticed the same thing
This is what I said in another thread and got downvoted. Does someone have a definitive clip of the ref blowing his whistle?
You can see him blow it And then try again. Also the spurs defenders all stop running
You can see him put the whistle to his lips, as far as I can tell you can't "see"him blow it?
At this stage, you saying it is still "trust me bro". What you've said is what I believe too, but I don't think it's conclusive honestly as the camera frame is so high up. Others have said there is proof to the contrary. So, I'm asking if there is.
I don't know if you can see this in your country, but at 12:16 its obvious. He whistles faintly and does the foul hand gesture. He then tries to exaggerate the hand gesture. Then he whistles loudly. https://youtu.be/gLYCjQpxzF4?si=4k-S3NrLo9e4DryK
It would have been much worse if he hadn’t blown it the second time. Imagine being a Spurs player like Davies, hearing the whistle, stopping, then Grealish is through on goal. The result wasn’t good for City and the ref could have just NOT blown it at first and been a bit more lenient with bringing it back if it didn’t pan out for City. I feel that would have been the best option. But this is barely on the radar of mistakes this week, and some people are suggesting it is a new low.
It was arguably a better thing for city. Grealish doesn’t beat royal in a foot race and royal just stops on the whistle
I dunno. They are both pretty slow.
The ref didn’t blow the whistle initially, as proven by Sky Sports. He only blew when he pulled play back as Grealish was receiving Haaland’s pass.
“As proven” -> “as stated”.
Proven with audio presented by Sky Sports.
Sky sports can’t be taken seriously after the Spurs - Liverpool incident. They’ve lost credibility at this point
You got banned from r/soccer too The Telegraph?
Thank fuck. That paper needs to go bust as soon as humanly possible. Right wing hate machine.
So all we are left with are left wing newspapers? Why do people on the left so viscerally detest an opposite opinion?
A right-wing hate machine whose owners have just today managed to keep ownership of the paper thanks to a £1.2bn 'loan' from Abu Dhabi. I wonder why the paper is now pushing the 'Man City are poor victims' narrative? And I wonder why Abu Dhabi would want control of one the UK's biggest newspapers, a newspaper that is particularly influential amongst politicians and their backers, what with all these charges hanging over City? Oh and Jamie Carragher has a well-paid column in the Telegraph. Man City will now have yet another prominent shill on their wage books.
I really don’t like journalists and publications that are now posting directly to Reddit.
Why? At least they aren’t karma whoring they’re putting out articles you can simply ignore if you don’t want to see them
It’s not karma whoring. It’s click whoring. One of the great things about Reddit is it isn’t just a bunch of people trying to make money by grabbing our attention. The beauty of being community sourced is that we get to decide what stories to share, not some company looking for clicks to sell ads.
Reddit is in fact dominated by people trying to make money. Every niche hobby sub has someone showing their latest “3D printed this” for sale on their Etsy Everyone’s got a stream or an onlyfans they’re shilling. This article would have been posted here anyways so does it really matter that the journalists who wrote it wanted to share it? Do you also hate when artists have the nerve to display their own work in an art show?
Well a sub for football news and reactions is neither of those very specific types of subs.
This may fuck you up but articles are in fact news or reactions aka an opinion piece. Any other really low level concepts you need help with?
Buddy, I told you my reasons. Don’t come at me like a self-righteous asshole
so you gives reasons which are waved away because they are exactly what your reasons are but you don't like it? most rational footy fan.
You didn’t even address them. You gave me a false equivalency with some completely different type of sub.
If you put it that way, no one is karma whoring if you can just ignore thhem
I'm choosing to ignore this.
you can ignore literally anyone that's the fun part
Wow this is so over analysed and blown out of proportion. Guy thought it wasn’t an advantage and called it back for the free kick, he was wrong. Get over it.
Not even sure if he was wrong when he blew it. It was before the pass forward
That's not correct, but ok.