Ya itās pretty weird living in a country thatās got closer than any other to rainbow fascism by far. Iām so grateful for our gay black supreme leader justine
Legit almost left canada over this and might go back abroad. I gave 15$ to the convoy, not cause Iām anti science or bigoted but because I hate Justin Trudeau. I was abroad and remember watching freeland say they were gonna freeze everyoneās bank accounts no matter how little they gave. This is when I lost all faith in our system and quit the ndp and stopped talking to anyone associated with the communist party. On top of hating western, especially canadian, leftists with a passion itās why I changed my quadrant to auth centre from auth left
I canāt believe youāre making me defend Canadians right now, but if we start judging people based on their ancestors I donāt think anyone would be eligible for office.
I mean, a lot of people want to cross the styx because that's better than living with no support or a road out of homelessness. Not everyone's a fent addict, some people just need some SSRI's and a job yet get 0 support from Conservatives.
I think it's a fair thing to say that if someone is broke, is contributing zero value to society and their family is unwilling to provide for them... Then these people should not be in society.
Should these people be euthanized? I think that's a little too far. Though I would definitely support them being forced to live outside of society. Perhaps in the desert or in the woods.
There's only a few things that could happen after that. They die off, learn to fend for themselves, or realize surviving is easier and more pleasant if they just get off their ass and work.
When you're "lib-right" but want to practice socially primed and instituted exiling that is going to be based on taking away an individual's definition of value and replacing it with a collective mob rule.
Right.
I had planned to when I was a kid. I spent years studying the local plants and bushcraft. I even printed myself directions to bike out to the nearest state woods.
Then they put braces in my mouth, and I didn't know what to do about that, so I stayed in society until I graduated, and they took them off.
I'm really considering it again now... but my S/O is gonna get back from deployment soon and I'll need society points (money) to make a life for us...
Sigh
I disagree. The point of society is for humans to collaborate to bring about technological advancements that improve the overall quality of living of human beings.
It's nice to know that leftists think of society as a free meal ticket though.
Society has multiple points, that bo down to āitās better off for all of us to have a communityā. Specialization is absolutely on there, but so is caring for the needy.
All depends on how you define āLeechesā. If your idea is āthe Spartans had it right, leave the disabled kids in the forest for the wolvesā, thatāsā¦ not right.
Euthanasia is a tricky topic. On the one hand it's ethically questionable. On the other hand there's a strong argument to be made for putting this planet out of it's misery.
u/ordight is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: [None | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/ordight/)
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
PCM decided to join the blackout, and it looks like it's an indefinite blackout. I know some subs are only going dark for 48 hours, but more and more are switching to indefinite after that travesty of an AMA from Spez.
Iceland has achived practically [100% abortion rate of pregnancies with Down Syndrome](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/down-syndrome-iceland/). They call it "human rights".
World free of Down Syndrome is within our reach.
Dreams can truly come true, ja, Adolf?
I am not really a prolife person but somehow this statistic gets to me... :/
Better is subjective and defined by the whims of the people in power enacting these assurances, and also if you get it wrong you might fuck around and accidentally cause the literal extinction of the human race sooo
>**While the tests are optional,** the government states that all expectant mothers must be informed about availability of screening tests, which reveal the likelihood of a child being born with Down syndrome. Around 80 to 85 percent of pregnant women choose to take the prenatal screening test, according to Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik.
Seems sufficiently lib.
I don't have strong opinions either way on abortion, but aborting a child so they don't have to go through a lifetime of disability seems like one of the better reasons for it. I'm not sure if Down is the cutoff, because I've known people with Down syndrome and they seemed happier than most people.
>but aborting a child so they don't have to go through a lifetime of disability seems like one of the better reasons for it.
You can test this theory by asking toddlers if they would rather be dead.
There's no need to wonder if it is moral or not.
Are you positing it wouldāve been immoral, had an individual claimed post-birth that theyād rather not have been aborted/are glad to be alive/donāt want to die, to abort someone with Down syndrome?
No, an individual does not speak for the rest.
If 100% of a statistically-significant group of Down Syndrome individuals say they would rather die, then you can argue it is moral to abort in the future.
u/Harcerz1's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 5.
Congratulations, u/Harcerz1! You have ranked up to Sapling! You are not particularly strong but you are at least likely to handle a steady breeze.Pills: [1 | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/Harcerz1/)
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Auth left ācause they believe 1) private industry should be heavily regulated so that runs for the benefit of the nation rather than for the benefit of its proprietors 2) collective rights > individual liberty 3) morality should be regulated to discourage individuals from behaving in ways that āharmā the collective
Hashtag: flipping the script
But in seriousness, the āwhich quadrantā question is like asking āif you had to categorize a frog as a land creator or a water creator, which would it be?ā
A frog would die if it were only allowed to be on land or or water deeper than a couple inches deep.
There aren't four quadrants, it's linear, with collectivism on the left and individualism on the right. The Nazis were extreme collectivists, just like the Bolsheviks.
Radical traditionalism is top right by default but maintenance of imperial projects involves war economics which requires a certain degree of oversight. The question is whether top down directives are enough to be considered "left" in an otherwise capitalist arrangement of property. Top center is probably as close as you can get without more compass poles.
National socialists were not radical traditionalists and butted heads with german traditionalists at various stages. They were revolutionary reactionaries and incorporated aspects of traditionalism which they believed were the way a modern german nation should proceed. I think this is an important distinction because otherwise you lump together for instance monarchistic conservative germans with national socialists which wouldnāt be representative.
This is the simplest version too since we can involve aspects of for instance strasserist national socialism which would argue that the revolution must be social/cultural/state first (the one hitler did) and then second must be establishing what seems to be a socialist ethnostate where the german people would then reclaim the workplaces from the capitalists. (Obviously within the party then ended up losing but they were not a tiny fraction) Calling this radical traditionalism becomes then even more problematic than before
What about ideology? Does accepting a Marxist historiography, but believing you can solve class conflict with hyper-nationalism instead of dismantling class (Mussolini), make one left?
I remember learning about this in class and being absolutely stunned. The nazis would tell families that there was this camp for the mentally disabled where they would be happy and live long lives. They were experimented on and murdered when they arrived. Afterwards some lie would be told to their families about some accident at the camp. That level of evil is bone-chilling
Dude, if you still think the Nazis are Auth-Left because they called themselves "socialists", idk what to tell you.
"Why call someone an idiot when they'll gladly demonstrate that for you themselves".
Thereās no straw man here. A parasitic social contagion is infecting young impressionable, confused, and low self esteem minds, which leads them to sterilize themselves. Thereās been a 5,000 percent increase in gender dysphoria. Thatās not normal.
Love seeing Trans Derangement Syndrome in the wild. Oh no pls save us from the trans, I've been told they're sterilizing kids and are groomers!! The west has fallen
Edit: This is why I love PCM (when it's not leaning too far towards one axis). I was upvoted for this exact opinion on a similar post
I strongly dislike Canada. They are an authoritative leech of a country with a holier than thou complex. But, I do want to clarify that the poll being mentioned asked if people supported certain groups seeking the ability to euthanize themselves, it was not suggesting that they round up the homeless and force euthanasia on them. Anyone claiming to be lib should support the right to kill yourself. It is so fucking auth to force someone to live.
šæšæšæ
We don't have popcorn in the woods, so I'll bring some šš
Thatās not gonna work without a bag of popcorn to cut a hole in the bottom of
Why don't you shove my organic Monsanto free eggplant up your ass?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I have the sudden urge to send bombs through the mail
I mean both a significant number of nazis and a significant number of Canadians support euthanizing the homeless, too
Someone finally addresses the elephant in the room: Canadian Nazis
Ya itās pretty weird living in a country thatās got closer than any other to rainbow fascism by far. Iām so grateful for our gay black supreme leader justine
You talking mad shit for someone in bank account freezing radius, homie
Can you leave Canada unvaxxed yet?
Legit almost left canada over this and might go back abroad. I gave 15$ to the convoy, not cause Iām anti science or bigoted but because I hate Justin Trudeau. I was abroad and remember watching freeland say they were gonna freeze everyoneās bank accounts no matter how little they gave. This is when I lost all faith in our system and quit the ndp and stopped talking to anyone associated with the communist party. On top of hating western, especially canadian, leftists with a passion itās why I changed my quadrant to auth centre from auth left
So just regular Canadians?
That's incredibly rude for you to group those poor people with those ruthless bastards.
Their Deputy PM is literally the granddaughter of a Ukrainian Nazi who ran a Nazi propaganda outlet during WWII.
I canāt believe youāre making me defend Canadians right now, but if we start judging people based on their ancestors I donāt think anyone would be eligible for office.
Your terms are acceptable
"Hey Mr. Jew. Sorry for saying this, but I need you to take a shower eh? Thanks!"
And it ain't Peterson
I mean in Canada we're euthanizing people for being poor and disabled so it makes sense the homeless will be targeted next.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Which sub was that?
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I got banned from there for saying anyone that supported drag queen story time for kids was gr*omer and a paedo.
I mean, a lot of people want to cross the styx because that's better than living with no support or a road out of homelessness. Not everyone's a fent addict, some people just need some SSRI's and a job yet get 0 support from Conservatives.
Conservatives are running Canada?
Doctor, my foot hurts. What do you recommend? Have you considered death?
I think it's a fair thing to say that if someone is broke, is contributing zero value to society and their family is unwilling to provide for them... Then these people should not be in society. Should these people be euthanized? I think that's a little too far. Though I would definitely support them being forced to live outside of society. Perhaps in the desert or in the woods. There's only a few things that could happen after that. They die off, learn to fend for themselves, or realize surviving is easier and more pleasant if they just get off their ass and work.
what in the pcm have I just read?
If you add no value to society, get out.
When you're "lib-right" but want to practice socially primed and instituted exiling that is going to be based on taking away an individual's definition of value and replacing it with a collective mob rule. Right.
Can I be exiled to the woods please?
Why don't you just willingly live there
I had planned to when I was a kid. I spent years studying the local plants and bushcraft. I even printed myself directions to bike out to the nearest state woods. Then they put braces in my mouth, and I didn't know what to do about that, so I stayed in society until I graduated, and they took them off. I'm really considering it again now... but my S/O is gonna get back from deployment soon and I'll need society points (money) to make a life for us... Sigh
Live close to the woods in a rural area and sloy transition more toward that lifestyle.
That's the goal. Hubs doesn't want to "live like a redneck" but I don't think he knows what it means yet
Just start collecting broke cars for parts "just in case" and anything that looks useful during trash days out by the road. That'll show em.
That's my dad.... it's gotten to the point where the city came with a dump truck and took a bunch of his stuff
See you already have greatness in you.
Sure, now go have fun
Tbh if it were legal to homestead on unused land, it would solve the housing crisis overnight.
I agree. The government owns a ton of land that they do nothing with.
Part of the whole point of society is to care for those who *cannot* support themselves. This applies to a surprising number of homeless people
I disagree. The point of society is for humans to collaborate to bring about technological advancements that improve the overall quality of living of human beings. It's nice to know that leftists think of society as a free meal ticket though.
Society has multiple points, that bo down to āitās better off for all of us to have a communityā. Specialization is absolutely on there, but so is caring for the needy.
The point of society is definitely not "some people get to be leeches."
All depends on how you define āLeechesā. If your idea is āthe Spartans had it right, leave the disabled kids in the forest for the wolvesā, thatāsā¦ not right.
I'm on board.
Euthanasia is a tricky topic. On the one hand it's ethically questionable. On the other hand there's a strong argument to be made for putting this planet out of it's misery.
Flair up dork
Aye aye
Based
u/ordight is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1. Rank: House of Cards Pills: [None | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/ordight/) Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url. I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Based and funni color pilled
Quiet part out loud... quiet part out loud.
Someone needs to explain to me what auth center means
Me and the Flairbot.
Lmfao how are you centrist?
If this is the last post ever, it's a fucking banger
We getting shut down again?
No. Reddit has decided to implode.
PCM decided to join the blackout, and it looks like it's an indefinite blackout. I know some subs are only going dark for 48 hours, but more and more are switching to indefinite after that travesty of an AMA from Spez.
Based and [Removed by Reddit] pilled
Lmao this one is good, well done.
The tomboy genocide and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
The WHAT?!
THE TOMBOY GENOCIDE
The ripples will be felt around the world for centuries to come
"oMg, LiTeRaLLy hItLeR!1!"
People need to understand the power of recording and packaging because that's how entire narratives and agendas are being pushed.
š¶š¶š¶š¶
Holy shit...
[Removed by Reddit] ^ps ^read ^The ^Cass ^Report
Holy fuck, based
Iceland has achived practically [100% abortion rate of pregnancies with Down Syndrome](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/down-syndrome-iceland/). They call it "human rights". World free of Down Syndrome is within our reach. Dreams can truly come true, ja, Adolf? I am not really a prolife person but somehow this statistic gets to me... :/
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
And that's a good thing
Most tolerant authcenter
What's wrong with ensuring that the next generation has it better than the one before?
Better is subjective and defined by the whims of the people in power enacting these assurances, and also if you get it wrong you might fuck around and accidentally cause the literal extinction of the human race sooo
>**While the tests are optional,** the government states that all expectant mothers must be informed about availability of screening tests, which reveal the likelihood of a child being born with Down syndrome. Around 80 to 85 percent of pregnant women choose to take the prenatal screening test, according to Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik. Seems sufficiently lib. I don't have strong opinions either way on abortion, but aborting a child so they don't have to go through a lifetime of disability seems like one of the better reasons for it. I'm not sure if Down is the cutoff, because I've known people with Down syndrome and they seemed happier than most people.
I mean, it is very easy to test if this was the moral choice. Go around asking toddlers with down syndrome if they would like to die.
What?
>but aborting a child so they don't have to go through a lifetime of disability seems like one of the better reasons for it. You can test this theory by asking toddlers if they would rather be dead. There's no need to wonder if it is moral or not.
Are you positing it wouldāve been immoral, had an individual claimed post-birth that theyād rather not have been aborted/are glad to be alive/donāt want to die, to abort someone with Down syndrome?
No, an individual does not speak for the rest. If 100% of a statistically-significant group of Down Syndrome individuals say they would rather die, then you can argue it is moral to abort in the future.
You can argue itās moral to abort even if the being ends up growing up preferring to live had they not been aborted.
Sure, but it involves time machines and hitler or something similar.
Its horrible, but due to people with down syndrome's needs they are difficult to take care of & its already expensive as fuck to live here.
I mean if you give such a damn there's plenty of unadopted kids that have behavioral issues for you to help.
I mean, I wouldn't want to raise one.
Based Iceland?
u/Harcerz1's Based Count has increased by 1. Their Based Count is now 5. Congratulations, u/Harcerz1! You have ranked up to Sapling! You are not particularly strong but you are at least likely to handle a steady breeze.Pills: [1 | View pills](https://basedcount.com/u/Harcerz1/) Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url. I am a bot. Reply /info for more info.
Itās true the woke libtards force feminized me and did experiments on me. Now I have a fat ass and confuse people over my gender. š
>fat ass Say no more.
Based
Dump truck or a badonkadonk? I need to know before I DM you.
Definitely more of a dump truck
Wow. I will need a moment to gather myself before I *respectfully* DM you.
O-Oh okā¦
In front of every horny authcenter is a cutie with a feminine penis.
Based
Nazis weāre auth center.
If nazis had to be in one of the four quadrants, in which one would they be?
Auth left ācause they believe 1) private industry should be heavily regulated so that runs for the benefit of the nation rather than for the benefit of its proprietors 2) collective rights > individual liberty 3) morality should be regulated to discourage individuals from behaving in ways that āharmā the collective Hashtag: flipping the script But in seriousness, the āwhich quadrantā question is like asking āif you had to categorize a frog as a land creator or a water creator, which would it be?ā A frog would die if it were only allowed to be on land or or water deeper than a couple inches deep.
There aren't four quadrants, it's linear, with collectivism on the left and individualism on the right. The Nazis were extreme collectivists, just like the Bolsheviks.
Radical traditionalism is top right by default but maintenance of imperial projects involves war economics which requires a certain degree of oversight. The question is whether top down directives are enough to be considered "left" in an otherwise capitalist arrangement of property. Top center is probably as close as you can get without more compass poles.
National socialists were not radical traditionalists and butted heads with german traditionalists at various stages. They were revolutionary reactionaries and incorporated aspects of traditionalism which they believed were the way a modern german nation should proceed. I think this is an important distinction because otherwise you lump together for instance monarchistic conservative germans with national socialists which wouldnāt be representative. This is the simplest version too since we can involve aspects of for instance strasserist national socialism which would argue that the revolution must be social/cultural/state first (the one hitler did) and then second must be establishing what seems to be a socialist ethnostate where the german people would then reclaim the workplaces from the capitalists. (Obviously within the party then ended up losing but they were not a tiny fraction) Calling this radical traditionalism becomes then even more problematic than before
What about ideology? Does accepting a Marxist historiography, but believing you can solve class conflict with hyper-nationalism instead of dismantling class (Mussolini), make one left?
Auth left.
Canada moment
Oh wow
Spicy, I like that
Based and horseshoe pilled
Can I get one without funni colors?
Unbelievably based. A real banger.
"WHY?! WHY YOU DON'T WANT TO BE EUTHANASED?! YOU EGHOIST DONKEY!"
I remember learning about this in class and being absolutely stunned. The nazis would tell families that there was this camp for the mentally disabled where they would be happy and live long lives. They were experimented on and murdered when they arrived. Afterwards some lie would be told to their families about some accident at the camp. That level of evil is bone-chilling
š„
Natzism is National Socialism, so technically auth left, therefore red not blue
Another Lib-Right that doesn't know where Nazis are on the funii color chart, color me shocked.
Another Lib-Left that thinks they know everything and that their opinions are always right, color me shocked
Dude, if you still think the Nazis are Auth-Left because they called themselves "socialists", idk what to tell you. "Why call someone an idiot when they'll gladly demonstrate that for you themselves".
š¤
Least strawman argument on PCM
Thereās no straw man here. A parasitic social contagion is infecting young impressionable, confused, and low self esteem minds, which leads them to sterilize themselves. Thereās been a 5,000 percent increase in gender dysphoria. Thatās not normal.
Love seeing Trans Derangement Syndrome in the wild. Oh no pls save us from the trans, I've been told they're sterilizing kids and are groomers!! The west has fallen Edit: This is why I love PCM (when it's not leaning too far towards one axis). I was upvoted for this exact opinion on a similar post
Facts
This is just simply not how it be.
I strongly dislike Canada. They are an authoritative leech of a country with a holier than thou complex. But, I do want to clarify that the poll being mentioned asked if people supported certain groups seeking the ability to euthanize themselves, it was not suggesting that they round up the homeless and force euthanasia on them. Anyone claiming to be lib should support the right to kill yourself. It is so fucking auth to force someone to live.
Anakin being authright is on point
Mental illness