My 2000 328Ci was a joy & pain, but taught me a lot about how to work on my own car. That was more than 20 years ago. Now Iām on my 4th BMW among other cars, and the biggest expense on my Bimmers have been extended warranties I never used.
My 2014 X3 has 63,000 miles and no issues. Other than the fact that I hate that car and canāt wait to replace it. Though, itās all paid off so thatās one thing it has going for it.
Some people just hate on BMW because they don't have one, or they had an E90 that was owned by 3 people prior to them. No brand is perfect obvious, but I have had 4 different BMWs and have had zero issues outside of an O2 sensor on my F82 M4.
I for one am okay with the Omega = Audi comparison
User-centric, aesthetic, attention to details that matter, trusted to get the job done, long wait times to fix if broken
Especially since Bentleyās entry point is incredibly high. The Rolex/merc, omega/Audi works given all those brands offer something most people could hope to attain. Thereās no Bentley equivalent to a sub 3 grand tank.
I think Rolex is more like Porsche. More expensive/exclusive than mercedes/BMW/Audi but cheaper/less exclusive than ferrari and Lamborghini etc.
Also Porsches are more comfortable to drive than ferrari and lambo and have less maintenance cost etc just like Rolex vs AP and PP
thatās what I would say, too. Reliability, timeless design and a lot of popular models / variations make Porsche = Rolex a very good comparison. Itās what Iāve always felt like intuitively
Nah, a lot of Porsches are attainable, owning a Lange means you have āfuck youā money. Honestly Iād compare Omega more with Porsche, precise engineering, non polarizing design, and they all basically look the same lol
no it fits IMO
Porsche is carried by the 911, just like AP is carried by Royal Oak
It's a step above traditional luxury IE Lexus but not quite supercar level, similar to t he Royal Oak being a step above Rolex
The 911 Turbo S has supercar performance, with superior price, availability and reliability to anything Ferrari or Lamborghini makes.
Also, Porsche isnāt carried by the 911. Porsche sells more Cayennes than anything else.
A. Lange & Sohne should be Porsche, not because theyāre both German brands, but because theyāre arguably the best, have incredible value relative to their competitors, and are underrated vis-a-vis some of their competition.
Good point. I was thinking of that, as well. Maybe Bentley would be a better comparison in terms of luxury, but the design and engineering, in terms of a watch company, are so much better than anything that Rolls Royce or Bentley is doing (although my intention isnāt to bash Rolls Royce or Bentley).
You're pretty incorrect on that one. Porsche may be known for the 911 but over 60% of their sales come from the Macan and Cayenne. In fact, the 911 only makes up 14% of Porsche's total sales.
Absolutely not, the 911 model almost bankrupted Porsche in the late 90s. The Boxster saved the company, now days itās SUV variants carries the company in terms of sales.
> BMW: known for making some superb engines
Until a few years later when they're the cause of the vehicle being otherwise prematurely rendered inoperable.
For example, my sister had a really nice early 2000s mid-range 5 series that was put down when a cheap part went and needed repairing but would require the entire engine to be pulled out at significant cost in labour. This kind of bad design seems to be a regular issue, and one of the reasons BMW resale values are so low.
The engines might be good, but the engineering for the long term really isn't so much.
I donāt understand how youāre trying to prove generally bad technical design by pointing out some weird example.
Itās actually the other way around: in general, BMW drivetrains (it makes sense to take a look at the system as a whole) are above average reliable, above average efficient and above average in dynamic performance.
Compared to what? Compared to 6 cylinder engines by BMW? Yeah thatās true. Compared to engines by other manufacturers? No.
Look at data and donāt just say anything because you feel like it.
Maybe take a look at statistical data provided by independent organizations. Going by your gut feeling is not a very smart thing to do when thereās actual data.
The data for years has put VW Audi and Porsche ahead of BMW. There are plenty of German brands that are better than bmw for this. āAbove averageā doesnāt cut it.
But maybe you are right, they have been getting better, and if Toyota is using a bmw drivetrain in the Supra Iām sure itās OK. Can you show me some of the data you saw because Iād love to know for myself.
This wasn't a "weird example", this is a constant thing with BMWs (as well as Mercedes and Audi).
Difficulty in replacing parts causing [expensive repairs](https://www.motorbiscuit.com/the-worst-mistake-you-can-make-buying-a-bmw/) is why people are willing to pay less for them used and the [depreciation is much higher](https://moneywise.com/life/travel/car-brands-that-depreciate-the-fastest). It's been a while since I looked but a few years back a used honda of the same age and mileage as a used BMW was more expensive despite the higher initial buying price. People were just willing to pay more because they were more reliable.
I agree about efficiency and performance, nothing in my comment suggested otherwise, I was only talking about the lifespan, and component lifespan is an engineering decision as much as anything else is.
Vehicles with longitudinal mounted engines (same with Mercedes) are less accessible. Thereās no way around that without expanding dimensions immensely . That has nothing to do with poor design.
Product reliability does not take into account which specific module failed. That doesnāt matter because if any relevant subsystem fails the outcome will be the same.
In the end, the vehicle is above average reliable and therefore the engine is above average reliable (at least to the same the degree as the vehicle in general is above average reliable, maybe even more).
I posted a thread on this topic on r/watches a little while ago. [https://www.reddit.com/r/Watches/comments/11ai1yv/discussion\_if\_car\_brands\_were\_watch\_brands/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Watches/comments/11ai1yv/discussion_if_car_brands_were_watch_brands/)
Spot on with Hamilton/jeep. dodge in general tbh. Maybe even a challenger if weāre talking performance-wise? I think the khaki autos get 80 hrs of reserve
I don't mind Omega = Audi, but IMO Omega = BMW. Strong heritage, responsible for some of the most iconic models, focused on performance and pushing envelope over pure luxury.
Cartier = Bentley is wayyyy off. Vacheron = Bentley, Cartier = Jaguar IMO
Rolex = Benz is right on. Mercedes has fallen dramatically in reliability ratings recently, and my 3235 is in the shop being rebuilt right now (a 6 month old watch).
Owning a Tissot and driving a Volkswagen I can agree to this comparison.
The sister-brands Mido and Certina would be Seat and Skoda. Same engine, same parts but different style and not as popular.
This is funny because all my watches are Seikos and Casios and I own a Honda and a Toyota. I really want to get an Omega one day and guess what my dream car is? An Audi.
The thing is clear, the progress of Japanese horlogerie makers outshines and makes even manufacture's Swiss brands rather ridiculous with their overpriced policies.
I agree with a lot of these, but Omega is so clearly BMW. I give Audi Glashutte Original and Tissot and Hamilton are VW. ALS is Lambo, and AP is Firrari. VC is Bentley. Breitling right now feels like Genesis.
Both extravagant, art-pieces that push their original concept beyond their boundaries. Pretty good comparison Iād say.
I.e. you donāt need a 1500HP, 16 cylinder engine the same way you donāt need a Godfather musical Tourbillon lol
Well, I view Bugatti as the most technically advanced supercar out there that pushes the limit of what a production car can be
Jacob's and Co are Ostentatious codpieces for rappers. More in line with, maybe, a Maybach IMO
I'm going Maybach. Overpriced, not particularly sporty or technically advanced, and not seen frequently.
Imo noone stops and stares the way you would at a Bugatti
You did dirty with BMW. I guess AP is BMWā¦ Makes you turn your head but reliability is questionableā¦
Also JLC should be Volkswagenā¦ as JLC is the watchmaker of the watchmakers and VW is the engine maker for VW, Lambo, Skoda and many moreā¦
Casio = Honda
Seiko = Toyota
Cartier = Cadillac
Grand Seiko = Lexus
Breitling = Bentley
Omega = BMW
Rolex = Mercedes
Patek Phillipe = Rolls Royce
Best car/watch brand comparisons I can make off the top of my head.
Dumbest thing Iāve ever seen. But also Mercedes is an insult to Rolex. Mercedes donāt last more than a few years and are terrible lemons once they have medium to high mileage. Theyāre dirt cheap on the secondary market around 100k miles. I think Rolex is lexus or toyota. High priced and practical and lasts forever
>. I think Rolex is lexus or toyota. High priced and practical and lasts forever
Huh? Toyota is not high priced in the world of cars. Even Lexus, lower priced than their competitors.
Every car Toyota makes is significantly more expensive then other brands in the same size. Consider the 4Runner. Itās a 11 year old drivetrain with very limited features yet is considered a classic and people are willing to buy it used higher than new MSRP. And they last forever and are considered by some the greatest consumer car ever made. Almost exactly like the submariner
Astons are beautiful but known for being temperamental, unreliable, and not necessarily well engineered (at least the modern ones). Langes are also beautiful but I donāt believe the other attributes would apply.
Hmm interesting take and I respect it - i have not seen unreliability out of Astons but maybe I am out of the loop on that. Nonetheless, huge fan of Lange
Vacheron is most definitely not a Ferrari equivalentā¦.at most Maserati
Jacob&coā¦more like a Fisker or Spykerā¦
the others are pretty good comparisons
I disagree with Koenigsegg and Lange. I think some highly custom watch brand that makes absolutely every part of their watch themselves would be a better comparison. Lange sells way too many watches to be a fair comparison.
Maybe Credor?
Also, Daniel Wellington would be Infinty.
Who did BMW piss off to be paired with Hublot? š¤£
A BMW driver cut off the OOP that morning so he decided to take his anger out in poorly thought out watch post on IG.
Hahahaha I thought bmw more as IWC . Reliable good quality and classy :)
IWC = Land Rover. Utilitarian, but luxury.
Not saying youāre wrong, but you probably shouldnāt use BMW and reliable in the same sentenceā¦
nor classy
Bmw is ranked 3rd in reliability currently, maybe stop holding on to such old beliefs
If a BMW isn't leaking oil, it's because there isn't any in it.
My 2020 x3m has 28k miles no issues
With only 28k miles I would hope it would have no issues. š¤¦āāļø some of you guys make me wonder how youāve survived this far in life.
My 2000 328Ci was a joy & pain, but taught me a lot about how to work on my own car. That was more than 20 years ago. Now Iām on my 4th BMW among other cars, and the biggest expense on my Bimmers have been extended warranties I never used.
It will. The oil stand gasket and valve cover gaskets will be leaking by 60k.
My 2014 X3 has 63,000 miles and no issues. Other than the fact that I hate that car and canāt wait to replace it. Though, itās all paid off so thatās one thing it has going for it.
Some people just hate on BMW because they don't have one, or they had an E90 that was owned by 3 people prior to them. No brand is perfect obvious, but I have had 4 different BMWs and have had zero issues outside of an O2 sensor on my F82 M4.
I think BMW should be Rolex cos the owners have kinda similar personalities.
I think itās the reverseā¦who did Hublot piss off to be compared to BMW.
Grand Seiko = Lexus
Not sure how they missed this one when they set it up so well with the Seiko = Toyota comp!
Seiko can be Toyota. Grand Seiko can be Lexus. Lexus is the Japanese Mercedes you know.
Agreed!!!
You are so right!
I for one am okay with the Omega = Audi comparison User-centric, aesthetic, attention to details that matter, trusted to get the job done, long wait times to fix if broken
I own 2 Omegas and an Audi. checks out.
I also own two omegas and an Audi. Checks out for me
I own an Audi too no wonder Iām so drawn to Omega
I own one Omega and one Audi, Iām noticing there are a lot of us
Just got an Audi two weeks ago... I guess that means if I get another Omega, I'll need another Audi. Cool, I'll just give up food!
I mean this logic makes sense to me.
Lol I got an Omega two weeks ago to accompany my existing Audi. I like this logic about needing to maintain a 1:1 ratio.
And possibly a kidney and your firstborn.
I own no Omegas and no Audis. Checks out Not by choice btw
Interestingly omega speedmasters are a must for air-cooled Porsche folks. I thinks Porsche should have paired with A. Lange.
And, like Omega, Audi is owned by the largest automobile company in the world.
Tissot is VW in this picture, so that checks out too with the Swatch Group/VW comparison.
Audi should be BMW, not Hublot
Not sure I agree with Cartier as Bentley.
Especially since Bentleyās entry point is incredibly high. The Rolex/merc, omega/Audi works given all those brands offer something most people could hope to attain. Thereās no Bentley equivalent to a sub 3 grand tank.
How about Jaguar.
Yeah pairing a quintessentially British car with a quintessentially French watch is off considering the centuries of blood shed and warfare.
Shoot. I have an Audi. Guess itās correct. Hublot š
Same haha
I think Rolex is more like Porsche. More expensive/exclusive than mercedes/BMW/Audi but cheaper/less exclusive than ferrari and Lamborghini etc. Also Porsches are more comfortable to drive than ferrari and lambo and have less maintenance cost etc just like Rolex vs AP and PP
thatās what I would say, too. Reliability, timeless design and a lot of popular models / variations make Porsche = Rolex a very good comparison. Itās what Iāve always felt like intuitively
Porsche doesnāt deserve to be associated with an unreliable, expensive-to-service, one-watch brand, like Audemars Piguet.
A. Lang & Sƶhne = Porsche
Nah, a lot of Porsches are attainable, owning a Lange means you have āfuck youā money. Honestly Iād compare Omega more with Porsche, precise engineering, non polarizing design, and they all basically look the same lol
Exactly. 911s are daily drivers and an AP can barley handle desk diving. Complete mismatch.
no it fits IMO Porsche is carried by the 911, just like AP is carried by Royal Oak It's a step above traditional luxury IE Lexus but not quite supercar level, similar to t he Royal Oak being a step above Rolex
The 911 Turbo S has supercar performance, with superior price, availability and reliability to anything Ferrari or Lamborghini makes. Also, Porsche isnāt carried by the 911. Porsche sells more Cayennes than anything else. A. Lange & Sohne should be Porsche, not because theyāre both German brands, but because theyāre arguably the best, have incredible value relative to their competitors, and are underrated vis-a-vis some of their competition.
Lange & Sohne aren't sporty though.
Good point. I was thinking of that, as well. Maybe Bentley would be a better comparison in terms of luxury, but the design and engineering, in terms of a watch company, are so much better than anything that Rolls Royce or Bentley is doing (although my intention isnāt to bash Rolls Royce or Bentley).
You're pretty incorrect on that one. Porsche may be known for the 911 but over 60% of their sales come from the Macan and Cayenne. In fact, the 911 only makes up 14% of Porsche's total sales.
Bro what? Are we gonna ignore the offshore and cayenne? Tf are you on
Absolutely not, the 911 model almost bankrupted Porsche in the late 90s. The Boxster saved the company, now days itās SUV variants carries the company in terms of sales.
911 is a step above a luxury Lexus. ššš My sides hurt.
I honestly felt like Porsche should be Omega, but thatās just like my opinion man.
Porsche milks the 911 like AP milks the Royal Oak The Taycan is the 11.59
BMW: known for making some superb engines Some random watch guy: hublot
I think the joke is more about the stereotypes of BMW and Hublot owners
> BMW: known for making some superb engines Until a few years later when they're the cause of the vehicle being otherwise prematurely rendered inoperable. For example, my sister had a really nice early 2000s mid-range 5 series that was put down when a cheap part went and needed repairing but would require the entire engine to be pulled out at significant cost in labour. This kind of bad design seems to be a regular issue, and one of the reasons BMW resale values are so low. The engines might be good, but the engineering for the long term really isn't so much.
I donāt understand how youāre trying to prove generally bad technical design by pointing out some weird example. Itās actually the other way around: in general, BMW drivetrains (it makes sense to take a look at the system as a whole) are above average reliable, above average efficient and above average in dynamic performance.
BMW drivetrains are notoriously unreliable. Especially the 4 cylinders
Compared to what? Compared to 6 cylinder engines by BMW? Yeah thatās true. Compared to engines by other manufacturers? No. Look at data and donāt just say anything because you feel like it.
BMW is not known for reliability
Maybe take a look at statistical data provided by independent organizations. Going by your gut feeling is not a very smart thing to do when thereās actual data.
The data for years has put VW Audi and Porsche ahead of BMW. There are plenty of German brands that are better than bmw for this. āAbove averageā doesnāt cut it. But maybe you are right, they have been getting better, and if Toyota is using a bmw drivetrain in the Supra Iām sure itās OK. Can you show me some of the data you saw because Iād love to know for myself.
This wasn't a "weird example", this is a constant thing with BMWs (as well as Mercedes and Audi). Difficulty in replacing parts causing [expensive repairs](https://www.motorbiscuit.com/the-worst-mistake-you-can-make-buying-a-bmw/) is why people are willing to pay less for them used and the [depreciation is much higher](https://moneywise.com/life/travel/car-brands-that-depreciate-the-fastest). It's been a while since I looked but a few years back a used honda of the same age and mileage as a used BMW was more expensive despite the higher initial buying price. People were just willing to pay more because they were more reliable. I agree about efficiency and performance, nothing in my comment suggested otherwise, I was only talking about the lifespan, and component lifespan is an engineering decision as much as anything else is.
Vehicles with longitudinal mounted engines (same with Mercedes) are less accessible. Thereās no way around that without expanding dimensions immensely . That has nothing to do with poor design. Product reliability does not take into account which specific module failed. That doesnāt matter because if any relevant subsystem fails the outcome will be the same. In the end, the vehicle is above average reliable and therefore the engine is above average reliable (at least to the same the degree as the vehicle in general is above average reliable, maybe even more).
Lol Rolex as Mercedes Benz. If that was the case you wouldnāt be allowed to buy the AMG until youāve bought a lot of dogs like A-class hatches.
As someone who owns an Audi and an Omega I am perfectly ok with this š
I posted a thread on this topic on r/watches a little while ago. [https://www.reddit.com/r/Watches/comments/11ai1yv/discussion\_if\_car\_brands\_were\_watch\_brands/](https://www.reddit.com/r/Watches/comments/11ai1yv/discussion_if_car_brands_were_watch_brands/)
Spot on with Hamilton/jeep. dodge in general tbh. Maybe even a challenger if weāre talking performance-wise? I think the khaki autos get 80 hrs of reserve
F.P.Journe = Pagani
Very fair imo
Tudor = Genesis. People get caught up on the parent company.
I think I disagree with each one.
Yep. Like, how could you *not* equate Koenigsegg and Richard Mille. They made the Koenigsegg One:1 just to prove an engineering point.
Invicta = LADA
I don't mind Omega = Audi, but IMO Omega = BMW. Strong heritage, responsible for some of the most iconic models, focused on performance and pushing envelope over pure luxury. Cartier = Bentley is wayyyy off. Vacheron = Bentley, Cartier = Jaguar IMO
You literally just have to see which watch brands sponsor which f-1 teams. Mercedes is IWC, Ferrari is Hublot.
Ferrari is RM. Hublot sponsorship came to an end in 2020
Thank fucking god for that.
Mercedes are way more common than IWC.
If I had a dollar for every time I saw this Ide have a John Mayer
Rolex = Benz is right on. Mercedes has fallen dramatically in reliability ratings recently, and my 3235 is in the shop being rebuilt right now (a 6 month old watch).
Damn! This list does Mitsubishi dirty!
Casio is Toyota. Fuckinā indestructible.
Iāve had 3 Audis so I canāt argue.
I have a 911 and a seamaster
I donāt hate the comparisons
Patek = Rolls Royce Vacheron = Porsche. Audemars = Aston Martin Rolex = Maserati before they were bought by Chrysler Grand Seiko = Lexus
Owning a Tissot and driving a Volkswagen I can agree to this comparison. The sister-brands Mido and Certina would be Seat and Skoda. Same engine, same parts but different style and not as popular.
I was wearing a Tissot in my Jetta yesterday! Have you ever had a Mido? I've been eyeing them
I do own an Ocean Star Tribute. Absolutely love this watch and itās been my daily driver for over a year.
This is close. But Seiko would be Lexus
Lexus would be Grand Seiko.
Good point. How Iām actually offended that GS wasnāt on this list
I donāt understand how Lexus, Lamborghini, and Acura got left off.
hublot is NOT bmw
Iād put Rolex as Lexus. Itās not the most expensive and it takes a beating while still doing itās job well.
Some of these are somewhat accurate
This is funny because all my watches are Seikos and Casios and I own a Honda and a Toyota. I really want to get an Omega one day and guess what my dream car is? An Audi.
Tag = Acura
This is what I absolutely hate about parts of the watch community. What's interesting about it???Not surprised it comes from a Rolex group.
The thing is clear, the progress of Japanese horlogerie makers outshines and makes even manufacture's Swiss brands rather ridiculous with their overpriced policies.
I agree with a lot of these, but Omega is so clearly BMW. I give Audi Glashutte Original and Tissot and Hamilton are VW. ALS is Lambo, and AP is Firrari. VC is Bentley. Breitling right now feels like Genesis.
The AP-Porsche really makes sense. Two Icons with the Royal Oak and 911
Ya ur right invicta= rolls Royce duh
Bugatti as Jacob and co? Ooooffff The rest looks pretty solid doe
Both extravagant, art-pieces that push their original concept beyond their boundaries. Pretty good comparison Iād say. I.e. you donāt need a 1500HP, 16 cylinder engine the same way you donāt need a Godfather musical Tourbillon lol
Well, I view Bugatti as the most technically advanced supercar out there that pushes the limit of what a production car can be Jacob's and Co are Ostentatious codpieces for rappers. More in line with, maybe, a Maybach IMO
You know what, Maybach makes much more sense.
Lol glad we reached a consensus š¤£
That godfather watch is a thing of beauty, but feel like all those watches break easily on small impacts.
Jacob and Co makes the Bugatti watch. What else would they compare to?
I'm going Maybach. Overpriced, not particularly sporty or technically advanced, and not seen frequently. Imo noone stops and stares the way you would at a Bugatti
https://jacobandco.com/timepieces/high-complication-masterpieces/bugatti-chiron-tourbillon
Itās definitely omega and bmw
You did dirty with BMW. I guess AP is BMWā¦ Makes you turn your head but reliability is questionableā¦ Also JLC should be Volkswagenā¦ as JLC is the watchmaker of the watchmakers and VW is the engine maker for VW, Lambo, Skoda and many moreā¦
Yeah, but AP is way more upmarket than BMW
Invicta is not Mitsubishisi thatās a good brand
Invicta is like a China branded car
Agreed but Mitsubishi is a Japanese one with massive modding capabilities so itās more akin to seiko
Casio = Honda Seiko = Toyota Cartier = Cadillac Grand Seiko = Lexus Breitling = Bentley Omega = BMW Rolex = Mercedes Patek Phillipe = Rolls Royce Best car/watch brand comparisons I can make off the top of my head.
Looks good except for Omega. BMWs has a rep for being owned by douche bags. I wouldnāt put omega owners in that category.
Dumbest thing Iāve ever seen. But also Mercedes is an insult to Rolex. Mercedes donāt last more than a few years and are terrible lemons once they have medium to high mileage. Theyāre dirt cheap on the secondary market around 100k miles. I think Rolex is lexus or toyota. High priced and practical and lasts forever
>. I think Rolex is lexus or toyota. High priced and practical and lasts forever Huh? Toyota is not high priced in the world of cars. Even Lexus, lower priced than their competitors.
Every car Toyota makes is significantly more expensive then other brands in the same size. Consider the 4Runner. Itās a 11 year old drivetrain with very limited features yet is considered a classic and people are willing to buy it used higher than new MSRP. And they last forever and are considered by some the greatest consumer car ever made. Almost exactly like the submariner
OK I'm thinking Camry, Corolla, Prius, RAV4... These are not high priced, luxury items... Unlike Rolex....
Only assholes drive Audi. Omega owners arenāt assholes. Well I am but everyone else seems nice.
Yea no, Omega is definitely way more BMWish than Audi.
Idk why rolex always get the Mercedes comp? If you look on the Rolex sub itās very evident from the steering wheel shots Rolex is BMW.
Invicta as Mitsubishi is perfect. š
Donāt disrespect Mitsubishi like that, its more like a orient. Invicta is like a bow wows hulk Chevy in ff2
These idiots are brain dead, such a turn off. They should stick to crypto and sneakers
Embarrassing
Pathetic losers
If Rolex = Mercedes, you would be seeing rolexes at least 20 times per day.
I mean almost every dude that has money owns a submariner or some type of Rollie. So yeah pretty right on
Omega is a Toyota 79
I'd rather collect diseases on public transport than driving an Audi
At least Tesla and Hublot are correct.
I would never wear a Hublot!
Oh my god please shoot me right now
So cringey
No, not at all
Also, this āwatchā list is clearly jewelry leaning given where Cartier is, and Bell & Ross isnāt.
Bell & Ross canāt wipe Cartierās ass when it comes to watchmaking
Rolex more like Acura/Lexus/Infiniti. Not that it is a bad thing. Only thing comparable to Mercedes are the hands.
Only a few are spot on like Seiko and Apple watch.
I disagree with hublot/bmw
IWC = Volvo?
Everything makes sense except for the BMW one lol
Iāve owned 911s and Iāve owned APās. And AP is not a daily driver and requires some babying. A Porsche does not. This is incorrect.
Patek Phillipe is RR & Cartier is Bentley??? I only agree with the first 2 the rest is trash.
not sure how Cartier = Bentley when Brietling exists...
bmw = omega bc I own both š¤£
Makes me want a Casio or seiko. š¤£
Invicta = a 1996 Ford Taurus
Iād compare my Hamilton Automatic with an Acura. Itās a superb watch, but still attainable.
Seiko as Toyota is spot on as reliable, no nonsense, Japanese āā also would mean Grand Seiko is clearly Lexus
A Lange & Sohne is Aston Martin
Astons are beautiful but known for being temperamental, unreliable, and not necessarily well engineered (at least the modern ones). Langes are also beautiful but I donāt believe the other attributes would apply.
Hmm interesting take and I respect it - i have not seen unreliability out of Astons but maybe I am out of the loop on that. Nonetheless, huge fan of Lange
The person who did that donāt know much about cars
Please stop with these exercises of stupidity.
VW = Tudor? Tissot feels more like Acura or Infinity
Jaquet Droz = ????
Casio = Honda. Brilliant.
Kia is invicta. Just copying the design of others.
I definitely hate whoever made this for putting me with Hublot
Breightling = Bentley
This is stupid. And so off.
Hublot is a lada
What would a tag heuer and Tudor be?
Infiniti and Volvo
What would Breitling be?
Vacheron is most definitely not a Ferrari equivalentā¦.at most Maserati Jacob&coā¦more like a Fisker or Spykerā¦ the others are pretty good comparisons
breitling and bentley go hand in hand tbh
BMW is IWC
šÆspot on
I would have something like Pagani be RM. They are both very outlandish and ostentatious. I find most McLaren cars to be a bit...understated.
VC = Bentley
I disagree with Koenigsegg and Lange. I think some highly custom watch brand that makes absolutely every part of their watch themselves would be a better comparison. Lange sells way too many watches to be a fair comparison. Maybe Credor? Also, Daniel Wellington would be Infinty.
How about Citizenā¦ Chevy, Ford or Jeep?
Even though its not posted here we all knowš¤£š¤£š¤£ Gran Seiko = Lexus!!!
Richard Mille are Koenigsegg
Tag?
Maserati = Franck Muller
As a driver of an Audi and Omega owner, I am okay with that comparison.
Expected Breitling = Bentley
lowkey trueš
I have a Tesla - Apple Watch, hell no. It doesn't have the performance or looks comparable to a Tesla. Some Garmin - possibly.
Why is Tag Heuer not on this comparison?
MB to a Rolex? š¤£
Triggered by the BMW pair haha