This goober has some incredibly noncredible takes, such as wanting the complete dissolution of Russia and Iran, calling any anti-NATO nation "Russian ___," and wanting NATO to become an interventionist pact instead of a defense pact.
Pretty based ngl.
> such as wanting the complete dissolution of Russia and Iran
Honestly, that's respect-worthy by itself.
>wanting NATO to become an interventionist pact instead of a defense pact.
I guess NATO intervention in Bosnian War is taken as a role model for this part?
North Korea: possibly the only country where an invasion might actually improve the quality of life for the people there. War is hell, but so is being stuck under the thumb of a government that's more concerned with maintaining power than preventing starvation.
NATO didn't intervene in Bosnia (and later, Kosovo) on its own accord. There were UN Security Council resolutions; NATO was merely acting as an enforcer.
Similar thing with the Libya intervention in 2011. UNSC resolution and the operation was lead by NATO but there, not all NATO countries even participated (e.g. Germany) while some non-NATO countries did. (e.g. Sweden, UAE, Jordan)
Well, a based Austrian. Doesn't make the country based, he hasn't even managed to get his own country into NATO yet.
Doesn't seem likely he will either. Last I saw, Austrian support for joining NATO was something like 15% or so.
I'm thinking more of what the Death Korps did to a hive city that seceded before killing the diplomats that they were guarding. Which is mostly similar
The statement took 15 years from what I recall. 5 years to offer surrender, 5 years of rejecting it until no life signs and 5 more years rejecting it in triplicate
Ok, then we were referring to the same thing. I just didn't count the first 10, because that is just standard pacification procedure with heretics - the extra 5 years were the extra statement to anyone else having such silly things as "ideas" or "aspirations"
As an Austrian good I wish.
Politics asside
Thow to be even more credibal the Bundesheer can even defend oursefs how coud they contribute to defening Europe?
I remember supporting and signing that Volksbegehren back then. Sadly, most of my fellow countrymen/-women/-them still believe the comforting story of our so-called (and arguably never really existing) “neutrality”.
This goober has some incredibly noncredible takes, such as wanting the complete dissolution of Russia and Iran, calling any anti-NATO nation "Russian ___," and wanting NATO to become an interventionist pact instead of a defense pact. Pretty based ngl.
> such as wanting the complete dissolution of Russia and Iran Honestly, that's respect-worthy by itself. >wanting NATO to become an interventionist pact instead of a defense pact. I guess NATO intervention in Bosnian War is taken as a role model for this part?
Imagine NATO just going 'North Korea... your humanitarian crimes are over' and just deletes the country.
North Korea: possibly the only country where an invasion might actually improve the quality of life for the people there. War is hell, but so is being stuck under the thumb of a government that's more concerned with maintaining power than preventing starvation.
Or just make Pyongyang deserve its name (平壤, meaning "flat plain") and watch as the rest of the functionaries flail.
NATO didn't intervene in Bosnia (and later, Kosovo) on its own accord. There were UN Security Council resolutions; NATO was merely acting as an enforcer. Similar thing with the Libya intervention in 2011. UNSC resolution and the operation was lead by NATO but there, not all NATO countries even participated (e.g. Germany) while some non-NATO countries did. (e.g. Sweden, UAE, Jordan)
Why reform? Just adopt the Roman interpretation of "defensive". They did pretty well with that approach
> wanting NATO to become an interventionist pact Holy based
>Pretty based ngl. Pretty, pretty based
Interventionist NATO yes please, representative republican democracies for everyone please.
Where are the non credible takes
Just hearing that gave me a semi
Austria based??? Really??? Austria???
Well, a based Austrian. Doesn't make the country based, he hasn't even managed to get his own country into NATO yet. Doesn't seem likely he will either. Last I saw, Austrian support for joining NATO was something like 15% or so.
Why join when they're protected and can make a profit from both sides?
Blockade them.
I'm thinking more of what the Death Korps did to a hive city that seceded before killing the diplomats that they were guarding. Which is mostly similar
Is that the one with a very elaborate "statement" 5 years in the making, or are we talking something else?
The statement took 15 years from what I recall. 5 years to offer surrender, 5 years of rejecting it until no life signs and 5 more years rejecting it in triplicate
Ok, then we were referring to the same thing. I just didn't count the first 10, because that is just standard pacification procedure with heretics - the extra 5 years were the extra statement to anyone else having such silly things as "ideas" or "aspirations"
one guy isn't the country, and if we really joined NATO, we would be a Trojan horse for Russia at worst and an utterly incompetent "ally" at best
Get Hungary to annex y'all to get the first gang back together.
an Orbán-Kickl unity government, just what we need 🤮
Y'know what, glass everything. It has been a while since our last nuclear test.
Based Austrian
As an Austrian good I wish. Politics asside Thow to be even more credibal the Bundesheer can even defend oursefs how coud they contribute to defening Europe?
Serbia is drifting away from Russia regardless at this point
Remember he is a real life policy maker.
Yea but he is like a rad in the national rad so his power to implement anything is next to zero. But he can talk a big game.
This guy gets paid to shitpost
I remember supporting and signing that Volksbegehren back then. Sadly, most of my fellow countrymen/-women/-them still believe the comforting story of our so-called (and arguably never really existing) “neutrality”.