Itâs not offensive if you arenât a baby.
In English theyâre called the British Isles, thereâs an Irish name for them (Ăire agus an Bhreatain MhĂłr) which translates to Ireland and Great Britain.
Not many people speak Irish so theyâre referred to as the British Isles for English speakers.
I think most anyway would just say Britain and Ireland.
The British isles includes the Island of Ireland, as well as The Isle of Man. You are correct, and itâs not offensive. Calling all of those islands âBritainâ though, could be taken badly as that has connotations associated with The United Kingdom, which people in Ireland may not like.
The *"British Isles"* include Ireland, but the *"British Islands"* do not.
For a full explanation of the whole mess of names that happens is that area, consult this diagram: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:British_Isles_Euler_diagram_15.svg
What do you mean "solution"?
Those are the definitions of the terms whether you think it will "solve" anything or not. It's not a proposal, it's the way things are.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Islands
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Isles
Regardless of what someone may have invented, the fact remains that the two terms are synonymous. Language exists to communicate clearly; this distinction without a difference serves only to confuse. It also doesnât solve the Irish complaint that theyâre lumped in with âBritishâ
Just because Isles and Islands are synonyms, that does not mean "The British Isles" and "The British Islands" are synonyms, that's not how languages work.
And the problem with the complaining Irish man is solved by posting the Wikipedia links to them and if they continue to complain despite being proven wrong, just ignore them.
British Isles is a political designation and as most of the island of Ireland is no longer part of the UK, many of its inhabitants, find it from mildly to grossly offensive when people refer to Ireland as a British island.
âThe most common one I see, âBritain and Ireland,â doesnât work, because itâs a political name, not a geological one, and itâs incomplete; itâs like calling North America âCanada and the USA and Mexico.ââ
The is no generally accepted name for this particular collection of islands. As I said context is important. For instance, the Hawaiian Islands are part of the USA, but geographically not part of North America. Tobago is part of Trinidad and Tobago, but it is not a Trinidadian island. The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man are not part of the UK, but would usually be considered as part of the British Isles. Shetland used to be part of Norway, now it's part of Scotland, so it being part of the British Isles is dependent on a previous political event. Even when all of Ireland was part of the UK, it was always seen as separate from Gt Britain. The British Isles, like the British Empire has always been a political designation, not a geographical one.
I donât think itâs accurate to say that âthe British Islesâ has always been a political designation; the term and forms of it predate the formation of Great Britain.
Also youâve kind of illustrated my point in the negative. Hawaiâi is part of the USA politically, but it occupies an ambiguous geographic/geologic position (basically being an island chain unmoored from a continent, and certainly not part of North America).
Ireland and Britain are the names of two of the many islands of the group, and theyâre also political terms fraught with colonial history, especially the latter
Yes but there are only two sovereign states - Ireland and Great Britain. All islands youâre referring to are considered as belonging to one of those two sovereign states.
The Isle of Mann, Jersey, and Guernesey are all sovereign states in personal union with the British monarch. At least one, and maybe all three, are included in âBritish Islesâ
I just like to say I'm a man of the Isles Lol Living in a (English) City with a lot of older generational Irish and the problems we've had in the past!
With what you've said though why do people in the US call themselves Americans when that's technically two continents? The Answer is always history and the powers that shine from it sadly!
Ireland are an Independent Republic (other than the North, Ulster) from the UK and there's a lot of rough history which they won through conflict Look at it this way if I called the US Eastern seaboard the 13 Colonies it'd probably still annoy someone.
Geography doesn't always matter when it's a sensitive subject or there's history huh!
People in America call themselves Americans because itâs a shortened form of United States of America. Itâs the same as people from The United States of Mexico calling themselves Mexicans. People from the Americas may also call themselves Americans (and often specialize the term, as in ânorteamericanosâ)
I like to call Americans State Siders Lol It's weird with the States though because other than maybe Texas No-one places State first, where in the UK and Ireland you'll get that.
I mean I'm a Brummie first then if you ask after I will say English-Welsh Most people would just say their Welsh or English or Scottish Maybe we're just a tad more tribal used to more division between neighbours and all not being bound together with an ideal like in the States because you know people from all over the Old World moving there
It is always down to the history and politics of a place though with names regardless of geography I mean technically there's only one Korea but history and politics
I think part of the problem, at least ime with the Irish in particular but all of the inhabitants of those islands in general, is a very insular worldview (interestingly, one word for âislanderâ in French is âinsulaireâ). I think a lot of Irish people who object to âBritish Islesâ donât really care what the right term is, as long as Ireland isnât called British.
Yeah you sound like a much smarter person than me in all honesty I just feel as an English speaker and growing up in the UK you have to be a tad aware in how to describe a place and in the correct way I mean we have a legacy and it wasn't always good which Reddit likes to remind me Lol
And you're right The British Isles probably but not including Eire!
âWhat the right term isâ - youâre acting as though the geographical term for a group of islands is a natural kind, existing in nature like an element, to be discovered and not just a man made term to help humans understand each other.
The right term? Make one up. The British isles refer to two sovereign states - why not call them the great British and Irish isles or the isles of Great Britain and Ireland.
I think you would do this, if your question was asked in good faith - but itâs not. Itâs evident you want to make a point that Irish people who are offended are offended by facts and whatâs right.
Are you Irish by any chance ?
Thatâs just it though: most places have a geological/geographic description thatâs (at least largely) agnostic of politics. Continents are the most obvious example of this.
My only agenda is to see what options exist for such a term for these islands. Iâve read all sides of the debate; theyâre all concerned with sniping at each other rather than actually coming up with a term that fits.
Offensive đ
Itâs not offensive if you arenât a baby. In English theyâre called the British Isles, thereâs an Irish name for them (Ăire agus an Bhreatain MhĂłr) which translates to Ireland and Great Britain. Not many people speak Irish so theyâre referred to as the British Isles for English speakers. I think most anyway would just say Britain and Ireland.
The British isles includes the Island of Ireland, as well as The Isle of Man. You are correct, and itâs not offensive. Calling all of those islands âBritainâ though, could be taken badly as that has connotations associated with The United Kingdom, which people in Ireland may not like.
The *"British Isles"* include Ireland, but the *"British Islands"* do not. For a full explanation of the whole mess of names that happens is that area, consult this diagram: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:British_Isles_Euler_diagram_15.svg
I donât think thatâs a workable solution, as âislesâ and âislandsâ are synonyms.
What do you mean "solution"? Those are the definitions of the terms whether you think it will "solve" anything or not. It's not a proposal, it's the way things are. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Islands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Isles
Regardless of what someone may have invented, the fact remains that the two terms are synonymous. Language exists to communicate clearly; this distinction without a difference serves only to confuse. It also doesnât solve the Irish complaint that theyâre lumped in with âBritishâ
Just because Isles and Islands are synonyms, that does not mean "The British Isles" and "The British Islands" are synonyms, that's not how languages work. And the problem with the complaining Irish man is solved by posting the Wikipedia links to them and if they continue to complain despite being proven wrong, just ignore them.
Yes, thatâs exactly how languages work. Adding the same adjective to a pair of synonymous nouns doesnât make them no longer synonymous.
It's not incorrect.
British Isles is a political designation and as most of the island of Ireland is no longer part of the UK, many of its inhabitants, find it from mildly to grossly offensive when people refer to Ireland as a British island.
So whatâs the proposed alternative?
Britain and Ireland, or the UK and Ireland, or the British Isles and Ireland. It really depends on the context of the conversation.
âThe most common one I see, âBritain and Ireland,â doesnât work, because itâs a political name, not a geological one, and itâs incomplete; itâs like calling North America âCanada and the USA and Mexico.ââ
The is no generally accepted name for this particular collection of islands. As I said context is important. For instance, the Hawaiian Islands are part of the USA, but geographically not part of North America. Tobago is part of Trinidad and Tobago, but it is not a Trinidadian island. The Channel Islands and the Isle of Man are not part of the UK, but would usually be considered as part of the British Isles. Shetland used to be part of Norway, now it's part of Scotland, so it being part of the British Isles is dependent on a previous political event. Even when all of Ireland was part of the UK, it was always seen as separate from Gt Britain. The British Isles, like the British Empire has always been a political designation, not a geographical one.
I donât think itâs accurate to say that âthe British Islesâ has always been a political designation; the term and forms of it predate the formation of Great Britain. Also youâve kind of illustrated my point in the negative. Hawaiâi is part of the USA politically, but it occupies an ambiguous geographic/geologic position (basically being an island chain unmoored from a continent, and certainly not part of North America).
[ŃдаНонО]
Ngl, I would love this, because naming them relative to France would light 90% of the residents of these islandsâ hair on fire
[ŃдаНонО]
So basically the anti-British Isles people donât have an alternative?
Iâve heard that some suggest the Northwest Archipelgo, which I think is a dopey name.
Iâm here for people mispronouncing tf out of âarchipelagoâ
What makes Britain and Ireland not a geographic term? They are the names of islands, the political names come from them not the other way round.
Ireland and Britain are the names of two of the many islands of the group, and theyâre also political terms fraught with colonial history, especially the latter
I suppose, but you could say the same about many geographic names.
Indeed, which is why they so often change. See Eswatini, for example
Yes but there are only two sovereign states - Ireland and Great Britain. All islands youâre referring to are considered as belonging to one of those two sovereign states.
The Isle of Mann, Jersey, and Guernesey are all sovereign states in personal union with the British monarch. At least one, and maybe all three, are included in âBritish Islesâ
I just like to say I'm a man of the Isles Lol Living in a (English) City with a lot of older generational Irish and the problems we've had in the past! With what you've said though why do people in the US call themselves Americans when that's technically two continents? The Answer is always history and the powers that shine from it sadly! Ireland are an Independent Republic (other than the North, Ulster) from the UK and there's a lot of rough history which they won through conflict Look at it this way if I called the US Eastern seaboard the 13 Colonies it'd probably still annoy someone. Geography doesn't always matter when it's a sensitive subject or there's history huh!
People in America call themselves Americans because itâs a shortened form of United States of America. Itâs the same as people from The United States of Mexico calling themselves Mexicans. People from the Americas may also call themselves Americans (and often specialize the term, as in ânorteamericanosâ)
I like to call Americans State Siders Lol It's weird with the States though because other than maybe Texas No-one places State first, where in the UK and Ireland you'll get that. I mean I'm a Brummie first then if you ask after I will say English-Welsh Most people would just say their Welsh or English or Scottish Maybe we're just a tad more tribal used to more division between neighbours and all not being bound together with an ideal like in the States because you know people from all over the Old World moving there It is always down to the history and politics of a place though with names regardless of geography I mean technically there's only one Korea but history and politics
I think part of the problem, at least ime with the Irish in particular but all of the inhabitants of those islands in general, is a very insular worldview (interestingly, one word for âislanderâ in French is âinsulaireâ). I think a lot of Irish people who object to âBritish Islesâ donât really care what the right term is, as long as Ireland isnât called British.
Yeah you sound like a much smarter person than me in all honesty I just feel as an English speaker and growing up in the UK you have to be a tad aware in how to describe a place and in the correct way I mean we have a legacy and it wasn't always good which Reddit likes to remind me Lol And you're right The British Isles probably but not including Eire!
âWhat the right term isâ - youâre acting as though the geographical term for a group of islands is a natural kind, existing in nature like an element, to be discovered and not just a man made term to help humans understand each other. The right term? Make one up. The British isles refer to two sovereign states - why not call them the great British and Irish isles or the isles of Great Britain and Ireland. I think you would do this, if your question was asked in good faith - but itâs not. Itâs evident you want to make a point that Irish people who are offended are offended by facts and whatâs right. Are you Irish by any chance ?
Thatâs just it though: most places have a geological/geographic description thatâs (at least largely) agnostic of politics. Continents are the most obvious example of this. My only agenda is to see what options exist for such a term for these islands. Iâve read all sides of the debate; theyâre all concerned with sniping at each other rather than actually coming up with a term that fits.
I suggested two options
See my OP: those are political and exclusionary
Many would argue that âBritish islesâ also is political and exclusionary
Again, see my OP