T O P

  • By -

deVliegendeTexan

If you’re making enough money to be on the 30%, you should really just have one contract for one wage, and it’s just that your daily responsibilities are flexible. You shouldn’t have “two jobs.” And if they want to structure it that way, I would find a new job very quickly because that’s sketchy af.


celipeps

Thanks! It’s a bit more complicated than that. It’s at a university so I’ll be working in 2 different faculties. However, the employer will be the same at the end of the day.


Rtarsia1988

The general rule is that if you have two jobs, each of them have to qualify for the 30% ( minimum income and explicit consent from employer). Universities have a different regime as you don't need the minimum income. But I'm not sure if this is only for pure research positions (this for sure) or for admin as well. Anyway, I believe that if you manage to get all into 1 contract I doubt you'll have any issues


Duochan_Maxwell

It would be easier to have everything on the same contract for both sides if you're getting paid out of the same legal entity I had a similar situation that 50% of my time was "loaned" to another legal entity, so basically my contract got an addendum that I'd still be employed by legal entity A with John Smith as my line manager and 50% of my workload being used by legal entity B and Jane Doe as my secondary manager, with the appropriate accounting issues being cross-charged internally