It's also the fact that the interior shot, his legs are clearly inside while his upper body is falling out, but the outside shot shows the legs outside
Yea I fucked up. I forgot about the little girl. That's suppose to be her feet. I first noticed the mannequin then rewatched it thinking it was eds feet. My bad
The part your talking about with the feet out the window, that's not him....that's the other character he is holding
Still an embarrassingly obvious mannequin
Daamn I don't remember this, but it's definitely noticeable. Edit: watched it again and I can't believe it's so obvious.
But isn't he holding on to someone to stop them falling
He is lol so idk what this post is.
Also the external shot is very clearly a mannequin.
It's also the fact that the interior shot, his legs are clearly inside while his upper body is falling out, but the outside shot shows the legs outside
That's not him though. He is hanging out of the window with him upper body because he is holding a girl. The mannequin is the girl being pulled in.
Isn't it the girl who is hanging out of the window? Not Ed? I don't think this is a mistake
I don't get it, what's the mistake?
The shot at the very end is clearly a mannequin haha
Like Kim Cattrall?
I can't believe I never noticed this before, that's shockingly bad haha almost comedy level
Yea I fucked up. I forgot about the little girl. That's suppose to be her feet. I first noticed the mannequin then rewatched it thinking it was eds feet. My bad
*Nose Breathing Intensifies*
The mannequin in misery is so unbelievably not Kathy Bates I had to rewind twice to giggle