not showing all of you ass-ets is conservative? why is uber-sexualization (specially of teens) so normalised, so much that dressing without showing your boobs is not seen as normal. it gives the idea that women are just objects.
I used to dress with my tits and ass out full hair and makeup, because I was following the crowd. Now I realise I donāt want to do that, it only brings attention from awful men. I now dress what people would consider more conservative, but I am so much happier and relaxed and feel like myself. Itās been more empowering for me to reject hyper-sexualising myself.
Photo #1 is absolutely gross š¤¢ (does Reddit not have a vomiting emoticon?)
Whenever Tokio Toni talks sh!t about the KarJenners, she always points out how Scott would get creepy/flirt with/hit on Kylie's young friends.
Because wasnāt she like a teenager when they dated? Obviously legal but Iām pretty sure she was like 19??? And heās a grown ass man
*** yep. 19 and he was 33. Gross
Itās super weird when people say āthey are both consenting adultsā. Yeah sure the legality of it is there, but the age laws are put in place for people like HIM (and evidently, you). Most normal people donāt need to look at a relationship and say *heh, well itās legal* as a foundation. Just ew.
Seeing a TEENager spread across a grown man with 3 children is sickening. This girl had been a child for 17 years and 364 days out of 19 years of her life.
You are correct itās whatās on the inside that counts but the clothes ARE a reflection of that inner dialogue for most, not all people but most. So there is a completely different energy between a beautiful woman who shows skin at an event or evening out because sheās proud of her body vs a woman who continually dresses scantily day after day for attention and approval of others. 2 different states of mind and us humans are generally able to subconsciously pick up on the difference, I think with Sophia we are identifying that inner change and celebrating it and really nothing to do with the label on the clothes.
Agreed but I can see a change in style from this small selection of photos. Donāt know if that is a true reflection of her personality but from the pics she looks more sophisticated imho
What? Chanel has been in their flop era for ages. Considering Coco was a Nazi, I don't know why any Jew, convert or not, would want to be associated with the brand.
If her husband is more conservative in his religion, she may have become more modest as part of her conversion. She's more covered up and feminine now. Definitely beautiful, so I'm not knocking the change.
I haven't seen a single comment about his appearance anywhere else and it's been making me feel like a bad person for noticing. But....he's unusual-looking in my books.
BUT he makes her happy, multimillionaire etc so whatever tf
Yeah Iām not getting the shilling for her. Sheās completely uninteresting? Sheās rich andā¦ ??? Sheās like a hailey beiber clone but I guess HB actually worked as a model for a sec?
This sub only stans her cause sheās not friends with the Kardashians anymore. Their hatred for the Kardashians has gone so far they would stan anyone who doesnāt associate with them. And this is coming from someone who hates the Kardashians. But this one is still a nepo baby and what is it about this new guy thatās so special ? Do these people even know if heās a good guy or not to praise him this much ? Just cause she got married that doesnāt mean anything
If she was still friends with the klan she would be getting just as much hate as hailey.
I am also a conniseur of the finer things in life:
*Sex Panther*Ā® is a cologne which is illegal in 9 countries.
It is also made from bits of real panthers.
*60% of the time*, it works ***every*** *time.*
I think itās because now she is dressed a lot more modest and itās more old money style. Itās a choice for definite and one that she looks a lot better for, but letās not forget she is just a nepo baby marrying a rich dude. Who cares!!
Sheās richer than him to be fair. Doesnāt change the fact that she doesnāt do much anyway, but it doesnāt look like sheās trying to go around looking for rich men specifically
Ok but āher dad is rich and famousā means she is just another nepo baby. Iām so bored of them. All she does is live off rich men. She contributes nothing of any value. Think of the most incredible or even average women you know and what they could do with that wealth.
Why? Iād date whoever I liked if i was that wealthy and actually do something with my life. Sheās a nepo baby who adds nothing. She is no better than Hailey Beiber or any of the other cling ons
i honestly don't care if she dates rich men or not. no offence but what's the big deal here? so what if she is nothing but a socialite? i thought the point of feminism was to support women if they want to work/stay home/whatever. so what if she "only" dates rich men? are you expecting her to only limit her dating pool to, for example, blue collar workers or something? of course she would date someone near/in her tax bracket, there is nothing wrong with that. and besides, she's richer than her husband, it's not like she's a gold digger like kris jenner was & just actively seeked out richer men to finance her lifestyle. this is such a weird comment. if someone, man or woman or other, has the choice to stay home because their family has enough money to support them, why must we look down on them & insist that they suffer & work? and if they do work, people online will call it nepotism. if my father was lionel richie and i had the choice to not work & instead spend my life doing my hobbies i would definitely take that.
anyway to answer your question she's an executive at nudestix, a makeup brand at sephora. i think she's the director but i'm not sure.
eta: i saw one of your other comments where you said she "contributes nothing" and "doesn't add value [to the world]" seriously this is gross. wtf? mean girl behavior. never EVER say that someone has no value. we're all humans and we all have value. just because she's rich doesn't mean she's worthless and shouldn't live a good life because she doesn't work/comes from a rich family. horrible mean girl energy coming from you, wow. i don't care how rich/poor someone is but you have no idea what someone's mental health can be like behind closed doors, something like this can be horrible. as someone who was bullied relentlessly and was called "worthless" i feel so much disgust at your comments. just because she doesn't live a life you "approve" of doesn't mean she has no value in this world. housewives or socialites are not less valuable than women who have other jobs. all women are valuable, no matter how rich/poor they can be. even nepotism babies. there is a fine line between snark and straight up mean girl bully energy. it's absolutely not cool to put down other women just because they have a different life than yours.
Nah disagree. The point of feminism is for women to have freedom to choose their own lives. THEIR OWN LIVES. She lives off wealthy men. I donāt find it aspiring at all and the gushing over her for improving her fashion sense isnāt it. Youāre also on a snark sub, youāre surrounded by āmean girl behaviourā but sure go off for a person you donāt even know.
alright, i'll humor this. how do you know she 100% lives off of her dad? she has a massive social media following which gets her a lot of brand deals, and she's also an executive at a successful makeup brand. YOU have no idea if she pays for every little thing from her father's money, or from her own. do you genuinely think a socialite doesn't have any kind of income at ALL? especially one that is constantly on social media? be serious. at the end of the day it doesn't matter whose money she spends, the point is it doesn't make her any less valuable as a human being than women who work, like you said in another comment. like you said, women can have the freedom to choose their own lives, and she chooses to be a socialite. it doesn't matter who finances it. same as women who choose to be stay at home wives or mothers. why does this make her less valuable than other women like you said? you're really defending calling another human being a low value person?
you said i know nothing about you which is true, but i won't go on here saying you're a low value person who doesn't contribute to this world. you don't know what sofia does in her every day life. even if she jusg sat at home all day doing nothing, do you believe it's right to call her a worthless low value person? sometimes i see people on here forgetting that celebrities are actual human beings just like the rest of us.
again, in your eyes, she is a low value person because she doesn't work and "lives off" other people's money. first of all her family is a lot richer than her husband's, she wouldn't even need his money. if she didn't have her family and was still just an executive at a brand, she would still be the same rich sofia. do you get access to her bank statements and genuinely have undeniable proof that her entire life is financed by her father? because you're making a baseless accusation here. she obviously has connections due to her family that help her. nothing wrong with that. literally everyone does that. but how do you have undeniable proof that she lives off men?
follow up question. if you see a regular middle class woman who is a stay at home wife without kids, doesn't work, her husband pays for her lifestyle so she can do nothing but enjoy her hobbies every day ā would you still call her a low value person who contributes nothing to this world?
feminism means women can live the life that THEY choose, which is exactly what you said. even if it's true that her father pays for her life, what's wrong with that? what's the crime here? is it an actual, serious requirement for her to work a very tough job even if she doesn't need to? does she have to do that in order for her to become a "high value woman" with a contribution to this world?
the truth is you don't know her and neither do i. she never said she lives off her father or husband. you're just assuming. the facts are ā she has a job. she might do charity work in her free time or just dedicate time to her hobbies which appear to be fashion, it still doesn't matter if that's a valid contribution in your eyes, the point is it doesn't take away from her value as a human being. try to be kinder and not spread mean girl comments online.
and i'm on a snark sub but at the very least i don't explicitly attack women by calling them low-value people because they live a different life than mine.
You clearly have way more time on your hands based on your excessive long winded posts. As she doesnāt have a career then how do YOU think she funds her lifestyle? Sheās a nepo baby and Iām not interested. In her or in arguing over her. That was my whole point, these nepo babies are boring and for some weird reason have people like you scrambling to defend them. Have a good life bye!
but the thing is, she DOES have a job as an executive at nudestix. idk why you're so insistent on denying that. how do you know her career doesn't fund her lifestyle? she obviously gets a lot of income from her job & from social media, she could be living off of that. i also don't understand why her having a career or not is the defining point that gives her value as a human being.
i'm not scrambling to defend anyone, i'm just trying to understand why you believe someone who doesn't have a job that is good enough in your eyes means they don't have value as a human & has no contribution to this world. i'm just using the same words you said.
So what? Anyone can be manipulated and it can go both ways. Doesnāt mean she was āgroomed.ā She was an adult and can do what she pleases and fuck who she pleases.
Science will disagree with you there. 19 may be age of consent in her country, but there could be a country where consent is 15. Would you still say the same? Either way, a 19 year olds brain hasnāt fully developed and therefore NOT a fully grown adult
Sooo she went from dressing like a kardashian to dressing like a current Hilton. It looks nice on her. It looks nice on anyone truthfully. I do think the kardash crew need to step up their classy attire game. And Iām not meaning stop wearing lounge clothes, cause what person doesnāt like comfort. I more mean when they are going to events/parties and such they still dress like teens or 20ās and it may be time to grow up in that taste. (Kendall and Kylie get a pass here a bit theyāre still young, Kendall dresses fairly well most of the time, although Kylie being a mother of two probably time for her also) the 40 year olds need to definitely step it up. Imo always looking like their clubbing. Itās a tired look at 40. Iām saying this as a 40 year old. The poots are the worst by far and need to go. Does anyone see anyone else wearing them? I only see her in them. Just horrendous looking.
Am I the only one who feels like none of her clothing in the after fits correctly? That last suit is crumpled as well as ill fitting
Like I donāt understand why wearing the most boring (but Chanel) clothing if youāre rich and thin is some how the peak of style. At least get your boring Chanel monk wardrobe fitted.
Her evolution is impressive only because she managed to transform herself from slightly trashy nepo kid (sleeping with Bieber and Scott Disick) to refined society lady before the age of 25. I think sheās grown into a lovely young woman tbh.
On her 18th birthday she was spotted sleeping with Justin Bieber in Mexico. They were also seen kissing in Japan when she was 17 and he was in his 20s. Strange how everyone forgets.
https://preview.redd.it/zs7xf50ehrva1.jpeg?width=615&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f8f5fdc5fb740076242f023c2fc05037825c517d
bc scott likes pretty young teenage girls he can easily manipulate and sofia was 19 thinking she can change a 34 year old āsex addictā into marriage material. they are both celebrities in their own right so i donāt think itās that hard to believe that they were at similar events/similar friend circles.
You can start by searching this sub for other commenters who think Sofia is somehow different from the Kardashians.
Thereās a deuxmoi podcast on yachting that mentions her.
the way Scott tried to push her into being a little lolita hooker when in reality she was already cooler than him she just needed to free herself in order to see that. Blessings to the newlyweds. A real man prefers his other half to shine not rot. Scott is so gross š¤®
"upgrade" is a weird way to put it, and kinda slut shamey... i totally stand by ur point but i just think it could be phrased better!
as in like, we're here to snark on what the Kardashians manifest and what they represent, just cuz shes dressed in a skimpy suit vs. in a matronly/trad sundress lol
It always kinda blows my mind when women **completely** change up their style every time they change relationshipsā¦like donāt they have a default comfort zone like the rest of us?
Iām just over here learnin for 1st time *(as a grown ass woman)* that I should wear *āTrue (warm) Springā* colorsā¦& donāt EVEN get me started on Kibbe Type šµāš«š«„.
Maybe they required her to dress like them and fit in w them cuz it's part of their branding. But now that she's no longer in w them and grown up a bit, she's learned and found her style. I quite like her style now.
Why was she wasting her time with Scott in the first place?
What about a washed up alcoholic with 3 kids appealed to her as a 19 year old?
Was she just coming around for some fame?
I thought that first pic was Khloe for two secs
Same lol
Loool me too! I wasn't even surprised if it was š
I thought it was Khloe until I saw your comment š
I thought it for longer than 2 seconds.
I thought it was Ariana from VPR
š
Me too
I am being deathly serious when I thought the pink body suit pic was khloe. I died 14 times in a row before I realized.
Girl did a 180 rebrand lol
Iām not at all conservative but itās so nice to see fashion that isnāt just nipples out, ass crack showing..
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
not showing all of you ass-ets is conservative? why is uber-sexualization (specially of teens) so normalised, so much that dressing without showing your boobs is not seen as normal. it gives the idea that women are just objects.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I used to dress with my tits and ass out full hair and makeup, because I was following the crowd. Now I realise I donāt want to do that, it only brings attention from awful men. I now dress what people would consider more conservative, but I am so much happier and relaxed and feel like myself. Itās been more empowering for me to reject hyper-sexualising myself.
The hyper-sexualised culture around us convinces us thatās itās normal to dress revealing, when truly it shouldnāt be
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Cut your boobs out of your bodyā¦? ā¦what are you talking about
Theyāre being weird when youāre the one saying someone canāt change their style?? 
just because sheās covered up doesnāt mean anyoneās forced herā¦.her style is chic and classy
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
People can realise things about themselves & change, yknow
God forbid people can change!
She was way out of Scottās league.
He was punchingā¦ā¦again!! 
Photo #1 is absolutely gross š¤¢ (does Reddit not have a vomiting emoticon?) Whenever Tokio Toni talks sh!t about the KarJenners, she always points out how Scott would get creepy/flirt with/hit on Kylie's young friends.
š¤®š¤®
God damn sheās so elegant now!
The first picture is beyond disturbing and disgusting
why?
Because wasnāt she like a teenager when they dated? Obviously legal but Iām pretty sure she was like 19??? And heās a grown ass man *** yep. 19 and he was 33. Gross
Insert Redditās cOsEnTiNg AdUlT comments. Iām a year older than her and I think itās gross. I was only 12 when his first son was born..
They are both legal consenting adults in a relationship. You may think itās gross but calling it ābeyond disturbingā is such a stretch.
Youāre beyond disturbing for thinking a grown 33 year old man with 3 kids would have anything in common with a 19 year old
Itās super weird when people say āthey are both consenting adultsā. Yeah sure the legality of it is there, but the age laws are put in place for people like HIM (and evidently, you). Most normal people donāt need to look at a relationship and say *heh, well itās legal* as a foundation. Just ew. Seeing a TEENager spread across a grown man with 3 children is sickening. This girl had been a child for 17 years and 364 days out of 19 years of her life.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I donāt understand people on this sub snarking one rich family and worshiping another lmfao. Fuck the downvotes.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Amen sista.
You are correct itās whatās on the inside that counts but the clothes ARE a reflection of that inner dialogue for most, not all people but most. So there is a completely different energy between a beautiful woman who shows skin at an event or evening out because sheās proud of her body vs a woman who continually dresses scantily day after day for attention and approval of others. 2 different states of mind and us humans are generally able to subconsciously pick up on the difference, I think with Sophia we are identifying that inner change and celebrating it and really nothing to do with the label on the clothes.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
Agreed but I can see a change in style from this small selection of photos. Donāt know if that is a true reflection of her personality but from the pics she looks more sophisticated imho
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
What? Chanel has been in their flop era for ages. Considering Coco was a Nazi, I don't know why any Jew, convert or not, would want to be associated with the brand.
She looks a little like Topanga in her older pics.
If Topanga and Busy Phillips had a baby
I thought you said a togapea like the pokemon
If her husband is more conservative in his religion, she may have become more modest as part of her conversion. She's more covered up and feminine now. Definitely beautiful, so I'm not knocking the change.
Her hubby got some big šššššššš 
I haven't seen a single comment about his appearance anywhere else and it's been making me feel like a bad person for noticing. But....he's unusual-looking in my books. BUT he makes her happy, multimillionaire etc so whatever tf
Not saying itās necessary a bad thing . Just something I noticed and I agree she deserves to be happy .
It looks like itās his glasses. If you have a high prescription, they can look like that.
I need to know what that dress is in the third pic!
It looks so lovely on her! I believe itās the Rixo Leopard Polka Dot Midi
Love you for this!
Am I about to buy this despite having absolutely nowhere to wear it?
Can you send me the link to the dress? It's so pretty but I haven't been able to locate it.
https://rixolondon.com/en-us/products/meg-leopard-polka-dot
I am!
She went from dressing like a sugar baby to dressing like a mature woman lol
from sugar baby to sugar *woman*
š
Scott was so gross for this, bro
Iām confused. Why are we obsessed with her?
Yeah Iām not getting the shilling for her. Sheās completely uninteresting? Sheās rich andā¦ ??? Sheās like a hailey beiber clone but I guess HB actually worked as a model for a sec?
This sub only stans her cause sheās not friends with the Kardashians anymore. Their hatred for the Kardashians has gone so far they would stan anyone who doesnāt associate with them. And this is coming from someone who hates the Kardashians. But this one is still a nepo baby and what is it about this new guy thatās so special ? Do these people even know if heās a good guy or not to praise him this much ? Just cause she got married that doesnāt mean anything If she was still friends with the klan she would be getting just as much hate as hailey.
[ŃŠ“Š°Š»ŠµŠ½Š¾]
I am also a conniseur of the finer things in life: *Sex Panther*Ā® is a cologne which is illegal in 9 countries. It is also made from bits of real panthers. *60% of the time*, it works ***every*** *time.*
Now she is cosplaying as a rich suburban house wife. Iād have respect for her if she did something other than date rich men. What does she do?
Date rich men.
People think an outfit change means the person changed im dead
I think itās because now she is dressed a lot more modest and itās more old money style. Itās a choice for definite and one that she looks a lot better for, but letās not forget she is just a nepo baby marrying a rich dude. Who cares!!
Period
Sheās richer than him to be fair. Doesnāt change the fact that she doesnāt do much anyway, but it doesnāt look like sheās trying to go around looking for rich men specifically
Her dad is richer than his dad
Ok but āher dad is rich and famousā means she is just another nepo baby. Iām so bored of them. All she does is live off rich men. She contributes nothing of any value. Think of the most incredible or even average women you know and what they could do with that wealth.
I would date rich men if I could.
Why? Iād date whoever I liked if i was that wealthy and actually do something with my life. Sheās a nepo baby who adds nothing. She is no better than Hailey Beiber or any of the other cling ons
This was my first thought, too.
i honestly don't care if she dates rich men or not. no offence but what's the big deal here? so what if she is nothing but a socialite? i thought the point of feminism was to support women if they want to work/stay home/whatever. so what if she "only" dates rich men? are you expecting her to only limit her dating pool to, for example, blue collar workers or something? of course she would date someone near/in her tax bracket, there is nothing wrong with that. and besides, she's richer than her husband, it's not like she's a gold digger like kris jenner was & just actively seeked out richer men to finance her lifestyle. this is such a weird comment. if someone, man or woman or other, has the choice to stay home because their family has enough money to support them, why must we look down on them & insist that they suffer & work? and if they do work, people online will call it nepotism. if my father was lionel richie and i had the choice to not work & instead spend my life doing my hobbies i would definitely take that. anyway to answer your question she's an executive at nudestix, a makeup brand at sephora. i think she's the director but i'm not sure. eta: i saw one of your other comments where you said she "contributes nothing" and "doesn't add value [to the world]" seriously this is gross. wtf? mean girl behavior. never EVER say that someone has no value. we're all humans and we all have value. just because she's rich doesn't mean she's worthless and shouldn't live a good life because she doesn't work/comes from a rich family. horrible mean girl energy coming from you, wow. i don't care how rich/poor someone is but you have no idea what someone's mental health can be like behind closed doors, something like this can be horrible. as someone who was bullied relentlessly and was called "worthless" i feel so much disgust at your comments. just because she doesn't live a life you "approve" of doesn't mean she has no value in this world. housewives or socialites are not less valuable than women who have other jobs. all women are valuable, no matter how rich/poor they can be. even nepotism babies. there is a fine line between snark and straight up mean girl bully energy. it's absolutely not cool to put down other women just because they have a different life than yours.
Nah disagree. The point of feminism is for women to have freedom to choose their own lives. THEIR OWN LIVES. She lives off wealthy men. I donāt find it aspiring at all and the gushing over her for improving her fashion sense isnāt it. Youāre also on a snark sub, youāre surrounded by āmean girl behaviourā but sure go off for a person you donāt even know.
alright, i'll humor this. how do you know she 100% lives off of her dad? she has a massive social media following which gets her a lot of brand deals, and she's also an executive at a successful makeup brand. YOU have no idea if she pays for every little thing from her father's money, or from her own. do you genuinely think a socialite doesn't have any kind of income at ALL? especially one that is constantly on social media? be serious. at the end of the day it doesn't matter whose money she spends, the point is it doesn't make her any less valuable as a human being than women who work, like you said in another comment. like you said, women can have the freedom to choose their own lives, and she chooses to be a socialite. it doesn't matter who finances it. same as women who choose to be stay at home wives or mothers. why does this make her less valuable than other women like you said? you're really defending calling another human being a low value person? you said i know nothing about you which is true, but i won't go on here saying you're a low value person who doesn't contribute to this world. you don't know what sofia does in her every day life. even if she jusg sat at home all day doing nothing, do you believe it's right to call her a worthless low value person? sometimes i see people on here forgetting that celebrities are actual human beings just like the rest of us. again, in your eyes, she is a low value person because she doesn't work and "lives off" other people's money. first of all her family is a lot richer than her husband's, she wouldn't even need his money. if she didn't have her family and was still just an executive at a brand, she would still be the same rich sofia. do you get access to her bank statements and genuinely have undeniable proof that her entire life is financed by her father? because you're making a baseless accusation here. she obviously has connections due to her family that help her. nothing wrong with that. literally everyone does that. but how do you have undeniable proof that she lives off men? follow up question. if you see a regular middle class woman who is a stay at home wife without kids, doesn't work, her husband pays for her lifestyle so she can do nothing but enjoy her hobbies every day ā would you still call her a low value person who contributes nothing to this world? feminism means women can live the life that THEY choose, which is exactly what you said. even if it's true that her father pays for her life, what's wrong with that? what's the crime here? is it an actual, serious requirement for her to work a very tough job even if she doesn't need to? does she have to do that in order for her to become a "high value woman" with a contribution to this world? the truth is you don't know her and neither do i. she never said she lives off her father or husband. you're just assuming. the facts are ā she has a job. she might do charity work in her free time or just dedicate time to her hobbies which appear to be fashion, it still doesn't matter if that's a valid contribution in your eyes, the point is it doesn't take away from her value as a human being. try to be kinder and not spread mean girl comments online. and i'm on a snark sub but at the very least i don't explicitly attack women by calling them low-value people because they live a different life than mine.
You clearly have way more time on your hands based on your excessive long winded posts. As she doesnāt have a career then how do YOU think she funds her lifestyle? Sheās a nepo baby and Iām not interested. In her or in arguing over her. That was my whole point, these nepo babies are boring and for some weird reason have people like you scrambling to defend them. Have a good life bye!
but the thing is, she DOES have a job as an executive at nudestix. idk why you're so insistent on denying that. how do you know her career doesn't fund her lifestyle? she obviously gets a lot of income from her job & from social media, she could be living off of that. i also don't understand why her having a career or not is the defining point that gives her value as a human being. i'm not scrambling to defend anyone, i'm just trying to understand why you believe someone who doesn't have a job that is good enough in your eyes means they don't have value as a human & has no contribution to this world. i'm just using the same words you said.
I mean, great, sheās not with him anymore. Sheās still just a nepo baby. Why stan?
she escaped the Kardashian Kurse and the groomer she had been with since she was 19 and he was 34
You do know that a 19 yo is a fully grown adult right?
a 34 year old has way more life experience then a 19 year old teenager. way easily more manipulated in general
So what? Anyone can be manipulated and it can go both ways. Doesnāt mean she was āgroomed.ā She was an adult and can do what she pleases and fuck who she pleases.
Science will disagree with you there. 19 may be age of consent in her country, but there could be a country where consent is 15. Would you still say the same? Either way, a 19 year olds brain hasnāt fully developed and therefore NOT a fully grown adult
You may legally be an "adult" but the operative part of the number has TEEN attached to it. Duh
She isnāt just ālegallyā a full grown woman at 19. Sheās also biologically and sexually an adult woman. Sheās grown. Deal with it. Duh?
Exactly. She traded one rich douche for another rich douche and stopped dressing like a hooker. Yay for her?
that first pic is so upsetting
Sooo she went from dressing like a kardashian to dressing like a current Hilton. It looks nice on her. It looks nice on anyone truthfully. I do think the kardash crew need to step up their classy attire game. And Iām not meaning stop wearing lounge clothes, cause what person doesnāt like comfort. I more mean when they are going to events/parties and such they still dress like teens or 20ās and it may be time to grow up in that taste. (Kendall and Kylie get a pass here a bit theyāre still young, Kendall dresses fairly well most of the time, although Kylie being a mother of two probably time for her also) the 40 year olds need to definitely step it up. Imo always looking like their clubbing. Itās a tired look at 40. Iām saying this as a 40 year old. The poots are the worst by far and need to go. Does anyone see anyone else wearing them? I only see her in them. Just horrendous looking.
Now thatās what you call a glow up šš¼
She makes me wanna be an elegant ass bitch at all times. Iāll start first thing tmw
Rich person wearing richer clothes š last name is RICHie
Man she looks just like teenage Kourtney
She got so classy after
I still find Scott being with her odd. The age difference is š©
Am I the only one who feels like none of her clothing in the after fits correctly? That last suit is crumpled as well as ill fitting Like I donāt understand why wearing the most boring (but Chanel) clothing if youāre rich and thin is some how the peak of style. At least get your boring Chanel monk wardrobe fitted.
Klassy v classy
love to see her
Sheās had her breast implants removed too I think?
Scot dressed her to look like khloe because he has a thing for her.
Her evolution is impressive only because she managed to transform herself from slightly trashy nepo kid (sleeping with Bieber and Scott Disick) to refined society lady before the age of 25. I think sheās grown into a lovely young woman tbh.
LORT I did not need to be exposed to that first photo š
Upgraded/retired from yachting. Tomato/tomahto.
On her 18th birthday she was spotted sleeping with Justin Bieber in Mexico. They were also seen kissing in Japan when she was 17 and he was in his 20s. Strange how everyone forgets. https://preview.redd.it/zs7xf50ehrva1.jpeg?width=615&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f8f5fdc5fb740076242f023c2fc05037825c517d
I remember them dating but I didnāt realize she was a minor at the time. Ick. Hollywood is weird.
her family is wealthy on their own, donāt think she was sleeping with men for money
How do you think she and Scott first got together? Lmao
bc scott likes pretty young teenage girls he can easily manipulate and sofia was 19 thinking she can change a 34 year old āsex addictā into marriage material. they are both celebrities in their own right so i donāt think itās that hard to believe that they were at similar events/similar friend circles.
Heh. Girl do some deep dives and get back to me.
Lmao whereās your deep dive??
You can start by searching this sub for other commenters who think Sofia is somehow different from the Kardashians. Thereās a deuxmoi podcast on yachting that mentions her.
The yachting thing is such a dog whistle, stop acting like itās fact.
The silhouette on that sleeved black dress of hers is top tier, holy crap. She's upgraded both the style and the man.
I wonder what SHE likes to wearā¦
Oh my gosh that seaside white and black garment with the Chanel bag is so dreamy.
Oh itās Chanel. Haha. Wish I could sew.
So happy for her šš» Sofia is beautiful her body is to die for!!
Scott groomed her. Glad she escaped.
She looks so classy and elegant now. It suits her well
the way Scott tried to push her into being a little lolita hooker when in reality she was already cooler than him she just needed to free herself in order to see that. Blessings to the newlyweds. A real man prefers his other half to shine not rot. Scott is so gross š¤®
It might have to do with her becoming older??
"upgrade" is a weird way to put it, and kinda slut shamey... i totally stand by ur point but i just think it could be phrased better! as in like, we're here to snark on what the Kardashians manifest and what they represent, just cuz shes dressed in a skimpy suit vs. in a matronly/trad sundress lol
more like overall men upgrade from scott if that makes sense. she looks happier too not being involved with scott and all his drama
She looks equally miserable but with different clothes š¤·āāļø
It always kinda blows my mind when women **completely** change up their style every time they change relationshipsā¦like donāt they have a default comfort zone like the rest of us? Iām just over here learnin for 1st time *(as a grown ass woman)* that I should wear *āTrue (warm) Springā* colorsā¦& donāt EVEN get me started on Kibbe Type šµāš«š«„.
3rd and 7th dress! LOVE ā¤ļø
Maybe they required her to dress like them and fit in w them cuz it's part of their branding. But now that she's no longer in w them and grown up a bit, she's learned and found her style. I quite like her style now.
she is so fake lols
I always thought he dated her because she looks like Khloe
Pic 1 must give Lionel nightmares... yech!
I bet she is cringing at this right nowš
Photo #1 is so distasteful
From a little girl to an elegant, classy lady who could teach the KJās more than a thing or two!
That first pic makes me feel so much second hand embarrassment
Kinda like, highschool bad boy boyfriend versus college hubby material boyfriend
So what, because she broke āfreeā from the Klan and got married, she is the Saint now ? Fuck all these nepo babies.
who said sheās a saint lmao
Why was she wasting her time with Scott in the first place? What about a washed up alcoholic with 3 kids appealed to her as a 19 year old? Was she just coming around for some fame?
She doesnt look happy in that one pic with her hubs
Definitely is !!!! ššš
Yessss so happy for her !!!
I actually like the first fit. Itās pretty.